Clarification required for the proof of Riemann Lebesgue Lemma












1












$begingroup$


Riemann Lebesgue Lemma Proof.



In the proof given above, I came across an unfamiliar notation $g= sum m_i chi_{[x_i-1,x_i]}$. What does the $chi$ mean here? Is it the characteristic function of the set $[x_i-1,x_i]$?



Please clarify in detail.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is the characteristic function.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 10:24










  • $begingroup$
    what role does it play in here?
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Jan 17 at 10:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It means $g$ is a step function: when $x in [x_{j-1}, x_j]$, $g(x) = m_j$.
    $endgroup$
    – xbh
    Jan 17 at 10:29






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    R-L Lemma is trivial when when the function you start with is the characteristic function of some closed interval. [Verify this!]. Hence it is true for linear combinations of such functions. The basic idea of the proof of R-L Lemma is to approximate the given function by a linear combination of characteristic functions of closed intervals.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 10:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. The appearance of $lambda $ in the denominator is what makes the whole things work.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 11:46


















1












$begingroup$


Riemann Lebesgue Lemma Proof.



In the proof given above, I came across an unfamiliar notation $g= sum m_i chi_{[x_i-1,x_i]}$. What does the $chi$ mean here? Is it the characteristic function of the set $[x_i-1,x_i]$?



Please clarify in detail.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is the characteristic function.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 10:24










  • $begingroup$
    what role does it play in here?
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Jan 17 at 10:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It means $g$ is a step function: when $x in [x_{j-1}, x_j]$, $g(x) = m_j$.
    $endgroup$
    – xbh
    Jan 17 at 10:29






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    R-L Lemma is trivial when when the function you start with is the characteristic function of some closed interval. [Verify this!]. Hence it is true for linear combinations of such functions. The basic idea of the proof of R-L Lemma is to approximate the given function by a linear combination of characteristic functions of closed intervals.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 10:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. The appearance of $lambda $ in the denominator is what makes the whole things work.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 11:46
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


Riemann Lebesgue Lemma Proof.



In the proof given above, I came across an unfamiliar notation $g= sum m_i chi_{[x_i-1,x_i]}$. What does the $chi$ mean here? Is it the characteristic function of the set $[x_i-1,x_i]$?



Please clarify in detail.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Riemann Lebesgue Lemma Proof.



In the proof given above, I came across an unfamiliar notation $g= sum m_i chi_{[x_i-1,x_i]}$. What does the $chi$ mean here? Is it the characteristic function of the set $[x_i-1,x_i]$?



Please clarify in detail.







proof-explanation riemann-integration






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 17 at 10:23









Subhasis BiswasSubhasis Biswas

493311




493311








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is the characteristic function.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 10:24










  • $begingroup$
    what role does it play in here?
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Jan 17 at 10:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It means $g$ is a step function: when $x in [x_{j-1}, x_j]$, $g(x) = m_j$.
    $endgroup$
    – xbh
    Jan 17 at 10:29






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    R-L Lemma is trivial when when the function you start with is the characteristic function of some closed interval. [Verify this!]. Hence it is true for linear combinations of such functions. The basic idea of the proof of R-L Lemma is to approximate the given function by a linear combination of characteristic functions of closed intervals.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 10:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. The appearance of $lambda $ in the denominator is what makes the whole things work.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 11:46
















  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is the characteristic function.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 10:24










  • $begingroup$
    what role does it play in here?
    $endgroup$
    – Subhasis Biswas
    Jan 17 at 10:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It means $g$ is a step function: when $x in [x_{j-1}, x_j]$, $g(x) = m_j$.
    $endgroup$
    – xbh
    Jan 17 at 10:29






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    R-L Lemma is trivial when when the function you start with is the characteristic function of some closed interval. [Verify this!]. Hence it is true for linear combinations of such functions. The basic idea of the proof of R-L Lemma is to approximate the given function by a linear combination of characteristic functions of closed intervals.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 10:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. The appearance of $lambda $ in the denominator is what makes the whole things work.
    $endgroup$
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 17 at 11:46










2




2




$begingroup$
Yes, it is the characteristic function.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 17 at 10:24




$begingroup$
Yes, it is the characteristic function.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 17 at 10:24












$begingroup$
what role does it play in here?
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Jan 17 at 10:25




$begingroup$
what role does it play in here?
$endgroup$
– Subhasis Biswas
Jan 17 at 10:25




1




1




$begingroup$
It means $g$ is a step function: when $x in [x_{j-1}, x_j]$, $g(x) = m_j$.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 17 at 10:29




$begingroup$
It means $g$ is a step function: when $x in [x_{j-1}, x_j]$, $g(x) = m_j$.
$endgroup$
– xbh
Jan 17 at 10:29




2




2




$begingroup$
R-L Lemma is trivial when when the function you start with is the characteristic function of some closed interval. [Verify this!]. Hence it is true for linear combinations of such functions. The basic idea of the proof of R-L Lemma is to approximate the given function by a linear combination of characteristic functions of closed intervals.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 17 at 10:31




$begingroup$
R-L Lemma is trivial when when the function you start with is the characteristic function of some closed interval. [Verify this!]. Hence it is true for linear combinations of such functions. The basic idea of the proof of R-L Lemma is to approximate the given function by a linear combination of characteristic functions of closed intervals.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 17 at 10:31




1




1




$begingroup$
Yes. The appearance of $lambda $ in the denominator is what makes the whole things work.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 17 at 11:46






$begingroup$
Yes. The appearance of $lambda $ in the denominator is what makes the whole things work.
$endgroup$
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 17 at 11:46












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076817%2fclarification-required-for-the-proof-of-riemann-lebesgue-lemma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3076817%2fclarification-required-for-the-proof-of-riemann-lebesgue-lemma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth