Elementary set theory problems and “proof techniques”
Multi tool use
$begingroup$
Let $f:Ato B$ be a function.. Consider the following functions on the powersets of $A$ and $B$:
$$f[-]:mathcal P(A)tomathcal P(B), f[S] = {yin B | exists xin S, f(x)=y}$$
$$f^{-1}[-]:mathcal P(B)tomathcal P(A), f^{-1}[T] = {xin A | f(x)in T}$$
Show that for every $S,S'subseteq A, T,T' subseteq B$:
$Ssubseteq f^{-1}[f[S]]$ and $f[f^{-1}[T]]subseteq T$
My attempt:
$f^{-1}[f[S]]={xin A|f(x)in{yin B|exists xin S, f(x)=y}}$. And this for me looks pretty obvious that $S$ must be included in this set, but how do I really prove it? What's there to say about it?
elementary-set-theory
edited Jan 17 at 19:04
Andrés E. Caicedo
65.4k8158249
asked Jan 17 at 18:52
C. CristiC. Cristi
1,629218
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:Ato B$ be a function.. Consider the following functions on the powersets of $A$ and $B$:
$$f[-]:mathcal P(A)tomathcal P(B), f[S] = {yin B | exists xin S, f(x)=y}$$
$$f^{-1}[-]:mathcal P(B)tomathcal P(A), f^{-1}[T] = {xin A | f(x)in T}$$
Show that for every $S,S'subseteq A, T,T' subseteq B$:
$Ssubseteq f^{-1}[f[S]]$ and $f[f^{-1}[T]]subseteq T$
My attempt:
$f^{-1}[f[S]]={xin A|f(x)in{yin B|exists xin S, f(x)=y}}$. And this for me looks pretty obvious that $S$ must be included in this set, but how do I really prove it? What's there to say about it?
elementary-set-theory
edited Jan 17 at 19:04
Andrés E. Caicedo
65.4k8158249
asked Jan 17 at 18:52
C. CristiC. Cristi
1,629218
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The standard way to prove that $Ssubset Z$ (for any set $Z$) is to prove, for all $x$, that $xin S implies xin Z$. So you need to prove the following statement: if $xin S$, then $xin f^{-1}[f[S]]$. Can you do that from the definition you wrote down? (or rather, the corrected definition where you don't use $x$ to mean two different things)
$endgroup$
– Greg Martin
Jan 17 at 19:00
$begingroup$
@GregMartin I don't think, I mean, not really, I don't think I can think this through, so, $f[S]$ is the set with all $yin B$ such that $f(x)=y$ and $x$ is $in S$, and $f^{-1}[f[S]]$ is the set with all $x in A$ such that $f(x) in f[S]$ so all $x$ in $A$ not $S$ and I don't get it
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 17 at 20:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:Ato B$ be a function.. Consider the following functions on the powersets of $A$ and $B$:
$$f[-]:mathcal P(A)tomathcal P(B), f[S] = {yin B | exists xin S, f(x)=y}$$
$$f^{-1}[-]:mathcal P(B)tomathcal P(A), f^{-1}[T] = {xin A | f(x)in T}$$
Show that for every $S,S'subseteq A, T,T' subseteq B$:
$Ssubseteq f^{-1}[f[S]]$ and $f[f^{-1}[T]]subseteq T$
My attempt:
$f^{-1}[f[S]]={xin A|f(x)in{yin B|exists xin S, f(x)=y}}$. And this for me looks pretty obvious that $S$ must be included in this set, but how do I really prove it? What's there to say about it?
elementary-set-theory
edited Jan 17 at 19:04
Andrés E. Caicedo
65.4k8158249
asked Jan 17 at 18:52
C. CristiC. Cristi
1,629218
$endgroup$
Let $f:Ato B$ be a function.. Consider the following functions on the powersets of $A$ and $B$:
$$f[-]:mathcal P(A)tomathcal P(B), f[S] = {yin B | exists xin S, f(x)=y}$$
$$f^{-1}[-]:mathcal P(B)tomathcal P(A), f^{-1}[T] = {xin A | f(x)in T}$$
Show that for every $S,S'subseteq A, T,T' subseteq B$:
$Ssubseteq f^{-1}[f[S]]$ and $f[f^{-1}[T]]subseteq T$
My attempt:
$f^{-1}[f[S]]={xin A|f(x)in{yin B|exists xin S, f(x)=y}}$. And this for me looks pretty obvious that $S$ must be included in this set, but how do I really prove it? What's there to say about it?
elementary-set-theory
elementary-set-theory
edited Jan 17 at 19:04
Andrés E. Caicedo
65.4k8158249
asked Jan 17 at 18:52
C. CristiC. Cristi
1,629218
edited Jan 17 at 19:04
Andrés E. Caicedo
65.4k8158249
asked Jan 17 at 18:52
C. CristiC. Cristi
1,629218
edited Jan 17 at 19:04
Andrés E. Caicedo
65.4k8158249
edited Jan 17 at 19:04
Andrés E. Caicedo
65.4k8158249
edited Jan 17 at 19:04
Andrés E. Caicedo
65.4k8158249
65.4k8158249
asked Jan 17 at 18:52
C. CristiC. Cristi
1,629218
asked Jan 17 at 18:52
C. CristiC. Cristi
1,629218
asked Jan 17 at 18:52
C. CristiC. Cristi
1,629218
1,629218
$begingroup$
The standard way to prove that $Ssubset Z$ (for any set $Z$) is to prove, for all $x$, that $xin S implies xin Z$. So you need to prove the following statement: if $xin S$, then $xin f^{-1}[f[S]]$. Can you do that from the definition you wrote down? (or rather, the corrected definition where you don't use $x$ to mean two different things)
$endgroup$
– Greg Martin
Jan 17 at 19:00
$begingroup$
@GregMartin I don't think, I mean, not really, I don't think I can think this through, so, $f[S]$ is the set with all $yin B$ such that $f(x)=y$ and $x$ is $in S$, and $f^{-1}[f[S]]$ is the set with all $x in A$ such that $f(x) in f[S]$ so all $x$ in $A$ not $S$ and I don't get it
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 17 at 20:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The standard way to prove that $Ssubset Z$ (for any set $Z$) is to prove, for all $x$, that $xin S implies xin Z$. So you need to prove the following statement: if $xin S$, then $xin f^{-1}[f[S]]$. Can you do that from the definition you wrote down? (or rather, the corrected definition where you don't use $x$ to mean two different things)
$endgroup$
– Greg Martin
Jan 17 at 19:00
$begingroup$
@GregMartin I don't think, I mean, not really, I don't think I can think this through, so, $f[S]$ is the set with all $yin B$ such that $f(x)=y$ and $x$ is $in S$, and $f^{-1}[f[S]]$ is the set with all $x in A$ such that $f(x) in f[S]$ so all $x$ in $A$ not $S$ and I don't get it
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 17 at 20:04
$begingroup$
The standard way to prove that $Ssubset Z$ (for any set $Z$) is to prove, for all $x$, that $xin S implies xin Z$. So you need to prove the following statement: if $xin S$, then $xin f^{-1}[f[S]]$. Can you do that from the definition you wrote down? (or rather, the corrected definition where you don't use $x$ to mean two different things)
$endgroup$
– Greg Martin
Jan 17 at 19:00
$begingroup$
The standard way to prove that $Ssubset Z$ (for any set $Z$) is to prove, for all $x$, that $xin S implies xin Z$. So you need to prove the following statement: if $xin S$, then $xin f^{-1}[f[S]]$. Can you do that from the definition you wrote down? (or rather, the corrected definition where you don't use $x$ to mean two different things)
$endgroup$
– Greg Martin
Jan 17 at 19:00
$begingroup$
@GregMartin I don't think, I mean, not really, I don't think I can think this through, so, $f[S]$ is the set with all $yin B$ such that $f(x)=y$ and $x$ is $in S$, and $f^{-1}[f[S]]$ is the set with all $x in A$ such that $f(x) in f[S]$ so all $x$ in $A$ not $S$ and I don't get it
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 17 at 20:04
$begingroup$
@GregMartin I don't think, I mean, not really, I don't think I can think this through, so, $f[S]$ is the set with all $yin B$ such that $f(x)=y$ and $x$ is $in S$, and $f^{-1}[f[S]]$ is the set with all $x in A$ such that $f(x) in f[S]$ so all $x$ in $A$ not $S$ and I don't get it
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 17 at 20:04
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I am a bit confused about your notation.
Is this version correct?
Assume $f:A to B$. Define $g:P(A) to P(B)$, $S to f^{-1}(S)$.
$h:P(B) to P(A)$, $S to f(S)$. Show $S subseteq hg(S)$, $gh(S) subseteq S$.
$S subset$ $f^{-1}(f(S)) = hg(S)$. Proof.
If $x in Simplies f(x) in f(S)$, $x in f^{-1}(f(S))$.
$f(f^{-1}(S)) = gh(S)$ $subset S$. Proof.
If $y in f(f^{-1}(S))implies exists x in f^{-1}(S)$ with $y = f(x)$;
$exists x$ with $f(x) in S$ and $y = f(x)implies y in S$.
edited Jan 18 at 12:09
Thomas Shelby
3,1271524
answered Jan 18 at 0:38
William ElliotWilliam Elliot
8,1212720
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
looks right I think, but can you edit more using mathJax?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:55
$begingroup$
Review my edit please.
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:59
$begingroup$
Can you add more details? You just apply $f^{-1}$ on both sides at the first proof?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 12:02
$begingroup$
No I did not do that to both sides, is used the definitions of f and inverse f as extended for sets. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
Remove the implication symbols and replace with the orginal English as they mess up the logic. If ... implies ... is absurd. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is how I would do these proofs: using element chasing, so seeing which elements are part of the most complex side, and then expanding definitions and simplifying towards the simpler side.$%
require{begingroup}
begingroup
newcommand{calc}{begin{align} quad &}
newcommand{op}[1]{\ #1 quad & quad unicode{x201c}}
newcommand{hints}[1]{mbox{#1} \ quad & quad phantom{unicode{x201c}} }
newcommand{hint}[1]{mbox{#1} unicode{x201d} \ quad & }
newcommand{endcalc}{end{align}}
newcommand{subcalch}[1]{\ quad & quad #1 \ quad &}
newcommand{subcalc}{quad begin{aligned} quad & \ bullet quad & }
newcommand{endsubcalc}{end{aligned} \ \ cdot quad &}
newcommand{Ref}[1]{text{(#1)}}
newcommand{then}{implies}
newcommand{when}{impliedby}
newcommand{equiv}{iff}
newcommand{true}{text{true}}
%$
For the first problem, let's see which $;s;$ are in the right hand side:
$$calc
s in f^{-1}[f[S]]
opequivhint{definition of $;f^{-1}[-];$}
s in A ;land; f(s) in f[S]
opequivhint{definition of $;f[-];$}
s in A ;land; f(s) in B ;land; exists x in S, f(x) = f(s)
opwhenhint{left: use $;S subseteq A;$; middle: $;f : A to B;$; right: choose $;x:=s;$}
s in S ;land; true ;land; f(s) = f(s)
opequivhint{logic: simplify}
s in S
endcalc$$
which (by set extensionality) proves $;S subseteq f^{-1}[f[S]];$.
The second statement can be proven similarly.
$%
endgroup
%$
answered Jan 19 at 10:17
Marnix KloosterMarnix Klooster
4,21322147
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077369%2felementary-set-theory-problems-and-proof-techniques%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I am a bit confused about your notation.
Is this version correct?
Assume $f:A to B$. Define $g:P(A) to P(B)$, $S to f^{-1}(S)$.
$h:P(B) to P(A)$, $S to f(S)$. Show $S subseteq hg(S)$, $gh(S) subseteq S$.
$S subset$ $f^{-1}(f(S)) = hg(S)$. Proof.
If $x in Simplies f(x) in f(S)$, $x in f^{-1}(f(S))$.
$f(f^{-1}(S)) = gh(S)$ $subset S$. Proof.
If $y in f(f^{-1}(S))implies exists x in f^{-1}(S)$ with $y = f(x)$;
$exists x$ with $f(x) in S$ and $y = f(x)implies y in S$.
edited Jan 18 at 12:09
Thomas Shelby
3,1271524
answered Jan 18 at 0:38
William ElliotWilliam Elliot
8,1212720
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
looks right I think, but can you edit more using mathJax?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:55
$begingroup$
Review my edit please.
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:59
$begingroup$
Can you add more details? You just apply $f^{-1}$ on both sides at the first proof?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 12:02
$begingroup$
No I did not do that to both sides, is used the definitions of f and inverse f as extended for sets. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
Remove the implication symbols and replace with the orginal English as they mess up the logic. If ... implies ... is absurd. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am a bit confused about your notation.
Is this version correct?
Assume $f:A to B$. Define $g:P(A) to P(B)$, $S to f^{-1}(S)$.
$h:P(B) to P(A)$, $S to f(S)$. Show $S subseteq hg(S)$, $gh(S) subseteq S$.
$S subset$ $f^{-1}(f(S)) = hg(S)$. Proof.
If $x in Simplies f(x) in f(S)$, $x in f^{-1}(f(S))$.
$f(f^{-1}(S)) = gh(S)$ $subset S$. Proof.
If $y in f(f^{-1}(S))implies exists x in f^{-1}(S)$ with $y = f(x)$;
$exists x$ with $f(x) in S$ and $y = f(x)implies y in S$.
edited Jan 18 at 12:09
Thomas Shelby
3,1271524
answered Jan 18 at 0:38
William ElliotWilliam Elliot
8,1212720
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
looks right I think, but can you edit more using mathJax?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:55
$begingroup$
Review my edit please.
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:59
$begingroup$
Can you add more details? You just apply $f^{-1}$ on both sides at the first proof?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 12:02
$begingroup$
No I did not do that to both sides, is used the definitions of f and inverse f as extended for sets. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
Remove the implication symbols and replace with the orginal English as they mess up the logic. If ... implies ... is absurd. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am a bit confused about your notation.
Is this version correct?
Assume $f:A to B$. Define $g:P(A) to P(B)$, $S to f^{-1}(S)$.
$h:P(B) to P(A)$, $S to f(S)$. Show $S subseteq hg(S)$, $gh(S) subseteq S$.
$S subset$ $f^{-1}(f(S)) = hg(S)$. Proof.
If $x in Simplies f(x) in f(S)$, $x in f^{-1}(f(S))$.
$f(f^{-1}(S)) = gh(S)$ $subset S$. Proof.
If $y in f(f^{-1}(S))implies exists x in f^{-1}(S)$ with $y = f(x)$;
$exists x$ with $f(x) in S$ and $y = f(x)implies y in S$.
edited Jan 18 at 12:09
Thomas Shelby
3,1271524
answered Jan 18 at 0:38
William ElliotWilliam Elliot
8,1212720
$endgroup$
I am a bit confused about your notation.
Is this version correct?
Assume $f:A to B$. Define $g:P(A) to P(B)$, $S to f^{-1}(S)$.
$h:P(B) to P(A)$, $S to f(S)$. Show $S subseteq hg(S)$, $gh(S) subseteq S$.
$S subset$ $f^{-1}(f(S)) = hg(S)$. Proof.
If $x in Simplies f(x) in f(S)$, $x in f^{-1}(f(S))$.
$f(f^{-1}(S)) = gh(S)$ $subset S$. Proof.
If $y in f(f^{-1}(S))implies exists x in f^{-1}(S)$ with $y = f(x)$;
$exists x$ with $f(x) in S$ and $y = f(x)implies y in S$.
edited Jan 18 at 12:09
Thomas Shelby
3,1271524
answered Jan 18 at 0:38
William ElliotWilliam Elliot
8,1212720
edited Jan 18 at 12:09
Thomas Shelby
3,1271524
edited Jan 18 at 12:09
Thomas Shelby
3,1271524
edited Jan 18 at 12:09
Thomas Shelby
3,1271524
3,1271524
answered Jan 18 at 0:38
William ElliotWilliam Elliot
8,1212720
answered Jan 18 at 0:38
William ElliotWilliam Elliot
8,1212720
answered Jan 18 at 0:38
William ElliotWilliam Elliot
8,1212720
8,1212720
$begingroup$
looks right I think, but can you edit more using mathJax?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:55
$begingroup$
Review my edit please.
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:59
$begingroup$
Can you add more details? You just apply $f^{-1}$ on both sides at the first proof?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 12:02
$begingroup$
No I did not do that to both sides, is used the definitions of f and inverse f as extended for sets. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
Remove the implication symbols and replace with the orginal English as they mess up the logic. If ... implies ... is absurd. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
looks right I think, but can you edit more using mathJax?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:55
$begingroup$
Review my edit please.
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:59
$begingroup$
Can you add more details? You just apply $f^{-1}$ on both sides at the first proof?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 12:02
$begingroup$
No I did not do that to both sides, is used the definitions of f and inverse f as extended for sets. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
Remove the implication symbols and replace with the orginal English as they mess up the logic. If ... implies ... is absurd. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:29
$begingroup$
looks right I think, but can you edit more using mathJax?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:55
$begingroup$
looks right I think, but can you edit more using mathJax?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:55
$begingroup$
Review my edit please.
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:59
$begingroup$
Review my edit please.
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 11:59
$begingroup$
Can you add more details? You just apply $f^{-1}$ on both sides at the first proof?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 12:02
$begingroup$
Can you add more details? You just apply $f^{-1}$ on both sides at the first proof?
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 18 at 12:02
$begingroup$
No I did not do that to both sides, is used the definitions of f and inverse f as extended for sets. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
No I did not do that to both sides, is used the definitions of f and inverse f as extended for sets. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:28
$begingroup$
Remove the implication symbols and replace with the orginal English as they mess up the logic. If ... implies ... is absurd. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:29
$begingroup$
Remove the implication symbols and replace with the orginal English as they mess up the logic. If ... implies ... is absurd. @C.Cristi
$endgroup$
– William Elliot
Jan 18 at 12:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is how I would do these proofs: using element chasing, so seeing which elements are part of the most complex side, and then expanding definitions and simplifying towards the simpler side.$%
require{begingroup}
begingroup
newcommand{calc}{begin{align} quad &}
newcommand{op}[1]{\ #1 quad & quad unicode{x201c}}
newcommand{hints}[1]{mbox{#1} \ quad & quad phantom{unicode{x201c}} }
newcommand{hint}[1]{mbox{#1} unicode{x201d} \ quad & }
newcommand{endcalc}{end{align}}
newcommand{subcalch}[1]{\ quad & quad #1 \ quad &}
newcommand{subcalc}{quad begin{aligned} quad & \ bullet quad & }
newcommand{endsubcalc}{end{aligned} \ \ cdot quad &}
newcommand{Ref}[1]{text{(#1)}}
newcommand{then}{implies}
newcommand{when}{impliedby}
newcommand{equiv}{iff}
newcommand{true}{text{true}}
%$
For the first problem, let's see which $;s;$ are in the right hand side:
$$calc
s in f^{-1}[f[S]]
opequivhint{definition of $;f^{-1}[-];$}
s in A ;land; f(s) in f[S]
opequivhint{definition of $;f[-];$}
s in A ;land; f(s) in B ;land; exists x in S, f(x) = f(s)
opwhenhint{left: use $;S subseteq A;$; middle: $;f : A to B;$; right: choose $;x:=s;$}
s in S ;land; true ;land; f(s) = f(s)
opequivhint{logic: simplify}
s in S
endcalc$$
which (by set extensionality) proves $;S subseteq f^{-1}[f[S]];$.
The second statement can be proven similarly.
$%
endgroup
%$
answered Jan 19 at 10:17
Marnix KloosterMarnix Klooster
4,21322147
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is how I would do these proofs: using element chasing, so seeing which elements are part of the most complex side, and then expanding definitions and simplifying towards the simpler side.$%
require{begingroup}
begingroup
newcommand{calc}{begin{align} quad &}
newcommand{op}[1]{\ #1 quad & quad unicode{x201c}}
newcommand{hints}[1]{mbox{#1} \ quad & quad phantom{unicode{x201c}} }
newcommand{hint}[1]{mbox{#1} unicode{x201d} \ quad & }
newcommand{endcalc}{end{align}}
newcommand{subcalch}[1]{\ quad & quad #1 \ quad &}
newcommand{subcalc}{quad begin{aligned} quad & \ bullet quad & }
newcommand{endsubcalc}{end{aligned} \ \ cdot quad &}
newcommand{Ref}[1]{text{(#1)}}
newcommand{then}{implies}
newcommand{when}{impliedby}
newcommand{equiv}{iff}
newcommand{true}{text{true}}
%$
For the first problem, let's see which $;s;$ are in the right hand side:
$$calc
s in f^{-1}[f[S]]
opequivhint{definition of $;f^{-1}[-];$}
s in A ;land; f(s) in f[S]
opequivhint{definition of $;f[-];$}
s in A ;land; f(s) in B ;land; exists x in S, f(x) = f(s)
opwhenhint{left: use $;S subseteq A;$; middle: $;f : A to B;$; right: choose $;x:=s;$}
s in S ;land; true ;land; f(s) = f(s)
opequivhint{logic: simplify}
s in S
endcalc$$
which (by set extensionality) proves $;S subseteq f^{-1}[f[S]];$.
The second statement can be proven similarly.
$%
endgroup
%$
answered Jan 19 at 10:17
Marnix KloosterMarnix Klooster
4,21322147
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is how I would do these proofs: using element chasing, so seeing which elements are part of the most complex side, and then expanding definitions and simplifying towards the simpler side.$%
require{begingroup}
begingroup
newcommand{calc}{begin{align} quad &}
newcommand{op}[1]{\ #1 quad & quad unicode{x201c}}
newcommand{hints}[1]{mbox{#1} \ quad & quad phantom{unicode{x201c}} }
newcommand{hint}[1]{mbox{#1} unicode{x201d} \ quad & }
newcommand{endcalc}{end{align}}
newcommand{subcalch}[1]{\ quad & quad #1 \ quad &}
newcommand{subcalc}{quad begin{aligned} quad & \ bullet quad & }
newcommand{endsubcalc}{end{aligned} \ \ cdot quad &}
newcommand{Ref}[1]{text{(#1)}}
newcommand{then}{implies}
newcommand{when}{impliedby}
newcommand{equiv}{iff}
newcommand{true}{text{true}}
%$
For the first problem, let's see which $;s;$ are in the right hand side:
$$calc
s in f^{-1}[f[S]]
opequivhint{definition of $;f^{-1}[-];$}
s in A ;land; f(s) in f[S]
opequivhint{definition of $;f[-];$}
s in A ;land; f(s) in B ;land; exists x in S, f(x) = f(s)
opwhenhint{left: use $;S subseteq A;$; middle: $;f : A to B;$; right: choose $;x:=s;$}
s in S ;land; true ;land; f(s) = f(s)
opequivhint{logic: simplify}
s in S
endcalc$$
which (by set extensionality) proves $;S subseteq f^{-1}[f[S]];$.
The second statement can be proven similarly.
$%
endgroup
%$
answered Jan 19 at 10:17
Marnix KloosterMarnix Klooster
4,21322147
$endgroup$
Here is how I would do these proofs: using element chasing, so seeing which elements are part of the most complex side, and then expanding definitions and simplifying towards the simpler side.$%
require{begingroup}
begingroup
newcommand{calc}{begin{align} quad &}
newcommand{op}[1]{\ #1 quad & quad unicode{x201c}}
newcommand{hints}[1]{mbox{#1} \ quad & quad phantom{unicode{x201c}} }
newcommand{hint}[1]{mbox{#1} unicode{x201d} \ quad & }
newcommand{endcalc}{end{align}}
newcommand{subcalch}[1]{\ quad & quad #1 \ quad &}
newcommand{subcalc}{quad begin{aligned} quad & \ bullet quad & }
newcommand{endsubcalc}{end{aligned} \ \ cdot quad &}
newcommand{Ref}[1]{text{(#1)}}
newcommand{then}{implies}
newcommand{when}{impliedby}
newcommand{equiv}{iff}
newcommand{true}{text{true}}
%$
For the first problem, let's see which $;s;$ are in the right hand side:
$$calc
s in f^{-1}[f[S]]
opequivhint{definition of $;f^{-1}[-];$}
s in A ;land; f(s) in f[S]
opequivhint{definition of $;f[-];$}
s in A ;land; f(s) in B ;land; exists x in S, f(x) = f(s)
opwhenhint{left: use $;S subseteq A;$; middle: $;f : A to B;$; right: choose $;x:=s;$}
s in S ;land; true ;land; f(s) = f(s)
opequivhint{logic: simplify}
s in S
endcalc$$
which (by set extensionality) proves $;S subseteq f^{-1}[f[S]];$.
The second statement can be proven similarly.
$%
endgroup
%$
answered Jan 19 at 10:17
Marnix KloosterMarnix Klooster
4,21322147
answered Jan 19 at 10:17
Marnix KloosterMarnix Klooster
4,21322147
answered Jan 19 at 10:17
Marnix KloosterMarnix Klooster
4,21322147
answered Jan 19 at 10:17
Marnix KloosterMarnix Klooster
4,21322147
4,21322147
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077369%2felementary-set-theory-problems-and-proof-techniques%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
r42Q 6 i,77pDyz,b N AHclGMTRM,uhamH,c7aZMEer9cKt1GvTC2EwwTHbaJzk4LxBR4Gc,qWAwLfGvm7VRVh5j,THwjZ o6VB3oO1
$begingroup$
The standard way to prove that $Ssubset Z$ (for any set $Z$) is to prove, for all $x$, that $xin S implies xin Z$. So you need to prove the following statement: if $xin S$, then $xin f^{-1}[f[S]]$. Can you do that from the definition you wrote down? (or rather, the corrected definition where you don't use $x$ to mean two different things)
$endgroup$
– Greg Martin
Jan 17 at 19:00
$begingroup$
@GregMartin I don't think, I mean, not really, I don't think I can think this through, so, $f[S]$ is the set with all $yin B$ such that $f(x)=y$ and $x$ is $in S$, and $f^{-1}[f[S]]$ is the set with all $x in A$ such that $f(x) in f[S]$ so all $x$ in $A$ not $S$ and I don't get it
$endgroup$
– C. Cristi
Jan 17 at 20:04