A weird value obtained by using Cauchy Principal Value on $int_{-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{x^2}dx$












2












$begingroup$


so I'm trying to evaluate the integral in the title,



$$int_{-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{x^2}dx$$



by using complex plane integration. I've chosen my contour to be a infinte half circle with it's diameter on the real axis. (integration is preformed ccw).



when R tends to infinity, the arch part of the contour yields zero, and so we are left with the part along the real axis, which is the one I'm trying to evalute.



there are no other poles in my contour, only a second order pole at $z=0$ lying on it. the residue of this pole is $0$ so the integral sums up to be zero (by using Cauchy principal value.)



However my function is always positive and greater than $0$, so this doesn't make sense.



Any help would be appreciated






complex-analysis complex-integration







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Residue Theorem is not applicable when there is a pole on the contour.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 11:49










  • $begingroup$
    I took an infinitely small half cirlce around that point, so it only contributes half of what is did if it was inside my contour so it contributes ipiRes(z=0). but since the Res is 0 it contributes nothing.
    $endgroup$
    – user635635
    Jan 17 at 11:58










  • $begingroup$
    When there are serious questions about the very existence of the integral you are assuming that it exists and the integral over a line slightly below the real axis tend to integral over the real line. This is way off any rigorous argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 12:07










  • $begingroup$
    Note this is a reply to a comment below - I can't put the reply in its proper place because that answer is deleted: Yes, the integral over the small circle is $0$. But the integral over half of the small circle is not half the integral over the small circle.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Jan 17 at 15:16
















2












$begingroup$


so I'm trying to evaluate the integral in the title,



$$int_{-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{x^2}dx$$



by using complex plane integration. I've chosen my contour to be a infinte half circle with it's diameter on the real axis. (integration is preformed ccw).



when R tends to infinity, the arch part of the contour yields zero, and so we are left with the part along the real axis, which is the one I'm trying to evalute.



there are no other poles in my contour, only a second order pole at $z=0$ lying on it. the residue of this pole is $0$ so the integral sums up to be zero (by using Cauchy principal value.)



However my function is always positive and greater than $0$, so this doesn't make sense.



Any help would be appreciated






complex-analysis complex-integration







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Residue Theorem is not applicable when there is a pole on the contour.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 11:49










  • $begingroup$
    I took an infinitely small half cirlce around that point, so it only contributes half of what is did if it was inside my contour so it contributes ipiRes(z=0). but since the Res is 0 it contributes nothing.
    $endgroup$
    – user635635
    Jan 17 at 11:58










  • $begingroup$
    When there are serious questions about the very existence of the integral you are assuming that it exists and the integral over a line slightly below the real axis tend to integral over the real line. This is way off any rigorous argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 12:07










  • $begingroup$
    Note this is a reply to a comment below - I can't put the reply in its proper place because that answer is deleted: Yes, the integral over the small circle is $0$. But the integral over half of the small circle is not half the integral over the small circle.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Jan 17 at 15:16














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


so I'm trying to evaluate the integral in the title,



$$int_{-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{x^2}dx$$



by using complex plane integration. I've chosen my contour to be a infinte half circle with it's diameter on the real axis. (integration is preformed ccw).



when R tends to infinity, the arch part of the contour yields zero, and so we are left with the part along the real axis, which is the one I'm trying to evalute.



there are no other poles in my contour, only a second order pole at $z=0$ lying on it. the residue of this pole is $0$ so the integral sums up to be zero (by using Cauchy principal value.)



However my function is always positive and greater than $0$, so this doesn't make sense.



Any help would be appreciated






complex-analysis complex-integration







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




so I'm trying to evaluate the integral in the title,



$$int_{-infty}^{infty}frac{1}{x^2}dx$$



by using complex plane integration. I've chosen my contour to be a infinte half circle with it's diameter on the real axis. (integration is preformed ccw).



when R tends to infinity, the arch part of the contour yields zero, and so we are left with the part along the real axis, which is the one I'm trying to evalute.



there are no other poles in my contour, only a second order pole at $z=0$ lying on it. the residue of this pole is $0$ so the integral sums up to be zero (by using Cauchy principal value.)



However my function is always positive and greater than $0$, so this doesn't make sense.



Any help would be appreciated






complex-analysis complex-integration




complex-analysis complex-integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 17 at 12:25









Somos

13.7k11235




13.7k11235










asked Jan 17 at 11:44









user635635user635635

141




141












  • $begingroup$
    Residue Theorem is not applicable when there is a pole on the contour.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 11:49










  • $begingroup$
    I took an infinitely small half cirlce around that point, so it only contributes half of what is did if it was inside my contour so it contributes ipiRes(z=0). but since the Res is 0 it contributes nothing.
    $endgroup$
    – user635635
    Jan 17 at 11:58










  • $begingroup$
    When there are serious questions about the very existence of the integral you are assuming that it exists and the integral over a line slightly below the real axis tend to integral over the real line. This is way off any rigorous argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 12:07










  • $begingroup$
    Note this is a reply to a comment below - I can't put the reply in its proper place because that answer is deleted: Yes, the integral over the small circle is $0$. But the integral over half of the small circle is not half the integral over the small circle.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Jan 17 at 15:16


















  • $begingroup$
    Residue Theorem is not applicable when there is a pole on the contour.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 11:49










  • $begingroup$
    I took an infinitely small half cirlce around that point, so it only contributes half of what is did if it was inside my contour so it contributes ipiRes(z=0). but since the Res is 0 it contributes nothing.
    $endgroup$
    – user635635
    Jan 17 at 11:58










  • $begingroup$
    When there are serious questions about the very existence of the integral you are assuming that it exists and the integral over a line slightly below the real axis tend to integral over the real line. This is way off any rigorous argument.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 12:07










  • $begingroup$
    Note this is a reply to a comment below - I can't put the reply in its proper place because that answer is deleted: Yes, the integral over the small circle is $0$. But the integral over half of the small circle is not half the integral over the small circle.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Jan 17 at 15:16
















$begingroup$
Residue Theorem is not applicable when there is a pole on the contour.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 17 at 11:49




$begingroup$
Residue Theorem is not applicable when there is a pole on the contour.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 17 at 11:49












$begingroup$
I took an infinitely small half cirlce around that point, so it only contributes half of what is did if it was inside my contour so it contributes ipiRes(z=0). but since the Res is 0 it contributes nothing.
$endgroup$
– user635635
Jan 17 at 11:58




$begingroup$
I took an infinitely small half cirlce around that point, so it only contributes half of what is did if it was inside my contour so it contributes ipiRes(z=0). but since the Res is 0 it contributes nothing.
$endgroup$
– user635635
Jan 17 at 11:58












$begingroup$
When there are serious questions about the very existence of the integral you are assuming that it exists and the integral over a line slightly below the real axis tend to integral over the real line. This is way off any rigorous argument.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 17 at 12:07




$begingroup$
When there are serious questions about the very existence of the integral you are assuming that it exists and the integral over a line slightly below the real axis tend to integral over the real line. This is way off any rigorous argument.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 17 at 12:07












$begingroup$
Note this is a reply to a comment below - I can't put the reply in its proper place because that answer is deleted: Yes, the integral over the small circle is $0$. But the integral over half of the small circle is not half the integral over the small circle.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 17 at 15:16




$begingroup$
Note this is a reply to a comment below - I can't put the reply in its proper place because that answer is deleted: Yes, the integral over the small circle is $0$. But the integral over half of the small circle is not half the integral over the small circle.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 17 at 15:16










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The integral diverges even if you chose the principal value. To show this by using residue theorem, first chose a contour C composed by the following:
$$C_R: text{ big semicircle centered at origin, with radius $R$, counterclockwise}$$
$$C_1: text{ straight line from $-R$ to $-r$, towards $+infty$}$$
$$C_r: text{ small semicircle centered at origin, with radius $r$, clockwise}$$
$$C_2: text{ straight line from $R$ to $r$, towards $+infty$}$$
$$int_Cfrac{dz}{z^2}=0$$ by residue theorem.
$$int_{-infty}^inftyfrac{dx}{x^2}=0-lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{C_R}frac{dz}{z^2}-lim_{rto0}int_{C_r}frac{dz}{z^2}\
=0-0-(-infty)=infty$$
The calculation of the limits is left to readers.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    perhaps i should clarify that I'm doing this in order to find the integral over real line of (sinc{x})^2 which is pi. Works fine if I take the integral in the title to be zero, but as you said, I believe it should converge.
    $endgroup$
    – user635635
    Jan 17 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    @user635635, the integral in your title must diverge I promise. I think, your calculation may be wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – Kemono Chen
    Jan 17 at 12:08





















0












$begingroup$

Usually you'd need this kind of contour if you happen to have poles on the real axis. We take the small radius $rto 0$ and the large radius $Rtoinfty$. The value on the bigger half circle should decay fast enough so the value of the integral would depend on the limit of the smaller half circle.



You can see this example of a similar calculation.



fig 1






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You should probably mention explicitly that if $f==1/z^2$ then the integral over the smaller half-circle does not tend to $0$ as $rto0$.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Jan 17 at 15:13













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076881%2fa-weird-value-obtained-by-using-cauchy-principal-value-on-int-infty-inft%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

The integral diverges even if you chose the principal value. To show this by using residue theorem, first chose a contour C composed by the following:
$$C_R: text{ big semicircle centered at origin, with radius $R$, counterclockwise}$$
$$C_1: text{ straight line from $-R$ to $-r$, towards $+infty$}$$
$$C_r: text{ small semicircle centered at origin, with radius $r$, clockwise}$$
$$C_2: text{ straight line from $R$ to $r$, towards $+infty$}$$
$$int_Cfrac{dz}{z^2}=0$$ by residue theorem.
$$int_{-infty}^inftyfrac{dx}{x^2}=0-lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{C_R}frac{dz}{z^2}-lim_{rto0}int_{C_r}frac{dz}{z^2}\
=0-0-(-infty)=infty$$
The calculation of the limits is left to readers.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    perhaps i should clarify that I'm doing this in order to find the integral over real line of (sinc{x})^2 which is pi. Works fine if I take the integral in the title to be zero, but as you said, I believe it should converge.
    $endgroup$
    – user635635
    Jan 17 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    @user635635, the integral in your title must diverge I promise. I think, your calculation may be wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – Kemono Chen
    Jan 17 at 12:08


















1












$begingroup$

The integral diverges even if you chose the principal value. To show this by using residue theorem, first chose a contour C composed by the following:
$$C_R: text{ big semicircle centered at origin, with radius $R$, counterclockwise}$$
$$C_1: text{ straight line from $-R$ to $-r$, towards $+infty$}$$
$$C_r: text{ small semicircle centered at origin, with radius $r$, clockwise}$$
$$C_2: text{ straight line from $R$ to $r$, towards $+infty$}$$
$$int_Cfrac{dz}{z^2}=0$$ by residue theorem.
$$int_{-infty}^inftyfrac{dx}{x^2}=0-lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{C_R}frac{dz}{z^2}-lim_{rto0}int_{C_r}frac{dz}{z^2}\
=0-0-(-infty)=infty$$
The calculation of the limits is left to readers.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    perhaps i should clarify that I'm doing this in order to find the integral over real line of (sinc{x})^2 which is pi. Works fine if I take the integral in the title to be zero, but as you said, I believe it should converge.
    $endgroup$
    – user635635
    Jan 17 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    @user635635, the integral in your title must diverge I promise. I think, your calculation may be wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – Kemono Chen
    Jan 17 at 12:08
















1












1








1





$begingroup$

The integral diverges even if you chose the principal value. To show this by using residue theorem, first chose a contour C composed by the following:
$$C_R: text{ big semicircle centered at origin, with radius $R$, counterclockwise}$$
$$C_1: text{ straight line from $-R$ to $-r$, towards $+infty$}$$
$$C_r: text{ small semicircle centered at origin, with radius $r$, clockwise}$$
$$C_2: text{ straight line from $R$ to $r$, towards $+infty$}$$
$$int_Cfrac{dz}{z^2}=0$$ by residue theorem.
$$int_{-infty}^inftyfrac{dx}{x^2}=0-lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{C_R}frac{dz}{z^2}-lim_{rto0}int_{C_r}frac{dz}{z^2}\
=0-0-(-infty)=infty$$
The calculation of the limits is left to readers.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The integral diverges even if you chose the principal value. To show this by using residue theorem, first chose a contour C composed by the following:
$$C_R: text{ big semicircle centered at origin, with radius $R$, counterclockwise}$$
$$C_1: text{ straight line from $-R$ to $-r$, towards $+infty$}$$
$$C_r: text{ small semicircle centered at origin, with radius $r$, clockwise}$$
$$C_2: text{ straight line from $R$ to $r$, towards $+infty$}$$
$$int_Cfrac{dz}{z^2}=0$$ by residue theorem.
$$int_{-infty}^inftyfrac{dx}{x^2}=0-lim_{Rtoinfty}int_{C_R}frac{dz}{z^2}-lim_{rto0}int_{C_r}frac{dz}{z^2}\
=0-0-(-infty)=infty$$
The calculation of the limits is left to readers.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 17 at 11:58









Kemono ChenKemono Chen

3,0721743




3,0721743












  • $begingroup$
    perhaps i should clarify that I'm doing this in order to find the integral over real line of (sinc{x})^2 which is pi. Works fine if I take the integral in the title to be zero, but as you said, I believe it should converge.
    $endgroup$
    – user635635
    Jan 17 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    @user635635, the integral in your title must diverge I promise. I think, your calculation may be wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – Kemono Chen
    Jan 17 at 12:08




















  • $begingroup$
    perhaps i should clarify that I'm doing this in order to find the integral over real line of (sinc{x})^2 which is pi. Works fine if I take the integral in the title to be zero, but as you said, I believe it should converge.
    $endgroup$
    – user635635
    Jan 17 at 12:06










  • $begingroup$
    @user635635, the integral in your title must diverge I promise. I think, your calculation may be wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – Kemono Chen
    Jan 17 at 12:08


















$begingroup$
perhaps i should clarify that I'm doing this in order to find the integral over real line of (sinc{x})^2 which is pi. Works fine if I take the integral in the title to be zero, but as you said, I believe it should converge.
$endgroup$
– user635635
Jan 17 at 12:06




$begingroup$
perhaps i should clarify that I'm doing this in order to find the integral over real line of (sinc{x})^2 which is pi. Works fine if I take the integral in the title to be zero, but as you said, I believe it should converge.
$endgroup$
– user635635
Jan 17 at 12:06












$begingroup$
@user635635, the integral in your title must diverge I promise. I think, your calculation may be wrong.
$endgroup$
– Kemono Chen
Jan 17 at 12:08






$begingroup$
@user635635, the integral in your title must diverge I promise. I think, your calculation may be wrong.
$endgroup$
– Kemono Chen
Jan 17 at 12:08













0












$begingroup$

Usually you'd need this kind of contour if you happen to have poles on the real axis. We take the small radius $rto 0$ and the large radius $Rtoinfty$. The value on the bigger half circle should decay fast enough so the value of the integral would depend on the limit of the smaller half circle.



You can see this example of a similar calculation.



fig 1






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You should probably mention explicitly that if $f==1/z^2$ then the integral over the smaller half-circle does not tend to $0$ as $rto0$.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Jan 17 at 15:13


















0












$begingroup$

Usually you'd need this kind of contour if you happen to have poles on the real axis. We take the small radius $rto 0$ and the large radius $Rtoinfty$. The value on the bigger half circle should decay fast enough so the value of the integral would depend on the limit of the smaller half circle.



You can see this example of a similar calculation.



fig 1






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    You should probably mention explicitly that if $f==1/z^2$ then the integral over the smaller half-circle does not tend to $0$ as $rto0$.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Jan 17 at 15:13
















0












0








0





$begingroup$

Usually you'd need this kind of contour if you happen to have poles on the real axis. We take the small radius $rto 0$ and the large radius $Rtoinfty$. The value on the bigger half circle should decay fast enough so the value of the integral would depend on the limit of the smaller half circle.



You can see this example of a similar calculation.



fig 1






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Usually you'd need this kind of contour if you happen to have poles on the real axis. We take the small radius $rto 0$ and the large radius $Rtoinfty$. The value on the bigger half circle should decay fast enough so the value of the integral would depend on the limit of the smaller half circle.



You can see this example of a similar calculation.



fig 1







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 17 at 11:58









BigbearZzzBigbearZzz

8,69121652




8,69121652












  • $begingroup$
    You should probably mention explicitly that if $f==1/z^2$ then the integral over the smaller half-circle does not tend to $0$ as $rto0$.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Jan 17 at 15:13




















  • $begingroup$
    You should probably mention explicitly that if $f==1/z^2$ then the integral over the smaller half-circle does not tend to $0$ as $rto0$.
    $endgroup$
    – David C. Ullrich
    Jan 17 at 15:13


















$begingroup$
You should probably mention explicitly that if $f==1/z^2$ then the integral over the smaller half-circle does not tend to $0$ as $rto0$.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 17 at 15:13






$begingroup$
You should probably mention explicitly that if $f==1/z^2$ then the integral over the smaller half-circle does not tend to $0$ as $rto0$.
$endgroup$
– David C. Ullrich
Jan 17 at 15:13




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076881%2fa-weird-value-obtained-by-using-cauchy-principal-value-on-int-infty-inft%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

Image
Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
Read more

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Image
5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
Read more

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

Image
Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth From The Cutting Room Floor < The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth Jump to: navigation, search This is a sub-page of The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth . Afterbirth is the first expansion pack for Rebirth and features a variety of improvements. Contents 1 Unused Graphics 1.1 Old Man Keeper 1.2 Skinless Hush 1.3 Miscellaneous Unused Hush Sprites 1.4 Generosity achievement 1.5 Afterbirth+ Room Editor 1.6 Bearded Ultra Greed 1.7 Early Ultra Greed 1.8 Unused Brownie Expression 1.9 Frail's Spinning Head 1.10 Mom's Dead Hand Alt 2 Unused Audio 2.1 Unused Dead Womb Layer 2.2 Unused Hush Battle Outro 2.3 The Stain Grunt Unused Graphics Old Man Keeper Image file: gfxuimain me
Read more