Compact operator on $L_2([0,1],m)$












0












$begingroup$


Consider the Hilbert space $H=L_2([0,1],m)$ where $m$ is the Lebesgue measure on the interval $[0,1]$. Let $T in mathcal{L}(H,H)$ given by
begin{equation*}
T f(x)=x f(x) f in H, x in[0,1]
end{equation*}

Is $T$ compact? I know that one way to prove that an operator is compact is to find a sequence of compact operator that converges to $T$. On the other side, to prove that $T$ is not compact, I should find a sequence such that its image doesn't admit a convergent subsequence.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Consider the Hilbert space $H=L_2([0,1],m)$ where $m$ is the Lebesgue measure on the interval $[0,1]$. Let $T in mathcal{L}(H,H)$ given by
    begin{equation*}
    T f(x)=x f(x) f in H, x in[0,1]
    end{equation*}

    Is $T$ compact? I know that one way to prove that an operator is compact is to find a sequence of compact operator that converges to $T$. On the other side, to prove that $T$ is not compact, I should find a sequence such that its image doesn't admit a convergent subsequence.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Consider the Hilbert space $H=L_2([0,1],m)$ where $m$ is the Lebesgue measure on the interval $[0,1]$. Let $T in mathcal{L}(H,H)$ given by
      begin{equation*}
      T f(x)=x f(x) f in H, x in[0,1]
      end{equation*}

      Is $T$ compact? I know that one way to prove that an operator is compact is to find a sequence of compact operator that converges to $T$. On the other side, to prove that $T$ is not compact, I should find a sequence such that its image doesn't admit a convergent subsequence.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Consider the Hilbert space $H=L_2([0,1],m)$ where $m$ is the Lebesgue measure on the interval $[0,1]$. Let $T in mathcal{L}(H,H)$ given by
      begin{equation*}
      T f(x)=x f(x) f in H, x in[0,1]
      end{equation*}

      Is $T$ compact? I know that one way to prove that an operator is compact is to find a sequence of compact operator that converges to $T$. On the other side, to prove that $T$ is not compact, I should find a sequence such that its image doesn't admit a convergent subsequence.







      functional-analysis hilbert-spaces compact-operators






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 17 at 10:00









      user289143user289143

      913313




      913313






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You can easily check that $T$ has no eigenvalues. However, $lambda=frac 1 2$ is in the spectrum but not in the point spectrum. Just try to solve for
          $$left( frac 1 2 - xright) f(x) = 1$$
          and see that no solution exists.
          But we know that the spectrum of a compact operator except zero consists only of eigenvalues. Hence the operator $T$ can not be compact.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            It is trivial to check that $T$ is a positive operator. Hence its norm is same as its spectral radius. If it is compact then the norm would be $0$ because it has no non-zero eigen values. Hence $T$ is not compact.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$





















              0












              $begingroup$

              Let $$s = sup_{|f|_2 leq 1} ,langle Tf,,frangle=1.$$



              It is quite easy to see that $s$ is not a maximum, so there exists some sequence $f_n$ such that $|f_n| leq 1$, and $langle Tf_n ,, f_n rangle rightarrow 1$.



              Assume that there is some converging subsequence $Tf_{varphi(n)} rightarrow g$. Then you easily get $langle g ,,f_{varphi(n)}rangle rightarrow 1$.



              We know there is a weakly converging subsequence $f_{varphi(psi(n))} rightarrow h$ thus $|g| leq 1$ and $|h| leq 1$ and their inner product is $1$, thus $g=h$ and their norm is $1$.



              Now, this entails (using the fact that $T$ is self-adjoint) that $Th=h$, which is impossible.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













                Your Answer





                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                });
                });
                }, "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076797%2fcompact-operator-on-l-20-1-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                1












                $begingroup$

                You can easily check that $T$ has no eigenvalues. However, $lambda=frac 1 2$ is in the spectrum but not in the point spectrum. Just try to solve for
                $$left( frac 1 2 - xright) f(x) = 1$$
                and see that no solution exists.
                But we know that the spectrum of a compact operator except zero consists only of eigenvalues. Hence the operator $T$ can not be compact.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  You can easily check that $T$ has no eigenvalues. However, $lambda=frac 1 2$ is in the spectrum but not in the point spectrum. Just try to solve for
                  $$left( frac 1 2 - xright) f(x) = 1$$
                  and see that no solution exists.
                  But we know that the spectrum of a compact operator except zero consists only of eigenvalues. Hence the operator $T$ can not be compact.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    You can easily check that $T$ has no eigenvalues. However, $lambda=frac 1 2$ is in the spectrum but not in the point spectrum. Just try to solve for
                    $$left( frac 1 2 - xright) f(x) = 1$$
                    and see that no solution exists.
                    But we know that the spectrum of a compact operator except zero consists only of eigenvalues. Hence the operator $T$ can not be compact.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    You can easily check that $T$ has no eigenvalues. However, $lambda=frac 1 2$ is in the spectrum but not in the point spectrum. Just try to solve for
                    $$left( frac 1 2 - xright) f(x) = 1$$
                    and see that no solution exists.
                    But we know that the spectrum of a compact operator except zero consists only of eigenvalues. Hence the operator $T$ can not be compact.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Jan 17 at 11:22

























                    answered Jan 17 at 10:51









                    ShashiShashi

                    7,1781628




                    7,1781628























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        It is trivial to check that $T$ is a positive operator. Hence its norm is same as its spectral radius. If it is compact then the norm would be $0$ because it has no non-zero eigen values. Hence $T$ is not compact.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          It is trivial to check that $T$ is a positive operator. Hence its norm is same as its spectral radius. If it is compact then the norm would be $0$ because it has no non-zero eigen values. Hence $T$ is not compact.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            It is trivial to check that $T$ is a positive operator. Hence its norm is same as its spectral radius. If it is compact then the norm would be $0$ because it has no non-zero eigen values. Hence $T$ is not compact.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            It is trivial to check that $T$ is a positive operator. Hence its norm is same as its spectral radius. If it is compact then the norm would be $0$ because it has no non-zero eigen values. Hence $T$ is not compact.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 17 at 10:14









                            Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

                            59.2k42161




                            59.2k42161























                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                Let $$s = sup_{|f|_2 leq 1} ,langle Tf,,frangle=1.$$



                                It is quite easy to see that $s$ is not a maximum, so there exists some sequence $f_n$ such that $|f_n| leq 1$, and $langle Tf_n ,, f_n rangle rightarrow 1$.



                                Assume that there is some converging subsequence $Tf_{varphi(n)} rightarrow g$. Then you easily get $langle g ,,f_{varphi(n)}rangle rightarrow 1$.



                                We know there is a weakly converging subsequence $f_{varphi(psi(n))} rightarrow h$ thus $|g| leq 1$ and $|h| leq 1$ and their inner product is $1$, thus $g=h$ and their norm is $1$.



                                Now, this entails (using the fact that $T$ is self-adjoint) that $Th=h$, which is impossible.






                                share|cite|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$


















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Let $$s = sup_{|f|_2 leq 1} ,langle Tf,,frangle=1.$$



                                  It is quite easy to see that $s$ is not a maximum, so there exists some sequence $f_n$ such that $|f_n| leq 1$, and $langle Tf_n ,, f_n rangle rightarrow 1$.



                                  Assume that there is some converging subsequence $Tf_{varphi(n)} rightarrow g$. Then you easily get $langle g ,,f_{varphi(n)}rangle rightarrow 1$.



                                  We know there is a weakly converging subsequence $f_{varphi(psi(n))} rightarrow h$ thus $|g| leq 1$ and $|h| leq 1$ and their inner product is $1$, thus $g=h$ and their norm is $1$.



                                  Now, this entails (using the fact that $T$ is self-adjoint) that $Th=h$, which is impossible.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$
















                                    0












                                    0








                                    0





                                    $begingroup$

                                    Let $$s = sup_{|f|_2 leq 1} ,langle Tf,,frangle=1.$$



                                    It is quite easy to see that $s$ is not a maximum, so there exists some sequence $f_n$ such that $|f_n| leq 1$, and $langle Tf_n ,, f_n rangle rightarrow 1$.



                                    Assume that there is some converging subsequence $Tf_{varphi(n)} rightarrow g$. Then you easily get $langle g ,,f_{varphi(n)}rangle rightarrow 1$.



                                    We know there is a weakly converging subsequence $f_{varphi(psi(n))} rightarrow h$ thus $|g| leq 1$ and $|h| leq 1$ and their inner product is $1$, thus $g=h$ and their norm is $1$.



                                    Now, this entails (using the fact that $T$ is self-adjoint) that $Th=h$, which is impossible.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    Let $$s = sup_{|f|_2 leq 1} ,langle Tf,,frangle=1.$$



                                    It is quite easy to see that $s$ is not a maximum, so there exists some sequence $f_n$ such that $|f_n| leq 1$, and $langle Tf_n ,, f_n rangle rightarrow 1$.



                                    Assume that there is some converging subsequence $Tf_{varphi(n)} rightarrow g$. Then you easily get $langle g ,,f_{varphi(n)}rangle rightarrow 1$.



                                    We know there is a weakly converging subsequence $f_{varphi(psi(n))} rightarrow h$ thus $|g| leq 1$ and $|h| leq 1$ and their inner product is $1$, thus $g=h$ and their norm is $1$.



                                    Now, this entails (using the fact that $T$ is self-adjoint) that $Th=h$, which is impossible.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer












                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer










                                    answered Jan 17 at 10:27









                                    MindlackMindlack

                                    3,86018




                                    3,86018






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076797%2fcompact-operator-on-l-20-1-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Mario Kart Wii

                                        What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                                        Antonio Litta Visconti Arese