Using energy method to existence and uniquesness the following PDE .












3












$begingroup$


enter image description here



Approach : Find the energy functional :
$int_Omega nabla u nabla v int_Omega |u| u.v -int_Omega fu=0 forall u in H_0^1(Omega) cap L^3(Omega)$



$implies E(u)=int_Omegafrac{1}{2} |nabla u|^2+frac{1}{3} |u|^3 -fu dx$



If $u$ solves $min_{u in A} E(u)$ with $A={}uin H_0^1( Omega)cap L^3(Omega)$ then for any $vin A$ we have



$0=frac{d}{depsilon}E(u+epsilon v)=intfrac {d}{depsilon}|nabla(u+epsilon v)|^2 +frac{1}{3} |u+epsilon v|^3 -f(u+epsilon v)dx$
$$=int(nabla u. nabla v +|u|v -fv) dx$$



Remark: There seems to be a problem while differentiating with respect to $epsilon$ the term $|u+epsilon v|^3$ , how do I resolve it ?



Next : Can I say that $u$ is a weak solution now ? If I could then would proceed further this way If
$A$ is not a null set , then $exists (u_k)_{kin mathbb N} subset A$



$$lim_{ktoinfty}u_k=inf_{uin A} E(u)$$



Assume $u_k$ is not bounded in $H_0^1 $
$$E(u_k)ge int_Omega frac {|nabla u_k|^2}{2}-fu_k dx ge frac{1}{2} ||nabla u||_{L^2}-C ||f||_{L^2} ||nabla u_k||_{L^2(Omega)}$$



I am stuck now , How do I proceed further ?
Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    enter image description here



    Approach : Find the energy functional :
    $int_Omega nabla u nabla v int_Omega |u| u.v -int_Omega fu=0 forall u in H_0^1(Omega) cap L^3(Omega)$



    $implies E(u)=int_Omegafrac{1}{2} |nabla u|^2+frac{1}{3} |u|^3 -fu dx$



    If $u$ solves $min_{u in A} E(u)$ with $A={}uin H_0^1( Omega)cap L^3(Omega)$ then for any $vin A$ we have



    $0=frac{d}{depsilon}E(u+epsilon v)=intfrac {d}{depsilon}|nabla(u+epsilon v)|^2 +frac{1}{3} |u+epsilon v|^3 -f(u+epsilon v)dx$
    $$=int(nabla u. nabla v +|u|v -fv) dx$$



    Remark: There seems to be a problem while differentiating with respect to $epsilon$ the term $|u+epsilon v|^3$ , how do I resolve it ?



    Next : Can I say that $u$ is a weak solution now ? If I could then would proceed further this way If
    $A$ is not a null set , then $exists (u_k)_{kin mathbb N} subset A$



    $$lim_{ktoinfty}u_k=inf_{uin A} E(u)$$



    Assume $u_k$ is not bounded in $H_0^1 $
    $$E(u_k)ge int_Omega frac {|nabla u_k|^2}{2}-fu_k dx ge frac{1}{2} ||nabla u||_{L^2}-C ||f||_{L^2} ||nabla u_k||_{L^2(Omega)}$$



    I am stuck now , How do I proceed further ?
    Thanks.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      enter image description here



      Approach : Find the energy functional :
      $int_Omega nabla u nabla v int_Omega |u| u.v -int_Omega fu=0 forall u in H_0^1(Omega) cap L^3(Omega)$



      $implies E(u)=int_Omegafrac{1}{2} |nabla u|^2+frac{1}{3} |u|^3 -fu dx$



      If $u$ solves $min_{u in A} E(u)$ with $A={}uin H_0^1( Omega)cap L^3(Omega)$ then for any $vin A$ we have



      $0=frac{d}{depsilon}E(u+epsilon v)=intfrac {d}{depsilon}|nabla(u+epsilon v)|^2 +frac{1}{3} |u+epsilon v|^3 -f(u+epsilon v)dx$
      $$=int(nabla u. nabla v +|u|v -fv) dx$$



      Remark: There seems to be a problem while differentiating with respect to $epsilon$ the term $|u+epsilon v|^3$ , how do I resolve it ?



      Next : Can I say that $u$ is a weak solution now ? If I could then would proceed further this way If
      $A$ is not a null set , then $exists (u_k)_{kin mathbb N} subset A$



      $$lim_{ktoinfty}u_k=inf_{uin A} E(u)$$



      Assume $u_k$ is not bounded in $H_0^1 $
      $$E(u_k)ge int_Omega frac {|nabla u_k|^2}{2}-fu_k dx ge frac{1}{2} ||nabla u||_{L^2}-C ||f||_{L^2} ||nabla u_k||_{L^2(Omega)}$$



      I am stuck now , How do I proceed further ?
      Thanks.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      enter image description here



      Approach : Find the energy functional :
      $int_Omega nabla u nabla v int_Omega |u| u.v -int_Omega fu=0 forall u in H_0^1(Omega) cap L^3(Omega)$



      $implies E(u)=int_Omegafrac{1}{2} |nabla u|^2+frac{1}{3} |u|^3 -fu dx$



      If $u$ solves $min_{u in A} E(u)$ with $A={}uin H_0^1( Omega)cap L^3(Omega)$ then for any $vin A$ we have



      $0=frac{d}{depsilon}E(u+epsilon v)=intfrac {d}{depsilon}|nabla(u+epsilon v)|^2 +frac{1}{3} |u+epsilon v|^3 -f(u+epsilon v)dx$
      $$=int(nabla u. nabla v +|u|v -fv) dx$$



      Remark: There seems to be a problem while differentiating with respect to $epsilon$ the term $|u+epsilon v|^3$ , how do I resolve it ?



      Next : Can I say that $u$ is a weak solution now ? If I could then would proceed further this way If
      $A$ is not a null set , then $exists (u_k)_{kin mathbb N} subset A$



      $$lim_{ktoinfty}u_k=inf_{uin A} E(u)$$



      Assume $u_k$ is not bounded in $H_0^1 $
      $$E(u_k)ge int_Omega frac {|nabla u_k|^2}{2}-fu_k dx ge frac{1}{2} ||nabla u||_{L^2}-C ||f||_{L^2} ||nabla u_k||_{L^2(Omega)}$$



      I am stuck now , How do I proceed further ?
      Thanks.







      pde






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 25 at 8:05









      dmtri

      1,5802521




      1,5802521










      asked Jul 23 '12 at 12:07









      TheoremTheorem

      3,37333374




      3,37333374






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Concerning the differentiation of $epsilonmapsto |u+epsilon v|^3$. The function $g(x)=|x|^3$ is in $C^2(mathbb R)$ with $g,'(x)=3x|x|$ and $g,''(x)=6|x|$. Notably, $g$ is convex, which makes the entire functional $E$ convex; we need this for its lower semicontinuity with respect to the weak convergence in $A$.



          But to begin with, we want to show that $E$ is bounded from below on $A$; otherwise the entire approach is doomed. The only question is what to do with $int-fu$: suppressing the urge to use Holder's inequality, I would write $-fuge -frac12f^2-frac12 u^2$. Here the integral of $f^2$ is a finite constant and $u^2le frac12|u|^3+8$ pointwise. It follows that $E$ is bounded from below: $E(u)ge int (frac12|nabla u|^2+frac{1}{12}|u|^3-frac12f^2-8)$ or something of the kind. Note that I bounded $u^2$ by a small multiple of $|u|^3$ in order to have some of the cubic term left over. This will be useful in a moment.



          Pick a minimizing sequence $u_kin A$ as you've done already. The lower bound for $E(u)$ in the previous paragraph tells us that $int|nabla u_k|^2$ and $int|u_k|^3$ are uniformly bounded. Thus, the sequences is bounded in $H_0^1$ and in $L^3$. Pick a weakly convergent subsequence in $H_0^1$; extract from it a weakly convergent subsequence in $L^3$. The lower semicontinuity of $E$ implies $E(u)=min_A E$ where $u$ is the weak limit.



          And yes, having $int (nabla ucdotnabla v +frac13 u|u|v-fv)=0$ for all test functions $v$ (you only need to consider $C^infty$-smooth $v$ with compact support) means that $u$ is a weak solution; this is what weak solution means. The boundary condition $u=0$ is automatically fulfilled since we work in $H_0^1$ all the time.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
            $endgroup$
            – Theorem
            Jul 25 '12 at 22:28










          • $begingroup$
            @Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
            $endgroup$
            – user31373
            Jul 26 '12 at 0:08











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f174203%2fusing-energy-method-to-existence-and-uniquesness-the-following-pde%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          Concerning the differentiation of $epsilonmapsto |u+epsilon v|^3$. The function $g(x)=|x|^3$ is in $C^2(mathbb R)$ with $g,'(x)=3x|x|$ and $g,''(x)=6|x|$. Notably, $g$ is convex, which makes the entire functional $E$ convex; we need this for its lower semicontinuity with respect to the weak convergence in $A$.



          But to begin with, we want to show that $E$ is bounded from below on $A$; otherwise the entire approach is doomed. The only question is what to do with $int-fu$: suppressing the urge to use Holder's inequality, I would write $-fuge -frac12f^2-frac12 u^2$. Here the integral of $f^2$ is a finite constant and $u^2le frac12|u|^3+8$ pointwise. It follows that $E$ is bounded from below: $E(u)ge int (frac12|nabla u|^2+frac{1}{12}|u|^3-frac12f^2-8)$ or something of the kind. Note that I bounded $u^2$ by a small multiple of $|u|^3$ in order to have some of the cubic term left over. This will be useful in a moment.



          Pick a minimizing sequence $u_kin A$ as you've done already. The lower bound for $E(u)$ in the previous paragraph tells us that $int|nabla u_k|^2$ and $int|u_k|^3$ are uniformly bounded. Thus, the sequences is bounded in $H_0^1$ and in $L^3$. Pick a weakly convergent subsequence in $H_0^1$; extract from it a weakly convergent subsequence in $L^3$. The lower semicontinuity of $E$ implies $E(u)=min_A E$ where $u$ is the weak limit.



          And yes, having $int (nabla ucdotnabla v +frac13 u|u|v-fv)=0$ for all test functions $v$ (you only need to consider $C^infty$-smooth $v$ with compact support) means that $u$ is a weak solution; this is what weak solution means. The boundary condition $u=0$ is automatically fulfilled since we work in $H_0^1$ all the time.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
            $endgroup$
            – Theorem
            Jul 25 '12 at 22:28










          • $begingroup$
            @Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
            $endgroup$
            – user31373
            Jul 26 '12 at 0:08
















          4












          $begingroup$

          Concerning the differentiation of $epsilonmapsto |u+epsilon v|^3$. The function $g(x)=|x|^3$ is in $C^2(mathbb R)$ with $g,'(x)=3x|x|$ and $g,''(x)=6|x|$. Notably, $g$ is convex, which makes the entire functional $E$ convex; we need this for its lower semicontinuity with respect to the weak convergence in $A$.



          But to begin with, we want to show that $E$ is bounded from below on $A$; otherwise the entire approach is doomed. The only question is what to do with $int-fu$: suppressing the urge to use Holder's inequality, I would write $-fuge -frac12f^2-frac12 u^2$. Here the integral of $f^2$ is a finite constant and $u^2le frac12|u|^3+8$ pointwise. It follows that $E$ is bounded from below: $E(u)ge int (frac12|nabla u|^2+frac{1}{12}|u|^3-frac12f^2-8)$ or something of the kind. Note that I bounded $u^2$ by a small multiple of $|u|^3$ in order to have some of the cubic term left over. This will be useful in a moment.



          Pick a minimizing sequence $u_kin A$ as you've done already. The lower bound for $E(u)$ in the previous paragraph tells us that $int|nabla u_k|^2$ and $int|u_k|^3$ are uniformly bounded. Thus, the sequences is bounded in $H_0^1$ and in $L^3$. Pick a weakly convergent subsequence in $H_0^1$; extract from it a weakly convergent subsequence in $L^3$. The lower semicontinuity of $E$ implies $E(u)=min_A E$ where $u$ is the weak limit.



          And yes, having $int (nabla ucdotnabla v +frac13 u|u|v-fv)=0$ for all test functions $v$ (you only need to consider $C^infty$-smooth $v$ with compact support) means that $u$ is a weak solution; this is what weak solution means. The boundary condition $u=0$ is automatically fulfilled since we work in $H_0^1$ all the time.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
            $endgroup$
            – Theorem
            Jul 25 '12 at 22:28










          • $begingroup$
            @Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
            $endgroup$
            – user31373
            Jul 26 '12 at 0:08














          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          Concerning the differentiation of $epsilonmapsto |u+epsilon v|^3$. The function $g(x)=|x|^3$ is in $C^2(mathbb R)$ with $g,'(x)=3x|x|$ and $g,''(x)=6|x|$. Notably, $g$ is convex, which makes the entire functional $E$ convex; we need this for its lower semicontinuity with respect to the weak convergence in $A$.



          But to begin with, we want to show that $E$ is bounded from below on $A$; otherwise the entire approach is doomed. The only question is what to do with $int-fu$: suppressing the urge to use Holder's inequality, I would write $-fuge -frac12f^2-frac12 u^2$. Here the integral of $f^2$ is a finite constant and $u^2le frac12|u|^3+8$ pointwise. It follows that $E$ is bounded from below: $E(u)ge int (frac12|nabla u|^2+frac{1}{12}|u|^3-frac12f^2-8)$ or something of the kind. Note that I bounded $u^2$ by a small multiple of $|u|^3$ in order to have some of the cubic term left over. This will be useful in a moment.



          Pick a minimizing sequence $u_kin A$ as you've done already. The lower bound for $E(u)$ in the previous paragraph tells us that $int|nabla u_k|^2$ and $int|u_k|^3$ are uniformly bounded. Thus, the sequences is bounded in $H_0^1$ and in $L^3$. Pick a weakly convergent subsequence in $H_0^1$; extract from it a weakly convergent subsequence in $L^3$. The lower semicontinuity of $E$ implies $E(u)=min_A E$ where $u$ is the weak limit.



          And yes, having $int (nabla ucdotnabla v +frac13 u|u|v-fv)=0$ for all test functions $v$ (you only need to consider $C^infty$-smooth $v$ with compact support) means that $u$ is a weak solution; this is what weak solution means. The boundary condition $u=0$ is automatically fulfilled since we work in $H_0^1$ all the time.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Concerning the differentiation of $epsilonmapsto |u+epsilon v|^3$. The function $g(x)=|x|^3$ is in $C^2(mathbb R)$ with $g,'(x)=3x|x|$ and $g,''(x)=6|x|$. Notably, $g$ is convex, which makes the entire functional $E$ convex; we need this for its lower semicontinuity with respect to the weak convergence in $A$.



          But to begin with, we want to show that $E$ is bounded from below on $A$; otherwise the entire approach is doomed. The only question is what to do with $int-fu$: suppressing the urge to use Holder's inequality, I would write $-fuge -frac12f^2-frac12 u^2$. Here the integral of $f^2$ is a finite constant and $u^2le frac12|u|^3+8$ pointwise. It follows that $E$ is bounded from below: $E(u)ge int (frac12|nabla u|^2+frac{1}{12}|u|^3-frac12f^2-8)$ or something of the kind. Note that I bounded $u^2$ by a small multiple of $|u|^3$ in order to have some of the cubic term left over. This will be useful in a moment.



          Pick a minimizing sequence $u_kin A$ as you've done already. The lower bound for $E(u)$ in the previous paragraph tells us that $int|nabla u_k|^2$ and $int|u_k|^3$ are uniformly bounded. Thus, the sequences is bounded in $H_0^1$ and in $L^3$. Pick a weakly convergent subsequence in $H_0^1$; extract from it a weakly convergent subsequence in $L^3$. The lower semicontinuity of $E$ implies $E(u)=min_A E$ where $u$ is the weak limit.



          And yes, having $int (nabla ucdotnabla v +frac13 u|u|v-fv)=0$ for all test functions $v$ (you only need to consider $C^infty$-smooth $v$ with compact support) means that $u$ is a weak solution; this is what weak solution means. The boundary condition $u=0$ is automatically fulfilled since we work in $H_0^1$ all the time.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jul 25 '12 at 0:01







          user31373



















          • $begingroup$
            Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
            $endgroup$
            – Theorem
            Jul 25 '12 at 22:28










          • $begingroup$
            @Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
            $endgroup$
            – user31373
            Jul 26 '12 at 0:08


















          • $begingroup$
            Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
            $endgroup$
            – Theorem
            Jul 25 '12 at 22:28










          • $begingroup$
            @Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
            $endgroup$
            – user31373
            Jul 26 '12 at 0:08
















          $begingroup$
          Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
          $endgroup$
          – Theorem
          Jul 25 '12 at 22:28




          $begingroup$
          Sir , what is meant by lower semicontinuous functional ? Is there a relation with convexity of the functional ?
          $endgroup$
          – Theorem
          Jul 25 '12 at 22:28












          $begingroup$
          @Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
          $endgroup$
          – user31373
          Jul 26 '12 at 0:08




          $begingroup$
          @Theorem It means a functional that is lower semicontinuous. And yes, there is a relation,
          $endgroup$
          – user31373
          Jul 26 '12 at 0:08


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f174203%2fusing-energy-method-to-existence-and-uniquesness-the-following-pde%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese