Are all (unbounded) chain complexes over a field bifibrant?
$begingroup$
In his paper Homological algebra of homotopy algebras, Hinich defines a model structure on unbounded chain complexes where
- weak equivalences are the quasi-isomorphisms,
- fibrations are degree-wise surjections, and
- cofibrations are defined by the left lifting property.
Obviously, every object is fibrant. Now assume that we are working over a field $k$ instead of a general ring.
Question: Is it true that in this case every chain complex is also cofibrant?
I believe the answer to be yes, and I have an ugly argument that should prove it (even though I still have to check the details). Is there a sly/elegant way to show it?
homological-algebra model-categories
asked Oct 4 '17 at 5:34
Daniel Robert-NicoudDaniel Robert-Nicoud
20.4k33596
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In his paper Homological algebra of homotopy algebras, Hinich defines a model structure on unbounded chain complexes where
- weak equivalences are the quasi-isomorphisms,
- fibrations are degree-wise surjections, and
- cofibrations are defined by the left lifting property.
Obviously, every object is fibrant. Now assume that we are working over a field $k$ instead of a general ring.
Question: Is it true that in this case every chain complex is also cofibrant?
I believe the answer to be yes, and I have an ugly argument that should prove it (even though I still have to check the details). Is there a sly/elegant way to show it?
homological-algebra model-categories
asked Oct 4 '17 at 5:34
Daniel Robert-NicoudDaniel Robert-Nicoud
20.4k33596
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In his paper Homological algebra of homotopy algebras, Hinich defines a model structure on unbounded chain complexes where
- weak equivalences are the quasi-isomorphisms,
- fibrations are degree-wise surjections, and
- cofibrations are defined by the left lifting property.
Obviously, every object is fibrant. Now assume that we are working over a field $k$ instead of a general ring.
Question: Is it true that in this case every chain complex is also cofibrant?
I believe the answer to be yes, and I have an ugly argument that should prove it (even though I still have to check the details). Is there a sly/elegant way to show it?
homological-algebra model-categories
asked Oct 4 '17 at 5:34
Daniel Robert-NicoudDaniel Robert-Nicoud
20.4k33596
$endgroup$
In his paper Homological algebra of homotopy algebras, Hinich defines a model structure on unbounded chain complexes where
- weak equivalences are the quasi-isomorphisms,
- fibrations are degree-wise surjections, and
- cofibrations are defined by the left lifting property.
Obviously, every object is fibrant. Now assume that we are working over a field $k$ instead of a general ring.
Question: Is it true that in this case every chain complex is also cofibrant?
I believe the answer to be yes, and I have an ugly argument that should prove it (even though I still have to check the details). Is there a sly/elegant way to show it?
homological-algebra model-categories
homological-algebra model-categories
asked Oct 4 '17 at 5:34
Daniel Robert-NicoudDaniel Robert-Nicoud
20.4k33596
asked Oct 4 '17 at 5:34
Daniel Robert-NicoudDaniel Robert-Nicoud
20.4k33596
asked Oct 4 '17 at 5:34
Daniel Robert-NicoudDaniel Robert-Nicoud
20.4k33596
asked Oct 4 '17 at 5:34
Daniel Robert-NicoudDaniel Robert-Nicoud
20.4k33596
asked Oct 4 '17 at 5:34
Daniel Robert-NicoudDaniel Robert-Nicoud
20.4k33596
20.4k33596
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes.
Every (possibly unbounded) chain complex of $k$-vector spaces is a (possibly infinite) direct sum of complexes of the form
$$dotsto0to kto0todots$$
and
$$dotsto0to kstackrel{sim}{to}kto0todots$$
and their shifts.
It is easy to show that each of these complexes is cofibrant, and so every complex is cofibrant.
answered Oct 4 '17 at 12:19
Jeremy RickardJeremy Rickard
16.1k11643
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good point. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Oct 4 '17 at 12:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
it is not difficult to see that when $k$ is a field, then a cofibration is exactly a degree-wise injective map.
The key lemma is the following: a chain complex whose homology is trivial is homotopic to zero.
answered Jan 11 at 6:21
Damien LDamien L
4,967833
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Merci Damien ;)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Jan 12 at 17:13
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2456887%2fare-all-unbounded-chain-complexes-over-a-field-bifibrant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes.
Every (possibly unbounded) chain complex of $k$-vector spaces is a (possibly infinite) direct sum of complexes of the form
$$dotsto0to kto0todots$$
and
$$dotsto0to kstackrel{sim}{to}kto0todots$$
and their shifts.
It is easy to show that each of these complexes is cofibrant, and so every complex is cofibrant.
answered Oct 4 '17 at 12:19
Jeremy RickardJeremy Rickard
16.1k11643
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good point. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Oct 4 '17 at 12:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes.
Every (possibly unbounded) chain complex of $k$-vector spaces is a (possibly infinite) direct sum of complexes of the form
$$dotsto0to kto0todots$$
and
$$dotsto0to kstackrel{sim}{to}kto0todots$$
and their shifts.
It is easy to show that each of these complexes is cofibrant, and so every complex is cofibrant.
answered Oct 4 '17 at 12:19
Jeremy RickardJeremy Rickard
16.1k11643
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good point. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Oct 4 '17 at 12:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes.
Every (possibly unbounded) chain complex of $k$-vector spaces is a (possibly infinite) direct sum of complexes of the form
$$dotsto0to kto0todots$$
and
$$dotsto0to kstackrel{sim}{to}kto0todots$$
and their shifts.
It is easy to show that each of these complexes is cofibrant, and so every complex is cofibrant.
answered Oct 4 '17 at 12:19
Jeremy RickardJeremy Rickard
16.1k11643
$endgroup$
Yes.
Every (possibly unbounded) chain complex of $k$-vector spaces is a (possibly infinite) direct sum of complexes of the form
$$dotsto0to kto0todots$$
and
$$dotsto0to kstackrel{sim}{to}kto0todots$$
and their shifts.
It is easy to show that each of these complexes is cofibrant, and so every complex is cofibrant.
answered Oct 4 '17 at 12:19
Jeremy RickardJeremy Rickard
16.1k11643
answered Oct 4 '17 at 12:19
Jeremy RickardJeremy Rickard
16.1k11643
answered Oct 4 '17 at 12:19
Jeremy RickardJeremy Rickard
16.1k11643
answered Oct 4 '17 at 12:19
Jeremy RickardJeremy Rickard
16.1k11643
16.1k11643
$begingroup$
Good point. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Oct 4 '17 at 12:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Good point. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Oct 4 '17 at 12:50
$begingroup$
Good point. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Oct 4 '17 at 12:50
$begingroup$
Good point. Thanks.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Oct 4 '17 at 12:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
it is not difficult to see that when $k$ is a field, then a cofibration is exactly a degree-wise injective map.
The key lemma is the following: a chain complex whose homology is trivial is homotopic to zero.
answered Jan 11 at 6:21
Damien LDamien L
4,967833
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Merci Damien ;)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Jan 12 at 17:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
it is not difficult to see that when $k$ is a field, then a cofibration is exactly a degree-wise injective map.
The key lemma is the following: a chain complex whose homology is trivial is homotopic to zero.
answered Jan 11 at 6:21
Damien LDamien L
4,967833
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Merci Damien ;)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Jan 12 at 17:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
it is not difficult to see that when $k$ is a field, then a cofibration is exactly a degree-wise injective map.
The key lemma is the following: a chain complex whose homology is trivial is homotopic to zero.
answered Jan 11 at 6:21
Damien LDamien L
4,967833
$endgroup$
it is not difficult to see that when $k$ is a field, then a cofibration is exactly a degree-wise injective map.
The key lemma is the following: a chain complex whose homology is trivial is homotopic to zero.
answered Jan 11 at 6:21
Damien LDamien L
4,967833
answered Jan 11 at 6:21
Damien LDamien L
4,967833
answered Jan 11 at 6:21
Damien LDamien L
4,967833
answered Jan 11 at 6:21
Damien LDamien L
4,967833
4,967833
$begingroup$
Merci Damien ;)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Jan 12 at 17:13
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Merci Damien ;)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Jan 12 at 17:13
$begingroup$
Merci Damien ;)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Jan 12 at 17:13
$begingroup$
Merci Damien ;)
$endgroup$
– Daniel Robert-Nicoud
Jan 12 at 17:13
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2456887%2fare-all-unbounded-chain-complexes-over-a-field-bifibrant%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
