Approximate a continuous functions with $C^infty$ functions in uniform norm.
$begingroup$
I have a question concerning the generator of a backwards SDE. Suppose that $f(omega,t,y,z):Omegatimesmathbb{R}^+timesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^drightarrowmathbb{R}$ is almost surely jointly continuous in $(t,y,z)$. Suppose further that $f$ has suitable growth conditions (e.g. linear in $y$ and quadratic in $z$.
In the Kobylanski 2000 paper, it was asserted that there is a sequence $f^{(n)}$ of $C^infty$ functions such that:
$$f+frac{1}{2^{n+1}}leq f^{(n)} leq f+frac{1}{2^n}$$
I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to prove the existence of such a sequence. In the said paper, it was said that the existence of this sequence is given by a standard argument of regularisation, but I don't quite see how. Any help or reference would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
real-analysis probability functional-analysis probability-theory stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a question concerning the generator of a backwards SDE. Suppose that $f(omega,t,y,z):Omegatimesmathbb{R}^+timesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^drightarrowmathbb{R}$ is almost surely jointly continuous in $(t,y,z)$. Suppose further that $f$ has suitable growth conditions (e.g. linear in $y$ and quadratic in $z$.
In the Kobylanski 2000 paper, it was asserted that there is a sequence $f^{(n)}$ of $C^infty$ functions such that:
$$f+frac{1}{2^{n+1}}leq f^{(n)} leq f+frac{1}{2^n}$$
I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to prove the existence of such a sequence. In the said paper, it was said that the existence of this sequence is given by a standard argument of regularisation, but I don't quite see how. Any help or reference would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
real-analysis probability functional-analysis probability-theory stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If $f$ is uniformly continuous, you can take $deltain (2^{-(n+1)},2^{-n})$ and convolute $f+delta$ with a mollifier $eta_epsilon$. The resulting function is smooth and converges uniformly to $f+delta$ as $epsilonsearrow 0$. One can probably make something similar work with the assumption of uniform continuity.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Jan 25 at 11:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a question concerning the generator of a backwards SDE. Suppose that $f(omega,t,y,z):Omegatimesmathbb{R}^+timesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^drightarrowmathbb{R}$ is almost surely jointly continuous in $(t,y,z)$. Suppose further that $f$ has suitable growth conditions (e.g. linear in $y$ and quadratic in $z$.
In the Kobylanski 2000 paper, it was asserted that there is a sequence $f^{(n)}$ of $C^infty$ functions such that:
$$f+frac{1}{2^{n+1}}leq f^{(n)} leq f+frac{1}{2^n}$$
I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to prove the existence of such a sequence. In the said paper, it was said that the existence of this sequence is given by a standard argument of regularisation, but I don't quite see how. Any help or reference would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
real-analysis probability functional-analysis probability-theory stochastic-calculus
$endgroup$
I have a question concerning the generator of a backwards SDE. Suppose that $f(omega,t,y,z):Omegatimesmathbb{R}^+timesmathbb{R}timesmathbb{R}^drightarrowmathbb{R}$ is almost surely jointly continuous in $(t,y,z)$. Suppose further that $f$ has suitable growth conditions (e.g. linear in $y$ and quadratic in $z$.
In the Kobylanski 2000 paper, it was asserted that there is a sequence $f^{(n)}$ of $C^infty$ functions such that:
$$f+frac{1}{2^{n+1}}leq f^{(n)} leq f+frac{1}{2^n}$$
I'm at a bit of a loss as to how to prove the existence of such a sequence. In the said paper, it was said that the existence of this sequence is given by a standard argument of regularisation, but I don't quite see how. Any help or reference would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
real-analysis probability functional-analysis probability-theory stochastic-calculus
real-analysis probability functional-analysis probability-theory stochastic-calculus
asked Jan 25 at 11:06
Viet DangViet Dang
162
162
$begingroup$
If $f$ is uniformly continuous, you can take $deltain (2^{-(n+1)},2^{-n})$ and convolute $f+delta$ with a mollifier $eta_epsilon$. The resulting function is smooth and converges uniformly to $f+delta$ as $epsilonsearrow 0$. One can probably make something similar work with the assumption of uniform continuity.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Jan 25 at 11:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $f$ is uniformly continuous, you can take $deltain (2^{-(n+1)},2^{-n})$ and convolute $f+delta$ with a mollifier $eta_epsilon$. The resulting function is smooth and converges uniformly to $f+delta$ as $epsilonsearrow 0$. One can probably make something similar work with the assumption of uniform continuity.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Jan 25 at 11:30
$begingroup$
If $f$ is uniformly continuous, you can take $deltain (2^{-(n+1)},2^{-n})$ and convolute $f+delta$ with a mollifier $eta_epsilon$. The resulting function is smooth and converges uniformly to $f+delta$ as $epsilonsearrow 0$. One can probably make something similar work with the assumption of uniform continuity.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Jan 25 at 11:30
$begingroup$
If $f$ is uniformly continuous, you can take $deltain (2^{-(n+1)},2^{-n})$ and convolute $f+delta$ with a mollifier $eta_epsilon$. The resulting function is smooth and converges uniformly to $f+delta$ as $epsilonsearrow 0$. One can probably make something similar work with the assumption of uniform continuity.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Jan 25 at 11:30
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086969%2fapproximate-a-continuous-functions-with-c-infty-functions-in-uniform-norm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086969%2fapproximate-a-continuous-functions-with-c-infty-functions-in-uniform-norm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If $f$ is uniformly continuous, you can take $deltain (2^{-(n+1)},2^{-n})$ and convolute $f+delta$ with a mollifier $eta_epsilon$. The resulting function is smooth and converges uniformly to $f+delta$ as $epsilonsearrow 0$. One can probably make something similar work with the assumption of uniform continuity.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Jan 25 at 11:30