What does a $4$-dimensional bell curve look like graphically?












4












$begingroup$


I have some $4$D data in $(w,x,y,z)$ quaternion format that I'd like to graph to discern whether or not it follows a Gaussian function. I am using MATLAB and a slider to emulate the fourth dimension. Does anyone know how a bell curve would look like in $4$D?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The best you could do is try to animate surface plots and see the evolution.
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Roberson
    Aug 7 '17 at 17:38










  • $begingroup$
    @Irregardless do you have the points in a txt file or so? I would use a projection of the points in a 3D space. I have done similar things before, here you have an example. If you can add a link to the points I can try to visualize them with python (it will take me one day maybe) math.stackexchange.com/questions/2131551/…
    $endgroup$
    – iadvd
    Aug 8 '17 at 0:26










  • $begingroup$
    @Irregardless or if you want to try yourself, in this other question I wrote the python template you can use to visualize the projection math.stackexchange.com/questions/2125036/…
    $endgroup$
    – iadvd
    Aug 8 '17 at 0:26










  • $begingroup$
    @Irreglardless no hurries, I will try to find a moment also to do it. How can we do? do you have dropbox for instance? you can leave a link to a shared folder, so I can download it.
    $endgroup$
    – iadvd
    Aug 8 '17 at 0:59
















4












$begingroup$


I have some $4$D data in $(w,x,y,z)$ quaternion format that I'd like to graph to discern whether or not it follows a Gaussian function. I am using MATLAB and a slider to emulate the fourth dimension. Does anyone know how a bell curve would look like in $4$D?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The best you could do is try to animate surface plots and see the evolution.
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Roberson
    Aug 7 '17 at 17:38










  • $begingroup$
    @Irregardless do you have the points in a txt file or so? I would use a projection of the points in a 3D space. I have done similar things before, here you have an example. If you can add a link to the points I can try to visualize them with python (it will take me one day maybe) math.stackexchange.com/questions/2131551/…
    $endgroup$
    – iadvd
    Aug 8 '17 at 0:26










  • $begingroup$
    @Irregardless or if you want to try yourself, in this other question I wrote the python template you can use to visualize the projection math.stackexchange.com/questions/2125036/…
    $endgroup$
    – iadvd
    Aug 8 '17 at 0:26










  • $begingroup$
    @Irreglardless no hurries, I will try to find a moment also to do it. How can we do? do you have dropbox for instance? you can leave a link to a shared folder, so I can download it.
    $endgroup$
    – iadvd
    Aug 8 '17 at 0:59














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


I have some $4$D data in $(w,x,y,z)$ quaternion format that I'd like to graph to discern whether or not it follows a Gaussian function. I am using MATLAB and a slider to emulate the fourth dimension. Does anyone know how a bell curve would look like in $4$D?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have some $4$D data in $(w,x,y,z)$ quaternion format that I'd like to graph to discern whether or not it follows a Gaussian function. I am using MATLAB and a slider to emulate the fourth dimension. Does anyone know how a bell curve would look like in $4$D?



Thank you.







algebra-precalculus statistics descriptive-statistics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 10 at 22:39







Irregardless

















asked Aug 7 '17 at 17:35









IrregardlessIrregardless

435417




435417












  • $begingroup$
    The best you could do is try to animate surface plots and see the evolution.
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Roberson
    Aug 7 '17 at 17:38










  • $begingroup$
    @Irregardless do you have the points in a txt file or so? I would use a projection of the points in a 3D space. I have done similar things before, here you have an example. If you can add a link to the points I can try to visualize them with python (it will take me one day maybe) math.stackexchange.com/questions/2131551/…
    $endgroup$
    – iadvd
    Aug 8 '17 at 0:26










  • $begingroup$
    @Irregardless or if you want to try yourself, in this other question I wrote the python template you can use to visualize the projection math.stackexchange.com/questions/2125036/…
    $endgroup$
    – iadvd
    Aug 8 '17 at 0:26










  • $begingroup$
    @Irreglardless no hurries, I will try to find a moment also to do it. How can we do? do you have dropbox for instance? you can leave a link to a shared folder, so I can download it.
    $endgroup$
    – iadvd
    Aug 8 '17 at 0:59


















  • $begingroup$
    The best you could do is try to animate surface plots and see the evolution.
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Roberson
    Aug 7 '17 at 17:38










  • $begingroup$
    @Irregardless do you have the points in a txt file or so? I would use a projection of the points in a 3D space. I have done similar things before, here you have an example. If you can add a link to the points I can try to visualize them with python (it will take me one day maybe) math.stackexchange.com/questions/2131551/…
    $endgroup$
    – iadvd
    Aug 8 '17 at 0:26










  • $begingroup$
    @Irregardless or if you want to try yourself, in this other question I wrote the python template you can use to visualize the projection math.stackexchange.com/questions/2125036/…
    $endgroup$
    – iadvd
    Aug 8 '17 at 0:26










  • $begingroup$
    @Irreglardless no hurries, I will try to find a moment also to do it. How can we do? do you have dropbox for instance? you can leave a link to a shared folder, so I can download it.
    $endgroup$
    – iadvd
    Aug 8 '17 at 0:59
















$begingroup$
The best you could do is try to animate surface plots and see the evolution.
$endgroup$
– Sean Roberson
Aug 7 '17 at 17:38




$begingroup$
The best you could do is try to animate surface plots and see the evolution.
$endgroup$
– Sean Roberson
Aug 7 '17 at 17:38












$begingroup$
@Irregardless do you have the points in a txt file or so? I would use a projection of the points in a 3D space. I have done similar things before, here you have an example. If you can add a link to the points I can try to visualize them with python (it will take me one day maybe) math.stackexchange.com/questions/2131551/…
$endgroup$
– iadvd
Aug 8 '17 at 0:26




$begingroup$
@Irregardless do you have the points in a txt file or so? I would use a projection of the points in a 3D space. I have done similar things before, here you have an example. If you can add a link to the points I can try to visualize them with python (it will take me one day maybe) math.stackexchange.com/questions/2131551/…
$endgroup$
– iadvd
Aug 8 '17 at 0:26












$begingroup$
@Irregardless or if you want to try yourself, in this other question I wrote the python template you can use to visualize the projection math.stackexchange.com/questions/2125036/…
$endgroup$
– iadvd
Aug 8 '17 at 0:26




$begingroup$
@Irregardless or if you want to try yourself, in this other question I wrote the python template you can use to visualize the projection math.stackexchange.com/questions/2125036/…
$endgroup$
– iadvd
Aug 8 '17 at 0:26












$begingroup$
@Irreglardless no hurries, I will try to find a moment also to do it. How can we do? do you have dropbox for instance? you can leave a link to a shared folder, so I can download it.
$endgroup$
– iadvd
Aug 8 '17 at 0:59




$begingroup$
@Irreglardless no hurries, I will try to find a moment also to do it. How can we do? do you have dropbox for instance? you can leave a link to a shared folder, so I can download it.
$endgroup$
– iadvd
Aug 8 '17 at 0:59










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Whereas the bivariate Normal yields elliptical contours (or a circle given zero correlation), the trivariate case yields the intuitive 3D equivalent, namely the surface of an ellipsoid (or that of a sphere given zero correlations).



So, at each point in time (reducing you to 3D), a contour plot of the pdf $f(x,y,z)$ = constant would look something like this:



enter image description here



where parameter $rho_{x,y}$ alters the 'orientation' of the ellipsoid in the $x$-$y$ plane etc






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    This answer focuses on the first need of the OP:




    I have some $4$-D data in $(w,x,y,z)$ quaternion format that I'd like to graph to discern whether or not it follows a Gaussian function.




    I have used a cloud of more than $4cdot10^4$ $(w,x,y,z)$ points that the OP has sent me by email to make some $3$D projections. There are several options when projecting. In this case what you will see is a projection into a $3$D $(x1,x2,x3)$ cloud of the original cloud $(w,x,y,z)$ of $4$D points with the following settings:



    $x1=w$



    $x2=x$



    $x3=$projection of the data in plane $(y,z)$ of the points.



    The merging of $y$ and $z$ is due to a source of "$4$D light" that is located "behind" the $4$D cloud of points, specifically to create a shadow of the plane of $(y,z)$ of the cloud of points, being the shadow the projected points at $x3$.
    (A more concise explanation about the way of calculating the projection is in this other question).



    enter image description here



    Any $3$D projection is an "slice" of the $4$D object, just a cut of it. Thus, to see the "complete" $4$D object we need to rotate $360$° , with a camera around it in the $4$D space and see how evolves the projection. In $3$D we can only see one slice at a time, so a complete $360$° rotation around the $4$D object (in this case the "object" is a cloud of points) gives a final idea of how it looks in four dimensions. Here, the projection of the complete rotation around the $4$D cloud is shown (so basically we are seeing the "whole body" of the cloud if we consider it as a unique object):



    enter image description here



    Well in this case, more than $3$D is something like a "$2.5$D" (because we are visualizing a $3$D projection into this computer screen, so we are simulating three dimensions with two dimensions).



    I will add another different plane projection in some hours or maybe tomorrow (the Python program that creates the aforementioned slides takes some time to finish, and after that I use VirtualDub to create an animated gif).



    Update: 2017/08/10. As promised here is the $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ projection of the original cloud $(w,x,y,z)$ of $4$D points with the following settings:



    $x_1=$projection of the data in plane $(w,x)$ of the points.



    $x_2=y$



    $x_3=z$



    A single slice:



    enter image description here



    And the complete object ($360$° view of the cloud). I do not know what the OP's points represent, but it looks quite cool:



    enter image description here






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2385828%2fwhat-does-a-4-dimensional-bell-curve-look-like-graphically%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5












      $begingroup$

      Whereas the bivariate Normal yields elliptical contours (or a circle given zero correlation), the trivariate case yields the intuitive 3D equivalent, namely the surface of an ellipsoid (or that of a sphere given zero correlations).



      So, at each point in time (reducing you to 3D), a contour plot of the pdf $f(x,y,z)$ = constant would look something like this:



      enter image description here



      where parameter $rho_{x,y}$ alters the 'orientation' of the ellipsoid in the $x$-$y$ plane etc






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        5












        $begingroup$

        Whereas the bivariate Normal yields elliptical contours (or a circle given zero correlation), the trivariate case yields the intuitive 3D equivalent, namely the surface of an ellipsoid (or that of a sphere given zero correlations).



        So, at each point in time (reducing you to 3D), a contour plot of the pdf $f(x,y,z)$ = constant would look something like this:



        enter image description here



        where parameter $rho_{x,y}$ alters the 'orientation' of the ellipsoid in the $x$-$y$ plane etc






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          Whereas the bivariate Normal yields elliptical contours (or a circle given zero correlation), the trivariate case yields the intuitive 3D equivalent, namely the surface of an ellipsoid (or that of a sphere given zero correlations).



          So, at each point in time (reducing you to 3D), a contour plot of the pdf $f(x,y,z)$ = constant would look something like this:



          enter image description here



          where parameter $rho_{x,y}$ alters the 'orientation' of the ellipsoid in the $x$-$y$ plane etc






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Whereas the bivariate Normal yields elliptical contours (or a circle given zero correlation), the trivariate case yields the intuitive 3D equivalent, namely the surface of an ellipsoid (or that of a sphere given zero correlations).



          So, at each point in time (reducing you to 3D), a contour plot of the pdf $f(x,y,z)$ = constant would look something like this:



          enter image description here



          where parameter $rho_{x,y}$ alters the 'orientation' of the ellipsoid in the $x$-$y$ plane etc







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Aug 7 '17 at 17:48









          wolfieswolfies

          4,1662923




          4,1662923























              2












              $begingroup$

              This answer focuses on the first need of the OP:




              I have some $4$-D data in $(w,x,y,z)$ quaternion format that I'd like to graph to discern whether or not it follows a Gaussian function.




              I have used a cloud of more than $4cdot10^4$ $(w,x,y,z)$ points that the OP has sent me by email to make some $3$D projections. There are several options when projecting. In this case what you will see is a projection into a $3$D $(x1,x2,x3)$ cloud of the original cloud $(w,x,y,z)$ of $4$D points with the following settings:



              $x1=w$



              $x2=x$



              $x3=$projection of the data in plane $(y,z)$ of the points.



              The merging of $y$ and $z$ is due to a source of "$4$D light" that is located "behind" the $4$D cloud of points, specifically to create a shadow of the plane of $(y,z)$ of the cloud of points, being the shadow the projected points at $x3$.
              (A more concise explanation about the way of calculating the projection is in this other question).



              enter image description here



              Any $3$D projection is an "slice" of the $4$D object, just a cut of it. Thus, to see the "complete" $4$D object we need to rotate $360$° , with a camera around it in the $4$D space and see how evolves the projection. In $3$D we can only see one slice at a time, so a complete $360$° rotation around the $4$D object (in this case the "object" is a cloud of points) gives a final idea of how it looks in four dimensions. Here, the projection of the complete rotation around the $4$D cloud is shown (so basically we are seeing the "whole body" of the cloud if we consider it as a unique object):



              enter image description here



              Well in this case, more than $3$D is something like a "$2.5$D" (because we are visualizing a $3$D projection into this computer screen, so we are simulating three dimensions with two dimensions).



              I will add another different plane projection in some hours or maybe tomorrow (the Python program that creates the aforementioned slides takes some time to finish, and after that I use VirtualDub to create an animated gif).



              Update: 2017/08/10. As promised here is the $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ projection of the original cloud $(w,x,y,z)$ of $4$D points with the following settings:



              $x_1=$projection of the data in plane $(w,x)$ of the points.



              $x_2=y$



              $x_3=z$



              A single slice:



              enter image description here



              And the complete object ($360$° view of the cloud). I do not know what the OP's points represent, but it looks quite cool:



              enter image description here






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                This answer focuses on the first need of the OP:




                I have some $4$-D data in $(w,x,y,z)$ quaternion format that I'd like to graph to discern whether or not it follows a Gaussian function.




                I have used a cloud of more than $4cdot10^4$ $(w,x,y,z)$ points that the OP has sent me by email to make some $3$D projections. There are several options when projecting. In this case what you will see is a projection into a $3$D $(x1,x2,x3)$ cloud of the original cloud $(w,x,y,z)$ of $4$D points with the following settings:



                $x1=w$



                $x2=x$



                $x3=$projection of the data in plane $(y,z)$ of the points.



                The merging of $y$ and $z$ is due to a source of "$4$D light" that is located "behind" the $4$D cloud of points, specifically to create a shadow of the plane of $(y,z)$ of the cloud of points, being the shadow the projected points at $x3$.
                (A more concise explanation about the way of calculating the projection is in this other question).



                enter image description here



                Any $3$D projection is an "slice" of the $4$D object, just a cut of it. Thus, to see the "complete" $4$D object we need to rotate $360$° , with a camera around it in the $4$D space and see how evolves the projection. In $3$D we can only see one slice at a time, so a complete $360$° rotation around the $4$D object (in this case the "object" is a cloud of points) gives a final idea of how it looks in four dimensions. Here, the projection of the complete rotation around the $4$D cloud is shown (so basically we are seeing the "whole body" of the cloud if we consider it as a unique object):



                enter image description here



                Well in this case, more than $3$D is something like a "$2.5$D" (because we are visualizing a $3$D projection into this computer screen, so we are simulating three dimensions with two dimensions).



                I will add another different plane projection in some hours or maybe tomorrow (the Python program that creates the aforementioned slides takes some time to finish, and after that I use VirtualDub to create an animated gif).



                Update: 2017/08/10. As promised here is the $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ projection of the original cloud $(w,x,y,z)$ of $4$D points with the following settings:



                $x_1=$projection of the data in plane $(w,x)$ of the points.



                $x_2=y$



                $x_3=z$



                A single slice:



                enter image description here



                And the complete object ($360$° view of the cloud). I do not know what the OP's points represent, but it looks quite cool:



                enter image description here






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  This answer focuses on the first need of the OP:




                  I have some $4$-D data in $(w,x,y,z)$ quaternion format that I'd like to graph to discern whether or not it follows a Gaussian function.




                  I have used a cloud of more than $4cdot10^4$ $(w,x,y,z)$ points that the OP has sent me by email to make some $3$D projections. There are several options when projecting. In this case what you will see is a projection into a $3$D $(x1,x2,x3)$ cloud of the original cloud $(w,x,y,z)$ of $4$D points with the following settings:



                  $x1=w$



                  $x2=x$



                  $x3=$projection of the data in plane $(y,z)$ of the points.



                  The merging of $y$ and $z$ is due to a source of "$4$D light" that is located "behind" the $4$D cloud of points, specifically to create a shadow of the plane of $(y,z)$ of the cloud of points, being the shadow the projected points at $x3$.
                  (A more concise explanation about the way of calculating the projection is in this other question).



                  enter image description here



                  Any $3$D projection is an "slice" of the $4$D object, just a cut of it. Thus, to see the "complete" $4$D object we need to rotate $360$° , with a camera around it in the $4$D space and see how evolves the projection. In $3$D we can only see one slice at a time, so a complete $360$° rotation around the $4$D object (in this case the "object" is a cloud of points) gives a final idea of how it looks in four dimensions. Here, the projection of the complete rotation around the $4$D cloud is shown (so basically we are seeing the "whole body" of the cloud if we consider it as a unique object):



                  enter image description here



                  Well in this case, more than $3$D is something like a "$2.5$D" (because we are visualizing a $3$D projection into this computer screen, so we are simulating three dimensions with two dimensions).



                  I will add another different plane projection in some hours or maybe tomorrow (the Python program that creates the aforementioned slides takes some time to finish, and after that I use VirtualDub to create an animated gif).



                  Update: 2017/08/10. As promised here is the $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ projection of the original cloud $(w,x,y,z)$ of $4$D points with the following settings:



                  $x_1=$projection of the data in plane $(w,x)$ of the points.



                  $x_2=y$



                  $x_3=z$



                  A single slice:



                  enter image description here



                  And the complete object ($360$° view of the cloud). I do not know what the OP's points represent, but it looks quite cool:



                  enter image description here






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  This answer focuses on the first need of the OP:




                  I have some $4$-D data in $(w,x,y,z)$ quaternion format that I'd like to graph to discern whether or not it follows a Gaussian function.




                  I have used a cloud of more than $4cdot10^4$ $(w,x,y,z)$ points that the OP has sent me by email to make some $3$D projections. There are several options when projecting. In this case what you will see is a projection into a $3$D $(x1,x2,x3)$ cloud of the original cloud $(w,x,y,z)$ of $4$D points with the following settings:



                  $x1=w$



                  $x2=x$



                  $x3=$projection of the data in plane $(y,z)$ of the points.



                  The merging of $y$ and $z$ is due to a source of "$4$D light" that is located "behind" the $4$D cloud of points, specifically to create a shadow of the plane of $(y,z)$ of the cloud of points, being the shadow the projected points at $x3$.
                  (A more concise explanation about the way of calculating the projection is in this other question).



                  enter image description here



                  Any $3$D projection is an "slice" of the $4$D object, just a cut of it. Thus, to see the "complete" $4$D object we need to rotate $360$° , with a camera around it in the $4$D space and see how evolves the projection. In $3$D we can only see one slice at a time, so a complete $360$° rotation around the $4$D object (in this case the "object" is a cloud of points) gives a final idea of how it looks in four dimensions. Here, the projection of the complete rotation around the $4$D cloud is shown (so basically we are seeing the "whole body" of the cloud if we consider it as a unique object):



                  enter image description here



                  Well in this case, more than $3$D is something like a "$2.5$D" (because we are visualizing a $3$D projection into this computer screen, so we are simulating three dimensions with two dimensions).



                  I will add another different plane projection in some hours or maybe tomorrow (the Python program that creates the aforementioned slides takes some time to finish, and after that I use VirtualDub to create an animated gif).



                  Update: 2017/08/10. As promised here is the $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ projection of the original cloud $(w,x,y,z)$ of $4$D points with the following settings:



                  $x_1=$projection of the data in plane $(w,x)$ of the points.



                  $x_2=y$



                  $x_3=z$



                  A single slice:



                  enter image description here



                  And the complete object ($360$° view of the cloud). I do not know what the OP's points represent, but it looks quite cool:



                  enter image description here







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Aug 10 '17 at 16:21









                  Irregardless

                  435417




                  435417










                  answered Aug 9 '17 at 8:35









                  iadvdiadvd

                  5,435102655




                  5,435102655






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2385828%2fwhat-does-a-4-dimensional-bell-curve-look-like-graphically%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Mario Kart Wii

                      What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                      Antonio Litta Visconti Arese