Is an open connected set “grid connected?”












0












$begingroup$


Let $S subseteq mathbb C$ be an open connected set. This implies that it the set is polygon connected. That means, given $a,bin S$, there is a finite sequence of line segments $[a,a_1],[a_1,a_2],...,[a_{n-1},b]$ which are all contained in $S$.



But is it "grid connected?" (I'm inventing this terminology on the spot, so bear with me.) I define a set $Esubseteq mathbb C$ to be "grid connected" if, given points $a,bin E$, there is a finite sequence of line segments $[a,a_1],[a_1,a_2],...,[a_{n-1},b]$ each of which is either horizontal or vertical.



For example, the plane $mathbb C$ is "grid connected" because, given distinct points $a+bi$ and $c+di$, we can connect them with the line segments $[a+bi, c+bi]$ and $[c+bi,c+di]$. (i.e. with a horizontal line segment and a vertical line segment.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What proof do you know of the fact that open connected sets on the plane are "polygon connected"? It will probably be adaptable to show that they are "grid connected" as well. (For instance, the proof by defining an equivalence relation given by $x sim y$ if $x$ can reach $y$ applies mutatis mutandis.)
    $endgroup$
    – Aloizio Macedo
    Jan 24 at 6:13


















0












$begingroup$


Let $S subseteq mathbb C$ be an open connected set. This implies that it the set is polygon connected. That means, given $a,bin S$, there is a finite sequence of line segments $[a,a_1],[a_1,a_2],...,[a_{n-1},b]$ which are all contained in $S$.



But is it "grid connected?" (I'm inventing this terminology on the spot, so bear with me.) I define a set $Esubseteq mathbb C$ to be "grid connected" if, given points $a,bin E$, there is a finite sequence of line segments $[a,a_1],[a_1,a_2],...,[a_{n-1},b]$ each of which is either horizontal or vertical.



For example, the plane $mathbb C$ is "grid connected" because, given distinct points $a+bi$ and $c+di$, we can connect them with the line segments $[a+bi, c+bi]$ and $[c+bi,c+di]$. (i.e. with a horizontal line segment and a vertical line segment.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What proof do you know of the fact that open connected sets on the plane are "polygon connected"? It will probably be adaptable to show that they are "grid connected" as well. (For instance, the proof by defining an equivalence relation given by $x sim y$ if $x$ can reach $y$ applies mutatis mutandis.)
    $endgroup$
    – Aloizio Macedo
    Jan 24 at 6:13
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $S subseteq mathbb C$ be an open connected set. This implies that it the set is polygon connected. That means, given $a,bin S$, there is a finite sequence of line segments $[a,a_1],[a_1,a_2],...,[a_{n-1},b]$ which are all contained in $S$.



But is it "grid connected?" (I'm inventing this terminology on the spot, so bear with me.) I define a set $Esubseteq mathbb C$ to be "grid connected" if, given points $a,bin E$, there is a finite sequence of line segments $[a,a_1],[a_1,a_2],...,[a_{n-1},b]$ each of which is either horizontal or vertical.



For example, the plane $mathbb C$ is "grid connected" because, given distinct points $a+bi$ and $c+di$, we can connect them with the line segments $[a+bi, c+bi]$ and $[c+bi,c+di]$. (i.e. with a horizontal line segment and a vertical line segment.



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $S subseteq mathbb C$ be an open connected set. This implies that it the set is polygon connected. That means, given $a,bin S$, there is a finite sequence of line segments $[a,a_1],[a_1,a_2],...,[a_{n-1},b]$ which are all contained in $S$.



But is it "grid connected?" (I'm inventing this terminology on the spot, so bear with me.) I define a set $Esubseteq mathbb C$ to be "grid connected" if, given points $a,bin E$, there is a finite sequence of line segments $[a,a_1],[a_1,a_2],...,[a_{n-1},b]$ each of which is either horizontal or vertical.



For example, the plane $mathbb C$ is "grid connected" because, given distinct points $a+bi$ and $c+di$, we can connect them with the line segments $[a+bi, c+bi]$ and $[c+bi,c+di]$. (i.e. with a horizontal line segment and a vertical line segment.



enter image description here







general-topology complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 24 at 3:51







Pascal's Wager

















asked Jan 24 at 3:45









Pascal's WagerPascal's Wager

371315




371315












  • $begingroup$
    What proof do you know of the fact that open connected sets on the plane are "polygon connected"? It will probably be adaptable to show that they are "grid connected" as well. (For instance, the proof by defining an equivalence relation given by $x sim y$ if $x$ can reach $y$ applies mutatis mutandis.)
    $endgroup$
    – Aloizio Macedo
    Jan 24 at 6:13




















  • $begingroup$
    What proof do you know of the fact that open connected sets on the plane are "polygon connected"? It will probably be adaptable to show that they are "grid connected" as well. (For instance, the proof by defining an equivalence relation given by $x sim y$ if $x$ can reach $y$ applies mutatis mutandis.)
    $endgroup$
    – Aloizio Macedo
    Jan 24 at 6:13


















$begingroup$
What proof do you know of the fact that open connected sets on the plane are "polygon connected"? It will probably be adaptable to show that they are "grid connected" as well. (For instance, the proof by defining an equivalence relation given by $x sim y$ if $x$ can reach $y$ applies mutatis mutandis.)
$endgroup$
– Aloizio Macedo
Jan 24 at 6:13






$begingroup$
What proof do you know of the fact that open connected sets on the plane are "polygon connected"? It will probably be adaptable to show that they are "grid connected" as well. (For instance, the proof by defining an equivalence relation given by $x sim y$ if $x$ can reach $y$ applies mutatis mutandis.)
$endgroup$
– Aloizio Macedo
Jan 24 at 6:13












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Since you agree that we can connect using line segments, it suffices to prove that for each segment $[z,w]$ there are a finite number of vertical or horizontal segments $[a_1,a_2]$, $[a_2,a_3]$, ... $[a_{k-1}, a_k]$, contained in the original set $S$ such that $a_1 = z$ and $a_k = w$.



Since $zin S$ and $S$ is open, there is an open neighborhood of $z$ contained in $S$. There we can connect with horizontal and vertical lines as shown in the picture, and, importantly, we're still in $S$.



Proof with an image



Finally, since $[z,w]$ is compact, only finitely many of those neighborhoods are needed.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085424%2fis-an-open-connected-set-grid-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Since you agree that we can connect using line segments, it suffices to prove that for each segment $[z,w]$ there are a finite number of vertical or horizontal segments $[a_1,a_2]$, $[a_2,a_3]$, ... $[a_{k-1}, a_k]$, contained in the original set $S$ such that $a_1 = z$ and $a_k = w$.



    Since $zin S$ and $S$ is open, there is an open neighborhood of $z$ contained in $S$. There we can connect with horizontal and vertical lines as shown in the picture, and, importantly, we're still in $S$.



    Proof with an image



    Finally, since $[z,w]$ is compact, only finitely many of those neighborhoods are needed.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Since you agree that we can connect using line segments, it suffices to prove that for each segment $[z,w]$ there are a finite number of vertical or horizontal segments $[a_1,a_2]$, $[a_2,a_3]$, ... $[a_{k-1}, a_k]$, contained in the original set $S$ such that $a_1 = z$ and $a_k = w$.



      Since $zin S$ and $S$ is open, there is an open neighborhood of $z$ contained in $S$. There we can connect with horizontal and vertical lines as shown in the picture, and, importantly, we're still in $S$.



      Proof with an image



      Finally, since $[z,w]$ is compact, only finitely many of those neighborhoods are needed.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Since you agree that we can connect using line segments, it suffices to prove that for each segment $[z,w]$ there are a finite number of vertical or horizontal segments $[a_1,a_2]$, $[a_2,a_3]$, ... $[a_{k-1}, a_k]$, contained in the original set $S$ such that $a_1 = z$ and $a_k = w$.



        Since $zin S$ and $S$ is open, there is an open neighborhood of $z$ contained in $S$. There we can connect with horizontal and vertical lines as shown in the picture, and, importantly, we're still in $S$.



        Proof with an image



        Finally, since $[z,w]$ is compact, only finitely many of those neighborhoods are needed.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Since you agree that we can connect using line segments, it suffices to prove that for each segment $[z,w]$ there are a finite number of vertical or horizontal segments $[a_1,a_2]$, $[a_2,a_3]$, ... $[a_{k-1}, a_k]$, contained in the original set $S$ such that $a_1 = z$ and $a_k = w$.



        Since $zin S$ and $S$ is open, there is an open neighborhood of $z$ contained in $S$. There we can connect with horizontal and vertical lines as shown in the picture, and, importantly, we're still in $S$.



        Proof with an image



        Finally, since $[z,w]$ is compact, only finitely many of those neighborhoods are needed.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 24 at 4:09









        DosidisDosidis

        41129




        41129






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085424%2fis-an-open-connected-set-grid-connected%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?