Weyl curvature of hypersurface in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$












3












$begingroup$


Let $M^nsubset mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ be an embedded hypersurface and let $g$ be the metric induced on $M$ by the flat metric on $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.



Q: What is a formula for the Weyl tensor $W$ of $g$ in terms of the second fundamental form $A$ of $M$? More precisely, what is $|W|^2$?



For example, the scalar curvature $S$ of $g$ can be written as
$$
S=H^2-|A|^2=mathrm{trace}(A)^2-mathrm{trace}(A^2)=sum_{1leq i_1<i_2leq n}lambda_{i_1}lambda_{i_2},
$$

where $H$ is the mean curvature (trace of $A$) and $lambda_1,dots,lambda_nin mathbb{R}$ are the principal curvatures of $M$, i.e. the eigenvalues of $A$. Note that $S$ is thus an elementary symmetric polynomial in $lambda_1,dots,lambda_n$.



Is $|W|^2$ also given by such a polynomial? I guess this is probably not true as $|W|^2$ is zero for any 2-manifold (all surfaces are locally conformally flat).










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    3












    $begingroup$


    Let $M^nsubset mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ be an embedded hypersurface and let $g$ be the metric induced on $M$ by the flat metric on $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.



    Q: What is a formula for the Weyl tensor $W$ of $g$ in terms of the second fundamental form $A$ of $M$? More precisely, what is $|W|^2$?



    For example, the scalar curvature $S$ of $g$ can be written as
    $$
    S=H^2-|A|^2=mathrm{trace}(A)^2-mathrm{trace}(A^2)=sum_{1leq i_1<i_2leq n}lambda_{i_1}lambda_{i_2},
    $$

    where $H$ is the mean curvature (trace of $A$) and $lambda_1,dots,lambda_nin mathbb{R}$ are the principal curvatures of $M$, i.e. the eigenvalues of $A$. Note that $S$ is thus an elementary symmetric polynomial in $lambda_1,dots,lambda_n$.



    Is $|W|^2$ also given by such a polynomial? I guess this is probably not true as $|W|^2$ is zero for any 2-manifold (all surfaces are locally conformally flat).










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      Let $M^nsubset mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ be an embedded hypersurface and let $g$ be the metric induced on $M$ by the flat metric on $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.



      Q: What is a formula for the Weyl tensor $W$ of $g$ in terms of the second fundamental form $A$ of $M$? More precisely, what is $|W|^2$?



      For example, the scalar curvature $S$ of $g$ can be written as
      $$
      S=H^2-|A|^2=mathrm{trace}(A)^2-mathrm{trace}(A^2)=sum_{1leq i_1<i_2leq n}lambda_{i_1}lambda_{i_2},
      $$

      where $H$ is the mean curvature (trace of $A$) and $lambda_1,dots,lambda_nin mathbb{R}$ are the principal curvatures of $M$, i.e. the eigenvalues of $A$. Note that $S$ is thus an elementary symmetric polynomial in $lambda_1,dots,lambda_n$.



      Is $|W|^2$ also given by such a polynomial? I guess this is probably not true as $|W|^2$ is zero for any 2-manifold (all surfaces are locally conformally flat).










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $M^nsubset mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ be an embedded hypersurface and let $g$ be the metric induced on $M$ by the flat metric on $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.



      Q: What is a formula for the Weyl tensor $W$ of $g$ in terms of the second fundamental form $A$ of $M$? More precisely, what is $|W|^2$?



      For example, the scalar curvature $S$ of $g$ can be written as
      $$
      S=H^2-|A|^2=mathrm{trace}(A)^2-mathrm{trace}(A^2)=sum_{1leq i_1<i_2leq n}lambda_{i_1}lambda_{i_2},
      $$

      where $H$ is the mean curvature (trace of $A$) and $lambda_1,dots,lambda_nin mathbb{R}$ are the principal curvatures of $M$, i.e. the eigenvalues of $A$. Note that $S$ is thus an elementary symmetric polynomial in $lambda_1,dots,lambda_n$.



      Is $|W|^2$ also given by such a polynomial? I guess this is probably not true as $|W|^2$ is zero for any 2-manifold (all surfaces are locally conformally flat).







      differential-geometry riemannian-geometry smooth-manifolds






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 24 at 15:35







      srp

















      asked Jan 24 at 2:43









      srpsrp

      2728




      2728






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          You can observe that by Gauss Equation and Codazzi-Mainardi equation you can write the Riemann tensor and the Ricci tensor in function of the second fundamental form of your hypersurface that is in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, so the Riemann and Ricci tensor of the ambient are zero.
          The Weyl tensor is defined in function of the induced metric, the Riemann tensor and the Ricci tensor of the hypersurface so it is true, it is possible write the Weyl tensor in function of the second fundamental form.



          We know that Gauss equation of an Hypersurface $Msubseteq N$ is



          $R^N(X,Y,Z,W)=R^M(X,Y,Z,W)+h(X,W)h(Y,Z)-h(X,Z)h(Y,W)$



          where $h$ is the second fundamental form of $M$.



          In local coordinates we have that



          $R^N_{ijkl}=R^M_{ijkl}+h_{il}h_{jk}-h_{ik}h_{jl}$



          In our case $R^N=0$ so



          $R^M_{ijkl}= h_{ik}h_{jl}-h_{il}h_{jk}$



          If we trace the equation we can write also Ricci Tensor in function of the second fundamental form:



          $R^M_{jl}=Hh_{jl}-g^{ik} h_{il}h_{jk}$



          where $H$ is the mean curvature of $M$.



          If we trace twice Gauss equation we get a relationship between the scalar curvature $R$ of $M$ and the second fundamental form:



          $R=H^2-|h|^2$



          We consider the (0,4)-Weyl tensor of $M$



          $W=R^M-frac{1}{n-2}(Ric-frac{R}{n}g)wedge g-frac{R}{2n(n-1)}gwedge g$



          where $wedge$ is the Kulkarni-Nomizou product.



          In local coordinate we have that



          $W_{ijkl}=R^M_{ijkl}+frac{1}{n-2}(R^M_{il}g_{jk}-R^M_{ik}g_{il}+R^M_{jk}g_{il}-R^M_{jl}g_{ik})+$



          $+frac{R}{(n-1)(n-2)}(g_{ik}g_{jl}-g_{il}g_{jk})$



          So you have all elements to write Weyl tensor in function of the second fundamental form of $M$ (and in function of the metric $g$).



          You can observe also that the (0,2)-Tensor $h$ is symmetric so there exists a local orthonormal frame ${Z_1,dots, Z_n}$ such that the matrix $A$ associated with $h$ with respect that frame is $diag(lambda_1,dots, lambda_n)$ and th matrix $G$ associated with the metric $g$ with respect that frame will be the identity $I$. In this case you can write all our formula in an easier way than before.



          If it is not clear I can explain more precisely.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. I am aware that the second fundamental form of a hypersurface completely determines its intrinsic curvature. My question is what the precise formula of the Weyl curvature is in terms of the second fundamental form.
            $endgroup$
            – srp
            Jan 24 at 16:54










          • $begingroup$
            Oook one moment that I write it
            $endgroup$
            – Federico Fallucca
            Jan 24 at 17:03











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085382%2fweyl-curvature-of-hypersurface-in-mathbbrn1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          You can observe that by Gauss Equation and Codazzi-Mainardi equation you can write the Riemann tensor and the Ricci tensor in function of the second fundamental form of your hypersurface that is in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, so the Riemann and Ricci tensor of the ambient are zero.
          The Weyl tensor is defined in function of the induced metric, the Riemann tensor and the Ricci tensor of the hypersurface so it is true, it is possible write the Weyl tensor in function of the second fundamental form.



          We know that Gauss equation of an Hypersurface $Msubseteq N$ is



          $R^N(X,Y,Z,W)=R^M(X,Y,Z,W)+h(X,W)h(Y,Z)-h(X,Z)h(Y,W)$



          where $h$ is the second fundamental form of $M$.



          In local coordinates we have that



          $R^N_{ijkl}=R^M_{ijkl}+h_{il}h_{jk}-h_{ik}h_{jl}$



          In our case $R^N=0$ so



          $R^M_{ijkl}= h_{ik}h_{jl}-h_{il}h_{jk}$



          If we trace the equation we can write also Ricci Tensor in function of the second fundamental form:



          $R^M_{jl}=Hh_{jl}-g^{ik} h_{il}h_{jk}$



          where $H$ is the mean curvature of $M$.



          If we trace twice Gauss equation we get a relationship between the scalar curvature $R$ of $M$ and the second fundamental form:



          $R=H^2-|h|^2$



          We consider the (0,4)-Weyl tensor of $M$



          $W=R^M-frac{1}{n-2}(Ric-frac{R}{n}g)wedge g-frac{R}{2n(n-1)}gwedge g$



          where $wedge$ is the Kulkarni-Nomizou product.



          In local coordinate we have that



          $W_{ijkl}=R^M_{ijkl}+frac{1}{n-2}(R^M_{il}g_{jk}-R^M_{ik}g_{il}+R^M_{jk}g_{il}-R^M_{jl}g_{ik})+$



          $+frac{R}{(n-1)(n-2)}(g_{ik}g_{jl}-g_{il}g_{jk})$



          So you have all elements to write Weyl tensor in function of the second fundamental form of $M$ (and in function of the metric $g$).



          You can observe also that the (0,2)-Tensor $h$ is symmetric so there exists a local orthonormal frame ${Z_1,dots, Z_n}$ such that the matrix $A$ associated with $h$ with respect that frame is $diag(lambda_1,dots, lambda_n)$ and th matrix $G$ associated with the metric $g$ with respect that frame will be the identity $I$. In this case you can write all our formula in an easier way than before.



          If it is not clear I can explain more precisely.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. I am aware that the second fundamental form of a hypersurface completely determines its intrinsic curvature. My question is what the precise formula of the Weyl curvature is in terms of the second fundamental form.
            $endgroup$
            – srp
            Jan 24 at 16:54










          • $begingroup$
            Oook one moment that I write it
            $endgroup$
            – Federico Fallucca
            Jan 24 at 17:03
















          1












          $begingroup$

          You can observe that by Gauss Equation and Codazzi-Mainardi equation you can write the Riemann tensor and the Ricci tensor in function of the second fundamental form of your hypersurface that is in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, so the Riemann and Ricci tensor of the ambient are zero.
          The Weyl tensor is defined in function of the induced metric, the Riemann tensor and the Ricci tensor of the hypersurface so it is true, it is possible write the Weyl tensor in function of the second fundamental form.



          We know that Gauss equation of an Hypersurface $Msubseteq N$ is



          $R^N(X,Y,Z,W)=R^M(X,Y,Z,W)+h(X,W)h(Y,Z)-h(X,Z)h(Y,W)$



          where $h$ is the second fundamental form of $M$.



          In local coordinates we have that



          $R^N_{ijkl}=R^M_{ijkl}+h_{il}h_{jk}-h_{ik}h_{jl}$



          In our case $R^N=0$ so



          $R^M_{ijkl}= h_{ik}h_{jl}-h_{il}h_{jk}$



          If we trace the equation we can write also Ricci Tensor in function of the second fundamental form:



          $R^M_{jl}=Hh_{jl}-g^{ik} h_{il}h_{jk}$



          where $H$ is the mean curvature of $M$.



          If we trace twice Gauss equation we get a relationship between the scalar curvature $R$ of $M$ and the second fundamental form:



          $R=H^2-|h|^2$



          We consider the (0,4)-Weyl tensor of $M$



          $W=R^M-frac{1}{n-2}(Ric-frac{R}{n}g)wedge g-frac{R}{2n(n-1)}gwedge g$



          where $wedge$ is the Kulkarni-Nomizou product.



          In local coordinate we have that



          $W_{ijkl}=R^M_{ijkl}+frac{1}{n-2}(R^M_{il}g_{jk}-R^M_{ik}g_{il}+R^M_{jk}g_{il}-R^M_{jl}g_{ik})+$



          $+frac{R}{(n-1)(n-2)}(g_{ik}g_{jl}-g_{il}g_{jk})$



          So you have all elements to write Weyl tensor in function of the second fundamental form of $M$ (and in function of the metric $g$).



          You can observe also that the (0,2)-Tensor $h$ is symmetric so there exists a local orthonormal frame ${Z_1,dots, Z_n}$ such that the matrix $A$ associated with $h$ with respect that frame is $diag(lambda_1,dots, lambda_n)$ and th matrix $G$ associated with the metric $g$ with respect that frame will be the identity $I$. In this case you can write all our formula in an easier way than before.



          If it is not clear I can explain more precisely.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. I am aware that the second fundamental form of a hypersurface completely determines its intrinsic curvature. My question is what the precise formula of the Weyl curvature is in terms of the second fundamental form.
            $endgroup$
            – srp
            Jan 24 at 16:54










          • $begingroup$
            Oook one moment that I write it
            $endgroup$
            – Federico Fallucca
            Jan 24 at 17:03














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          You can observe that by Gauss Equation and Codazzi-Mainardi equation you can write the Riemann tensor and the Ricci tensor in function of the second fundamental form of your hypersurface that is in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, so the Riemann and Ricci tensor of the ambient are zero.
          The Weyl tensor is defined in function of the induced metric, the Riemann tensor and the Ricci tensor of the hypersurface so it is true, it is possible write the Weyl tensor in function of the second fundamental form.



          We know that Gauss equation of an Hypersurface $Msubseteq N$ is



          $R^N(X,Y,Z,W)=R^M(X,Y,Z,W)+h(X,W)h(Y,Z)-h(X,Z)h(Y,W)$



          where $h$ is the second fundamental form of $M$.



          In local coordinates we have that



          $R^N_{ijkl}=R^M_{ijkl}+h_{il}h_{jk}-h_{ik}h_{jl}$



          In our case $R^N=0$ so



          $R^M_{ijkl}= h_{ik}h_{jl}-h_{il}h_{jk}$



          If we trace the equation we can write also Ricci Tensor in function of the second fundamental form:



          $R^M_{jl}=Hh_{jl}-g^{ik} h_{il}h_{jk}$



          where $H$ is the mean curvature of $M$.



          If we trace twice Gauss equation we get a relationship between the scalar curvature $R$ of $M$ and the second fundamental form:



          $R=H^2-|h|^2$



          We consider the (0,4)-Weyl tensor of $M$



          $W=R^M-frac{1}{n-2}(Ric-frac{R}{n}g)wedge g-frac{R}{2n(n-1)}gwedge g$



          where $wedge$ is the Kulkarni-Nomizou product.



          In local coordinate we have that



          $W_{ijkl}=R^M_{ijkl}+frac{1}{n-2}(R^M_{il}g_{jk}-R^M_{ik}g_{il}+R^M_{jk}g_{il}-R^M_{jl}g_{ik})+$



          $+frac{R}{(n-1)(n-2)}(g_{ik}g_{jl}-g_{il}g_{jk})$



          So you have all elements to write Weyl tensor in function of the second fundamental form of $M$ (and in function of the metric $g$).



          You can observe also that the (0,2)-Tensor $h$ is symmetric so there exists a local orthonormal frame ${Z_1,dots, Z_n}$ such that the matrix $A$ associated with $h$ with respect that frame is $diag(lambda_1,dots, lambda_n)$ and th matrix $G$ associated with the metric $g$ with respect that frame will be the identity $I$. In this case you can write all our formula in an easier way than before.



          If it is not clear I can explain more precisely.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          You can observe that by Gauss Equation and Codazzi-Mainardi equation you can write the Riemann tensor and the Ricci tensor in function of the second fundamental form of your hypersurface that is in $mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, so the Riemann and Ricci tensor of the ambient are zero.
          The Weyl tensor is defined in function of the induced metric, the Riemann tensor and the Ricci tensor of the hypersurface so it is true, it is possible write the Weyl tensor in function of the second fundamental form.



          We know that Gauss equation of an Hypersurface $Msubseteq N$ is



          $R^N(X,Y,Z,W)=R^M(X,Y,Z,W)+h(X,W)h(Y,Z)-h(X,Z)h(Y,W)$



          where $h$ is the second fundamental form of $M$.



          In local coordinates we have that



          $R^N_{ijkl}=R^M_{ijkl}+h_{il}h_{jk}-h_{ik}h_{jl}$



          In our case $R^N=0$ so



          $R^M_{ijkl}= h_{ik}h_{jl}-h_{il}h_{jk}$



          If we trace the equation we can write also Ricci Tensor in function of the second fundamental form:



          $R^M_{jl}=Hh_{jl}-g^{ik} h_{il}h_{jk}$



          where $H$ is the mean curvature of $M$.



          If we trace twice Gauss equation we get a relationship between the scalar curvature $R$ of $M$ and the second fundamental form:



          $R=H^2-|h|^2$



          We consider the (0,4)-Weyl tensor of $M$



          $W=R^M-frac{1}{n-2}(Ric-frac{R}{n}g)wedge g-frac{R}{2n(n-1)}gwedge g$



          where $wedge$ is the Kulkarni-Nomizou product.



          In local coordinate we have that



          $W_{ijkl}=R^M_{ijkl}+frac{1}{n-2}(R^M_{il}g_{jk}-R^M_{ik}g_{il}+R^M_{jk}g_{il}-R^M_{jl}g_{ik})+$



          $+frac{R}{(n-1)(n-2)}(g_{ik}g_{jl}-g_{il}g_{jk})$



          So you have all elements to write Weyl tensor in function of the second fundamental form of $M$ (and in function of the metric $g$).



          You can observe also that the (0,2)-Tensor $h$ is symmetric so there exists a local orthonormal frame ${Z_1,dots, Z_n}$ such that the matrix $A$ associated with $h$ with respect that frame is $diag(lambda_1,dots, lambda_n)$ and th matrix $G$ associated with the metric $g$ with respect that frame will be the identity $I$. In this case you can write all our formula in an easier way than before.



          If it is not clear I can explain more precisely.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 24 at 17:43

























          answered Jan 24 at 15:59









          Federico FalluccaFederico Fallucca

          2,235210




          2,235210












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. I am aware that the second fundamental form of a hypersurface completely determines its intrinsic curvature. My question is what the precise formula of the Weyl curvature is in terms of the second fundamental form.
            $endgroup$
            – srp
            Jan 24 at 16:54










          • $begingroup$
            Oook one moment that I write it
            $endgroup$
            – Federico Fallucca
            Jan 24 at 17:03


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. I am aware that the second fundamental form of a hypersurface completely determines its intrinsic curvature. My question is what the precise formula of the Weyl curvature is in terms of the second fundamental form.
            $endgroup$
            – srp
            Jan 24 at 16:54










          • $begingroup$
            Oook one moment that I write it
            $endgroup$
            – Federico Fallucca
            Jan 24 at 17:03
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer. I am aware that the second fundamental form of a hypersurface completely determines its intrinsic curvature. My question is what the precise formula of the Weyl curvature is in terms of the second fundamental form.
          $endgroup$
          – srp
          Jan 24 at 16:54




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer. I am aware that the second fundamental form of a hypersurface completely determines its intrinsic curvature. My question is what the precise formula of the Weyl curvature is in terms of the second fundamental form.
          $endgroup$
          – srp
          Jan 24 at 16:54












          $begingroup$
          Oook one moment that I write it
          $endgroup$
          – Federico Fallucca
          Jan 24 at 17:03




          $begingroup$
          Oook one moment that I write it
          $endgroup$
          – Federico Fallucca
          Jan 24 at 17:03


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085382%2fweyl-curvature-of-hypersurface-in-mathbbrn1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?