Alternative definiton of differentiability












-1












$begingroup$


Is it correct to say that both of definitions of differentiability are equivalent?



$(1);;displaystyle f:Drightarrowmathbb{C},Dsubseteqmathbb{R}text{ is differentiable in }z_oiffexists_{ainmathbb{C}}left(lim_{zrightarrow z_0}frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_o}=aright)$.



$(2);;displaystyle f:Drightarrowmathbb{C},Dsubseteqmathbb{R}text{ is differentiable in }z_o
qquad iffexists_{ainmathbb{C}};forall_{epsilon>0};exists_{delta>0};forall_{zin D}left(left(vert z-z_0vert<deltaright)Rightarrow left(|frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_o}-a|right)<epsilon.right)$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you unpack the definition of a limit in the first definition, what do you get?
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    Jan 19 at 18:55










  • $begingroup$
    I am not sure whether I get what I wrote down or $exists_{ainmathbb{C}}forall_{epsilon>0}exists_{delta>0}forall_{zin D}|z-z_0|<deltaRightarrow |frac{f(z)-a}{z-z_o}|<epsilon$
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 19 at 19:01












  • $begingroup$
    But this is exactly what you wrote in the question, no? (Apart from the fact that $|z-z_0|<delta$ should read $0<|z-z_0|<delta$.)
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 19 at 19:20










  • $begingroup$
    @Did the Right side is different. In my comment I wrote $|frac{f(z)-a}{z-z_0}|$But in my Question I wrote down $|frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_0}-a|$
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 19 at 19:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ah, I missed that. But then the comment is truly absurd. Would not work even for $f(z)=z$, whose derivative you probably know...
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 19 at 19:30
















-1












$begingroup$


Is it correct to say that both of definitions of differentiability are equivalent?



$(1);;displaystyle f:Drightarrowmathbb{C},Dsubseteqmathbb{R}text{ is differentiable in }z_oiffexists_{ainmathbb{C}}left(lim_{zrightarrow z_0}frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_o}=aright)$.



$(2);;displaystyle f:Drightarrowmathbb{C},Dsubseteqmathbb{R}text{ is differentiable in }z_o
qquad iffexists_{ainmathbb{C}};forall_{epsilon>0};exists_{delta>0};forall_{zin D}left(left(vert z-z_0vert<deltaright)Rightarrow left(|frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_o}-a|right)<epsilon.right)$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you unpack the definition of a limit in the first definition, what do you get?
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    Jan 19 at 18:55










  • $begingroup$
    I am not sure whether I get what I wrote down or $exists_{ainmathbb{C}}forall_{epsilon>0}exists_{delta>0}forall_{zin D}|z-z_0|<deltaRightarrow |frac{f(z)-a}{z-z_o}|<epsilon$
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 19 at 19:01












  • $begingroup$
    But this is exactly what you wrote in the question, no? (Apart from the fact that $|z-z_0|<delta$ should read $0<|z-z_0|<delta$.)
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 19 at 19:20










  • $begingroup$
    @Did the Right side is different. In my comment I wrote $|frac{f(z)-a}{z-z_0}|$But in my Question I wrote down $|frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_0}-a|$
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 19 at 19:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ah, I missed that. But then the comment is truly absurd. Would not work even for $f(z)=z$, whose derivative you probably know...
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 19 at 19:30














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


Is it correct to say that both of definitions of differentiability are equivalent?



$(1);;displaystyle f:Drightarrowmathbb{C},Dsubseteqmathbb{R}text{ is differentiable in }z_oiffexists_{ainmathbb{C}}left(lim_{zrightarrow z_0}frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_o}=aright)$.



$(2);;displaystyle f:Drightarrowmathbb{C},Dsubseteqmathbb{R}text{ is differentiable in }z_o
qquad iffexists_{ainmathbb{C}};forall_{epsilon>0};exists_{delta>0};forall_{zin D}left(left(vert z-z_0vert<deltaright)Rightarrow left(|frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_o}-a|right)<epsilon.right)$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is it correct to say that both of definitions of differentiability are equivalent?



$(1);;displaystyle f:Drightarrowmathbb{C},Dsubseteqmathbb{R}text{ is differentiable in }z_oiffexists_{ainmathbb{C}}left(lim_{zrightarrow z_0}frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_o}=aright)$.



$(2);;displaystyle f:Drightarrowmathbb{C},Dsubseteqmathbb{R}text{ is differentiable in }z_o
qquad iffexists_{ainmathbb{C}};forall_{epsilon>0};exists_{delta>0};forall_{zin D}left(left(vert z-z_0vert<deltaright)Rightarrow left(|frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_o}-a|right)<epsilon.right)$







real-analysis derivatives






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 19 at 19:11









jordan_glen

1




1










asked Jan 19 at 18:47









RM777RM777

39112




39112








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you unpack the definition of a limit in the first definition, what do you get?
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    Jan 19 at 18:55










  • $begingroup$
    I am not sure whether I get what I wrote down or $exists_{ainmathbb{C}}forall_{epsilon>0}exists_{delta>0}forall_{zin D}|z-z_0|<deltaRightarrow |frac{f(z)-a}{z-z_o}|<epsilon$
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 19 at 19:01












  • $begingroup$
    But this is exactly what you wrote in the question, no? (Apart from the fact that $|z-z_0|<delta$ should read $0<|z-z_0|<delta$.)
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 19 at 19:20










  • $begingroup$
    @Did the Right side is different. In my comment I wrote $|frac{f(z)-a}{z-z_0}|$But in my Question I wrote down $|frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_0}-a|$
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 19 at 19:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ah, I missed that. But then the comment is truly absurd. Would not work even for $f(z)=z$, whose derivative you probably know...
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 19 at 19:30














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    If you unpack the definition of a limit in the first definition, what do you get?
    $endgroup$
    – Xander Henderson
    Jan 19 at 18:55










  • $begingroup$
    I am not sure whether I get what I wrote down or $exists_{ainmathbb{C}}forall_{epsilon>0}exists_{delta>0}forall_{zin D}|z-z_0|<deltaRightarrow |frac{f(z)-a}{z-z_o}|<epsilon$
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 19 at 19:01












  • $begingroup$
    But this is exactly what you wrote in the question, no? (Apart from the fact that $|z-z_0|<delta$ should read $0<|z-z_0|<delta$.)
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 19 at 19:20










  • $begingroup$
    @Did the Right side is different. In my comment I wrote $|frac{f(z)-a}{z-z_0}|$But in my Question I wrote down $|frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_0}-a|$
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 19 at 19:24






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Ah, I missed that. But then the comment is truly absurd. Would not work even for $f(z)=z$, whose derivative you probably know...
    $endgroup$
    – Did
    Jan 19 at 19:30








1




1




$begingroup$
If you unpack the definition of a limit in the first definition, what do you get?
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
Jan 19 at 18:55




$begingroup$
If you unpack the definition of a limit in the first definition, what do you get?
$endgroup$
– Xander Henderson
Jan 19 at 18:55












$begingroup$
I am not sure whether I get what I wrote down or $exists_{ainmathbb{C}}forall_{epsilon>0}exists_{delta>0}forall_{zin D}|z-z_0|<deltaRightarrow |frac{f(z)-a}{z-z_o}|<epsilon$
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 19 at 19:01






$begingroup$
I am not sure whether I get what I wrote down or $exists_{ainmathbb{C}}forall_{epsilon>0}exists_{delta>0}forall_{zin D}|z-z_0|<deltaRightarrow |frac{f(z)-a}{z-z_o}|<epsilon$
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 19 at 19:01














$begingroup$
But this is exactly what you wrote in the question, no? (Apart from the fact that $|z-z_0|<delta$ should read $0<|z-z_0|<delta$.)
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 19 at 19:20




$begingroup$
But this is exactly what you wrote in the question, no? (Apart from the fact that $|z-z_0|<delta$ should read $0<|z-z_0|<delta$.)
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 19 at 19:20












$begingroup$
@Did the Right side is different. In my comment I wrote $|frac{f(z)-a}{z-z_0}|$But in my Question I wrote down $|frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_0}-a|$
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 19 at 19:24




$begingroup$
@Did the Right side is different. In my comment I wrote $|frac{f(z)-a}{z-z_0}|$But in my Question I wrote down $|frac{f(z)-f(z_0)}{z-z_0}-a|$
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 19 at 19:24




1




1




$begingroup$
Ah, I missed that. But then the comment is truly absurd. Would not work even for $f(z)=z$, whose derivative you probably know...
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 19 at 19:30




$begingroup$
Ah, I missed that. But then the comment is truly absurd. Would not work even for $f(z)=z$, whose derivative you probably know...
$endgroup$
– Did
Jan 19 at 19:30










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079682%2falternative-definiton-of-differentiability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079682%2falternative-definiton-of-differentiability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Antonio Litta Visconti Arese