Solve the recursion given by $f(n) = 2f(n-1) + frac{(-1)^n}{n!}$ using generating functions.
$begingroup$
Assume that $f(0) = 0, f(1) = -1$.
$g(x)$ is $f(n)$'s generating function, I got to the expression:
$ g(x) = frac{e^{-x}-1}{1-2x} $
But am now stuck, since I can't find a power series for the function in simple terms. Any ideas?
combinatorics discrete-mathematics power-series generating-functions recursion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume that $f(0) = 0, f(1) = -1$.
$g(x)$ is $f(n)$'s generating function, I got to the expression:
$ g(x) = frac{e^{-x}-1}{1-2x} $
But am now stuck, since I can't find a power series for the function in simple terms. Any ideas?
combinatorics discrete-mathematics power-series generating-functions recursion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume that $f(0) = 0, f(1) = -1$.
$g(x)$ is $f(n)$'s generating function, I got to the expression:
$ g(x) = frac{e^{-x}-1}{1-2x} $
But am now stuck, since I can't find a power series for the function in simple terms. Any ideas?
combinatorics discrete-mathematics power-series generating-functions recursion
$endgroup$
Assume that $f(0) = 0, f(1) = -1$.
$g(x)$ is $f(n)$'s generating function, I got to the expression:
$ g(x) = frac{e^{-x}-1}{1-2x} $
But am now stuck, since I can't find a power series for the function in simple terms. Any ideas?
combinatorics discrete-mathematics power-series generating-functions recursion
combinatorics discrete-mathematics power-series generating-functions recursion
edited Jan 24 at 17:12
OmG
2,527822
2,527822
asked Jan 24 at 16:44
Amit LevyAmit Levy
747
747
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think you should have $e^{-x}$ in your formula, not $e^x$.
Now you have $g(x) = (e^{-x}-1) cdot frac{1}{1-2x}$. Can you find power series for those both separately? Do you know how to multiply power series?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The exponent was just a spelling mistake which I now fixed. I do know how to multiply power series, but then I get a sum as the solution, which doesn't feel simplified enough. Is that usually considered a solution to a recursion?
$endgroup$
– Amit Levy
Jan 24 at 17:02
$begingroup$
Sometimes there may be a way to simplify the sum, but sometimes not.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:12
$begingroup$
In any case, you should still be able to say what happens to $f(n)$ asymptotically, which may be of interest.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A simpler solution might be expand the recursion equation here.
$$f(n) = sum_{i = 1}^{n} 2^{n-i} frac{(-1)^i}{i!} = 2^nsum_{i = 1}^{n} 2^{-i} frac{(-1)^i}{i!}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086102%2fsolve-the-recursion-given-by-fn-2fn-1-frac-1nn-using-generati%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think you should have $e^{-x}$ in your formula, not $e^x$.
Now you have $g(x) = (e^{-x}-1) cdot frac{1}{1-2x}$. Can you find power series for those both separately? Do you know how to multiply power series?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The exponent was just a spelling mistake which I now fixed. I do know how to multiply power series, but then I get a sum as the solution, which doesn't feel simplified enough. Is that usually considered a solution to a recursion?
$endgroup$
– Amit Levy
Jan 24 at 17:02
$begingroup$
Sometimes there may be a way to simplify the sum, but sometimes not.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:12
$begingroup$
In any case, you should still be able to say what happens to $f(n)$ asymptotically, which may be of interest.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you should have $e^{-x}$ in your formula, not $e^x$.
Now you have $g(x) = (e^{-x}-1) cdot frac{1}{1-2x}$. Can you find power series for those both separately? Do you know how to multiply power series?
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The exponent was just a spelling mistake which I now fixed. I do know how to multiply power series, but then I get a sum as the solution, which doesn't feel simplified enough. Is that usually considered a solution to a recursion?
$endgroup$
– Amit Levy
Jan 24 at 17:02
$begingroup$
Sometimes there may be a way to simplify the sum, but sometimes not.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:12
$begingroup$
In any case, you should still be able to say what happens to $f(n)$ asymptotically, which may be of interest.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you should have $e^{-x}$ in your formula, not $e^x$.
Now you have $g(x) = (e^{-x}-1) cdot frac{1}{1-2x}$. Can you find power series for those both separately? Do you know how to multiply power series?
$endgroup$
I think you should have $e^{-x}$ in your formula, not $e^x$.
Now you have $g(x) = (e^{-x}-1) cdot frac{1}{1-2x}$. Can you find power series for those both separately? Do you know how to multiply power series?
answered Jan 24 at 17:00
kccukccu
10.6k11229
10.6k11229
$begingroup$
The exponent was just a spelling mistake which I now fixed. I do know how to multiply power series, but then I get a sum as the solution, which doesn't feel simplified enough. Is that usually considered a solution to a recursion?
$endgroup$
– Amit Levy
Jan 24 at 17:02
$begingroup$
Sometimes there may be a way to simplify the sum, but sometimes not.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:12
$begingroup$
In any case, you should still be able to say what happens to $f(n)$ asymptotically, which may be of interest.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The exponent was just a spelling mistake which I now fixed. I do know how to multiply power series, but then I get a sum as the solution, which doesn't feel simplified enough. Is that usually considered a solution to a recursion?
$endgroup$
– Amit Levy
Jan 24 at 17:02
$begingroup$
Sometimes there may be a way to simplify the sum, but sometimes not.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:12
$begingroup$
In any case, you should still be able to say what happens to $f(n)$ asymptotically, which may be of interest.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:14
$begingroup$
The exponent was just a spelling mistake which I now fixed. I do know how to multiply power series, but then I get a sum as the solution, which doesn't feel simplified enough. Is that usually considered a solution to a recursion?
$endgroup$
– Amit Levy
Jan 24 at 17:02
$begingroup$
The exponent was just a spelling mistake which I now fixed. I do know how to multiply power series, but then I get a sum as the solution, which doesn't feel simplified enough. Is that usually considered a solution to a recursion?
$endgroup$
– Amit Levy
Jan 24 at 17:02
$begingroup$
Sometimes there may be a way to simplify the sum, but sometimes not.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:12
$begingroup$
Sometimes there may be a way to simplify the sum, but sometimes not.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:12
$begingroup$
In any case, you should still be able to say what happens to $f(n)$ asymptotically, which may be of interest.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:14
$begingroup$
In any case, you should still be able to say what happens to $f(n)$ asymptotically, which may be of interest.
$endgroup$
– kccu
Jan 24 at 17:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A simpler solution might be expand the recursion equation here.
$$f(n) = sum_{i = 1}^{n} 2^{n-i} frac{(-1)^i}{i!} = 2^nsum_{i = 1}^{n} 2^{-i} frac{(-1)^i}{i!}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A simpler solution might be expand the recursion equation here.
$$f(n) = sum_{i = 1}^{n} 2^{n-i} frac{(-1)^i}{i!} = 2^nsum_{i = 1}^{n} 2^{-i} frac{(-1)^i}{i!}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A simpler solution might be expand the recursion equation here.
$$f(n) = sum_{i = 1}^{n} 2^{n-i} frac{(-1)^i}{i!} = 2^nsum_{i = 1}^{n} 2^{-i} frac{(-1)^i}{i!}$$
$endgroup$
A simpler solution might be expand the recursion equation here.
$$f(n) = sum_{i = 1}^{n} 2^{n-i} frac{(-1)^i}{i!} = 2^nsum_{i = 1}^{n} 2^{-i} frac{(-1)^i}{i!}$$
answered Jan 24 at 17:11
OmGOmG
2,527822
2,527822
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086102%2fsolve-the-recursion-given-by-fn-2fn-1-frac-1nn-using-generati%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown