Using energy method to existence and uniquesness the following PDE .
$begingroup$
Approach : Find the energy functional :
$int_Omega nabla u nabla v int_Omega |u| u.v -int_Omega fu=0 forall u in H_0^1(Omega) cap L^3(Omega)$
$implies E(u)=int_Omegafrac{1}{2} |nabla u|^2+frac{1}{3} |u|^3 -fu dx$
If $u$ solves $min_{u in A} E(u)$ with $A={}uin H_0^1( Omega)cap L^3(Omega)$ then for any $vin A$ we have
$0=frac{d}{depsilon}E(u+epsilon v)=intfrac {d}{depsilon}|nabla(u+epsilon v)|^2 +frac{1}{3} |u+epsilon v|^3 -f(u+epsilon v)dx$
$$=int(nabla u. nabla v +|u|v -fv) dx$$
Remark: There seems to be a problem while differentiating with respect to $epsilon$ the term $|u+epsilon v|^3$ , how do I resolve it ?
Next : Can I say that $u$ is a weak solution now ? If I could then would proceed further this way If
$A$ is not a null set , then $exists (u_k)_{kin mathbb N} subset A$
$$lim_{ktoinfty}u_k=inf_{uin A} E(u)$$
Assume $u_k$ is not bounded in $H_0^1 $
$$E(u_k)ge int_Omega frac {|nabla u_k|^2}{2}-fu_k dx ge frac{1}{2} ||nabla u||_{L^2}-C ||f||_{L^2} ||nabla u_k||_{L^2(Omega)}$$
I am stuck now , How do I proceed further ?
Thanks.
pde
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Approach : Find the energy functional :
$int_Omega nabla u nabla v int_Omega |u| u.v -int_Omega fu=0 forall u in H_0^1(Omega) cap L^3(Omega)$
$implies E(u)=int_Omegafrac{1}{2} |nabla u|^2+frac{1}{3} |u|^3 -fu dx$
If $u$ solves $min_{u in A} E(u)$ with $A={}uin H_0^1( Omega)cap L^3(Omega)$ then for any $vin A$ we have
$0=frac{d}{depsilon}E(u+epsilon v)=intfrac {d}{depsilon}|nabla(u+epsilon v)|^2 +frac{1}{3} |u+epsilon v|^3 -f(u+epsilon v)dx$
$$=int(nabla u. nabla v +|u|v -fv) dx$$
Remark: There seems to be a problem while differentiating with respect to $epsilon$ the term $|u+epsilon v|^3$ , how do I resolve it ?
Next : Can I say that $u$ is a weak solution now ? If I could then would proceed further this way If
$A$ is not a null set , then $exists (u_k)_{kin mathbb N} subset A$
$$lim_{ktoinfty}u_k=inf_{uin A} E(u)$$
Assume $u_k$ is not bounded in $H_0^1 $
$$E(u_k)ge int_Omega frac {|nabla u_k|^2}{2}-fu_k dx ge frac{1}{2} ||nabla u||_{L^2}-C ||f||_{L^2} ||nabla u_k||_{L^2(Omega)}$$
I am stuck now , How do I proceed further ?
Thanks.
pde
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Approach : Find the energy functional :
$int_Omega nabla u nabla v int_Omega |u| u.v -int_Omega fu=0 forall u in H_0^1(Omega) cap L^3(Omega)$
$implies E(u)=int_Omegafrac{1}{2} |nabla u|^2+frac{1}{3} |u|^3 -fu dx$
If $u$ solves $min_{u in A} E(u)$ with $A={}uin H_0^1( Omega)cap L^3(Omega)$ then for any $vin A$ we have
$0=frac{d}{depsilon}E(u+epsilon v)=intfrac {d}{depsilon}|nabla(u+epsilon v)|^2 +frac{1}{3} |u+epsilon v|^3 -f(u+epsilon v)dx$
$$=int(nabla u. nabla v +|u|v -fv) dx$$
Remark: There seems to be a problem while differentiating with respect to $epsilon$ the term $|u+epsilon v|^3$ , how do I resolve it ?
Next : Can I say that $u$ is a weak solution now ? If I could then would proceed further this way If
$A$ is not a null set , then $exists (u_k)_{kin mathbb N} subset A$
$$lim_{ktoinfty}u_k=inf_{uin A} E(u)$$
Assume $u_k$ is not bounded in $H_0^1 $
$$E(u_k)ge int_Omega frac {|nabla u_k|^2}{2}-fu_k dx ge frac{1}{2} ||nabla u||_{L^2}-C ||f||_{L^2} ||nabla u_k||_{L^2(Omega)}$$
I am stuck now , How do I proceed further ?
Thanks.
pde
$endgroup$
Approach : Find the energy functional :
$int_Omega nabla u nabla v int_Omega |u| u.v -int_Omega fu=0 forall u in H_0^1(Omega) cap L^3(Omega)$
$implies E(u)=int_Omegafrac{1}{2} |nabla u|^2+frac{1}{3} |u|^3 -fu dx$
If $u$ solves $min_{u in A} E(u)$ with $A={}uin H_0^1( Omega)cap L^3(Omega)$ then for any $vin A$ we have
$0=frac{d}{depsilon}E(u+epsilon v)=intfrac {d}{depsilon}|nabla(u+epsilon v)|^2 +frac{1}{3} |u+epsilon v|^3 -f(u+epsilon v)dx$
$$=int(nabla u. nabla v +|u|v -fv) dx$$
Remark: There seems to be a problem while differentiating with respect to $epsilon$ the term $|u+epsilon v|^3$ , how do I resolve it ?
Next : Can I say that $u$ is a weak solution now ? If I could then would proceed further this way If
$A$ is not a null set , then $exists (u_k)_{kin mathbb N} subset A$
$$lim_{ktoinfty}u_k=inf_{uin A} E(u)$$
Assume $u_k$ is not bounded in $H_0^1 $
$$E(u_k)ge int_Omega frac {|nabla u_k|^2}{2}-fu_k dx ge frac{1}{2} ||nabla u||_{L^2}-C ||f||_{L^2} ||nabla u_k||_{L^2(Omega)}$$
I am stuck now , How do I proceed further ?
Thanks.
pde
pde
edited Jan 25 at 8:05
dmtri
1,5802521
1,5802521
asked Jul 23 '12 at 12:07
TheoremTheorem
3,37333374
3,37333374
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Concerning the differentiation of $epsilonmapsto |u+epsilon v|^3$. The function $g(x)=|x|^3$ is in $C^2(mathbb R)$ with $g,'(x)=3x|x|$ and $g,''(x)=6|x|$. Notably, $g$ is convex, which makes the entire functional $E$ convex; we need this for its lower semicontinuity with respect to the weak convergence in $A$.
But to begin with, we want to show that $E$ is bounded from below on $A$; otherwise the entire approach is doomed. The only question is what to do with $int-fu$: suppressing the urge to use Holder's inequality, I would write $-fuge -frac12f^2-frac12 u^2$. Here the integral of $f^2$ is a finite constant and $u^2le frac12|u|^3+8$ pointwise. It follows that $E$ is bounded from below: $E(u)ge int (frac12|nabla u|^2+frac{1}{12}|u|^3-frac12f^2-8)$ or something of the kind. Note that I bounded $u^2$ by a small multiple of $|u|^3$ in order to have some of the cubic term left over. This will be useful in a moment.
Pick a minimizing sequence $u_kin A$ as you've done already. The lower bound for $E(u)$ in the previous paragraph tells us that $int|nabla u_k|^2$ and $int|u_k|^3$ are uniformly bounded. Thus, the sequences is bounded in $H_0^1$ and in $L^3$. Pick a weakly convergent subsequence in $H_0^1$; extract from it a weakly convergent subsequence in $L^3$. The lower semicontinuity of $E$ implies $E(u)=min_A E$ where $u$ is the weak limit.
And yes, having $int (nabla ucdotnabla v +frac13 u|u|v-fv)=0$ for all test functions $v$ (you only need to consider $C^infty$-smooth $v$ with compact support) means that $u$ is a weak solution; this is what weak solution means. The boundary condition $u=0$ is automatically fulfilled since we work in $H_0^1$ all the time.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Jul 25 '12 at 22:28
$begingroup$
@Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
$endgroup$
– user31373
Jul 26 '12 at 0:08
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f174203%2fusing-energy-method-to-existence-and-uniquesness-the-following-pde%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Concerning the differentiation of $epsilonmapsto |u+epsilon v|^3$. The function $g(x)=|x|^3$ is in $C^2(mathbb R)$ with $g,'(x)=3x|x|$ and $g,''(x)=6|x|$. Notably, $g$ is convex, which makes the entire functional $E$ convex; we need this for its lower semicontinuity with respect to the weak convergence in $A$.
But to begin with, we want to show that $E$ is bounded from below on $A$; otherwise the entire approach is doomed. The only question is what to do with $int-fu$: suppressing the urge to use Holder's inequality, I would write $-fuge -frac12f^2-frac12 u^2$. Here the integral of $f^2$ is a finite constant and $u^2le frac12|u|^3+8$ pointwise. It follows that $E$ is bounded from below: $E(u)ge int (frac12|nabla u|^2+frac{1}{12}|u|^3-frac12f^2-8)$ or something of the kind. Note that I bounded $u^2$ by a small multiple of $|u|^3$ in order to have some of the cubic term left over. This will be useful in a moment.
Pick a minimizing sequence $u_kin A$ as you've done already. The lower bound for $E(u)$ in the previous paragraph tells us that $int|nabla u_k|^2$ and $int|u_k|^3$ are uniformly bounded. Thus, the sequences is bounded in $H_0^1$ and in $L^3$. Pick a weakly convergent subsequence in $H_0^1$; extract from it a weakly convergent subsequence in $L^3$. The lower semicontinuity of $E$ implies $E(u)=min_A E$ where $u$ is the weak limit.
And yes, having $int (nabla ucdotnabla v +frac13 u|u|v-fv)=0$ for all test functions $v$ (you only need to consider $C^infty$-smooth $v$ with compact support) means that $u$ is a weak solution; this is what weak solution means. The boundary condition $u=0$ is automatically fulfilled since we work in $H_0^1$ all the time.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Jul 25 '12 at 22:28
$begingroup$
@Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
$endgroup$
– user31373
Jul 26 '12 at 0:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Concerning the differentiation of $epsilonmapsto |u+epsilon v|^3$. The function $g(x)=|x|^3$ is in $C^2(mathbb R)$ with $g,'(x)=3x|x|$ and $g,''(x)=6|x|$. Notably, $g$ is convex, which makes the entire functional $E$ convex; we need this for its lower semicontinuity with respect to the weak convergence in $A$.
But to begin with, we want to show that $E$ is bounded from below on $A$; otherwise the entire approach is doomed. The only question is what to do with $int-fu$: suppressing the urge to use Holder's inequality, I would write $-fuge -frac12f^2-frac12 u^2$. Here the integral of $f^2$ is a finite constant and $u^2le frac12|u|^3+8$ pointwise. It follows that $E$ is bounded from below: $E(u)ge int (frac12|nabla u|^2+frac{1}{12}|u|^3-frac12f^2-8)$ or something of the kind. Note that I bounded $u^2$ by a small multiple of $|u|^3$ in order to have some of the cubic term left over. This will be useful in a moment.
Pick a minimizing sequence $u_kin A$ as you've done already. The lower bound for $E(u)$ in the previous paragraph tells us that $int|nabla u_k|^2$ and $int|u_k|^3$ are uniformly bounded. Thus, the sequences is bounded in $H_0^1$ and in $L^3$. Pick a weakly convergent subsequence in $H_0^1$; extract from it a weakly convergent subsequence in $L^3$. The lower semicontinuity of $E$ implies $E(u)=min_A E$ where $u$ is the weak limit.
And yes, having $int (nabla ucdotnabla v +frac13 u|u|v-fv)=0$ for all test functions $v$ (you only need to consider $C^infty$-smooth $v$ with compact support) means that $u$ is a weak solution; this is what weak solution means. The boundary condition $u=0$ is automatically fulfilled since we work in $H_0^1$ all the time.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Jul 25 '12 at 22:28
$begingroup$
@Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
$endgroup$
– user31373
Jul 26 '12 at 0:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Concerning the differentiation of $epsilonmapsto |u+epsilon v|^3$. The function $g(x)=|x|^3$ is in $C^2(mathbb R)$ with $g,'(x)=3x|x|$ and $g,''(x)=6|x|$. Notably, $g$ is convex, which makes the entire functional $E$ convex; we need this for its lower semicontinuity with respect to the weak convergence in $A$.
But to begin with, we want to show that $E$ is bounded from below on $A$; otherwise the entire approach is doomed. The only question is what to do with $int-fu$: suppressing the urge to use Holder's inequality, I would write $-fuge -frac12f^2-frac12 u^2$. Here the integral of $f^2$ is a finite constant and $u^2le frac12|u|^3+8$ pointwise. It follows that $E$ is bounded from below: $E(u)ge int (frac12|nabla u|^2+frac{1}{12}|u|^3-frac12f^2-8)$ or something of the kind. Note that I bounded $u^2$ by a small multiple of $|u|^3$ in order to have some of the cubic term left over. This will be useful in a moment.
Pick a minimizing sequence $u_kin A$ as you've done already. The lower bound for $E(u)$ in the previous paragraph tells us that $int|nabla u_k|^2$ and $int|u_k|^3$ are uniformly bounded. Thus, the sequences is bounded in $H_0^1$ and in $L^3$. Pick a weakly convergent subsequence in $H_0^1$; extract from it a weakly convergent subsequence in $L^3$. The lower semicontinuity of $E$ implies $E(u)=min_A E$ where $u$ is the weak limit.
And yes, having $int (nabla ucdotnabla v +frac13 u|u|v-fv)=0$ for all test functions $v$ (you only need to consider $C^infty$-smooth $v$ with compact support) means that $u$ is a weak solution; this is what weak solution means. The boundary condition $u=0$ is automatically fulfilled since we work in $H_0^1$ all the time.
$endgroup$
Concerning the differentiation of $epsilonmapsto |u+epsilon v|^3$. The function $g(x)=|x|^3$ is in $C^2(mathbb R)$ with $g,'(x)=3x|x|$ and $g,''(x)=6|x|$. Notably, $g$ is convex, which makes the entire functional $E$ convex; we need this for its lower semicontinuity with respect to the weak convergence in $A$.
But to begin with, we want to show that $E$ is bounded from below on $A$; otherwise the entire approach is doomed. The only question is what to do with $int-fu$: suppressing the urge to use Holder's inequality, I would write $-fuge -frac12f^2-frac12 u^2$. Here the integral of $f^2$ is a finite constant and $u^2le frac12|u|^3+8$ pointwise. It follows that $E$ is bounded from below: $E(u)ge int (frac12|nabla u|^2+frac{1}{12}|u|^3-frac12f^2-8)$ or something of the kind. Note that I bounded $u^2$ by a small multiple of $|u|^3$ in order to have some of the cubic term left over. This will be useful in a moment.
Pick a minimizing sequence $u_kin A$ as you've done already. The lower bound for $E(u)$ in the previous paragraph tells us that $int|nabla u_k|^2$ and $int|u_k|^3$ are uniformly bounded. Thus, the sequences is bounded in $H_0^1$ and in $L^3$. Pick a weakly convergent subsequence in $H_0^1$; extract from it a weakly convergent subsequence in $L^3$. The lower semicontinuity of $E$ implies $E(u)=min_A E$ where $u$ is the weak limit.
And yes, having $int (nabla ucdotnabla v +frac13 u|u|v-fv)=0$ for all test functions $v$ (you only need to consider $C^infty$-smooth $v$ with compact support) means that $u$ is a weak solution; this is what weak solution means. The boundary condition $u=0$ is automatically fulfilled since we work in $H_0^1$ all the time.
answered Jul 25 '12 at 0:01
user31373
$begingroup$
Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Jul 25 '12 at 22:28
$begingroup$
@Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
$endgroup$
– user31373
Jul 26 '12 at 0:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Jul 25 '12 at 22:28
$begingroup$
@Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
$endgroup$
– user31373
Jul 26 '12 at 0:08
$begingroup$
Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Jul 25 '12 at 22:28
$begingroup$
Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
$endgroup$
– Theorem
Jul 25 '12 at 22:28
$begingroup$
@Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
$endgroup$
– user31373
Jul 26 '12 at 0:08
$begingroup$
@Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
$endgroup$
– user31373
Jul 26 '12 at 0:08
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f174203%2fusing-energy-method-to-existence-and-uniquesness-the-following-pde%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown