Hypergeometric function 3F2 with unit argument
$begingroup$
Recently I obtained the following expression
$${}_3F_2(-n,a - b ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; 1), $$
with $b>a>0$ and $ninmathbb{N}$.
My question is: If someone knows a closed form solution to the above expression (either in terms of the gamma function or the rising factorials).
I'm aware of the Saalschütz's theorem which states that
$${}_3F_2(-n,a,b; c, 1+a+b-n-c; 1) = frac{(c-a)_{n}(c-b)_{n}}{(c)_{n}(c-a-b)_{n}}, $$
or the Dixon's identity, however the derived equation (while only based on 3 parameters) does not have the necessary forms. I also tried a lot of identities listed here: http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/17/02/06/ but no success so far.
Alternatively, I can also obtain the equation
$${}_3F_2(-n,-a-1 ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; -1), $$
by using few operations in the early stage of the problem, but the list of formulas is much larger for $z=1$.
I'm not really an expert on the hypergeometric functions, so a help from a trained eye in this problematic would be appreciated and very helpfull. From what I have read, the ${}_3F_2(-n,...;...; 1)$ form of the hypergeometric function ${}_3F_2$ frequently appears in many problems.
sequences-and-series special-functions hypergeometric-function sums-of-squares
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Recently I obtained the following expression
$${}_3F_2(-n,a - b ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; 1), $$
with $b>a>0$ and $ninmathbb{N}$.
My question is: If someone knows a closed form solution to the above expression (either in terms of the gamma function or the rising factorials).
I'm aware of the Saalschütz's theorem which states that
$${}_3F_2(-n,a,b; c, 1+a+b-n-c; 1) = frac{(c-a)_{n}(c-b)_{n}}{(c)_{n}(c-a-b)_{n}}, $$
or the Dixon's identity, however the derived equation (while only based on 3 parameters) does not have the necessary forms. I also tried a lot of identities listed here: http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/17/02/06/ but no success so far.
Alternatively, I can also obtain the equation
$${}_3F_2(-n,-a-1 ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; -1), $$
by using few operations in the early stage of the problem, but the list of formulas is much larger for $z=1$.
I'm not really an expert on the hypergeometric functions, so a help from a trained eye in this problematic would be appreciated and very helpfull. From what I have read, the ${}_3F_2(-n,...;...; 1)$ form of the hypergeometric function ${}_3F_2$ frequently appears in many problems.
sequences-and-series special-functions hypergeometric-function sums-of-squares
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Recently I obtained the following expression
$${}_3F_2(-n,a - b ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; 1), $$
with $b>a>0$ and $ninmathbb{N}$.
My question is: If someone knows a closed form solution to the above expression (either in terms of the gamma function or the rising factorials).
I'm aware of the Saalschütz's theorem which states that
$${}_3F_2(-n,a,b; c, 1+a+b-n-c; 1) = frac{(c-a)_{n}(c-b)_{n}}{(c)_{n}(c-a-b)_{n}}, $$
or the Dixon's identity, however the derived equation (while only based on 3 parameters) does not have the necessary forms. I also tried a lot of identities listed here: http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/17/02/06/ but no success so far.
Alternatively, I can also obtain the equation
$${}_3F_2(-n,-a-1 ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; -1), $$
by using few operations in the early stage of the problem, but the list of formulas is much larger for $z=1$.
I'm not really an expert on the hypergeometric functions, so a help from a trained eye in this problematic would be appreciated and very helpfull. From what I have read, the ${}_3F_2(-n,...;...; 1)$ form of the hypergeometric function ${}_3F_2$ frequently appears in many problems.
sequences-and-series special-functions hypergeometric-function sums-of-squares
$endgroup$
Recently I obtained the following expression
$${}_3F_2(-n,a - b ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; 1), $$
with $b>a>0$ and $ninmathbb{N}$.
My question is: If someone knows a closed form solution to the above expression (either in terms of the gamma function or the rising factorials).
I'm aware of the Saalschütz's theorem which states that
$${}_3F_2(-n,a,b; c, 1+a+b-n-c; 1) = frac{(c-a)_{n}(c-b)_{n}}{(c)_{n}(c-a-b)_{n}}, $$
or the Dixon's identity, however the derived equation (while only based on 3 parameters) does not have the necessary forms. I also tried a lot of identities listed here: http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/Hypergeometric3F2/17/02/06/ but no success so far.
Alternatively, I can also obtain the equation
$${}_3F_2(-n,-a-1 ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; -1), $$
by using few operations in the early stage of the problem, but the list of formulas is much larger for $z=1$.
I'm not really an expert on the hypergeometric functions, so a help from a trained eye in this problematic would be appreciated and very helpfull. From what I have read, the ${}_3F_2(-n,...;...; 1)$ form of the hypergeometric function ${}_3F_2$ frequently appears in many problems.
sequences-and-series special-functions hypergeometric-function sums-of-squares
sequences-and-series special-functions hypergeometric-function sums-of-squares
asked Jan 25 at 10:01
K. KeeperK. Keeper
335
335
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I am not an expert on hypergeometric functions, but just incrementing by $n$ in Mathematica and looking for a pattern I find conjecturally that up to $n=5$ (and further if the pattern continues):
$${}_3F_2(-n,a - b ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; 1)= sum _{k=0}^n frac{(-1)^{k} binom{n}{k} left(prod _{j=1}^k (-b+j-n)right)left(prod _{j=1}^k (a-b+j-1)right) }{ left(prod _{j=1}^k (-a+j-n)right)left(prod _{j=1}^k (b+j)right) }$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Isn't this also the case just by the definition of ${}_3F_2$? I was hoping more for a solution not involving a sum, if there is any. Something in the lines of mathworld.wolfram.com/GausssHypergeometricTheorem.html, which is derived for more general case of a simpler hypergeometric function. But thanks a lot anyway.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 13:39
$begingroup$
Thanks for clarifying. For $n=3$ you get $$frac{(b+2) left(-6 a^3-6 a^2 b^2+6 a^2 b+15 a b^3+18 a b^2+15 a b+6 a+b^5-2 b^4-b^3+2 b^2right)}{(-a-2) (-a-1) a (b+1) (b+2) (b+3)}$$ where the $(b+2)$ cancels the numerator can't be factorised further; it doesn't look promising.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Jan 25 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Hmm, interesting. Actually (using also now Mathematica to evaluate it) the second function (the one with -1) seems to have a nicer form as it returns much more stable fractions but so far I could not find the pattern.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 23:00
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086928%2fhypergeometric-function-3f2-with-unit-argument%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I am not an expert on hypergeometric functions, but just incrementing by $n$ in Mathematica and looking for a pattern I find conjecturally that up to $n=5$ (and further if the pattern continues):
$${}_3F_2(-n,a - b ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; 1)= sum _{k=0}^n frac{(-1)^{k} binom{n}{k} left(prod _{j=1}^k (-b+j-n)right)left(prod _{j=1}^k (a-b+j-1)right) }{ left(prod _{j=1}^k (-a+j-n)right)left(prod _{j=1}^k (b+j)right) }$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Isn't this also the case just by the definition of ${}_3F_2$? I was hoping more for a solution not involving a sum, if there is any. Something in the lines of mathworld.wolfram.com/GausssHypergeometricTheorem.html, which is derived for more general case of a simpler hypergeometric function. But thanks a lot anyway.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 13:39
$begingroup$
Thanks for clarifying. For $n=3$ you get $$frac{(b+2) left(-6 a^3-6 a^2 b^2+6 a^2 b+15 a b^3+18 a b^2+15 a b+6 a+b^5-2 b^4-b^3+2 b^2right)}{(-a-2) (-a-1) a (b+1) (b+2) (b+3)}$$ where the $(b+2)$ cancels the numerator can't be factorised further; it doesn't look promising.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Jan 25 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Hmm, interesting. Actually (using also now Mathematica to evaluate it) the second function (the one with -1) seems to have a nicer form as it returns much more stable fractions but so far I could not find the pattern.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 23:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am not an expert on hypergeometric functions, but just incrementing by $n$ in Mathematica and looking for a pattern I find conjecturally that up to $n=5$ (and further if the pattern continues):
$${}_3F_2(-n,a - b ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; 1)= sum _{k=0}^n frac{(-1)^{k} binom{n}{k} left(prod _{j=1}^k (-b+j-n)right)left(prod _{j=1}^k (a-b+j-1)right) }{ left(prod _{j=1}^k (-a+j-n)right)left(prod _{j=1}^k (b+j)right) }$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Isn't this also the case just by the definition of ${}_3F_2$? I was hoping more for a solution not involving a sum, if there is any. Something in the lines of mathworld.wolfram.com/GausssHypergeometricTheorem.html, which is derived for more general case of a simpler hypergeometric function. But thanks a lot anyway.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 13:39
$begingroup$
Thanks for clarifying. For $n=3$ you get $$frac{(b+2) left(-6 a^3-6 a^2 b^2+6 a^2 b+15 a b^3+18 a b^2+15 a b+6 a+b^5-2 b^4-b^3+2 b^2right)}{(-a-2) (-a-1) a (b+1) (b+2) (b+3)}$$ where the $(b+2)$ cancels the numerator can't be factorised further; it doesn't look promising.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Jan 25 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Hmm, interesting. Actually (using also now Mathematica to evaluate it) the second function (the one with -1) seems to have a nicer form as it returns much more stable fractions but so far I could not find the pattern.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 23:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am not an expert on hypergeometric functions, but just incrementing by $n$ in Mathematica and looking for a pattern I find conjecturally that up to $n=5$ (and further if the pattern continues):
$${}_3F_2(-n,a - b ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; 1)= sum _{k=0}^n frac{(-1)^{k} binom{n}{k} left(prod _{j=1}^k (-b+j-n)right)left(prod _{j=1}^k (a-b+j-1)right) }{ left(prod _{j=1}^k (-a+j-n)right)left(prod _{j=1}^k (b+j)right) }$$
$endgroup$
I am not an expert on hypergeometric functions, but just incrementing by $n$ in Mathematica and looking for a pattern I find conjecturally that up to $n=5$ (and further if the pattern continues):
$${}_3F_2(-n,a - b ,1-b-n; b + 1, 1-a-n; 1)= sum _{k=0}^n frac{(-1)^{k} binom{n}{k} left(prod _{j=1}^k (-b+j-n)right)left(prod _{j=1}^k (a-b+j-1)right) }{ left(prod _{j=1}^k (-a+j-n)right)left(prod _{j=1}^k (b+j)right) }$$
edited Jan 25 at 13:06
answered Jan 25 at 12:52
James ArathoonJames Arathoon
1,546423
1,546423
$begingroup$
Isn't this also the case just by the definition of ${}_3F_2$? I was hoping more for a solution not involving a sum, if there is any. Something in the lines of mathworld.wolfram.com/GausssHypergeometricTheorem.html, which is derived for more general case of a simpler hypergeometric function. But thanks a lot anyway.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 13:39
$begingroup$
Thanks for clarifying. For $n=3$ you get $$frac{(b+2) left(-6 a^3-6 a^2 b^2+6 a^2 b+15 a b^3+18 a b^2+15 a b+6 a+b^5-2 b^4-b^3+2 b^2right)}{(-a-2) (-a-1) a (b+1) (b+2) (b+3)}$$ where the $(b+2)$ cancels the numerator can't be factorised further; it doesn't look promising.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Jan 25 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Hmm, interesting. Actually (using also now Mathematica to evaluate it) the second function (the one with -1) seems to have a nicer form as it returns much more stable fractions but so far I could not find the pattern.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 23:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Isn't this also the case just by the definition of ${}_3F_2$? I was hoping more for a solution not involving a sum, if there is any. Something in the lines of mathworld.wolfram.com/GausssHypergeometricTheorem.html, which is derived for more general case of a simpler hypergeometric function. But thanks a lot anyway.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 13:39
$begingroup$
Thanks for clarifying. For $n=3$ you get $$frac{(b+2) left(-6 a^3-6 a^2 b^2+6 a^2 b+15 a b^3+18 a b^2+15 a b+6 a+b^5-2 b^4-b^3+2 b^2right)}{(-a-2) (-a-1) a (b+1) (b+2) (b+3)}$$ where the $(b+2)$ cancels the numerator can't be factorised further; it doesn't look promising.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Jan 25 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Hmm, interesting. Actually (using also now Mathematica to evaluate it) the second function (the one with -1) seems to have a nicer form as it returns much more stable fractions but so far I could not find the pattern.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 23:00
$begingroup$
Isn't this also the case just by the definition of ${}_3F_2$? I was hoping more for a solution not involving a sum, if there is any. Something in the lines of mathworld.wolfram.com/GausssHypergeometricTheorem.html, which is derived for more general case of a simpler hypergeometric function. But thanks a lot anyway.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 13:39
$begingroup$
Isn't this also the case just by the definition of ${}_3F_2$? I was hoping more for a solution not involving a sum, if there is any. Something in the lines of mathworld.wolfram.com/GausssHypergeometricTheorem.html, which is derived for more general case of a simpler hypergeometric function. But thanks a lot anyway.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 13:39
$begingroup$
Thanks for clarifying. For $n=3$ you get $$frac{(b+2) left(-6 a^3-6 a^2 b^2+6 a^2 b+15 a b^3+18 a b^2+15 a b+6 a+b^5-2 b^4-b^3+2 b^2right)}{(-a-2) (-a-1) a (b+1) (b+2) (b+3)}$$ where the $(b+2)$ cancels the numerator can't be factorised further; it doesn't look promising.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Jan 25 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Thanks for clarifying. For $n=3$ you get $$frac{(b+2) left(-6 a^3-6 a^2 b^2+6 a^2 b+15 a b^3+18 a b^2+15 a b+6 a+b^5-2 b^4-b^3+2 b^2right)}{(-a-2) (-a-1) a (b+1) (b+2) (b+3)}$$ where the $(b+2)$ cancels the numerator can't be factorised further; it doesn't look promising.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
Jan 25 at 14:48
$begingroup$
Hmm, interesting. Actually (using also now Mathematica to evaluate it) the second function (the one with -1) seems to have a nicer form as it returns much more stable fractions but so far I could not find the pattern.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 23:00
$begingroup$
Hmm, interesting. Actually (using also now Mathematica to evaluate it) the second function (the one with -1) seems to have a nicer form as it returns much more stable fractions but so far I could not find the pattern.
$endgroup$
– K. Keeper
Jan 25 at 23:00
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3086928%2fhypergeometric-function-3f2-with-unit-argument%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown