Bounds on Ramsey Numbers












1












$begingroup$


I'm working on a script with a section on Ramsey Theory. I know that $R(s,t) leq R(s-1,t) + R(s,t-1)$ and that you can add a -1 on the right side if both $R(s-1,t)$ and $R(s,t-1)$ are even. Using this inductively, one can prove $R(s,t) leq {s + t - 2 choose s-1}$, or $R(3,t) leq frac{1}{2} cdot (t^2 + t)$. Now, my script claims that this can be sharpened using the two upper inequalities to $R(3,t) leq frac{1}{2} cdot (t^2 + 3)$. How? I've been trying this for the past half hour and I can't find an answer. Thanks in advance for any help.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'm working on a script with a section on Ramsey Theory. I know that $R(s,t) leq R(s-1,t) + R(s,t-1)$ and that you can add a -1 on the right side if both $R(s-1,t)$ and $R(s,t-1)$ are even. Using this inductively, one can prove $R(s,t) leq {s + t - 2 choose s-1}$, or $R(3,t) leq frac{1}{2} cdot (t^2 + t)$. Now, my script claims that this can be sharpened using the two upper inequalities to $R(3,t) leq frac{1}{2} cdot (t^2 + 3)$. How? I've been trying this for the past half hour and I can't find an answer. Thanks in advance for any help.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I'm working on a script with a section on Ramsey Theory. I know that $R(s,t) leq R(s-1,t) + R(s,t-1)$ and that you can add a -1 on the right side if both $R(s-1,t)$ and $R(s,t-1)$ are even. Using this inductively, one can prove $R(s,t) leq {s + t - 2 choose s-1}$, or $R(3,t) leq frac{1}{2} cdot (t^2 + t)$. Now, my script claims that this can be sharpened using the two upper inequalities to $R(3,t) leq frac{1}{2} cdot (t^2 + 3)$. How? I've been trying this for the past half hour and I can't find an answer. Thanks in advance for any help.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I'm working on a script with a section on Ramsey Theory. I know that $R(s,t) leq R(s-1,t) + R(s,t-1)$ and that you can add a -1 on the right side if both $R(s-1,t)$ and $R(s,t-1)$ are even. Using this inductively, one can prove $R(s,t) leq {s + t - 2 choose s-1}$, or $R(3,t) leq frac{1}{2} cdot (t^2 + t)$. Now, my script claims that this can be sharpened using the two upper inequalities to $R(3,t) leq frac{1}{2} cdot (t^2 + 3)$. How? I've been trying this for the past half hour and I can't find an answer. Thanks in advance for any help.







      ramsey-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 24 at 16:22









      MateInTwoMateInTwo

      207




      207






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Observe first that $R(2,t) = t$ since any $2$-coloring of $K_t$ either contains an edge of the first color, or else is a monochromatic $K_t$ of the second color.



          This, together with your recurrence for $R(s,t)$, gives:
          $$
          R(3,t) le
          begin{cases}
          R(3,t-1) + t - 1 & text{if $R(3,t-1)$ and $t$ are both even,} \
          R(3,t-1) + t & text{otherwise.}
          end{cases}
          $$

          (Okay, technically the first case applies if our upper bound on $R(3,t-1)$ is even, as well as $t$; it doesn't matter if the true value of $R(3,t-1)$ is odd.)



          Try this for small values. We have





          • $R(3,3) = 6$ as the base case.


          • $R(3,4) le 6 + 4 - 1 = 9$ since $6$ and $4$ are both even.


          • $R(3,5) le 9 + 5 = 14$.


          • $R(3,6) le 14 + 6 - 1 = 19$ since $14$ and $6$ are both even.


          And so on. It becomes clear that our upper bound on $R(3,t)$ will be odd for even $t$ and even for odd $t$, so that we subtract $-1$ every other step. This may be shown by induction.



          We subtract $1$ once for $t=5$, twice for $t=7$, three times for $t=9$, and so on, saving us a total of $frac{t-3}{2}$ for odd $t$. (For even $t$ it is $frac{t-2}{2}$, which is slightly better.) So the usual bound of $R(3,t) le frac{t^2+t}{2}$ improves to $R(3,t) le frac{t^2+t}{2} - frac{t-3}{2} = frac{t^2+3}{2}.$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            "Okay, technically the first case applies if our upper bound on R(3,t−1) is even, as well as t; it doesn't matter if the true value of R(3,t−1) is odd." That's what I hadn't understood. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – MateInTwo
            Jan 26 at 12:48













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086065%2fbounds-on-ramsey-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          Observe first that $R(2,t) = t$ since any $2$-coloring of $K_t$ either contains an edge of the first color, or else is a monochromatic $K_t$ of the second color.



          This, together with your recurrence for $R(s,t)$, gives:
          $$
          R(3,t) le
          begin{cases}
          R(3,t-1) + t - 1 & text{if $R(3,t-1)$ and $t$ are both even,} \
          R(3,t-1) + t & text{otherwise.}
          end{cases}
          $$

          (Okay, technically the first case applies if our upper bound on $R(3,t-1)$ is even, as well as $t$; it doesn't matter if the true value of $R(3,t-1)$ is odd.)



          Try this for small values. We have





          • $R(3,3) = 6$ as the base case.


          • $R(3,4) le 6 + 4 - 1 = 9$ since $6$ and $4$ are both even.


          • $R(3,5) le 9 + 5 = 14$.


          • $R(3,6) le 14 + 6 - 1 = 19$ since $14$ and $6$ are both even.


          And so on. It becomes clear that our upper bound on $R(3,t)$ will be odd for even $t$ and even for odd $t$, so that we subtract $-1$ every other step. This may be shown by induction.



          We subtract $1$ once for $t=5$, twice for $t=7$, three times for $t=9$, and so on, saving us a total of $frac{t-3}{2}$ for odd $t$. (For even $t$ it is $frac{t-2}{2}$, which is slightly better.) So the usual bound of $R(3,t) le frac{t^2+t}{2}$ improves to $R(3,t) le frac{t^2+t}{2} - frac{t-3}{2} = frac{t^2+3}{2}.$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            "Okay, technically the first case applies if our upper bound on R(3,t−1) is even, as well as t; it doesn't matter if the true value of R(3,t−1) is odd." That's what I hadn't understood. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – MateInTwo
            Jan 26 at 12:48


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Observe first that $R(2,t) = t$ since any $2$-coloring of $K_t$ either contains an edge of the first color, or else is a monochromatic $K_t$ of the second color.



          This, together with your recurrence for $R(s,t)$, gives:
          $$
          R(3,t) le
          begin{cases}
          R(3,t-1) + t - 1 & text{if $R(3,t-1)$ and $t$ are both even,} \
          R(3,t-1) + t & text{otherwise.}
          end{cases}
          $$

          (Okay, technically the first case applies if our upper bound on $R(3,t-1)$ is even, as well as $t$; it doesn't matter if the true value of $R(3,t-1)$ is odd.)



          Try this for small values. We have





          • $R(3,3) = 6$ as the base case.


          • $R(3,4) le 6 + 4 - 1 = 9$ since $6$ and $4$ are both even.


          • $R(3,5) le 9 + 5 = 14$.


          • $R(3,6) le 14 + 6 - 1 = 19$ since $14$ and $6$ are both even.


          And so on. It becomes clear that our upper bound on $R(3,t)$ will be odd for even $t$ and even for odd $t$, so that we subtract $-1$ every other step. This may be shown by induction.



          We subtract $1$ once for $t=5$, twice for $t=7$, three times for $t=9$, and so on, saving us a total of $frac{t-3}{2}$ for odd $t$. (For even $t$ it is $frac{t-2}{2}$, which is slightly better.) So the usual bound of $R(3,t) le frac{t^2+t}{2}$ improves to $R(3,t) le frac{t^2+t}{2} - frac{t-3}{2} = frac{t^2+3}{2}.$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            "Okay, technically the first case applies if our upper bound on R(3,t−1) is even, as well as t; it doesn't matter if the true value of R(3,t−1) is odd." That's what I hadn't understood. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – MateInTwo
            Jan 26 at 12:48
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Observe first that $R(2,t) = t$ since any $2$-coloring of $K_t$ either contains an edge of the first color, or else is a monochromatic $K_t$ of the second color.



          This, together with your recurrence for $R(s,t)$, gives:
          $$
          R(3,t) le
          begin{cases}
          R(3,t-1) + t - 1 & text{if $R(3,t-1)$ and $t$ are both even,} \
          R(3,t-1) + t & text{otherwise.}
          end{cases}
          $$

          (Okay, technically the first case applies if our upper bound on $R(3,t-1)$ is even, as well as $t$; it doesn't matter if the true value of $R(3,t-1)$ is odd.)



          Try this for small values. We have





          • $R(3,3) = 6$ as the base case.


          • $R(3,4) le 6 + 4 - 1 = 9$ since $6$ and $4$ are both even.


          • $R(3,5) le 9 + 5 = 14$.


          • $R(3,6) le 14 + 6 - 1 = 19$ since $14$ and $6$ are both even.


          And so on. It becomes clear that our upper bound on $R(3,t)$ will be odd for even $t$ and even for odd $t$, so that we subtract $-1$ every other step. This may be shown by induction.



          We subtract $1$ once for $t=5$, twice for $t=7$, three times for $t=9$, and so on, saving us a total of $frac{t-3}{2}$ for odd $t$. (For even $t$ it is $frac{t-2}{2}$, which is slightly better.) So the usual bound of $R(3,t) le frac{t^2+t}{2}$ improves to $R(3,t) le frac{t^2+t}{2} - frac{t-3}{2} = frac{t^2+3}{2}.$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Observe first that $R(2,t) = t$ since any $2$-coloring of $K_t$ either contains an edge of the first color, or else is a monochromatic $K_t$ of the second color.



          This, together with your recurrence for $R(s,t)$, gives:
          $$
          R(3,t) le
          begin{cases}
          R(3,t-1) + t - 1 & text{if $R(3,t-1)$ and $t$ are both even,} \
          R(3,t-1) + t & text{otherwise.}
          end{cases}
          $$

          (Okay, technically the first case applies if our upper bound on $R(3,t-1)$ is even, as well as $t$; it doesn't matter if the true value of $R(3,t-1)$ is odd.)



          Try this for small values. We have





          • $R(3,3) = 6$ as the base case.


          • $R(3,4) le 6 + 4 - 1 = 9$ since $6$ and $4$ are both even.


          • $R(3,5) le 9 + 5 = 14$.


          • $R(3,6) le 14 + 6 - 1 = 19$ since $14$ and $6$ are both even.


          And so on. It becomes clear that our upper bound on $R(3,t)$ will be odd for even $t$ and even for odd $t$, so that we subtract $-1$ every other step. This may be shown by induction.



          We subtract $1$ once for $t=5$, twice for $t=7$, three times for $t=9$, and so on, saving us a total of $frac{t-3}{2}$ for odd $t$. (For even $t$ it is $frac{t-2}{2}$, which is slightly better.) So the usual bound of $R(3,t) le frac{t^2+t}{2}$ improves to $R(3,t) le frac{t^2+t}{2} - frac{t-3}{2} = frac{t^2+3}{2}.$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 26 at 2:22









          Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

          47.3k657107




          47.3k657107












          • $begingroup$
            "Okay, technically the first case applies if our upper bound on R(3,t−1) is even, as well as t; it doesn't matter if the true value of R(3,t−1) is odd." That's what I hadn't understood. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – MateInTwo
            Jan 26 at 12:48




















          • $begingroup$
            "Okay, technically the first case applies if our upper bound on R(3,t−1) is even, as well as t; it doesn't matter if the true value of R(3,t−1) is odd." That's what I hadn't understood. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – MateInTwo
            Jan 26 at 12:48


















          $begingroup$
          "Okay, technically the first case applies if our upper bound on R(3,t−1) is even, as well as t; it doesn't matter if the true value of R(3,t−1) is odd." That's what I hadn't understood. Thank you.
          $endgroup$
          – MateInTwo
          Jan 26 at 12:48






          $begingroup$
          "Okay, technically the first case applies if our upper bound on R(3,t−1) is even, as well as t; it doesn't matter if the true value of R(3,t−1) is odd." That's what I hadn't understood. Thank you.
          $endgroup$
          – MateInTwo
          Jan 26 at 12:48




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086065%2fbounds-on-ramsey-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese