Transform of a wave equation to a hyperbolic system












2














We consider the wave equation $$y_{tt}=y_{xx}+a(t,x)y, text{ x$in$(0,1)}, tin (0,infty).$$
with Dirichlet boundary conditions.
I want to transform this equation to a hyperbolic system of the form
$$z_t=Az_x+Bz.$$
So, I introduced the following substitutions: $z^1=y_t$, $z^2=y_x$, I obtained
$$z^1_t=z^2_{x}+az^1+a_ty$$
$$z^2_t=z^1_{x}$$



The question here:

How I get rid of the $y$ in the $z^1$ formula? Is there more adequate substitution then this ? thank you.






pde systems-of-equations hyperbolic-equations







share|cite|improve this question





























    2














    We consider the wave equation $$y_{tt}=y_{xx}+a(t,x)y, text{ x$in$(0,1)}, tin (0,infty).$$
    with Dirichlet boundary conditions.
    I want to transform this equation to a hyperbolic system of the form
    $$z_t=Az_x+Bz.$$
    So, I introduced the following substitutions: $z^1=y_t$, $z^2=y_x$, I obtained
    $$z^1_t=z^2_{x}+az^1+a_ty$$
    $$z^2_t=z^1_{x}$$



    The question here:

    How I get rid of the $y$ in the $z^1$ formula? Is there more adequate substitution then this ? thank you.






    pde systems-of-equations hyperbolic-equations







    share|cite|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2







      We consider the wave equation $$y_{tt}=y_{xx}+a(t,x)y, text{ x$in$(0,1)}, tin (0,infty).$$
      with Dirichlet boundary conditions.
      I want to transform this equation to a hyperbolic system of the form
      $$z_t=Az_x+Bz.$$
      So, I introduced the following substitutions: $z^1=y_t$, $z^2=y_x$, I obtained
      $$z^1_t=z^2_{x}+az^1+a_ty$$
      $$z^2_t=z^1_{x}$$



      The question here:

      How I get rid of the $y$ in the $z^1$ formula? Is there more adequate substitution then this ? thank you.






      pde systems-of-equations hyperbolic-equations







      share|cite|improve this question















      We consider the wave equation $$y_{tt}=y_{xx}+a(t,x)y, text{ x$in$(0,1)}, tin (0,infty).$$
      with Dirichlet boundary conditions.
      I want to transform this equation to a hyperbolic system of the form
      $$z_t=Az_x+Bz.$$
      So, I introduced the following substitutions: $z^1=y_t$, $z^2=y_x$, I obtained
      $$z^1_t=z^2_{x}+az^1+a_ty$$
      $$z^2_t=z^1_{x}$$



      The question here:

      How I get rid of the $y$ in the $z^1$ formula? Is there more adequate substitution then this ? thank you.






      pde systems-of-equations hyperbolic-equations




      pde systems-of-equations hyperbolic-equations






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 15 hours ago









      Harry49

      5,99121031




      5,99121031










      asked 2 days ago









      Gustave

      720211




      720211






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          You need to include $y$ in your $z$ vector. Set $z^1 =y, z^2 = y_t, z^3 = y_x$. Then
          $$
          partial_t
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}
          =
          begin{pmatrix}
          y_t \ y_{xx} + a y \ y_{xt}
          end{pmatrix}
          =
          begin{pmatrix}
          0 & 0& 0\
          0 & 0& 1\
          0 & 1& 0\
          end{pmatrix}
          partial_x
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}
          +
          begin{pmatrix}
          0 & 1& 0\
          a & 0& 0\
          0 & 0& 0\
          end{pmatrix}
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}.
          $$
          This is the form you want.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you @Glitch for replaying. Is there any alternative substitutions to write the above system under a $2 times 2$ hyperbolic system with $A$ is diagonal matrix? I h'ave tried but I have not secceeded.
            – Gustave
            yesterday








          • 1




            @Gustave You're welcome. I don't think it's possible to reduce to a $2 times 2$ first-order system when you have the lower order term $a y$ in your original equation. If you want to capture the PDE then $z$ must contain both $y_t$ and $y_x$, but $y$ itself cannot be obtained from these without integration. If you wanted to integrate, then you could obtain $y$, but you would break the structure of the first-order PDE system. Is there a particular reason you don't like the $3 times 3$ system? The tricks to solve a $2times 2$ should work here just as well...
            – Glitch
            yesterday










          • Thank you sir..
            – Gustave
            yesterday











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062598%2ftransform-of-a-wave-equation-to-a-hyperbolic-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          You need to include $y$ in your $z$ vector. Set $z^1 =y, z^2 = y_t, z^3 = y_x$. Then
          $$
          partial_t
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}
          =
          begin{pmatrix}
          y_t \ y_{xx} + a y \ y_{xt}
          end{pmatrix}
          =
          begin{pmatrix}
          0 & 0& 0\
          0 & 0& 1\
          0 & 1& 0\
          end{pmatrix}
          partial_x
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}
          +
          begin{pmatrix}
          0 & 1& 0\
          a & 0& 0\
          0 & 0& 0\
          end{pmatrix}
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}.
          $$
          This is the form you want.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you @Glitch for replaying. Is there any alternative substitutions to write the above system under a $2 times 2$ hyperbolic system with $A$ is diagonal matrix? I h'ave tried but I have not secceeded.
            – Gustave
            yesterday








          • 1




            @Gustave You're welcome. I don't think it's possible to reduce to a $2 times 2$ first-order system when you have the lower order term $a y$ in your original equation. If you want to capture the PDE then $z$ must contain both $y_t$ and $y_x$, but $y$ itself cannot be obtained from these without integration. If you wanted to integrate, then you could obtain $y$, but you would break the structure of the first-order PDE system. Is there a particular reason you don't like the $3 times 3$ system? The tricks to solve a $2times 2$ should work here just as well...
            – Glitch
            yesterday










          • Thank you sir..
            – Gustave
            yesterday
















          1














          You need to include $y$ in your $z$ vector. Set $z^1 =y, z^2 = y_t, z^3 = y_x$. Then
          $$
          partial_t
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}
          =
          begin{pmatrix}
          y_t \ y_{xx} + a y \ y_{xt}
          end{pmatrix}
          =
          begin{pmatrix}
          0 & 0& 0\
          0 & 0& 1\
          0 & 1& 0\
          end{pmatrix}
          partial_x
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}
          +
          begin{pmatrix}
          0 & 1& 0\
          a & 0& 0\
          0 & 0& 0\
          end{pmatrix}
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}.
          $$
          This is the form you want.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you @Glitch for replaying. Is there any alternative substitutions to write the above system under a $2 times 2$ hyperbolic system with $A$ is diagonal matrix? I h'ave tried but I have not secceeded.
            – Gustave
            yesterday








          • 1




            @Gustave You're welcome. I don't think it's possible to reduce to a $2 times 2$ first-order system when you have the lower order term $a y$ in your original equation. If you want to capture the PDE then $z$ must contain both $y_t$ and $y_x$, but $y$ itself cannot be obtained from these without integration. If you wanted to integrate, then you could obtain $y$, but you would break the structure of the first-order PDE system. Is there a particular reason you don't like the $3 times 3$ system? The tricks to solve a $2times 2$ should work here just as well...
            – Glitch
            yesterday










          • Thank you sir..
            – Gustave
            yesterday














          1












          1








          1






          You need to include $y$ in your $z$ vector. Set $z^1 =y, z^2 = y_t, z^3 = y_x$. Then
          $$
          partial_t
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}
          =
          begin{pmatrix}
          y_t \ y_{xx} + a y \ y_{xt}
          end{pmatrix}
          =
          begin{pmatrix}
          0 & 0& 0\
          0 & 0& 1\
          0 & 1& 0\
          end{pmatrix}
          partial_x
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}
          +
          begin{pmatrix}
          0 & 1& 0\
          a & 0& 0\
          0 & 0& 0\
          end{pmatrix}
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}.
          $$
          This is the form you want.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          You need to include $y$ in your $z$ vector. Set $z^1 =y, z^2 = y_t, z^3 = y_x$. Then
          $$
          partial_t
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}
          =
          begin{pmatrix}
          y_t \ y_{xx} + a y \ y_{xt}
          end{pmatrix}
          =
          begin{pmatrix}
          0 & 0& 0\
          0 & 0& 1\
          0 & 1& 0\
          end{pmatrix}
          partial_x
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}
          +
          begin{pmatrix}
          0 & 1& 0\
          a & 0& 0\
          0 & 0& 0\
          end{pmatrix}
          begin{pmatrix}
          y \ y_t \ y_x
          end{pmatrix}.
          $$
          This is the form you want.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 2 days ago









          Glitch

          5,5431030




          5,5431030












          • Thank you @Glitch for replaying. Is there any alternative substitutions to write the above system under a $2 times 2$ hyperbolic system with $A$ is diagonal matrix? I h'ave tried but I have not secceeded.
            – Gustave
            yesterday








          • 1




            @Gustave You're welcome. I don't think it's possible to reduce to a $2 times 2$ first-order system when you have the lower order term $a y$ in your original equation. If you want to capture the PDE then $z$ must contain both $y_t$ and $y_x$, but $y$ itself cannot be obtained from these without integration. If you wanted to integrate, then you could obtain $y$, but you would break the structure of the first-order PDE system. Is there a particular reason you don't like the $3 times 3$ system? The tricks to solve a $2times 2$ should work here just as well...
            – Glitch
            yesterday










          • Thank you sir..
            – Gustave
            yesterday


















          • Thank you @Glitch for replaying. Is there any alternative substitutions to write the above system under a $2 times 2$ hyperbolic system with $A$ is diagonal matrix? I h'ave tried but I have not secceeded.
            – Gustave
            yesterday








          • 1




            @Gustave You're welcome. I don't think it's possible to reduce to a $2 times 2$ first-order system when you have the lower order term $a y$ in your original equation. If you want to capture the PDE then $z$ must contain both $y_t$ and $y_x$, but $y$ itself cannot be obtained from these without integration. If you wanted to integrate, then you could obtain $y$, but you would break the structure of the first-order PDE system. Is there a particular reason you don't like the $3 times 3$ system? The tricks to solve a $2times 2$ should work here just as well...
            – Glitch
            yesterday










          • Thank you sir..
            – Gustave
            yesterday
















          Thank you @Glitch for replaying. Is there any alternative substitutions to write the above system under a $2 times 2$ hyperbolic system with $A$ is diagonal matrix? I h'ave tried but I have not secceeded.
          – Gustave
          yesterday






          Thank you @Glitch for replaying. Is there any alternative substitutions to write the above system under a $2 times 2$ hyperbolic system with $A$ is diagonal matrix? I h'ave tried but I have not secceeded.
          – Gustave
          yesterday






          1




          1




          @Gustave You're welcome. I don't think it's possible to reduce to a $2 times 2$ first-order system when you have the lower order term $a y$ in your original equation. If you want to capture the PDE then $z$ must contain both $y_t$ and $y_x$, but $y$ itself cannot be obtained from these without integration. If you wanted to integrate, then you could obtain $y$, but you would break the structure of the first-order PDE system. Is there a particular reason you don't like the $3 times 3$ system? The tricks to solve a $2times 2$ should work here just as well...
          – Glitch
          yesterday




          @Gustave You're welcome. I don't think it's possible to reduce to a $2 times 2$ first-order system when you have the lower order term $a y$ in your original equation. If you want to capture the PDE then $z$ must contain both $y_t$ and $y_x$, but $y$ itself cannot be obtained from these without integration. If you wanted to integrate, then you could obtain $y$, but you would break the structure of the first-order PDE system. Is there a particular reason you don't like the $3 times 3$ system? The tricks to solve a $2times 2$ should work here just as well...
          – Glitch
          yesterday












          Thank you sir..
          – Gustave
          yesterday




          Thank you sir..
          – Gustave
          yesterday


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062598%2ftransform-of-a-wave-equation-to-a-hyperbolic-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          Image
          Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
          Read more

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

          Image
          5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
          Read more

          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

          Image
          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
          Read more