Compute $int_C ze^{sqrt{x^2+y^2}} mathrm ds$












2












$begingroup$



Compute $int_C ze^{sqrt{x^2+y^2}} mathrm ds$ where



$$C:x^2+y^2+z^2=a^2, x+ y=0, a gt 0$$




At first I thought to parametrize this as: $x=a cos t , y=a sin t, z =0$, but then the integral will result in $0$ and this might not be true.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I wonder if here we have also the restriction $zgeq0$ otherwise by symmetry the integral is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Jan 25 at 10:22










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertZ no restriction this time, why it should be $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – C. Cristi
    Jan 25 at 10:25
















2












$begingroup$



Compute $int_C ze^{sqrt{x^2+y^2}} mathrm ds$ where



$$C:x^2+y^2+z^2=a^2, x+ y=0, a gt 0$$




At first I thought to parametrize this as: $x=a cos t , y=a sin t, z =0$, but then the integral will result in $0$ and this might not be true.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I wonder if here we have also the restriction $zgeq0$ otherwise by symmetry the integral is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Jan 25 at 10:22










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertZ no restriction this time, why it should be $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – C. Cristi
    Jan 25 at 10:25














2












2








2





$begingroup$



Compute $int_C ze^{sqrt{x^2+y^2}} mathrm ds$ where



$$C:x^2+y^2+z^2=a^2, x+ y=0, a gt 0$$




At first I thought to parametrize this as: $x=a cos t , y=a sin t, z =0$, but then the integral will result in $0$ and this might not be true.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Compute $int_C ze^{sqrt{x^2+y^2}} mathrm ds$ where



$$C:x^2+y^2+z^2=a^2, x+ y=0, a gt 0$$




At first I thought to parametrize this as: $x=a cos t , y=a sin t, z =0$, but then the integral will result in $0$ and this might not be true.







integration curves






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 25 at 9:59









Mohammad Zuhair Khan

1,6682625




1,6682625










asked Jan 25 at 9:55









C. CristiC. Cristi

1,634218




1,634218












  • $begingroup$
    I wonder if here we have also the restriction $zgeq0$ otherwise by symmetry the integral is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Jan 25 at 10:22










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertZ no restriction this time, why it should be $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – C. Cristi
    Jan 25 at 10:25


















  • $begingroup$
    I wonder if here we have also the restriction $zgeq0$ otherwise by symmetry the integral is zero.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Jan 25 at 10:22










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertZ no restriction this time, why it should be $0$?
    $endgroup$
    – C. Cristi
    Jan 25 at 10:25
















$begingroup$
I wonder if here we have also the restriction $zgeq0$ otherwise by symmetry the integral is zero.
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Jan 25 at 10:22




$begingroup$
I wonder if here we have also the restriction $zgeq0$ otherwise by symmetry the integral is zero.
$endgroup$
– Robert Z
Jan 25 at 10:22












$begingroup$
@RobertZ no restriction this time, why it should be $0$?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 25 at 10:25




$begingroup$
@RobertZ no restriction this time, why it should be $0$?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 25 at 10:25










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The curve $C$ is a circle in the plane $x+y=0$ centered at the origin with radius $a$, so it is symmetric with respect to the plane $z=0$. Moreover the integrand is odd with respect to $z$and therefore, by symmetry, the given integral $int_C ze^{sqrt{x^2+y^2}} mathrm ds$ is zero.



BTW a convenient parametrization for the circle $C$ could be:
$$x(t)=-y(t)=frac{acos(t)}{sqrt{2}},quad z=asin(t)quad text{with $tin [0,2pi]$}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    If I have an integral like that and it's a function of more variables under the integral if the function is odd with respect to $1$ variable then the integral must equal 0?
    $endgroup$
    – C. Cristi
    Jan 25 at 12:39










  • $begingroup$
    Yes if the domain is symmetric with respect to that variable.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Jan 25 at 12:47










  • $begingroup$
    How have you figured out that this one is symetric with $z$?
    $endgroup$
    – C. Cristi
    Jan 25 at 12:58










  • $begingroup$
    @C.Cristi The defining equations are invariant when we replace $z$ with $-z$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Z
    Jan 25 at 13:06



















2












$begingroup$

Ok, so lets start with $x + y = 0$ since it has been given to you. This implies that $x^2 = y^2$. From this result we can simplify the following:



begin{align*}
C: 2x^2 + z^2 = a^2
end{align*}



As you can see this implies more of an elliptical curve. Your initial parametrization assumed a circular curve. Also, it is never acceptable to just choose a value for a variable like $z = 0$. This would have to be given to you.



Now, we only have two variables, $x$ and $z$. I am assuming that $a$ is just a positive scalar since $x$, $y$ and $z$ cover the three spacial dimensions. Since the curve relation only has these two variables, we can write one of them in terms of the other as follows:



begin{align*}
z^2 &= a^2 - 2x^2 \
end{align*}



Now, I did not write the relation as a function, because I want to keep it in this form for easier calculations. If I was to write it in terms of $z$, by itself, it would require piece-wise defined functions, which can be avoided in this scenario as I will soon demonstrate. Applying implicit differentiation on the above relation, we can find the following useful result:



begin{align*}
frac{d}{dx}left(z^2right) &= frac{d}{dx}left(a^2right) - 2frac{d}{dx}left(x^2right) \
2zfrac{dz}{dx} &= -4xfrac{dx}{dx} \
2zfrac{dz}{dx} &= -4x \
frac{dz}{dx} &= -frac{2x}{z} \
\
left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 &= frac{4x^2}{z^2} \
left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 &= frac{4x^2}{a^2 - x^2} \
end{align*}



In general we have the relation, for 3-dimensional space, of:



$$ds = (dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2)^frac{1}{2}$$



Since we have $x = -y$, we can deduce that $dx^2 = dy^2$ which allows us to simplify the above relation and reformulate it to a sensible form as follows:



begin{align*}
ds &= (2dx^2 + dz^2)^frac{1}{2} \
ds &= left(2 + left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 right)^frac{1}{2}dx \
ds &= left(2 + frac{4x^2}{a^2 - x^2} right)^frac{1}{2}dx \
end{align*}



Let me know if I should give more information.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    $x=a cos t , y=a sin t, z =0$ is not a parametrisation of $C$ as $x + y neq 0$. Try plugging $x+y=0$ into $x^2+y^2+z^2 = a^2$ and then use your approach with $sin$ and $cos$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086923%2fcompute-int-c-ze-sqrtx2y2-mathrm-ds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      The curve $C$ is a circle in the plane $x+y=0$ centered at the origin with radius $a$, so it is symmetric with respect to the plane $z=0$. Moreover the integrand is odd with respect to $z$and therefore, by symmetry, the given integral $int_C ze^{sqrt{x^2+y^2}} mathrm ds$ is zero.



      BTW a convenient parametrization for the circle $C$ could be:
      $$x(t)=-y(t)=frac{acos(t)}{sqrt{2}},quad z=asin(t)quad text{with $tin [0,2pi]$}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        If I have an integral like that and it's a function of more variables under the integral if the function is odd with respect to $1$ variable then the integral must equal 0?
        $endgroup$
        – C. Cristi
        Jan 25 at 12:39










      • $begingroup$
        Yes if the domain is symmetric with respect to that variable.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Z
        Jan 25 at 12:47










      • $begingroup$
        How have you figured out that this one is symetric with $z$?
        $endgroup$
        – C. Cristi
        Jan 25 at 12:58










      • $begingroup$
        @C.Cristi The defining equations are invariant when we replace $z$ with $-z$.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Z
        Jan 25 at 13:06
















      1












      $begingroup$

      The curve $C$ is a circle in the plane $x+y=0$ centered at the origin with radius $a$, so it is symmetric with respect to the plane $z=0$. Moreover the integrand is odd with respect to $z$and therefore, by symmetry, the given integral $int_C ze^{sqrt{x^2+y^2}} mathrm ds$ is zero.



      BTW a convenient parametrization for the circle $C$ could be:
      $$x(t)=-y(t)=frac{acos(t)}{sqrt{2}},quad z=asin(t)quad text{with $tin [0,2pi]$}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        If I have an integral like that and it's a function of more variables under the integral if the function is odd with respect to $1$ variable then the integral must equal 0?
        $endgroup$
        – C. Cristi
        Jan 25 at 12:39










      • $begingroup$
        Yes if the domain is symmetric with respect to that variable.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Z
        Jan 25 at 12:47










      • $begingroup$
        How have you figured out that this one is symetric with $z$?
        $endgroup$
        – C. Cristi
        Jan 25 at 12:58










      • $begingroup$
        @C.Cristi The defining equations are invariant when we replace $z$ with $-z$.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Z
        Jan 25 at 13:06














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$

      The curve $C$ is a circle in the plane $x+y=0$ centered at the origin with radius $a$, so it is symmetric with respect to the plane $z=0$. Moreover the integrand is odd with respect to $z$and therefore, by symmetry, the given integral $int_C ze^{sqrt{x^2+y^2}} mathrm ds$ is zero.



      BTW a convenient parametrization for the circle $C$ could be:
      $$x(t)=-y(t)=frac{acos(t)}{sqrt{2}},quad z=asin(t)quad text{with $tin [0,2pi]$}$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      The curve $C$ is a circle in the plane $x+y=0$ centered at the origin with radius $a$, so it is symmetric with respect to the plane $z=0$. Moreover the integrand is odd with respect to $z$and therefore, by symmetry, the given integral $int_C ze^{sqrt{x^2+y^2}} mathrm ds$ is zero.



      BTW a convenient parametrization for the circle $C$ could be:
      $$x(t)=-y(t)=frac{acos(t)}{sqrt{2}},quad z=asin(t)quad text{with $tin [0,2pi]$}$$







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited Jan 25 at 10:43

























      answered Jan 25 at 10:37









      Robert ZRobert Z

      100k1069140




      100k1069140












      • $begingroup$
        If I have an integral like that and it's a function of more variables under the integral if the function is odd with respect to $1$ variable then the integral must equal 0?
        $endgroup$
        – C. Cristi
        Jan 25 at 12:39










      • $begingroup$
        Yes if the domain is symmetric with respect to that variable.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Z
        Jan 25 at 12:47










      • $begingroup$
        How have you figured out that this one is symetric with $z$?
        $endgroup$
        – C. Cristi
        Jan 25 at 12:58










      • $begingroup$
        @C.Cristi The defining equations are invariant when we replace $z$ with $-z$.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Z
        Jan 25 at 13:06


















      • $begingroup$
        If I have an integral like that and it's a function of more variables under the integral if the function is odd with respect to $1$ variable then the integral must equal 0?
        $endgroup$
        – C. Cristi
        Jan 25 at 12:39










      • $begingroup$
        Yes if the domain is symmetric with respect to that variable.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Z
        Jan 25 at 12:47










      • $begingroup$
        How have you figured out that this one is symetric with $z$?
        $endgroup$
        – C. Cristi
        Jan 25 at 12:58










      • $begingroup$
        @C.Cristi The defining equations are invariant when we replace $z$ with $-z$.
        $endgroup$
        – Robert Z
        Jan 25 at 13:06
















      $begingroup$
      If I have an integral like that and it's a function of more variables under the integral if the function is odd with respect to $1$ variable then the integral must equal 0?
      $endgroup$
      – C. Cristi
      Jan 25 at 12:39




      $begingroup$
      If I have an integral like that and it's a function of more variables under the integral if the function is odd with respect to $1$ variable then the integral must equal 0?
      $endgroup$
      – C. Cristi
      Jan 25 at 12:39












      $begingroup$
      Yes if the domain is symmetric with respect to that variable.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Z
      Jan 25 at 12:47




      $begingroup$
      Yes if the domain is symmetric with respect to that variable.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Z
      Jan 25 at 12:47












      $begingroup$
      How have you figured out that this one is symetric with $z$?
      $endgroup$
      – C. Cristi
      Jan 25 at 12:58




      $begingroup$
      How have you figured out that this one is symetric with $z$?
      $endgroup$
      – C. Cristi
      Jan 25 at 12:58












      $begingroup$
      @C.Cristi The defining equations are invariant when we replace $z$ with $-z$.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Z
      Jan 25 at 13:06




      $begingroup$
      @C.Cristi The defining equations are invariant when we replace $z$ with $-z$.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Z
      Jan 25 at 13:06











      2












      $begingroup$

      Ok, so lets start with $x + y = 0$ since it has been given to you. This implies that $x^2 = y^2$. From this result we can simplify the following:



      begin{align*}
      C: 2x^2 + z^2 = a^2
      end{align*}



      As you can see this implies more of an elliptical curve. Your initial parametrization assumed a circular curve. Also, it is never acceptable to just choose a value for a variable like $z = 0$. This would have to be given to you.



      Now, we only have two variables, $x$ and $z$. I am assuming that $a$ is just a positive scalar since $x$, $y$ and $z$ cover the three spacial dimensions. Since the curve relation only has these two variables, we can write one of them in terms of the other as follows:



      begin{align*}
      z^2 &= a^2 - 2x^2 \
      end{align*}



      Now, I did not write the relation as a function, because I want to keep it in this form for easier calculations. If I was to write it in terms of $z$, by itself, it would require piece-wise defined functions, which can be avoided in this scenario as I will soon demonstrate. Applying implicit differentiation on the above relation, we can find the following useful result:



      begin{align*}
      frac{d}{dx}left(z^2right) &= frac{d}{dx}left(a^2right) - 2frac{d}{dx}left(x^2right) \
      2zfrac{dz}{dx} &= -4xfrac{dx}{dx} \
      2zfrac{dz}{dx} &= -4x \
      frac{dz}{dx} &= -frac{2x}{z} \
      \
      left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 &= frac{4x^2}{z^2} \
      left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 &= frac{4x^2}{a^2 - x^2} \
      end{align*}



      In general we have the relation, for 3-dimensional space, of:



      $$ds = (dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2)^frac{1}{2}$$



      Since we have $x = -y$, we can deduce that $dx^2 = dy^2$ which allows us to simplify the above relation and reformulate it to a sensible form as follows:



      begin{align*}
      ds &= (2dx^2 + dz^2)^frac{1}{2} \
      ds &= left(2 + left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 right)^frac{1}{2}dx \
      ds &= left(2 + frac{4x^2}{a^2 - x^2} right)^frac{1}{2}dx \
      end{align*}



      Let me know if I should give more information.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        2












        $begingroup$

        Ok, so lets start with $x + y = 0$ since it has been given to you. This implies that $x^2 = y^2$. From this result we can simplify the following:



        begin{align*}
        C: 2x^2 + z^2 = a^2
        end{align*}



        As you can see this implies more of an elliptical curve. Your initial parametrization assumed a circular curve. Also, it is never acceptable to just choose a value for a variable like $z = 0$. This would have to be given to you.



        Now, we only have two variables, $x$ and $z$. I am assuming that $a$ is just a positive scalar since $x$, $y$ and $z$ cover the three spacial dimensions. Since the curve relation only has these two variables, we can write one of them in terms of the other as follows:



        begin{align*}
        z^2 &= a^2 - 2x^2 \
        end{align*}



        Now, I did not write the relation as a function, because I want to keep it in this form for easier calculations. If I was to write it in terms of $z$, by itself, it would require piece-wise defined functions, which can be avoided in this scenario as I will soon demonstrate. Applying implicit differentiation on the above relation, we can find the following useful result:



        begin{align*}
        frac{d}{dx}left(z^2right) &= frac{d}{dx}left(a^2right) - 2frac{d}{dx}left(x^2right) \
        2zfrac{dz}{dx} &= -4xfrac{dx}{dx} \
        2zfrac{dz}{dx} &= -4x \
        frac{dz}{dx} &= -frac{2x}{z} \
        \
        left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 &= frac{4x^2}{z^2} \
        left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 &= frac{4x^2}{a^2 - x^2} \
        end{align*}



        In general we have the relation, for 3-dimensional space, of:



        $$ds = (dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2)^frac{1}{2}$$



        Since we have $x = -y$, we can deduce that $dx^2 = dy^2$ which allows us to simplify the above relation and reformulate it to a sensible form as follows:



        begin{align*}
        ds &= (2dx^2 + dz^2)^frac{1}{2} \
        ds &= left(2 + left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 right)^frac{1}{2}dx \
        ds &= left(2 + frac{4x^2}{a^2 - x^2} right)^frac{1}{2}dx \
        end{align*}



        Let me know if I should give more information.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Ok, so lets start with $x + y = 0$ since it has been given to you. This implies that $x^2 = y^2$. From this result we can simplify the following:



          begin{align*}
          C: 2x^2 + z^2 = a^2
          end{align*}



          As you can see this implies more of an elliptical curve. Your initial parametrization assumed a circular curve. Also, it is never acceptable to just choose a value for a variable like $z = 0$. This would have to be given to you.



          Now, we only have two variables, $x$ and $z$. I am assuming that $a$ is just a positive scalar since $x$, $y$ and $z$ cover the three spacial dimensions. Since the curve relation only has these two variables, we can write one of them in terms of the other as follows:



          begin{align*}
          z^2 &= a^2 - 2x^2 \
          end{align*}



          Now, I did not write the relation as a function, because I want to keep it in this form for easier calculations. If I was to write it in terms of $z$, by itself, it would require piece-wise defined functions, which can be avoided in this scenario as I will soon demonstrate. Applying implicit differentiation on the above relation, we can find the following useful result:



          begin{align*}
          frac{d}{dx}left(z^2right) &= frac{d}{dx}left(a^2right) - 2frac{d}{dx}left(x^2right) \
          2zfrac{dz}{dx} &= -4xfrac{dx}{dx} \
          2zfrac{dz}{dx} &= -4x \
          frac{dz}{dx} &= -frac{2x}{z} \
          \
          left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 &= frac{4x^2}{z^2} \
          left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 &= frac{4x^2}{a^2 - x^2} \
          end{align*}



          In general we have the relation, for 3-dimensional space, of:



          $$ds = (dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2)^frac{1}{2}$$



          Since we have $x = -y$, we can deduce that $dx^2 = dy^2$ which allows us to simplify the above relation and reformulate it to a sensible form as follows:



          begin{align*}
          ds &= (2dx^2 + dz^2)^frac{1}{2} \
          ds &= left(2 + left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 right)^frac{1}{2}dx \
          ds &= left(2 + frac{4x^2}{a^2 - x^2} right)^frac{1}{2}dx \
          end{align*}



          Let me know if I should give more information.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Ok, so lets start with $x + y = 0$ since it has been given to you. This implies that $x^2 = y^2$. From this result we can simplify the following:



          begin{align*}
          C: 2x^2 + z^2 = a^2
          end{align*}



          As you can see this implies more of an elliptical curve. Your initial parametrization assumed a circular curve. Also, it is never acceptable to just choose a value for a variable like $z = 0$. This would have to be given to you.



          Now, we only have two variables, $x$ and $z$. I am assuming that $a$ is just a positive scalar since $x$, $y$ and $z$ cover the three spacial dimensions. Since the curve relation only has these two variables, we can write one of them in terms of the other as follows:



          begin{align*}
          z^2 &= a^2 - 2x^2 \
          end{align*}



          Now, I did not write the relation as a function, because I want to keep it in this form for easier calculations. If I was to write it in terms of $z$, by itself, it would require piece-wise defined functions, which can be avoided in this scenario as I will soon demonstrate. Applying implicit differentiation on the above relation, we can find the following useful result:



          begin{align*}
          frac{d}{dx}left(z^2right) &= frac{d}{dx}left(a^2right) - 2frac{d}{dx}left(x^2right) \
          2zfrac{dz}{dx} &= -4xfrac{dx}{dx} \
          2zfrac{dz}{dx} &= -4x \
          frac{dz}{dx} &= -frac{2x}{z} \
          \
          left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 &= frac{4x^2}{z^2} \
          left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 &= frac{4x^2}{a^2 - x^2} \
          end{align*}



          In general we have the relation, for 3-dimensional space, of:



          $$ds = (dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2)^frac{1}{2}$$



          Since we have $x = -y$, we can deduce that $dx^2 = dy^2$ which allows us to simplify the above relation and reformulate it to a sensible form as follows:



          begin{align*}
          ds &= (2dx^2 + dz^2)^frac{1}{2} \
          ds &= left(2 + left(frac{dz}{dx}right)^2 right)^frac{1}{2}dx \
          ds &= left(2 + frac{4x^2}{a^2 - x^2} right)^frac{1}{2}dx \
          end{align*}



          Let me know if I should give more information.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 25 at 10:43









          GustavGustav

          1469




          1469























              0












              $begingroup$

              $x=a cos t , y=a sin t, z =0$ is not a parametrisation of $C$ as $x + y neq 0$. Try plugging $x+y=0$ into $x^2+y^2+z^2 = a^2$ and then use your approach with $sin$ and $cos$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                $x=a cos t , y=a sin t, z =0$ is not a parametrisation of $C$ as $x + y neq 0$. Try plugging $x+y=0$ into $x^2+y^2+z^2 = a^2$ and then use your approach with $sin$ and $cos$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  $x=a cos t , y=a sin t, z =0$ is not a parametrisation of $C$ as $x + y neq 0$. Try plugging $x+y=0$ into $x^2+y^2+z^2 = a^2$ and then use your approach with $sin$ and $cos$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  $x=a cos t , y=a sin t, z =0$ is not a parametrisation of $C$ as $x + y neq 0$. Try plugging $x+y=0$ into $x^2+y^2+z^2 = a^2$ and then use your approach with $sin$ and $cos$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 25 at 10:17









                  KlausKlaus

                  2,12711




                  2,12711






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086923%2fcompute-int-c-ze-sqrtx2y2-mathrm-ds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Mario Kart Wii

                      What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                      Antonio Litta Visconti Arese