Integer multiplicity current without boundary is boundary of another current












0












$begingroup$


Let us say we have an integer multiplicity current $Tin mathcal{D}_n(Omega)$, $Omegasubset mathbb{R}^m$, $n+1leq m$ and $partial T =0$. Do we always find another current $Rin mathcal{D}_{n+1}(Omega)$ such that $partial R=T$?



In case the support of $T$ is compact the answer to this question is yes by just taking a cone or using the result for the isoperimetric inequality by Federer and Fleming, which can be deduced by the Deformation Theorem.



So what happens if the support is not compact anymore? Are there counterexamples? I am especially interested in the case $m=n+1$.



If the answer is no, what if $T$ is a minimizing current?



Many thanks for your time and effort.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let us say we have an integer multiplicity current $Tin mathcal{D}_n(Omega)$, $Omegasubset mathbb{R}^m$, $n+1leq m$ and $partial T =0$. Do we always find another current $Rin mathcal{D}_{n+1}(Omega)$ such that $partial R=T$?



    In case the support of $T$ is compact the answer to this question is yes by just taking a cone or using the result for the isoperimetric inequality by Federer and Fleming, which can be deduced by the Deformation Theorem.



    So what happens if the support is not compact anymore? Are there counterexamples? I am especially interested in the case $m=n+1$.



    If the answer is no, what if $T$ is a minimizing current?



    Many thanks for your time and effort.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let us say we have an integer multiplicity current $Tin mathcal{D}_n(Omega)$, $Omegasubset mathbb{R}^m$, $n+1leq m$ and $partial T =0$. Do we always find another current $Rin mathcal{D}_{n+1}(Omega)$ such that $partial R=T$?



      In case the support of $T$ is compact the answer to this question is yes by just taking a cone or using the result for the isoperimetric inequality by Federer and Fleming, which can be deduced by the Deformation Theorem.



      So what happens if the support is not compact anymore? Are there counterexamples? I am especially interested in the case $m=n+1$.



      If the answer is no, what if $T$ is a minimizing current?



      Many thanks for your time and effort.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let us say we have an integer multiplicity current $Tin mathcal{D}_n(Omega)$, $Omegasubset mathbb{R}^m$, $n+1leq m$ and $partial T =0$. Do we always find another current $Rin mathcal{D}_{n+1}(Omega)$ such that $partial R=T$?



      In case the support of $T$ is compact the answer to this question is yes by just taking a cone or using the result for the isoperimetric inequality by Federer and Fleming, which can be deduced by the Deformation Theorem.



      So what happens if the support is not compact anymore? Are there counterexamples? I am especially interested in the case $m=n+1$.



      If the answer is no, what if $T$ is a minimizing current?



      Many thanks for your time and effort.







      measure-theory geometric-measure-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 25 at 11:11









      humanStampedisthumanStampedist

      2,228214




      2,228214






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086978%2finteger-multiplicity-current-without-boundary-is-boundary-of-another-current%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086978%2finteger-multiplicity-current-without-boundary-is-boundary-of-another-current%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?