Determine Computability of Joint and Conditional Probabilities Given Few Tables












0












$begingroup$


Problem



I've encountered the following problem during the introduction lecture of my Machine Learning class. I haven't taken a formal probability course yet, so any help would be appreciated.





Consider the multi-valued, random variables:
C (campus), G (grade), M (major), and Y (year).



None of these variables are independent. Given the probability tables for the following joint, marginal, and conditional probabilities, explain how to compute each probability below given the probabilities from above, or write “impossible.”



$P(Y)$, $P(M)$, $P(G,Y)$, $P(C|Y)$, $P(C,M)$, $P(Y|M)$



Attempt



I'm unsure as to how to combine the given probabilities to derive $P(G | C, M)$ (#2) and what to specify for $P(C=main | Y=freshman)$ given the table for $P(C|Y)$ (#3). Does the order of joint and conditional probabilities matter?




  1. P(M=compSci, Y=sophomore) = $P(Y|M)P(Y)$

  2. P(G=B | C=LC, M=business) = ?

  3. P(C=main | Y=freshman) = ?

  4. P(G=B, M=bio) = not possible










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Problem



    I've encountered the following problem during the introduction lecture of my Machine Learning class. I haven't taken a formal probability course yet, so any help would be appreciated.





    Consider the multi-valued, random variables:
    C (campus), G (grade), M (major), and Y (year).



    None of these variables are independent. Given the probability tables for the following joint, marginal, and conditional probabilities, explain how to compute each probability below given the probabilities from above, or write “impossible.”



    $P(Y)$, $P(M)$, $P(G,Y)$, $P(C|Y)$, $P(C,M)$, $P(Y|M)$



    Attempt



    I'm unsure as to how to combine the given probabilities to derive $P(G | C, M)$ (#2) and what to specify for $P(C=main | Y=freshman)$ given the table for $P(C|Y)$ (#3). Does the order of joint and conditional probabilities matter?




    1. P(M=compSci, Y=sophomore) = $P(Y|M)P(Y)$

    2. P(G=B | C=LC, M=business) = ?

    3. P(C=main | Y=freshman) = ?

    4. P(G=B, M=bio) = not possible










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Problem



      I've encountered the following problem during the introduction lecture of my Machine Learning class. I haven't taken a formal probability course yet, so any help would be appreciated.





      Consider the multi-valued, random variables:
      C (campus), G (grade), M (major), and Y (year).



      None of these variables are independent. Given the probability tables for the following joint, marginal, and conditional probabilities, explain how to compute each probability below given the probabilities from above, or write “impossible.”



      $P(Y)$, $P(M)$, $P(G,Y)$, $P(C|Y)$, $P(C,M)$, $P(Y|M)$



      Attempt



      I'm unsure as to how to combine the given probabilities to derive $P(G | C, M)$ (#2) and what to specify for $P(C=main | Y=freshman)$ given the table for $P(C|Y)$ (#3). Does the order of joint and conditional probabilities matter?




      1. P(M=compSci, Y=sophomore) = $P(Y|M)P(Y)$

      2. P(G=B | C=LC, M=business) = ?

      3. P(C=main | Y=freshman) = ?

      4. P(G=B, M=bio) = not possible










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Problem



      I've encountered the following problem during the introduction lecture of my Machine Learning class. I haven't taken a formal probability course yet, so any help would be appreciated.





      Consider the multi-valued, random variables:
      C (campus), G (grade), M (major), and Y (year).



      None of these variables are independent. Given the probability tables for the following joint, marginal, and conditional probabilities, explain how to compute each probability below given the probabilities from above, or write “impossible.”



      $P(Y)$, $P(M)$, $P(G,Y)$, $P(C|Y)$, $P(C,M)$, $P(Y|M)$



      Attempt



      I'm unsure as to how to combine the given probabilities to derive $P(G | C, M)$ (#2) and what to specify for $P(C=main | Y=freshman)$ given the table for $P(C|Y)$ (#3). Does the order of joint and conditional probabilities matter?




      1. P(M=compSci, Y=sophomore) = $P(Y|M)P(Y)$

      2. P(G=B | C=LC, M=business) = ?

      3. P(C=main | Y=freshman) = ?

      4. P(G=B, M=bio) = not possible







      probability conditional-probability






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 19 at 18:25









      Anthony KrivonosAnthony Krivonos

      21410




      21410






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          For (2), the only information about $G$ that you have is $P(G,Y)$, which does not give you any information about the dependence between $G$ and $(C,M)$. So this is impossible.



          For (3), you already have the table for $P(C mid Y)$, so $P(C=text{main} mid Y=text{freshman})$ is one entry in this table.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ah, makes sense! By the same reasoning for (2), (4) would also be impossible, correct? And (1) can be derived from the givens.
            $endgroup$
            – Anthony Krivonos
            Jan 19 at 18:49










          • $begingroup$
            @AnthonyKrivonos Yes I believe so.
            $endgroup$
            – angryavian
            Jan 19 at 18:58











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079660%2fdetermine-computability-of-joint-and-conditional-probabilities-given-few-tables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          For (2), the only information about $G$ that you have is $P(G,Y)$, which does not give you any information about the dependence between $G$ and $(C,M)$. So this is impossible.



          For (3), you already have the table for $P(C mid Y)$, so $P(C=text{main} mid Y=text{freshman})$ is one entry in this table.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ah, makes sense! By the same reasoning for (2), (4) would also be impossible, correct? And (1) can be derived from the givens.
            $endgroup$
            – Anthony Krivonos
            Jan 19 at 18:49










          • $begingroup$
            @AnthonyKrivonos Yes I believe so.
            $endgroup$
            – angryavian
            Jan 19 at 18:58
















          0












          $begingroup$

          For (2), the only information about $G$ that you have is $P(G,Y)$, which does not give you any information about the dependence between $G$ and $(C,M)$. So this is impossible.



          For (3), you already have the table for $P(C mid Y)$, so $P(C=text{main} mid Y=text{freshman})$ is one entry in this table.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ah, makes sense! By the same reasoning for (2), (4) would also be impossible, correct? And (1) can be derived from the givens.
            $endgroup$
            – Anthony Krivonos
            Jan 19 at 18:49










          • $begingroup$
            @AnthonyKrivonos Yes I believe so.
            $endgroup$
            – angryavian
            Jan 19 at 18:58














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          For (2), the only information about $G$ that you have is $P(G,Y)$, which does not give you any information about the dependence between $G$ and $(C,M)$. So this is impossible.



          For (3), you already have the table for $P(C mid Y)$, so $P(C=text{main} mid Y=text{freshman})$ is one entry in this table.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          For (2), the only information about $G$ that you have is $P(G,Y)$, which does not give you any information about the dependence between $G$ and $(C,M)$. So this is impossible.



          For (3), you already have the table for $P(C mid Y)$, so $P(C=text{main} mid Y=text{freshman})$ is one entry in this table.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 19 at 18:34









          angryavianangryavian

          41.1k23380




          41.1k23380












          • $begingroup$
            Ah, makes sense! By the same reasoning for (2), (4) would also be impossible, correct? And (1) can be derived from the givens.
            $endgroup$
            – Anthony Krivonos
            Jan 19 at 18:49










          • $begingroup$
            @AnthonyKrivonos Yes I believe so.
            $endgroup$
            – angryavian
            Jan 19 at 18:58


















          • $begingroup$
            Ah, makes sense! By the same reasoning for (2), (4) would also be impossible, correct? And (1) can be derived from the givens.
            $endgroup$
            – Anthony Krivonos
            Jan 19 at 18:49










          • $begingroup$
            @AnthonyKrivonos Yes I believe so.
            $endgroup$
            – angryavian
            Jan 19 at 18:58
















          $begingroup$
          Ah, makes sense! By the same reasoning for (2), (4) would also be impossible, correct? And (1) can be derived from the givens.
          $endgroup$
          – Anthony Krivonos
          Jan 19 at 18:49




          $begingroup$
          Ah, makes sense! By the same reasoning for (2), (4) would also be impossible, correct? And (1) can be derived from the givens.
          $endgroup$
          – Anthony Krivonos
          Jan 19 at 18:49












          $begingroup$
          @AnthonyKrivonos Yes I believe so.
          $endgroup$
          – angryavian
          Jan 19 at 18:58




          $begingroup$
          @AnthonyKrivonos Yes I believe so.
          $endgroup$
          – angryavian
          Jan 19 at 18:58


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079660%2fdetermine-computability-of-joint-and-conditional-probabilities-given-few-tables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese