Even numbers of circ causes weird spacing
I noticed when trying to make a string of 6 circ
symbols that the last one is closer to the one beside it than the rest of them, after playing with it for a while it looks like an even number (greater than 2) of circ
causes this, how can I fix the spacing so it is even?
Example:
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ $
2 circ: $circ circ $
3 circ: $circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$
5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ $
7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ $
end{document}
math-mode spacing
add a comment |
I noticed when trying to make a string of 6 circ
symbols that the last one is closer to the one beside it than the rest of them, after playing with it for a while it looks like an even number (greater than 2) of circ
causes this, how can I fix the spacing so it is even?
Example:
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ $
2 circ: $circ circ $
3 circ: $circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$
5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ $
7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ $
end{document}
math-mode spacing
1
One way is to makecirc
not a binary/relational operator. Use{circ}
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 21:44
... red circ, blue circ. :-)
– Mees de Vries
Jan 16 at 23:57
add a comment |
I noticed when trying to make a string of 6 circ
symbols that the last one is closer to the one beside it than the rest of them, after playing with it for a while it looks like an even number (greater than 2) of circ
causes this, how can I fix the spacing so it is even?
Example:
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ $
2 circ: $circ circ $
3 circ: $circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$
5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ $
7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ $
end{document}
math-mode spacing
I noticed when trying to make a string of 6 circ
symbols that the last one is closer to the one beside it than the rest of them, after playing with it for a while it looks like an even number (greater than 2) of circ
causes this, how can I fix the spacing so it is even?
Example:
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ $
2 circ: $circ circ $
3 circ: $circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$
5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ $
7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ $
end{document}
math-mode spacing
math-mode spacing
edited Jan 16 at 22:16
Mark Omo
asked Jan 16 at 21:41
Mark OmoMark Omo
1385
1385
1
One way is to makecirc
not a binary/relational operator. Use{circ}
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 21:44
... red circ, blue circ. :-)
– Mees de Vries
Jan 16 at 23:57
add a comment |
1
One way is to makecirc
not a binary/relational operator. Use{circ}
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 21:44
... red circ, blue circ. :-)
– Mees de Vries
Jan 16 at 23:57
1
1
One way is to make
circ
not a binary/relational operator. Use {circ}
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 21:44
One way is to make
circ
not a binary/relational operator. Use {circ}
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 21:44
... red circ, blue circ. :-)
– Mees de Vries
Jan 16 at 23:57
... red circ, blue circ. :-)
– Mees de Vries
Jan 16 at 23:57
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
From the TeXbook (page 187, solution on page 326)
Exercise 19.7
B. L. User tried typing ‘eqno(*)
’ and ‘eqno(**)
’,
and he was pleased to discover that this produced the equation numbers
‘(∗)’ and ‘(∗∗)’. [He had been a bit worried that they would come out
‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’ instead.] But then a few months later he tried
‘eqno(***)
’ and got a surprise. What was it?
When you type an asterisk in math mode, plain TeX considers
*
to be a binary operation. In the cases ‘(*)
’ and ‘(**)
’, the
binary operations are converted to type Ord, because they don't appear in
a binary context; but the middle asterisk in ‘(***)
’ remains of type Bin.
So the result was ‘(∗ ∗ ∗)’. To avoid the extra medium spaces, you can
type ‘eqno(*{*}*)
’; or you can changemathcode`*
, if you never use
*
as a binary operation.
It doesn't matter if we're in an equation number (eqno
); the main issue is math mode where the behavior shows. Since circ
is a binary operation symbol just like *
, you get the same.
If you want evenly spaced circ
symbols you can use
{circ};{circ};{circ};{circ}
Even better, define a suitable command:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommand{circs}{m}
{
ensuremath
{{
{circ}prg_replicate:nn { #1 - 1 } { ; {circ} }
}}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
$circs{1}$
$circs{2}$
$circs{3}$
$circs{4}$
$circs{5}$
$circs{6}$
$circs{7}$
end{document}
Great explanation (and excercise too)!
– manooooh
Jan 16 at 22:09
1
@manooooh That's due to Knuth.;-)
– egreg
Jan 16 at 22:09
add a comment |
When you issue showcirc
you'll see it defined as mathchar"220E
. The first number in this definition points to the intrinsic "format" of the character. 2
denotes a binary operator which has a specific spacing around. So, circ
is considered a binary operator and therefore expects operands on either side. Odd-numbered circ
s show better alignment as they supply "operands" on either side (barring accommodation for uniform spacing around consecutive circ
s):
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ$
2 circ: $circ circ$
2 circ: $circ circ {}$
3 circ: $circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ {}$
5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ$
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ {}$
7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ$
end{document}
If you just want to list a number of circ
s with the correct spacing, consider adding a empty math group at the end when using an even number of circ
s. Alternatively, use {circ}
or mathord{circ}
to avoid the surrounding space; mathord
turns its argument into a math ordinal.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470447%2feven-numbers-of-circ-causes-weird-spacing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From the TeXbook (page 187, solution on page 326)
Exercise 19.7
B. L. User tried typing ‘eqno(*)
’ and ‘eqno(**)
’,
and he was pleased to discover that this produced the equation numbers
‘(∗)’ and ‘(∗∗)’. [He had been a bit worried that they would come out
‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’ instead.] But then a few months later he tried
‘eqno(***)
’ and got a surprise. What was it?
When you type an asterisk in math mode, plain TeX considers
*
to be a binary operation. In the cases ‘(*)
’ and ‘(**)
’, the
binary operations are converted to type Ord, because they don't appear in
a binary context; but the middle asterisk in ‘(***)
’ remains of type Bin.
So the result was ‘(∗ ∗ ∗)’. To avoid the extra medium spaces, you can
type ‘eqno(*{*}*)
’; or you can changemathcode`*
, if you never use
*
as a binary operation.
It doesn't matter if we're in an equation number (eqno
); the main issue is math mode where the behavior shows. Since circ
is a binary operation symbol just like *
, you get the same.
If you want evenly spaced circ
symbols you can use
{circ};{circ};{circ};{circ}
Even better, define a suitable command:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommand{circs}{m}
{
ensuremath
{{
{circ}prg_replicate:nn { #1 - 1 } { ; {circ} }
}}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
$circs{1}$
$circs{2}$
$circs{3}$
$circs{4}$
$circs{5}$
$circs{6}$
$circs{7}$
end{document}
Great explanation (and excercise too)!
– manooooh
Jan 16 at 22:09
1
@manooooh That's due to Knuth.;-)
– egreg
Jan 16 at 22:09
add a comment |
From the TeXbook (page 187, solution on page 326)
Exercise 19.7
B. L. User tried typing ‘eqno(*)
’ and ‘eqno(**)
’,
and he was pleased to discover that this produced the equation numbers
‘(∗)’ and ‘(∗∗)’. [He had been a bit worried that they would come out
‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’ instead.] But then a few months later he tried
‘eqno(***)
’ and got a surprise. What was it?
When you type an asterisk in math mode, plain TeX considers
*
to be a binary operation. In the cases ‘(*)
’ and ‘(**)
’, the
binary operations are converted to type Ord, because they don't appear in
a binary context; but the middle asterisk in ‘(***)
’ remains of type Bin.
So the result was ‘(∗ ∗ ∗)’. To avoid the extra medium spaces, you can
type ‘eqno(*{*}*)
’; or you can changemathcode`*
, if you never use
*
as a binary operation.
It doesn't matter if we're in an equation number (eqno
); the main issue is math mode where the behavior shows. Since circ
is a binary operation symbol just like *
, you get the same.
If you want evenly spaced circ
symbols you can use
{circ};{circ};{circ};{circ}
Even better, define a suitable command:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommand{circs}{m}
{
ensuremath
{{
{circ}prg_replicate:nn { #1 - 1 } { ; {circ} }
}}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
$circs{1}$
$circs{2}$
$circs{3}$
$circs{4}$
$circs{5}$
$circs{6}$
$circs{7}$
end{document}
Great explanation (and excercise too)!
– manooooh
Jan 16 at 22:09
1
@manooooh That's due to Knuth.;-)
– egreg
Jan 16 at 22:09
add a comment |
From the TeXbook (page 187, solution on page 326)
Exercise 19.7
B. L. User tried typing ‘eqno(*)
’ and ‘eqno(**)
’,
and he was pleased to discover that this produced the equation numbers
‘(∗)’ and ‘(∗∗)’. [He had been a bit worried that they would come out
‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’ instead.] But then a few months later he tried
‘eqno(***)
’ and got a surprise. What was it?
When you type an asterisk in math mode, plain TeX considers
*
to be a binary operation. In the cases ‘(*)
’ and ‘(**)
’, the
binary operations are converted to type Ord, because they don't appear in
a binary context; but the middle asterisk in ‘(***)
’ remains of type Bin.
So the result was ‘(∗ ∗ ∗)’. To avoid the extra medium spaces, you can
type ‘eqno(*{*}*)
’; or you can changemathcode`*
, if you never use
*
as a binary operation.
It doesn't matter if we're in an equation number (eqno
); the main issue is math mode where the behavior shows. Since circ
is a binary operation symbol just like *
, you get the same.
If you want evenly spaced circ
symbols you can use
{circ};{circ};{circ};{circ}
Even better, define a suitable command:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommand{circs}{m}
{
ensuremath
{{
{circ}prg_replicate:nn { #1 - 1 } { ; {circ} }
}}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
$circs{1}$
$circs{2}$
$circs{3}$
$circs{4}$
$circs{5}$
$circs{6}$
$circs{7}$
end{document}
From the TeXbook (page 187, solution on page 326)
Exercise 19.7
B. L. User tried typing ‘eqno(*)
’ and ‘eqno(**)
’,
and he was pleased to discover that this produced the equation numbers
‘(∗)’ and ‘(∗∗)’. [He had been a bit worried that they would come out
‘(*)’ and ‘(**)’ instead.] But then a few months later he tried
‘eqno(***)
’ and got a surprise. What was it?
When you type an asterisk in math mode, plain TeX considers
*
to be a binary operation. In the cases ‘(*)
’ and ‘(**)
’, the
binary operations are converted to type Ord, because they don't appear in
a binary context; but the middle asterisk in ‘(***)
’ remains of type Bin.
So the result was ‘(∗ ∗ ∗)’. To avoid the extra medium spaces, you can
type ‘eqno(*{*}*)
’; or you can changemathcode`*
, if you never use
*
as a binary operation.
It doesn't matter if we're in an equation number (eqno
); the main issue is math mode where the behavior shows. Since circ
is a binary operation symbol just like *
, you get the same.
If you want evenly spaced circ
symbols you can use
{circ};{circ};{circ};{circ}
Even better, define a suitable command:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xparse}
ExplSyntaxOn
NewDocumentCommand{circs}{m}
{
ensuremath
{{
{circ}prg_replicate:nn { #1 - 1 } { ; {circ} }
}}
}
ExplSyntaxOff
begin{document}
$circs{1}$
$circs{2}$
$circs{3}$
$circs{4}$
$circs{5}$
$circs{6}$
$circs{7}$
end{document}
edited Jan 16 at 22:14
answered Jan 16 at 22:07
egregegreg
718k8719043200
718k8719043200
Great explanation (and excercise too)!
– manooooh
Jan 16 at 22:09
1
@manooooh That's due to Knuth.;-)
– egreg
Jan 16 at 22:09
add a comment |
Great explanation (and excercise too)!
– manooooh
Jan 16 at 22:09
1
@manooooh That's due to Knuth.;-)
– egreg
Jan 16 at 22:09
Great explanation (and excercise too)!
– manooooh
Jan 16 at 22:09
Great explanation (and excercise too)!
– manooooh
Jan 16 at 22:09
1
1
@manooooh That's due to Knuth.
;-)
– egreg
Jan 16 at 22:09
@manooooh That's due to Knuth.
;-)
– egreg
Jan 16 at 22:09
add a comment |
When you issue showcirc
you'll see it defined as mathchar"220E
. The first number in this definition points to the intrinsic "format" of the character. 2
denotes a binary operator which has a specific spacing around. So, circ
is considered a binary operator and therefore expects operands on either side. Odd-numbered circ
s show better alignment as they supply "operands" on either side (barring accommodation for uniform spacing around consecutive circ
s):
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ$
2 circ: $circ circ$
2 circ: $circ circ {}$
3 circ: $circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ {}$
5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ$
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ {}$
7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ$
end{document}
If you just want to list a number of circ
s with the correct spacing, consider adding a empty math group at the end when using an even number of circ
s. Alternatively, use {circ}
or mathord{circ}
to avoid the surrounding space; mathord
turns its argument into a math ordinal.
add a comment |
When you issue showcirc
you'll see it defined as mathchar"220E
. The first number in this definition points to the intrinsic "format" of the character. 2
denotes a binary operator which has a specific spacing around. So, circ
is considered a binary operator and therefore expects operands on either side. Odd-numbered circ
s show better alignment as they supply "operands" on either side (barring accommodation for uniform spacing around consecutive circ
s):
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ$
2 circ: $circ circ$
2 circ: $circ circ {}$
3 circ: $circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ {}$
5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ$
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ {}$
7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ$
end{document}
If you just want to list a number of circ
s with the correct spacing, consider adding a empty math group at the end when using an even number of circ
s. Alternatively, use {circ}
or mathord{circ}
to avoid the surrounding space; mathord
turns its argument into a math ordinal.
add a comment |
When you issue showcirc
you'll see it defined as mathchar"220E
. The first number in this definition points to the intrinsic "format" of the character. 2
denotes a binary operator which has a specific spacing around. So, circ
is considered a binary operator and therefore expects operands on either side. Odd-numbered circ
s show better alignment as they supply "operands" on either side (barring accommodation for uniform spacing around consecutive circ
s):
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ$
2 circ: $circ circ$
2 circ: $circ circ {}$
3 circ: $circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ {}$
5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ$
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ {}$
7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ$
end{document}
If you just want to list a number of circ
s with the correct spacing, consider adding a empty math group at the end when using an even number of circ
s. Alternatively, use {circ}
or mathord{circ}
to avoid the surrounding space; mathord
turns its argument into a math ordinal.
When you issue showcirc
you'll see it defined as mathchar"220E
. The first number in this definition points to the intrinsic "format" of the character. 2
denotes a binary operator which has a specific spacing around. So, circ
is considered a binary operator and therefore expects operands on either side. Odd-numbered circ
s show better alignment as they supply "operands" on either side (barring accommodation for uniform spacing around consecutive circ
s):
documentclass{article}
begin{document}
1 circ: $circ$
2 circ: $circ circ$
2 circ: $circ circ {}$
3 circ: $circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ$
4 circ: $circ circ circ circ {}$
5 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ $
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ$
6 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ {}$
7 circ: $circ circ circ circ circ circ circ$
end{document}
If you just want to list a number of circ
s with the correct spacing, consider adding a empty math group at the end when using an even number of circ
s. Alternatively, use {circ}
or mathord{circ}
to avoid the surrounding space; mathord
turns its argument into a math ordinal.
answered Jan 16 at 21:54
WernerWerner
443k679791676
443k679791676
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470447%2feven-numbers-of-circ-causes-weird-spacing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
One way is to make
circ
not a binary/relational operator. Use{circ}
– Sigur
Jan 16 at 21:44
... red circ, blue circ. :-)
– Mees de Vries
Jan 16 at 23:57