Limit of powers of matrix if spectral radius < 1












1












$begingroup$


I want to show $lim_{krightarrow infty}A^k=0$ iff $sigma(A)<1$.
I have $0leq ||A^k||leq ||A||^k=||Ax||^k=||lambda_{max}x||^k=|lambda_{max}|^k<1$ if we choose $x$ s.t. $||x||<1$ and $Ax=lambda_{max}x$ for the backwards direction and $lim_{krightarrowinfty}||A^kx||=|lambda_{max}|^k ||x||= 0Rightarrow sigma(A)<1$ if we choose $x$ in the same way for the forwards direction. Is this sufficient?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you learned Gelfand's formula, you can prove $lim_{krightarrowinfty}|A|^k =0$.
    $endgroup$
    – i707107
    Jan 26 at 2:35
















1












$begingroup$


I want to show $lim_{krightarrow infty}A^k=0$ iff $sigma(A)<1$.
I have $0leq ||A^k||leq ||A||^k=||Ax||^k=||lambda_{max}x||^k=|lambda_{max}|^k<1$ if we choose $x$ s.t. $||x||<1$ and $Ax=lambda_{max}x$ for the backwards direction and $lim_{krightarrowinfty}||A^kx||=|lambda_{max}|^k ||x||= 0Rightarrow sigma(A)<1$ if we choose $x$ in the same way for the forwards direction. Is this sufficient?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you learned Gelfand's formula, you can prove $lim_{krightarrowinfty}|A|^k =0$.
    $endgroup$
    – i707107
    Jan 26 at 2:35














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I want to show $lim_{krightarrow infty}A^k=0$ iff $sigma(A)<1$.
I have $0leq ||A^k||leq ||A||^k=||Ax||^k=||lambda_{max}x||^k=|lambda_{max}|^k<1$ if we choose $x$ s.t. $||x||<1$ and $Ax=lambda_{max}x$ for the backwards direction and $lim_{krightarrowinfty}||A^kx||=|lambda_{max}|^k ||x||= 0Rightarrow sigma(A)<1$ if we choose $x$ in the same way for the forwards direction. Is this sufficient?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I want to show $lim_{krightarrow infty}A^k=0$ iff $sigma(A)<1$.
I have $0leq ||A^k||leq ||A||^k=||Ax||^k=||lambda_{max}x||^k=|lambda_{max}|^k<1$ if we choose $x$ s.t. $||x||<1$ and $Ax=lambda_{max}x$ for the backwards direction and $lim_{krightarrowinfty}||A^kx||=|lambda_{max}|^k ||x||= 0Rightarrow sigma(A)<1$ if we choose $x$ in the same way for the forwards direction. Is this sufficient?







linear-algebra numerical-linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 24 at 3:24









HBHSUHBHSU

302111




302111












  • $begingroup$
    If you learned Gelfand's formula, you can prove $lim_{krightarrowinfty}|A|^k =0$.
    $endgroup$
    – i707107
    Jan 26 at 2:35


















  • $begingroup$
    If you learned Gelfand's formula, you can prove $lim_{krightarrowinfty}|A|^k =0$.
    $endgroup$
    – i707107
    Jan 26 at 2:35
















$begingroup$
If you learned Gelfand's formula, you can prove $lim_{krightarrowinfty}|A|^k =0$.
$endgroup$
– i707107
Jan 26 at 2:35




$begingroup$
If you learned Gelfand's formula, you can prove $lim_{krightarrowinfty}|A|^k =0$.
$endgroup$
– i707107
Jan 26 at 2:35










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

If $A$ is nonsymmetric, it need not be the case that there exists an eigenvector $x$ such that $|A| = |Ax| = |lambda_{max}| |x|$. For take



begin{equation}
A = begin{pmatrix}
r & 1 \
0 & r end{pmatrix}.tag{1}
end{equation}



Then the only eigenvalue of $A$ is $r$ but $|A| > r$ since $|Ae_2| = sqrt{1+r^2}$, where $e_2 = begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 end{pmatrix}^T$. (Here, $|cdot|$ is the vector 2-norm and matrix 2-norm $|A| = max_{|x|le 1} |Ax|$.) However, by direct computations of powers of $A$, we observe



$$
A^k = begin{pmatrix}
r^k & kr^{k-1} \
0 & r^k
end{pmatrix} to 0 textrm{ as } ktoinfty textrm{ provided } |r| < 1.
$$



One way to tackle this problem is to compute a Jordan normal form for your matrix, $A = VJV^{-1}$, which block diagonalizes $A$ into matrices which look like (1). In which case you observe, $0le|A^k|= |VJ^k V^{-1}| le |V| |J|^k |V^{-1}|$. From here, the analysis reduces to showing that if $|lambda| < 1$, then a Jordan block $J$ with eigenvalue $lambda$ satisfies $J^k to 0$ as $ktoinfty$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Is there any way to prove this without using a Jordan normal form? I haven't learned about it yet.
    $endgroup$
    – HBHSU
    Jan 24 at 4:19



















1












$begingroup$

This is wrong. An $x$ that maximizes $|Ax|/|x|$ is not necessarily an eigenvector. For example, try $$ A= pmatrix{0 & 2cr 0 & 0cr}$$ where the only eigenvalue is $0$, but $|A| = 2$. Here $x = pmatrix{0cr 1}$ satisfies $|A x| = 2$ and $|x| = 1$. By looking at $|A|$ alone you wouldn't know that $lim_{nto infty} A^n = 0$ (in fact in this case $A^2 = 0$).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085410%2flimit-of-powers-of-matrix-if-spectral-radius-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    If $A$ is nonsymmetric, it need not be the case that there exists an eigenvector $x$ such that $|A| = |Ax| = |lambda_{max}| |x|$. For take



    begin{equation}
    A = begin{pmatrix}
    r & 1 \
    0 & r end{pmatrix}.tag{1}
    end{equation}



    Then the only eigenvalue of $A$ is $r$ but $|A| > r$ since $|Ae_2| = sqrt{1+r^2}$, where $e_2 = begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 end{pmatrix}^T$. (Here, $|cdot|$ is the vector 2-norm and matrix 2-norm $|A| = max_{|x|le 1} |Ax|$.) However, by direct computations of powers of $A$, we observe



    $$
    A^k = begin{pmatrix}
    r^k & kr^{k-1} \
    0 & r^k
    end{pmatrix} to 0 textrm{ as } ktoinfty textrm{ provided } |r| < 1.
    $$



    One way to tackle this problem is to compute a Jordan normal form for your matrix, $A = VJV^{-1}$, which block diagonalizes $A$ into matrices which look like (1). In which case you observe, $0le|A^k|= |VJ^k V^{-1}| le |V| |J|^k |V^{-1}|$. From here, the analysis reduces to showing that if $|lambda| < 1$, then a Jordan block $J$ with eigenvalue $lambda$ satisfies $J^k to 0$ as $ktoinfty$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Is there any way to prove this without using a Jordan normal form? I haven't learned about it yet.
      $endgroup$
      – HBHSU
      Jan 24 at 4:19
















    3












    $begingroup$

    If $A$ is nonsymmetric, it need not be the case that there exists an eigenvector $x$ such that $|A| = |Ax| = |lambda_{max}| |x|$. For take



    begin{equation}
    A = begin{pmatrix}
    r & 1 \
    0 & r end{pmatrix}.tag{1}
    end{equation}



    Then the only eigenvalue of $A$ is $r$ but $|A| > r$ since $|Ae_2| = sqrt{1+r^2}$, where $e_2 = begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 end{pmatrix}^T$. (Here, $|cdot|$ is the vector 2-norm and matrix 2-norm $|A| = max_{|x|le 1} |Ax|$.) However, by direct computations of powers of $A$, we observe



    $$
    A^k = begin{pmatrix}
    r^k & kr^{k-1} \
    0 & r^k
    end{pmatrix} to 0 textrm{ as } ktoinfty textrm{ provided } |r| < 1.
    $$



    One way to tackle this problem is to compute a Jordan normal form for your matrix, $A = VJV^{-1}$, which block diagonalizes $A$ into matrices which look like (1). In which case you observe, $0le|A^k|= |VJ^k V^{-1}| le |V| |J|^k |V^{-1}|$. From here, the analysis reduces to showing that if $|lambda| < 1$, then a Jordan block $J$ with eigenvalue $lambda$ satisfies $J^k to 0$ as $ktoinfty$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Is there any way to prove this without using a Jordan normal form? I haven't learned about it yet.
      $endgroup$
      – HBHSU
      Jan 24 at 4:19














    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    If $A$ is nonsymmetric, it need not be the case that there exists an eigenvector $x$ such that $|A| = |Ax| = |lambda_{max}| |x|$. For take



    begin{equation}
    A = begin{pmatrix}
    r & 1 \
    0 & r end{pmatrix}.tag{1}
    end{equation}



    Then the only eigenvalue of $A$ is $r$ but $|A| > r$ since $|Ae_2| = sqrt{1+r^2}$, where $e_2 = begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 end{pmatrix}^T$. (Here, $|cdot|$ is the vector 2-norm and matrix 2-norm $|A| = max_{|x|le 1} |Ax|$.) However, by direct computations of powers of $A$, we observe



    $$
    A^k = begin{pmatrix}
    r^k & kr^{k-1} \
    0 & r^k
    end{pmatrix} to 0 textrm{ as } ktoinfty textrm{ provided } |r| < 1.
    $$



    One way to tackle this problem is to compute a Jordan normal form for your matrix, $A = VJV^{-1}$, which block diagonalizes $A$ into matrices which look like (1). In which case you observe, $0le|A^k|= |VJ^k V^{-1}| le |V| |J|^k |V^{-1}|$. From here, the analysis reduces to showing that if $|lambda| < 1$, then a Jordan block $J$ with eigenvalue $lambda$ satisfies $J^k to 0$ as $ktoinfty$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    If $A$ is nonsymmetric, it need not be the case that there exists an eigenvector $x$ such that $|A| = |Ax| = |lambda_{max}| |x|$. For take



    begin{equation}
    A = begin{pmatrix}
    r & 1 \
    0 & r end{pmatrix}.tag{1}
    end{equation}



    Then the only eigenvalue of $A$ is $r$ but $|A| > r$ since $|Ae_2| = sqrt{1+r^2}$, where $e_2 = begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 end{pmatrix}^T$. (Here, $|cdot|$ is the vector 2-norm and matrix 2-norm $|A| = max_{|x|le 1} |Ax|$.) However, by direct computations of powers of $A$, we observe



    $$
    A^k = begin{pmatrix}
    r^k & kr^{k-1} \
    0 & r^k
    end{pmatrix} to 0 textrm{ as } ktoinfty textrm{ provided } |r| < 1.
    $$



    One way to tackle this problem is to compute a Jordan normal form for your matrix, $A = VJV^{-1}$, which block diagonalizes $A$ into matrices which look like (1). In which case you observe, $0le|A^k|= |VJ^k V^{-1}| le |V| |J|^k |V^{-1}|$. From here, the analysis reduces to showing that if $|lambda| < 1$, then a Jordan block $J$ with eigenvalue $lambda$ satisfies $J^k to 0$ as $ktoinfty$.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jan 24 at 4:07









    eepperly16eepperly16

    3,02611125




    3,02611125












    • $begingroup$
      Is there any way to prove this without using a Jordan normal form? I haven't learned about it yet.
      $endgroup$
      – HBHSU
      Jan 24 at 4:19


















    • $begingroup$
      Is there any way to prove this without using a Jordan normal form? I haven't learned about it yet.
      $endgroup$
      – HBHSU
      Jan 24 at 4:19
















    $begingroup$
    Is there any way to prove this without using a Jordan normal form? I haven't learned about it yet.
    $endgroup$
    – HBHSU
    Jan 24 at 4:19




    $begingroup$
    Is there any way to prove this without using a Jordan normal form? I haven't learned about it yet.
    $endgroup$
    – HBHSU
    Jan 24 at 4:19











    1












    $begingroup$

    This is wrong. An $x$ that maximizes $|Ax|/|x|$ is not necessarily an eigenvector. For example, try $$ A= pmatrix{0 & 2cr 0 & 0cr}$$ where the only eigenvalue is $0$, but $|A| = 2$. Here $x = pmatrix{0cr 1}$ satisfies $|A x| = 2$ and $|x| = 1$. By looking at $|A|$ alone you wouldn't know that $lim_{nto infty} A^n = 0$ (in fact in this case $A^2 = 0$).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      This is wrong. An $x$ that maximizes $|Ax|/|x|$ is not necessarily an eigenvector. For example, try $$ A= pmatrix{0 & 2cr 0 & 0cr}$$ where the only eigenvalue is $0$, but $|A| = 2$. Here $x = pmatrix{0cr 1}$ satisfies $|A x| = 2$ and $|x| = 1$. By looking at $|A|$ alone you wouldn't know that $lim_{nto infty} A^n = 0$ (in fact in this case $A^2 = 0$).






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        This is wrong. An $x$ that maximizes $|Ax|/|x|$ is not necessarily an eigenvector. For example, try $$ A= pmatrix{0 & 2cr 0 & 0cr}$$ where the only eigenvalue is $0$, but $|A| = 2$. Here $x = pmatrix{0cr 1}$ satisfies $|A x| = 2$ and $|x| = 1$. By looking at $|A|$ alone you wouldn't know that $lim_{nto infty} A^n = 0$ (in fact in this case $A^2 = 0$).






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        This is wrong. An $x$ that maximizes $|Ax|/|x|$ is not necessarily an eigenvector. For example, try $$ A= pmatrix{0 & 2cr 0 & 0cr}$$ where the only eigenvalue is $0$, but $|A| = 2$. Here $x = pmatrix{0cr 1}$ satisfies $|A x| = 2$ and $|x| = 1$. By looking at $|A|$ alone you wouldn't know that $lim_{nto infty} A^n = 0$ (in fact in this case $A^2 = 0$).







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 24 at 4:08









        Robert IsraelRobert Israel

        326k23215469




        326k23215469






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085410%2flimit-of-powers-of-matrix-if-spectral-radius-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese