Is $langle x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1 rangle$ a prime ideal in $mathbb{C}[x_{1},dots, x_{n}]$?












1












$begingroup$


I've heard from Google that the algebraic torus, the zero locus of $x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1=0$, is an affine variety, which means $x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1$ is an irreducible polynomial, which means $langle x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1 rangle$ is a prime. But I still don't know how I can prove that it is prime ideal. Could anyone give me a hint for approaching this?






algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra irreducible-polynomials







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I see how to solve it; just assume that it is reducible, then we can do the degree counting to get a contradiction. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 3:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @user124697 In an integral domain, every prime element is irreducible, but the converse is not true. The converse is true in unique factorization domains. Is $mathbb{C}[x_1,cdots,x_n]$ a UFD? (I think it is, because $mathbb{C}$ is a UFD. But I think it's not very trivial)
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 19 at 3:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: yes, it is a result of Gauss that if $R$ is a UFD, then so is $R[X]$. (By induction, this shows that any polynomial ring over a UFD in finitely many variables is also a UFD.)
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Wertheim
    Jan 19 at 3:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kelvinhong方 That's not true. An irreducible element generates a maximal idea amongst "principal ideals" only. Not a maximal ideal of the ring itself in general. A multivariate polynomial ring has many non-principal ideals in general.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 19 at 3:30








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To show that $f:=x_1cdots x_n-1$ is irreducible, view it as a polynomial in $x_n$ with coefficients in $mathbb C[x_1cdots x_{n-1}]$. Any factorization of $f$ has the form $$f=g(x_1cdots x_{n-1})(h(x_1cdots x_{n-1})x_n-k(x_1cdots x_{n-1})).$$ It suffices to show that $g$ is constant. But the equality $$g(x_1cdots x_{n-1})k(x_1cdots x_{n-1})=1$$ shows that $g$ is indeed constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre-Yves Gaillard
    Jan 19 at 15:42
















1












$begingroup$


I've heard from Google that the algebraic torus, the zero locus of $x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1=0$, is an affine variety, which means $x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1$ is an irreducible polynomial, which means $langle x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1 rangle$ is a prime. But I still don't know how I can prove that it is prime ideal. Could anyone give me a hint for approaching this?






algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra irreducible-polynomials







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I see how to solve it; just assume that it is reducible, then we can do the degree counting to get a contradiction. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 3:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @user124697 In an integral domain, every prime element is irreducible, but the converse is not true. The converse is true in unique factorization domains. Is $mathbb{C}[x_1,cdots,x_n]$ a UFD? (I think it is, because $mathbb{C}$ is a UFD. But I think it's not very trivial)
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 19 at 3:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: yes, it is a result of Gauss that if $R$ is a UFD, then so is $R[X]$. (By induction, this shows that any polynomial ring over a UFD in finitely many variables is also a UFD.)
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Wertheim
    Jan 19 at 3:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kelvinhong方 That's not true. An irreducible element generates a maximal idea amongst "principal ideals" only. Not a maximal ideal of the ring itself in general. A multivariate polynomial ring has many non-principal ideals in general.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 19 at 3:30








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To show that $f:=x_1cdots x_n-1$ is irreducible, view it as a polynomial in $x_n$ with coefficients in $mathbb C[x_1cdots x_{n-1}]$. Any factorization of $f$ has the form $$f=g(x_1cdots x_{n-1})(h(x_1cdots x_{n-1})x_n-k(x_1cdots x_{n-1})).$$ It suffices to show that $g$ is constant. But the equality $$g(x_1cdots x_{n-1})k(x_1cdots x_{n-1})=1$$ shows that $g$ is indeed constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre-Yves Gaillard
    Jan 19 at 15:42














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I've heard from Google that the algebraic torus, the zero locus of $x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1=0$, is an affine variety, which means $x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1$ is an irreducible polynomial, which means $langle x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1 rangle$ is a prime. But I still don't know how I can prove that it is prime ideal. Could anyone give me a hint for approaching this?






algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra irreducible-polynomials







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I've heard from Google that the algebraic torus, the zero locus of $x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1=0$, is an affine variety, which means $x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1$ is an irreducible polynomial, which means $langle x_{1}cdots x_{n}-1 rangle$ is a prime. But I still don't know how I can prove that it is prime ideal. Could anyone give me a hint for approaching this?






algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra irreducible-polynomials




algebraic-geometry commutative-algebra irreducible-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 19 at 20:30









user26857

39.3k124183




39.3k124183










asked Jan 19 at 3:04









user124697user124697

638515




638515








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I see how to solve it; just assume that it is reducible, then we can do the degree counting to get a contradiction. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 3:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @user124697 In an integral domain, every prime element is irreducible, but the converse is not true. The converse is true in unique factorization domains. Is $mathbb{C}[x_1,cdots,x_n]$ a UFD? (I think it is, because $mathbb{C}$ is a UFD. But I think it's not very trivial)
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 19 at 3:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: yes, it is a result of Gauss that if $R$ is a UFD, then so is $R[X]$. (By induction, this shows that any polynomial ring over a UFD in finitely many variables is also a UFD.)
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Wertheim
    Jan 19 at 3:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kelvinhong方 That's not true. An irreducible element generates a maximal idea amongst "principal ideals" only. Not a maximal ideal of the ring itself in general. A multivariate polynomial ring has many non-principal ideals in general.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 19 at 3:30








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To show that $f:=x_1cdots x_n-1$ is irreducible, view it as a polynomial in $x_n$ with coefficients in $mathbb C[x_1cdots x_{n-1}]$. Any factorization of $f$ has the form $$f=g(x_1cdots x_{n-1})(h(x_1cdots x_{n-1})x_n-k(x_1cdots x_{n-1})).$$ It suffices to show that $g$ is constant. But the equality $$g(x_1cdots x_{n-1})k(x_1cdots x_{n-1})=1$$ shows that $g$ is indeed constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre-Yves Gaillard
    Jan 19 at 15:42














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I see how to solve it; just assume that it is reducible, then we can do the degree counting to get a contradiction. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 3:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @user124697 In an integral domain, every prime element is irreducible, but the converse is not true. The converse is true in unique factorization domains. Is $mathbb{C}[x_1,cdots,x_n]$ a UFD? (I think it is, because $mathbb{C}$ is a UFD. But I think it's not very trivial)
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 19 at 3:20








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: yes, it is a result of Gauss that if $R$ is a UFD, then so is $R[X]$. (By induction, this shows that any polynomial ring over a UFD in finitely many variables is also a UFD.)
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Wertheim
    Jan 19 at 3:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @kelvinhong方 That's not true. An irreducible element generates a maximal idea amongst "principal ideals" only. Not a maximal ideal of the ring itself in general. A multivariate polynomial ring has many non-principal ideals in general.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 19 at 3:30








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To show that $f:=x_1cdots x_n-1$ is irreducible, view it as a polynomial in $x_n$ with coefficients in $mathbb C[x_1cdots x_{n-1}]$. Any factorization of $f$ has the form $$f=g(x_1cdots x_{n-1})(h(x_1cdots x_{n-1})x_n-k(x_1cdots x_{n-1})).$$ It suffices to show that $g$ is constant. But the equality $$g(x_1cdots x_{n-1})k(x_1cdots x_{n-1})=1$$ shows that $g$ is indeed constant.
    $endgroup$
    – Pierre-Yves Gaillard
    Jan 19 at 15:42








1




1




$begingroup$
Oh, I see how to solve it; just assume that it is reducible, then we can do the degree counting to get a contradiction. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– user124697
Jan 19 at 3:18




$begingroup$
Oh, I see how to solve it; just assume that it is reducible, then we can do the degree counting to get a contradiction. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– user124697
Jan 19 at 3:18




1




1




$begingroup$
@user124697 In an integral domain, every prime element is irreducible, but the converse is not true. The converse is true in unique factorization domains. Is $mathbb{C}[x_1,cdots,x_n]$ a UFD? (I think it is, because $mathbb{C}$ is a UFD. But I think it's not very trivial)
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 19 at 3:20






$begingroup$
@user124697 In an integral domain, every prime element is irreducible, but the converse is not true. The converse is true in unique factorization domains. Is $mathbb{C}[x_1,cdots,x_n]$ a UFD? (I think it is, because $mathbb{C}$ is a UFD. But I think it's not very trivial)
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 19 at 3:20






1




1




$begingroup$
@stressedout: yes, it is a result of Gauss that if $R$ is a UFD, then so is $R[X]$. (By induction, this shows that any polynomial ring over a UFD in finitely many variables is also a UFD.)
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
Jan 19 at 3:24




$begingroup$
@stressedout: yes, it is a result of Gauss that if $R$ is a UFD, then so is $R[X]$. (By induction, this shows that any polynomial ring over a UFD in finitely many variables is also a UFD.)
$endgroup$
– Alex Wertheim
Jan 19 at 3:24




1




1




$begingroup$
@kelvinhong方 That's not true. An irreducible element generates a maximal idea amongst "principal ideals" only. Not a maximal ideal of the ring itself in general. A multivariate polynomial ring has many non-principal ideals in general.
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 19 at 3:30






$begingroup$
@kelvinhong方 That's not true. An irreducible element generates a maximal idea amongst "principal ideals" only. Not a maximal ideal of the ring itself in general. A multivariate polynomial ring has many non-principal ideals in general.
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 19 at 3:30






1




1




$begingroup$
To show that $f:=x_1cdots x_n-1$ is irreducible, view it as a polynomial in $x_n$ with coefficients in $mathbb C[x_1cdots x_{n-1}]$. Any factorization of $f$ has the form $$f=g(x_1cdots x_{n-1})(h(x_1cdots x_{n-1})x_n-k(x_1cdots x_{n-1})).$$ It suffices to show that $g$ is constant. But the equality $$g(x_1cdots x_{n-1})k(x_1cdots x_{n-1})=1$$ shows that $g$ is indeed constant.
$endgroup$
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
Jan 19 at 15:42




$begingroup$
To show that $f:=x_1cdots x_n-1$ is irreducible, view it as a polynomial in $x_n$ with coefficients in $mathbb C[x_1cdots x_{n-1}]$. Any factorization of $f$ has the form $$f=g(x_1cdots x_{n-1})(h(x_1cdots x_{n-1})x_n-k(x_1cdots x_{n-1})).$$ It suffices to show that $g$ is constant. But the equality $$g(x_1cdots x_{n-1})k(x_1cdots x_{n-1})=1$$ shows that $g$ is indeed constant.
$endgroup$
– Pierre-Yves Gaillard
Jan 19 at 15:42










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Here is a hint (and if you cannot complete it I may come back and do so):




  1. If you are not satisfied with $z_1-1$ is irreducible for induction first step, prove that $z_1z_2-1$ is irreducible

  2. The induction hypothesis is that for $kge 1$ we assume that $z_1cdots z_k -1$ is irreducible

  3. Consider now $f=z_1cdots z_{k+1}-1$ and assume, by contradiction, that $f=gh$ and $g,hnotinmathbb C$.

  4. Without loss of generality we can assume that $g(z_1,dots,z_k,1)=1$, you can then show (use the induction hypothesis) that
    $$g(z_1,z_2,dots,z_{k-1},1,z_{k+1})=g(z_1,dots,1,z_k,z_{k+1})=dots=g(1,z_2,dots,z_k)=1$$

  5. Can you now show that $g$ is $1$?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for answer! However, I didn't fully understand your argument, especially number 4. How can you get the equation $g(z_{1},cdots, 1,z_{k+1}) = cdots = g(1,z_{2},cdots, z_{k})=1$?
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 12:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $f(z_1,dots,1,z_k)=g(z_1,dots,1,z_k)h(z_1,dots,z_k)$ is irreducible so either the left or the right factor is $1$. But the right factor cannot be $1$ because $h(z_1,dots,z_{k-2},1,1)=prod_{i=1}^{k-2} z_i -1$ (by the assumption that $g(z_1,dots,z_k,1)=1$). And you do the same with the other equalities
    $endgroup$
    – quantum
    Jan 19 at 13:05












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, now I see. Now I am thinking about 5. Give me a little bit time :)
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 13:17










  • $begingroup$
    Could you give me more hints on 5? I tried several approaches such as counting leading term, but I cannot get the result; I think the problem is turned out to showing that zariski closure of ${(z_{1}, cdots, z_{k+1}) : z_{i}=1 text{ for some }i}$ is the whole affine plane. However, it seems not true since, for example, if $k+1=2$, then ${(x,1)} = V(x-1)$ and ${ (1,y)}= V(y-1)$ thus ${(x,y) : x text{ or } y=1 } = V((x-1)(y-1)) neq V(0)$. This implies that $g(x,y)-1 = (xyh(x,y) + xq(x)+yr(y) - 1)(x-1)(y-1)$, and now I'm stucked. Could you let me know how to do that?
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 14:36








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If $gne 1$, what can you say about $g-1$? is it reducible? If so, can you write some of its factors?
    $endgroup$
    – quantum
    Jan 19 at 15:52



















1












$begingroup$

Here is a slick way to deal with things that doesn't require any computation. We want to show that the ideal $I := langle X_{1}X_{2}cdots X_{n} - 1 rangle$ is a prime ideal of $mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]$. Instead, put $R = mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n-1}]$, and let $f(X_{1}, ldots, X_{n-1}) = X_{1}cdots X_{n-1} in R$. Via the isomorphism $R[X_{n}] cong mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]$, we can then view the ideal $I$ as $langle fX_{n} - 1 rangle$ in $R[X_{n}]$.



Now, it is well-known that for any commutative ring $A$ and any element $f in A$, the localization $A_{f}$ is isomorphic to $A[X]/langle fX - 1 rangle$. (One way to see this is that both rings satisfy the universal property of localization at the multiplicative subset $S = {1, f, f^{2}, ldots}$; this is done here. Another beautiful, explicit approach is given here.) Hence, we have that $mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]/I cong R[X_{n}]/langle fX_{n}-1rangle cong R_{f}$. Since $R$ is a domain, any nonzero localization of $R$ is also a domain, whence $I$ is prime, as desired.



Incidentally, thinking about the geometry of this variety (at least the closed points) naturally leads one to this approach, I think. If we think about the points of this variety as solutions $(a_{1}, ldots, a_{n}) in mathbb{C}^{n}$ to the equation $x_{1}cdots x_{n} = 1$, then it is clear that this is equivalent to requiring that $a_{1} cdots a_{n-1} in mathbb{C}^{times}$, and $a_{n} = frac{1}{a_{1}cdots a_{n-1}}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Wow, this argument let me know about the geometric side of the variety. Thank you very much, I appreciated.
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 21 at 2:42











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078974%2fis-langle-x-1-cdots-x-n-1-rangle-a-prime-ideal-in-mathbbcx-1-dot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Here is a hint (and if you cannot complete it I may come back and do so):




  1. If you are not satisfied with $z_1-1$ is irreducible for induction first step, prove that $z_1z_2-1$ is irreducible

  2. The induction hypothesis is that for $kge 1$ we assume that $z_1cdots z_k -1$ is irreducible

  3. Consider now $f=z_1cdots z_{k+1}-1$ and assume, by contradiction, that $f=gh$ and $g,hnotinmathbb C$.

  4. Without loss of generality we can assume that $g(z_1,dots,z_k,1)=1$, you can then show (use the induction hypothesis) that
    $$g(z_1,z_2,dots,z_{k-1},1,z_{k+1})=g(z_1,dots,1,z_k,z_{k+1})=dots=g(1,z_2,dots,z_k)=1$$

  5. Can you now show that $g$ is $1$?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for answer! However, I didn't fully understand your argument, especially number 4. How can you get the equation $g(z_{1},cdots, 1,z_{k+1}) = cdots = g(1,z_{2},cdots, z_{k})=1$?
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 12:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $f(z_1,dots,1,z_k)=g(z_1,dots,1,z_k)h(z_1,dots,z_k)$ is irreducible so either the left or the right factor is $1$. But the right factor cannot be $1$ because $h(z_1,dots,z_{k-2},1,1)=prod_{i=1}^{k-2} z_i -1$ (by the assumption that $g(z_1,dots,z_k,1)=1$). And you do the same with the other equalities
    $endgroup$
    – quantum
    Jan 19 at 13:05












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, now I see. Now I am thinking about 5. Give me a little bit time :)
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 13:17










  • $begingroup$
    Could you give me more hints on 5? I tried several approaches such as counting leading term, but I cannot get the result; I think the problem is turned out to showing that zariski closure of ${(z_{1}, cdots, z_{k+1}) : z_{i}=1 text{ for some }i}$ is the whole affine plane. However, it seems not true since, for example, if $k+1=2$, then ${(x,1)} = V(x-1)$ and ${ (1,y)}= V(y-1)$ thus ${(x,y) : x text{ or } y=1 } = V((x-1)(y-1)) neq V(0)$. This implies that $g(x,y)-1 = (xyh(x,y) + xq(x)+yr(y) - 1)(x-1)(y-1)$, and now I'm stucked. Could you let me know how to do that?
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 14:36








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If $gne 1$, what can you say about $g-1$? is it reducible? If so, can you write some of its factors?
    $endgroup$
    – quantum
    Jan 19 at 15:52
















1












$begingroup$

Here is a hint (and if you cannot complete it I may come back and do so):




  1. If you are not satisfied with $z_1-1$ is irreducible for induction first step, prove that $z_1z_2-1$ is irreducible

  2. The induction hypothesis is that for $kge 1$ we assume that $z_1cdots z_k -1$ is irreducible

  3. Consider now $f=z_1cdots z_{k+1}-1$ and assume, by contradiction, that $f=gh$ and $g,hnotinmathbb C$.

  4. Without loss of generality we can assume that $g(z_1,dots,z_k,1)=1$, you can then show (use the induction hypothesis) that
    $$g(z_1,z_2,dots,z_{k-1},1,z_{k+1})=g(z_1,dots,1,z_k,z_{k+1})=dots=g(1,z_2,dots,z_k)=1$$

  5. Can you now show that $g$ is $1$?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for answer! However, I didn't fully understand your argument, especially number 4. How can you get the equation $g(z_{1},cdots, 1,z_{k+1}) = cdots = g(1,z_{2},cdots, z_{k})=1$?
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 12:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $f(z_1,dots,1,z_k)=g(z_1,dots,1,z_k)h(z_1,dots,z_k)$ is irreducible so either the left or the right factor is $1$. But the right factor cannot be $1$ because $h(z_1,dots,z_{k-2},1,1)=prod_{i=1}^{k-2} z_i -1$ (by the assumption that $g(z_1,dots,z_k,1)=1$). And you do the same with the other equalities
    $endgroup$
    – quantum
    Jan 19 at 13:05












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, now I see. Now I am thinking about 5. Give me a little bit time :)
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 13:17










  • $begingroup$
    Could you give me more hints on 5? I tried several approaches such as counting leading term, but I cannot get the result; I think the problem is turned out to showing that zariski closure of ${(z_{1}, cdots, z_{k+1}) : z_{i}=1 text{ for some }i}$ is the whole affine plane. However, it seems not true since, for example, if $k+1=2$, then ${(x,1)} = V(x-1)$ and ${ (1,y)}= V(y-1)$ thus ${(x,y) : x text{ or } y=1 } = V((x-1)(y-1)) neq V(0)$. This implies that $g(x,y)-1 = (xyh(x,y) + xq(x)+yr(y) - 1)(x-1)(y-1)$, and now I'm stucked. Could you let me know how to do that?
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 14:36








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If $gne 1$, what can you say about $g-1$? is it reducible? If so, can you write some of its factors?
    $endgroup$
    – quantum
    Jan 19 at 15:52














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Here is a hint (and if you cannot complete it I may come back and do so):




  1. If you are not satisfied with $z_1-1$ is irreducible for induction first step, prove that $z_1z_2-1$ is irreducible

  2. The induction hypothesis is that for $kge 1$ we assume that $z_1cdots z_k -1$ is irreducible

  3. Consider now $f=z_1cdots z_{k+1}-1$ and assume, by contradiction, that $f=gh$ and $g,hnotinmathbb C$.

  4. Without loss of generality we can assume that $g(z_1,dots,z_k,1)=1$, you can then show (use the induction hypothesis) that
    $$g(z_1,z_2,dots,z_{k-1},1,z_{k+1})=g(z_1,dots,1,z_k,z_{k+1})=dots=g(1,z_2,dots,z_k)=1$$

  5. Can you now show that $g$ is $1$?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Here is a hint (and if you cannot complete it I may come back and do so):




  1. If you are not satisfied with $z_1-1$ is irreducible for induction first step, prove that $z_1z_2-1$ is irreducible

  2. The induction hypothesis is that for $kge 1$ we assume that $z_1cdots z_k -1$ is irreducible

  3. Consider now $f=z_1cdots z_{k+1}-1$ and assume, by contradiction, that $f=gh$ and $g,hnotinmathbb C$.

  4. Without loss of generality we can assume that $g(z_1,dots,z_k,1)=1$, you can then show (use the induction hypothesis) that
    $$g(z_1,z_2,dots,z_{k-1},1,z_{k+1})=g(z_1,dots,1,z_k,z_{k+1})=dots=g(1,z_2,dots,z_k)=1$$

  5. Can you now show that $g$ is $1$?







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 19 at 12:25









quantumquantum

533210




533210












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for answer! However, I didn't fully understand your argument, especially number 4. How can you get the equation $g(z_{1},cdots, 1,z_{k+1}) = cdots = g(1,z_{2},cdots, z_{k})=1$?
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 12:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $f(z_1,dots,1,z_k)=g(z_1,dots,1,z_k)h(z_1,dots,z_k)$ is irreducible so either the left or the right factor is $1$. But the right factor cannot be $1$ because $h(z_1,dots,z_{k-2},1,1)=prod_{i=1}^{k-2} z_i -1$ (by the assumption that $g(z_1,dots,z_k,1)=1$). And you do the same with the other equalities
    $endgroup$
    – quantum
    Jan 19 at 13:05












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, now I see. Now I am thinking about 5. Give me a little bit time :)
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 13:17










  • $begingroup$
    Could you give me more hints on 5? I tried several approaches such as counting leading term, but I cannot get the result; I think the problem is turned out to showing that zariski closure of ${(z_{1}, cdots, z_{k+1}) : z_{i}=1 text{ for some }i}$ is the whole affine plane. However, it seems not true since, for example, if $k+1=2$, then ${(x,1)} = V(x-1)$ and ${ (1,y)}= V(y-1)$ thus ${(x,y) : x text{ or } y=1 } = V((x-1)(y-1)) neq V(0)$. This implies that $g(x,y)-1 = (xyh(x,y) + xq(x)+yr(y) - 1)(x-1)(y-1)$, and now I'm stucked. Could you let me know how to do that?
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 14:36








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If $gne 1$, what can you say about $g-1$? is it reducible? If so, can you write some of its factors?
    $endgroup$
    – quantum
    Jan 19 at 15:52


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for answer! However, I didn't fully understand your argument, especially number 4. How can you get the equation $g(z_{1},cdots, 1,z_{k+1}) = cdots = g(1,z_{2},cdots, z_{k})=1$?
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 12:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $f(z_1,dots,1,z_k)=g(z_1,dots,1,z_k)h(z_1,dots,z_k)$ is irreducible so either the left or the right factor is $1$. But the right factor cannot be $1$ because $h(z_1,dots,z_{k-2},1,1)=prod_{i=1}^{k-2} z_i -1$ (by the assumption that $g(z_1,dots,z_k,1)=1$). And you do the same with the other equalities
    $endgroup$
    – quantum
    Jan 19 at 13:05












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, now I see. Now I am thinking about 5. Give me a little bit time :)
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 13:17










  • $begingroup$
    Could you give me more hints on 5? I tried several approaches such as counting leading term, but I cannot get the result; I think the problem is turned out to showing that zariski closure of ${(z_{1}, cdots, z_{k+1}) : z_{i}=1 text{ for some }i}$ is the whole affine plane. However, it seems not true since, for example, if $k+1=2$, then ${(x,1)} = V(x-1)$ and ${ (1,y)}= V(y-1)$ thus ${(x,y) : x text{ or } y=1 } = V((x-1)(y-1)) neq V(0)$. This implies that $g(x,y)-1 = (xyh(x,y) + xq(x)+yr(y) - 1)(x-1)(y-1)$, and now I'm stucked. Could you let me know how to do that?
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 19 at 14:36








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If $gne 1$, what can you say about $g-1$? is it reducible? If so, can you write some of its factors?
    $endgroup$
    – quantum
    Jan 19 at 15:52
















$begingroup$
Thank you for answer! However, I didn't fully understand your argument, especially number 4. How can you get the equation $g(z_{1},cdots, 1,z_{k+1}) = cdots = g(1,z_{2},cdots, z_{k})=1$?
$endgroup$
– user124697
Jan 19 at 12:34




$begingroup$
Thank you for answer! However, I didn't fully understand your argument, especially number 4. How can you get the equation $g(z_{1},cdots, 1,z_{k+1}) = cdots = g(1,z_{2},cdots, z_{k})=1$?
$endgroup$
– user124697
Jan 19 at 12:34




1




1




$begingroup$
$f(z_1,dots,1,z_k)=g(z_1,dots,1,z_k)h(z_1,dots,z_k)$ is irreducible so either the left or the right factor is $1$. But the right factor cannot be $1$ because $h(z_1,dots,z_{k-2},1,1)=prod_{i=1}^{k-2} z_i -1$ (by the assumption that $g(z_1,dots,z_k,1)=1$). And you do the same with the other equalities
$endgroup$
– quantum
Jan 19 at 13:05






$begingroup$
$f(z_1,dots,1,z_k)=g(z_1,dots,1,z_k)h(z_1,dots,z_k)$ is irreducible so either the left or the right factor is $1$. But the right factor cannot be $1$ because $h(z_1,dots,z_{k-2},1,1)=prod_{i=1}^{k-2} z_i -1$ (by the assumption that $g(z_1,dots,z_k,1)=1$). And you do the same with the other equalities
$endgroup$
– quantum
Jan 19 at 13:05














$begingroup$
Oh, now I see. Now I am thinking about 5. Give me a little bit time :)
$endgroup$
– user124697
Jan 19 at 13:17




$begingroup$
Oh, now I see. Now I am thinking about 5. Give me a little bit time :)
$endgroup$
– user124697
Jan 19 at 13:17












$begingroup$
Could you give me more hints on 5? I tried several approaches such as counting leading term, but I cannot get the result; I think the problem is turned out to showing that zariski closure of ${(z_{1}, cdots, z_{k+1}) : z_{i}=1 text{ for some }i}$ is the whole affine plane. However, it seems not true since, for example, if $k+1=2$, then ${(x,1)} = V(x-1)$ and ${ (1,y)}= V(y-1)$ thus ${(x,y) : x text{ or } y=1 } = V((x-1)(y-1)) neq V(0)$. This implies that $g(x,y)-1 = (xyh(x,y) + xq(x)+yr(y) - 1)(x-1)(y-1)$, and now I'm stucked. Could you let me know how to do that?
$endgroup$
– user124697
Jan 19 at 14:36






$begingroup$
Could you give me more hints on 5? I tried several approaches such as counting leading term, but I cannot get the result; I think the problem is turned out to showing that zariski closure of ${(z_{1}, cdots, z_{k+1}) : z_{i}=1 text{ for some }i}$ is the whole affine plane. However, it seems not true since, for example, if $k+1=2$, then ${(x,1)} = V(x-1)$ and ${ (1,y)}= V(y-1)$ thus ${(x,y) : x text{ or } y=1 } = V((x-1)(y-1)) neq V(0)$. This implies that $g(x,y)-1 = (xyh(x,y) + xq(x)+yr(y) - 1)(x-1)(y-1)$, and now I'm stucked. Could you let me know how to do that?
$endgroup$
– user124697
Jan 19 at 14:36






1




1




$begingroup$
If $gne 1$, what can you say about $g-1$? is it reducible? If so, can you write some of its factors?
$endgroup$
– quantum
Jan 19 at 15:52




$begingroup$
If $gne 1$, what can you say about $g-1$? is it reducible? If so, can you write some of its factors?
$endgroup$
– quantum
Jan 19 at 15:52











1












$begingroup$

Here is a slick way to deal with things that doesn't require any computation. We want to show that the ideal $I := langle X_{1}X_{2}cdots X_{n} - 1 rangle$ is a prime ideal of $mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]$. Instead, put $R = mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n-1}]$, and let $f(X_{1}, ldots, X_{n-1}) = X_{1}cdots X_{n-1} in R$. Via the isomorphism $R[X_{n}] cong mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]$, we can then view the ideal $I$ as $langle fX_{n} - 1 rangle$ in $R[X_{n}]$.



Now, it is well-known that for any commutative ring $A$ and any element $f in A$, the localization $A_{f}$ is isomorphic to $A[X]/langle fX - 1 rangle$. (One way to see this is that both rings satisfy the universal property of localization at the multiplicative subset $S = {1, f, f^{2}, ldots}$; this is done here. Another beautiful, explicit approach is given here.) Hence, we have that $mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]/I cong R[X_{n}]/langle fX_{n}-1rangle cong R_{f}$. Since $R$ is a domain, any nonzero localization of $R$ is also a domain, whence $I$ is prime, as desired.



Incidentally, thinking about the geometry of this variety (at least the closed points) naturally leads one to this approach, I think. If we think about the points of this variety as solutions $(a_{1}, ldots, a_{n}) in mathbb{C}^{n}$ to the equation $x_{1}cdots x_{n} = 1$, then it is clear that this is equivalent to requiring that $a_{1} cdots a_{n-1} in mathbb{C}^{times}$, and $a_{n} = frac{1}{a_{1}cdots a_{n-1}}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Wow, this argument let me know about the geometric side of the variety. Thank you very much, I appreciated.
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 21 at 2:42
















1












$begingroup$

Here is a slick way to deal with things that doesn't require any computation. We want to show that the ideal $I := langle X_{1}X_{2}cdots X_{n} - 1 rangle$ is a prime ideal of $mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]$. Instead, put $R = mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n-1}]$, and let $f(X_{1}, ldots, X_{n-1}) = X_{1}cdots X_{n-1} in R$. Via the isomorphism $R[X_{n}] cong mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]$, we can then view the ideal $I$ as $langle fX_{n} - 1 rangle$ in $R[X_{n}]$.



Now, it is well-known that for any commutative ring $A$ and any element $f in A$, the localization $A_{f}$ is isomorphic to $A[X]/langle fX - 1 rangle$. (One way to see this is that both rings satisfy the universal property of localization at the multiplicative subset $S = {1, f, f^{2}, ldots}$; this is done here. Another beautiful, explicit approach is given here.) Hence, we have that $mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]/I cong R[X_{n}]/langle fX_{n}-1rangle cong R_{f}$. Since $R$ is a domain, any nonzero localization of $R$ is also a domain, whence $I$ is prime, as desired.



Incidentally, thinking about the geometry of this variety (at least the closed points) naturally leads one to this approach, I think. If we think about the points of this variety as solutions $(a_{1}, ldots, a_{n}) in mathbb{C}^{n}$ to the equation $x_{1}cdots x_{n} = 1$, then it is clear that this is equivalent to requiring that $a_{1} cdots a_{n-1} in mathbb{C}^{times}$, and $a_{n} = frac{1}{a_{1}cdots a_{n-1}}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Wow, this argument let me know about the geometric side of the variety. Thank you very much, I appreciated.
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 21 at 2:42














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Here is a slick way to deal with things that doesn't require any computation. We want to show that the ideal $I := langle X_{1}X_{2}cdots X_{n} - 1 rangle$ is a prime ideal of $mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]$. Instead, put $R = mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n-1}]$, and let $f(X_{1}, ldots, X_{n-1}) = X_{1}cdots X_{n-1} in R$. Via the isomorphism $R[X_{n}] cong mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]$, we can then view the ideal $I$ as $langle fX_{n} - 1 rangle$ in $R[X_{n}]$.



Now, it is well-known that for any commutative ring $A$ and any element $f in A$, the localization $A_{f}$ is isomorphic to $A[X]/langle fX - 1 rangle$. (One way to see this is that both rings satisfy the universal property of localization at the multiplicative subset $S = {1, f, f^{2}, ldots}$; this is done here. Another beautiful, explicit approach is given here.) Hence, we have that $mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]/I cong R[X_{n}]/langle fX_{n}-1rangle cong R_{f}$. Since $R$ is a domain, any nonzero localization of $R$ is also a domain, whence $I$ is prime, as desired.



Incidentally, thinking about the geometry of this variety (at least the closed points) naturally leads one to this approach, I think. If we think about the points of this variety as solutions $(a_{1}, ldots, a_{n}) in mathbb{C}^{n}$ to the equation $x_{1}cdots x_{n} = 1$, then it is clear that this is equivalent to requiring that $a_{1} cdots a_{n-1} in mathbb{C}^{times}$, and $a_{n} = frac{1}{a_{1}cdots a_{n-1}}$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Here is a slick way to deal with things that doesn't require any computation. We want to show that the ideal $I := langle X_{1}X_{2}cdots X_{n} - 1 rangle$ is a prime ideal of $mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]$. Instead, put $R = mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n-1}]$, and let $f(X_{1}, ldots, X_{n-1}) = X_{1}cdots X_{n-1} in R$. Via the isomorphism $R[X_{n}] cong mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]$, we can then view the ideal $I$ as $langle fX_{n} - 1 rangle$ in $R[X_{n}]$.



Now, it is well-known that for any commutative ring $A$ and any element $f in A$, the localization $A_{f}$ is isomorphic to $A[X]/langle fX - 1 rangle$. (One way to see this is that both rings satisfy the universal property of localization at the multiplicative subset $S = {1, f, f^{2}, ldots}$; this is done here. Another beautiful, explicit approach is given here.) Hence, we have that $mathbb{C}[X_{1}, ldots, X_{n}]/I cong R[X_{n}]/langle fX_{n}-1rangle cong R_{f}$. Since $R$ is a domain, any nonzero localization of $R$ is also a domain, whence $I$ is prime, as desired.



Incidentally, thinking about the geometry of this variety (at least the closed points) naturally leads one to this approach, I think. If we think about the points of this variety as solutions $(a_{1}, ldots, a_{n}) in mathbb{C}^{n}$ to the equation $x_{1}cdots x_{n} = 1$, then it is clear that this is equivalent to requiring that $a_{1} cdots a_{n-1} in mathbb{C}^{times}$, and $a_{n} = frac{1}{a_{1}cdots a_{n-1}}$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 20 at 20:34









Alex WertheimAlex Wertheim

16.1k22848




16.1k22848












  • $begingroup$
    Wow, this argument let me know about the geometric side of the variety. Thank you very much, I appreciated.
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 21 at 2:42


















  • $begingroup$
    Wow, this argument let me know about the geometric side of the variety. Thank you very much, I appreciated.
    $endgroup$
    – user124697
    Jan 21 at 2:42
















$begingroup$
Wow, this argument let me know about the geometric side of the variety. Thank you very much, I appreciated.
$endgroup$
– user124697
Jan 21 at 2:42




$begingroup$
Wow, this argument let me know about the geometric side of the variety. Thank you very much, I appreciated.
$endgroup$
– user124697
Jan 21 at 2:42


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078974%2fis-langle-x-1-cdots-x-n-1-rangle-a-prime-ideal-in-mathbbcx-1-dot%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

Image
Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
Read more

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Image
5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
Read more

Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

Image
Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
Read more