Surface integral of an infinitesimal volume = 0?
$begingroup$
Cracking open the texts for the first time in a while, I'm prepping for school with a review of vector calc. Question 1 asks to derive the expressions for divergence for cartesian, cylindrical and spherical coordinates, based on the equation
$$nablacdotvec{f} = lim_{Delta V rightarrow 0} frac{1}{Delta V} left[ iint vec{f}cdot dvec{s} right]$$
(Also refreshing myself on latex, ooint seems to not be a thing in SE?)
So for a given point $P$, and the vector $vec{f}(P)$ at that specific point, I calculate the dot product between that vector and the outward facing surface area over the infinitesimal volume surrounding $P$.
The problem is, if I'm looking at both sides of that little $dV$, wrt each axis, the products should cancel out exactly. So for the surfaces normal to the x-axis, we get
$$f_x(P)hat{i} cdot dydzhat{i} + f_x(P)hat{i} cdot dydz left(hat{-i}right) = 0$$
I figure the most likely issues are that I either have something like a sign error, or that integrating $vec{f}cdot dvec{s}$ should yield zero, and I'm not doing the calculus that I should be doing. I think it isn't the former, because $vec{f}(P)$ should be the same regardless of which side you're taking the product with. Is it the latter?
vector-analysis
asked Jan 24 at 2:42
Frank HarrisFrank Harris
62
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Cracking open the texts for the first time in a while, I'm prepping for school with a review of vector calc. Question 1 asks to derive the expressions for divergence for cartesian, cylindrical and spherical coordinates, based on the equation
$$nablacdotvec{f} = lim_{Delta V rightarrow 0} frac{1}{Delta V} left[ iint vec{f}cdot dvec{s} right]$$
(Also refreshing myself on latex, ooint seems to not be a thing in SE?)
So for a given point $P$, and the vector $vec{f}(P)$ at that specific point, I calculate the dot product between that vector and the outward facing surface area over the infinitesimal volume surrounding $P$.
The problem is, if I'm looking at both sides of that little $dV$, wrt each axis, the products should cancel out exactly. So for the surfaces normal to the x-axis, we get
$$f_x(P)hat{i} cdot dydzhat{i} + f_x(P)hat{i} cdot dydz left(hat{-i}right) = 0$$
I figure the most likely issues are that I either have something like a sign error, or that integrating $vec{f}cdot dvec{s}$ should yield zero, and I'm not doing the calculus that I should be doing. I think it isn't the former, because $vec{f}(P)$ should be the same regardless of which side you're taking the product with. Is it the latter?
vector-analysis
asked Jan 24 at 2:42
Frank HarrisFrank Harris
62
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The code is oiint, but I can't get that one to work, either (though I could swear I've seen it before).
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 24 at 13:09
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Cracking open the texts for the first time in a while, I'm prepping for school with a review of vector calc. Question 1 asks to derive the expressions for divergence for cartesian, cylindrical and spherical coordinates, based on the equation
$$nablacdotvec{f} = lim_{Delta V rightarrow 0} frac{1}{Delta V} left[ iint vec{f}cdot dvec{s} right]$$
(Also refreshing myself on latex, ooint seems to not be a thing in SE?)
So for a given point $P$, and the vector $vec{f}(P)$ at that specific point, I calculate the dot product between that vector and the outward facing surface area over the infinitesimal volume surrounding $P$.
The problem is, if I'm looking at both sides of that little $dV$, wrt each axis, the products should cancel out exactly. So for the surfaces normal to the x-axis, we get
$$f_x(P)hat{i} cdot dydzhat{i} + f_x(P)hat{i} cdot dydz left(hat{-i}right) = 0$$
I figure the most likely issues are that I either have something like a sign error, or that integrating $vec{f}cdot dvec{s}$ should yield zero, and I'm not doing the calculus that I should be doing. I think it isn't the former, because $vec{f}(P)$ should be the same regardless of which side you're taking the product with. Is it the latter?
vector-analysis
asked Jan 24 at 2:42
Frank HarrisFrank Harris
62
$endgroup$
Cracking open the texts for the first time in a while, I'm prepping for school with a review of vector calc. Question 1 asks to derive the expressions for divergence for cartesian, cylindrical and spherical coordinates, based on the equation
$$nablacdotvec{f} = lim_{Delta V rightarrow 0} frac{1}{Delta V} left[ iint vec{f}cdot dvec{s} right]$$
(Also refreshing myself on latex, ooint seems to not be a thing in SE?)
So for a given point $P$, and the vector $vec{f}(P)$ at that specific point, I calculate the dot product between that vector and the outward facing surface area over the infinitesimal volume surrounding $P$.
The problem is, if I'm looking at both sides of that little $dV$, wrt each axis, the products should cancel out exactly. So for the surfaces normal to the x-axis, we get
$$f_x(P)hat{i} cdot dydzhat{i} + f_x(P)hat{i} cdot dydz left(hat{-i}right) = 0$$
I figure the most likely issues are that I either have something like a sign error, or that integrating $vec{f}cdot dvec{s}$ should yield zero, and I'm not doing the calculus that I should be doing. I think it isn't the former, because $vec{f}(P)$ should be the same regardless of which side you're taking the product with. Is it the latter?
vector-analysis
vector-analysis
asked Jan 24 at 2:42
Frank HarrisFrank Harris
62
asked Jan 24 at 2:42
Frank HarrisFrank Harris
62
asked Jan 24 at 2:42
Frank HarrisFrank Harris
62
asked Jan 24 at 2:42
Frank HarrisFrank Harris
62
asked Jan 24 at 2:42
Frank HarrisFrank Harris
62
62
$begingroup$
The code is oiint, but I can't get that one to work, either (though I could swear I've seen it before).
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 24 at 13:09
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The code is oiint, but I can't get that one to work, either (though I could swear I've seen it before).
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 24 at 13:09
$begingroup$
The code is oiint, but I can't get that one to work, either (though I could swear I've seen it before).
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 24 at 13:09
$begingroup$
The code is oiint, but I can't get that one to work, either (though I could swear I've seen it before).
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 24 at 13:09
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your problem is that you are treating $vec f$ as constant over this volume, and the divergence of a constant vector field is $0$.
If the vector field is treated as the velocity of some flow, then the divergence at a point is the rate at which the flow comes out of the point (negative when the flow is into the point). If a "fluid" is emerging from a point, then you would expect that on opposite sides of a small volume around the point that the flow would be in opposite directions on opposite sides. This doesn't have to violate continuity, as the vector field of this outward flow can be $0$ at the point itself. And if you add in a large locally constant flow past the point, the full vector field is not required to be $0$, either. But the divergence of the constant flow is $0$, so the divergence only picks up the contribution of the emerging fluid.
So instead of treating $vec f$ as the same everywhere, break it up into its even and odd components about $P$: $$vec f_e(vec v) = frac 12(vec f(P+vec v)) + vec f(P -vec v)\vec f_o(vec v) = frac 12(vec f(P+vec v) - vec f(P -vec v))$$
While $vec f(Q) = vec f_e(Q - P) + vec f_o(Q - P)$, you will find that the integration for $vec f_e$ is indeed $0$, but for $vec f_o$, the vector field has opposite signs in each direction, so it does not cancel out.
answered Jan 24 at 13:32
Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair
20.4k21443
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085381%2fsurface-integral-of-an-infinitesimal-volume-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Your problem is that you are treating $vec f$ as constant over this volume, and the divergence of a constant vector field is $0$.
If the vector field is treated as the velocity of some flow, then the divergence at a point is the rate at which the flow comes out of the point (negative when the flow is into the point). If a "fluid" is emerging from a point, then you would expect that on opposite sides of a small volume around the point that the flow would be in opposite directions on opposite sides. This doesn't have to violate continuity, as the vector field of this outward flow can be $0$ at the point itself. And if you add in a large locally constant flow past the point, the full vector field is not required to be $0$, either. But the divergence of the constant flow is $0$, so the divergence only picks up the contribution of the emerging fluid.
So instead of treating $vec f$ as the same everywhere, break it up into its even and odd components about $P$: $$vec f_e(vec v) = frac 12(vec f(P+vec v)) + vec f(P -vec v)\vec f_o(vec v) = frac 12(vec f(P+vec v) - vec f(P -vec v))$$
While $vec f(Q) = vec f_e(Q - P) + vec f_o(Q - P)$, you will find that the integration for $vec f_e$ is indeed $0$, but for $vec f_o$, the vector field has opposite signs in each direction, so it does not cancel out.
answered Jan 24 at 13:32
Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair
20.4k21443
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your problem is that you are treating $vec f$ as constant over this volume, and the divergence of a constant vector field is $0$.
If the vector field is treated as the velocity of some flow, then the divergence at a point is the rate at which the flow comes out of the point (negative when the flow is into the point). If a "fluid" is emerging from a point, then you would expect that on opposite sides of a small volume around the point that the flow would be in opposite directions on opposite sides. This doesn't have to violate continuity, as the vector field of this outward flow can be $0$ at the point itself. And if you add in a large locally constant flow past the point, the full vector field is not required to be $0$, either. But the divergence of the constant flow is $0$, so the divergence only picks up the contribution of the emerging fluid.
So instead of treating $vec f$ as the same everywhere, break it up into its even and odd components about $P$: $$vec f_e(vec v) = frac 12(vec f(P+vec v)) + vec f(P -vec v)\vec f_o(vec v) = frac 12(vec f(P+vec v) - vec f(P -vec v))$$
While $vec f(Q) = vec f_e(Q - P) + vec f_o(Q - P)$, you will find that the integration for $vec f_e$ is indeed $0$, but for $vec f_o$, the vector field has opposite signs in each direction, so it does not cancel out.
answered Jan 24 at 13:32
Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair
20.4k21443
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Your problem is that you are treating $vec f$ as constant over this volume, and the divergence of a constant vector field is $0$.
If the vector field is treated as the velocity of some flow, then the divergence at a point is the rate at which the flow comes out of the point (negative when the flow is into the point). If a "fluid" is emerging from a point, then you would expect that on opposite sides of a small volume around the point that the flow would be in opposite directions on opposite sides. This doesn't have to violate continuity, as the vector field of this outward flow can be $0$ at the point itself. And if you add in a large locally constant flow past the point, the full vector field is not required to be $0$, either. But the divergence of the constant flow is $0$, so the divergence only picks up the contribution of the emerging fluid.
So instead of treating $vec f$ as the same everywhere, break it up into its even and odd components about $P$: $$vec f_e(vec v) = frac 12(vec f(P+vec v)) + vec f(P -vec v)\vec f_o(vec v) = frac 12(vec f(P+vec v) - vec f(P -vec v))$$
While $vec f(Q) = vec f_e(Q - P) + vec f_o(Q - P)$, you will find that the integration for $vec f_e$ is indeed $0$, but for $vec f_o$, the vector field has opposite signs in each direction, so it does not cancel out.
answered Jan 24 at 13:32
Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair
20.4k21443
$endgroup$
Your problem is that you are treating $vec f$ as constant over this volume, and the divergence of a constant vector field is $0$.
If the vector field is treated as the velocity of some flow, then the divergence at a point is the rate at which the flow comes out of the point (negative when the flow is into the point). If a "fluid" is emerging from a point, then you would expect that on opposite sides of a small volume around the point that the flow would be in opposite directions on opposite sides. This doesn't have to violate continuity, as the vector field of this outward flow can be $0$ at the point itself. And if you add in a large locally constant flow past the point, the full vector field is not required to be $0$, either. But the divergence of the constant flow is $0$, so the divergence only picks up the contribution of the emerging fluid.
So instead of treating $vec f$ as the same everywhere, break it up into its even and odd components about $P$: $$vec f_e(vec v) = frac 12(vec f(P+vec v)) + vec f(P -vec v)\vec f_o(vec v) = frac 12(vec f(P+vec v) - vec f(P -vec v))$$
While $vec f(Q) = vec f_e(Q - P) + vec f_o(Q - P)$, you will find that the integration for $vec f_e$ is indeed $0$, but for $vec f_o$, the vector field has opposite signs in each direction, so it does not cancel out.
answered Jan 24 at 13:32
Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair
20.4k21443
answered Jan 24 at 13:32
Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair
20.4k21443
answered Jan 24 at 13:32
Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair
20.4k21443
answered Jan 24 at 13:32
Paul SinclairPaul Sinclair
20.4k21443
20.4k21443
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085381%2fsurface-integral-of-an-infinitesimal-volume-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The code is oiint, but I can't get that one to work, either (though I could swear I've seen it before).
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Jan 24 at 13:09