If $f$ is a derivative then is $|f|$ also a derivative?












2












$begingroup$


If $f$ is a derivative then, is $|f|$ also a derivative?



If $f$ is Riemann integrable then it's true. But, if it's not the case,then is it true?






riemann-integration







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    By saying, $f$ is a derivative, I want to mean that there exists a function $g$ such that $g'(x)=f(x)$
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Jan 24 at 4:40










  • $begingroup$
    So, technically, a function is a derivative iff $int_0^x f(t)dt= g(x)$ exists for all $x$ and is differentiable everywhere. Is that it?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 4:41


















2












$begingroup$


If $f$ is a derivative then, is $|f|$ also a derivative?



If $f$ is Riemann integrable then it's true. But, if it's not the case,then is it true?






riemann-integration







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    By saying, $f$ is a derivative, I want to mean that there exists a function $g$ such that $g'(x)=f(x)$
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Jan 24 at 4:40










  • $begingroup$
    So, technically, a function is a derivative iff $int_0^x f(t)dt= g(x)$ exists for all $x$ and is differentiable everywhere. Is that it?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 4:41
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


If $f$ is a derivative then, is $|f|$ also a derivative?



If $f$ is Riemann integrable then it's true. But, if it's not the case,then is it true?






riemann-integration







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




If $f$ is a derivative then, is $|f|$ also a derivative?



If $f$ is Riemann integrable then it's true. But, if it's not the case,then is it true?






riemann-integration




riemann-integration






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 24 at 4:23









Tom.Tom.

15619




15619












  • $begingroup$
    By saying, $f$ is a derivative, I want to mean that there exists a function $g$ such that $g'(x)=f(x)$
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Jan 24 at 4:40










  • $begingroup$
    So, technically, a function is a derivative iff $int_0^x f(t)dt= g(x)$ exists for all $x$ and is differentiable everywhere. Is that it?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 4:41




















  • $begingroup$
    By saying, $f$ is a derivative, I want to mean that there exists a function $g$ such that $g'(x)=f(x)$
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Jan 24 at 4:40










  • $begingroup$
    So, technically, a function is a derivative iff $int_0^x f(t)dt= g(x)$ exists for all $x$ and is differentiable everywhere. Is that it?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 4:41


















$begingroup$
By saying, $f$ is a derivative, I want to mean that there exists a function $g$ such that $g'(x)=f(x)$
$endgroup$
– Tom.
Jan 24 at 4:40




$begingroup$
By saying, $f$ is a derivative, I want to mean that there exists a function $g$ such that $g'(x)=f(x)$
$endgroup$
– Tom.
Jan 24 at 4:40












$begingroup$
So, technically, a function is a derivative iff $int_0^x f(t)dt= g(x)$ exists for all $x$ and is differentiable everywhere. Is that it?
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 24 at 4:41






$begingroup$
So, technically, a function is a derivative iff $int_0^x f(t)dt= g(x)$ exists for all $x$ and is differentiable everywhere. Is that it?
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 24 at 4:41












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

This is not true even if $f$ is integrable.



Consider $f(x) = begin{cases}cos(x^{-1}), & 0 < x leqslant 1 \ 0, & x= 0 end{cases}$ and $g(x) = |f|(x) = begin{cases}|cos(x^{-1})|, & 0 < x leqslant 1 \ 0, & x= 0 end{cases}$



We can show that $f = F'$ where $F(x) = int_0^x f(t) , dt$. This is easy to show for $0 < x leqslant 1$ where $f$ is continuous. It is also true but harder to show that $F'(0) = f(0) = 0$.



Now if $g = G'$ on $[0,1]$ and $g$ is integrable then $int_0^x g(t) , dt = G(x)$ by the FTC with $G'(0) = g(0)$.



However,



$$G'(0) = lim_{h to 0} frac{1}{h}int_0^h g(t) , dt = lim_{h to 0} frac{1}{h}int_0^h |cos(t^{-1})| , dt = frac{2}{pi} neq g(0)$$



See here for a proof that $G'(0) = 2/pi$.



Addendum



To prove that $F'(0) = 0$, note that $F(0) = 0$ and with a variable change $y = t^{-1}$,



$$F(x) = int_0^x cos (t^{-1}) , dt = int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{cos y}{y^2} , dy$$



Integrating by parts we get,



$$F(x) = frac{sin(x^{-1})}{x^{-2}} + 2 int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{sin y}{y^3} , dy$$



Thus,



$$0 leqslant left|frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x} right| leqslant frac{|sin(x^{-1})|}{x^{-1}} + frac{2}{x} int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{|sin y|}{y^3} , dy \ leqslant x + frac{2}{x} int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{1}{y^3} , dy = 2x$$



By the squeeze theorem it follows that



$$F'(0) = lim_{x searrow 0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x} = 0 $$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Well, I'm replying to your comment here. Yes, I agree with you. All I was saying is that the OP hadn't worded the question as precisely as possible. Anyway, +1 for your answer.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 6:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: Thank you. It would be appropriate for OP to respond to your request for clarification. Although think the first comment does it for me.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 6:33












  • $begingroup$
    @RRL, can you give a proof of your claim i.e. $F'(0) = f(0) = 0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Jan 24 at 8:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Tom: I added the proof of that. Note that functions which are derivatives on an interval $[a,b]$ are said to belong to the space $mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ and I am sure (aside from the counterexample I came up with) that $f in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ does not imply $|f| in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$, but I have not found a reference yet.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 8:51








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Tom: If $f$ is Riemann integrable then $g = |f|$ is always Riemann integrable. In my example $f$ is Riemann integrable. I don’t know what you mean by “I assumed”. In general if $g$ is a derivative it does not have to be integrable. Look up Volterra’s function.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 15:09



















0












$begingroup$

Consider $f(x)=x$ which is differentiable everywhere but $|f(x)|$ is not differentiable at zero.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Did you answer the question?
    $endgroup$
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 24 at 4:48










  • $begingroup$
    It's not your fault. The question is ambiguous. You haven't actually answered the question. Check the comments.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 4:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: The question is not ambiguous. This answer is about differentiability of $|f|$ -- which does not answer the OP. OP is asking if $f = F'$ on some domain does that mean that $|f| = G'$ for some differentiable function $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 5:50










  • $begingroup$
    @RRL The question is ambiguous in the sense that the OP has not defined what a 'derivative' function is. I left a comment under their post asking for more explanation because it sounded ambiguous to me at first. Plus, if $f$ is not Riemann integrable, then I don't see how $f=F'$ can hold in the first place. Because if it does, then $int f = f$ exists. No?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 5:55












  • $begingroup$
    @stressedout: Good you asked for clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 6:02











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085455%2fif-f-is-a-derivative-then-is-f-also-a-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4












$begingroup$

This is not true even if $f$ is integrable.



Consider $f(x) = begin{cases}cos(x^{-1}), & 0 < x leqslant 1 \ 0, & x= 0 end{cases}$ and $g(x) = |f|(x) = begin{cases}|cos(x^{-1})|, & 0 < x leqslant 1 \ 0, & x= 0 end{cases}$



We can show that $f = F'$ where $F(x) = int_0^x f(t) , dt$. This is easy to show for $0 < x leqslant 1$ where $f$ is continuous. It is also true but harder to show that $F'(0) = f(0) = 0$.



Now if $g = G'$ on $[0,1]$ and $g$ is integrable then $int_0^x g(t) , dt = G(x)$ by the FTC with $G'(0) = g(0)$.



However,



$$G'(0) = lim_{h to 0} frac{1}{h}int_0^h g(t) , dt = lim_{h to 0} frac{1}{h}int_0^h |cos(t^{-1})| , dt = frac{2}{pi} neq g(0)$$



See here for a proof that $G'(0) = 2/pi$.



Addendum



To prove that $F'(0) = 0$, note that $F(0) = 0$ and with a variable change $y = t^{-1}$,



$$F(x) = int_0^x cos (t^{-1}) , dt = int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{cos y}{y^2} , dy$$



Integrating by parts we get,



$$F(x) = frac{sin(x^{-1})}{x^{-2}} + 2 int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{sin y}{y^3} , dy$$



Thus,



$$0 leqslant left|frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x} right| leqslant frac{|sin(x^{-1})|}{x^{-1}} + frac{2}{x} int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{|sin y|}{y^3} , dy \ leqslant x + frac{2}{x} int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{1}{y^3} , dy = 2x$$



By the squeeze theorem it follows that



$$F'(0) = lim_{x searrow 0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x} = 0 $$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Well, I'm replying to your comment here. Yes, I agree with you. All I was saying is that the OP hadn't worded the question as precisely as possible. Anyway, +1 for your answer.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 6:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: Thank you. It would be appropriate for OP to respond to your request for clarification. Although think the first comment does it for me.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 6:33












  • $begingroup$
    @RRL, can you give a proof of your claim i.e. $F'(0) = f(0) = 0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Jan 24 at 8:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Tom: I added the proof of that. Note that functions which are derivatives on an interval $[a,b]$ are said to belong to the space $mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ and I am sure (aside from the counterexample I came up with) that $f in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ does not imply $|f| in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$, but I have not found a reference yet.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 8:51








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Tom: If $f$ is Riemann integrable then $g = |f|$ is always Riemann integrable. In my example $f$ is Riemann integrable. I don’t know what you mean by “I assumed”. In general if $g$ is a derivative it does not have to be integrable. Look up Volterra’s function.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 15:09
















4












$begingroup$

This is not true even if $f$ is integrable.



Consider $f(x) = begin{cases}cos(x^{-1}), & 0 < x leqslant 1 \ 0, & x= 0 end{cases}$ and $g(x) = |f|(x) = begin{cases}|cos(x^{-1})|, & 0 < x leqslant 1 \ 0, & x= 0 end{cases}$



We can show that $f = F'$ where $F(x) = int_0^x f(t) , dt$. This is easy to show for $0 < x leqslant 1$ where $f$ is continuous. It is also true but harder to show that $F'(0) = f(0) = 0$.



Now if $g = G'$ on $[0,1]$ and $g$ is integrable then $int_0^x g(t) , dt = G(x)$ by the FTC with $G'(0) = g(0)$.



However,



$$G'(0) = lim_{h to 0} frac{1}{h}int_0^h g(t) , dt = lim_{h to 0} frac{1}{h}int_0^h |cos(t^{-1})| , dt = frac{2}{pi} neq g(0)$$



See here for a proof that $G'(0) = 2/pi$.



Addendum



To prove that $F'(0) = 0$, note that $F(0) = 0$ and with a variable change $y = t^{-1}$,



$$F(x) = int_0^x cos (t^{-1}) , dt = int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{cos y}{y^2} , dy$$



Integrating by parts we get,



$$F(x) = frac{sin(x^{-1})}{x^{-2}} + 2 int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{sin y}{y^3} , dy$$



Thus,



$$0 leqslant left|frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x} right| leqslant frac{|sin(x^{-1})|}{x^{-1}} + frac{2}{x} int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{|sin y|}{y^3} , dy \ leqslant x + frac{2}{x} int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{1}{y^3} , dy = 2x$$



By the squeeze theorem it follows that



$$F'(0) = lim_{x searrow 0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x} = 0 $$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Well, I'm replying to your comment here. Yes, I agree with you. All I was saying is that the OP hadn't worded the question as precisely as possible. Anyway, +1 for your answer.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 6:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: Thank you. It would be appropriate for OP to respond to your request for clarification. Although think the first comment does it for me.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 6:33












  • $begingroup$
    @RRL, can you give a proof of your claim i.e. $F'(0) = f(0) = 0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Jan 24 at 8:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Tom: I added the proof of that. Note that functions which are derivatives on an interval $[a,b]$ are said to belong to the space $mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ and I am sure (aside from the counterexample I came up with) that $f in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ does not imply $|f| in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$, but I have not found a reference yet.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 8:51








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Tom: If $f$ is Riemann integrable then $g = |f|$ is always Riemann integrable. In my example $f$ is Riemann integrable. I don’t know what you mean by “I assumed”. In general if $g$ is a derivative it does not have to be integrable. Look up Volterra’s function.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 15:09














4












4








4





$begingroup$

This is not true even if $f$ is integrable.



Consider $f(x) = begin{cases}cos(x^{-1}), & 0 < x leqslant 1 \ 0, & x= 0 end{cases}$ and $g(x) = |f|(x) = begin{cases}|cos(x^{-1})|, & 0 < x leqslant 1 \ 0, & x= 0 end{cases}$



We can show that $f = F'$ where $F(x) = int_0^x f(t) , dt$. This is easy to show for $0 < x leqslant 1$ where $f$ is continuous. It is also true but harder to show that $F'(0) = f(0) = 0$.



Now if $g = G'$ on $[0,1]$ and $g$ is integrable then $int_0^x g(t) , dt = G(x)$ by the FTC with $G'(0) = g(0)$.



However,



$$G'(0) = lim_{h to 0} frac{1}{h}int_0^h g(t) , dt = lim_{h to 0} frac{1}{h}int_0^h |cos(t^{-1})| , dt = frac{2}{pi} neq g(0)$$



See here for a proof that $G'(0) = 2/pi$.



Addendum



To prove that $F'(0) = 0$, note that $F(0) = 0$ and with a variable change $y = t^{-1}$,



$$F(x) = int_0^x cos (t^{-1}) , dt = int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{cos y}{y^2} , dy$$



Integrating by parts we get,



$$F(x) = frac{sin(x^{-1})}{x^{-2}} + 2 int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{sin y}{y^3} , dy$$



Thus,



$$0 leqslant left|frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x} right| leqslant frac{|sin(x^{-1})|}{x^{-1}} + frac{2}{x} int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{|sin y|}{y^3} , dy \ leqslant x + frac{2}{x} int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{1}{y^3} , dy = 2x$$



By the squeeze theorem it follows that



$$F'(0) = lim_{x searrow 0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x} = 0 $$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



This is not true even if $f$ is integrable.



Consider $f(x) = begin{cases}cos(x^{-1}), & 0 < x leqslant 1 \ 0, & x= 0 end{cases}$ and $g(x) = |f|(x) = begin{cases}|cos(x^{-1})|, & 0 < x leqslant 1 \ 0, & x= 0 end{cases}$



We can show that $f = F'$ where $F(x) = int_0^x f(t) , dt$. This is easy to show for $0 < x leqslant 1$ where $f$ is continuous. It is also true but harder to show that $F'(0) = f(0) = 0$.



Now if $g = G'$ on $[0,1]$ and $g$ is integrable then $int_0^x g(t) , dt = G(x)$ by the FTC with $G'(0) = g(0)$.



However,



$$G'(0) = lim_{h to 0} frac{1}{h}int_0^h g(t) , dt = lim_{h to 0} frac{1}{h}int_0^h |cos(t^{-1})| , dt = frac{2}{pi} neq g(0)$$



See here for a proof that $G'(0) = 2/pi$.



Addendum



To prove that $F'(0) = 0$, note that $F(0) = 0$ and with a variable change $y = t^{-1}$,



$$F(x) = int_0^x cos (t^{-1}) , dt = int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{cos y}{y^2} , dy$$



Integrating by parts we get,



$$F(x) = frac{sin(x^{-1})}{x^{-2}} + 2 int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{sin y}{y^3} , dy$$



Thus,



$$0 leqslant left|frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x} right| leqslant frac{|sin(x^{-1})|}{x^{-1}} + frac{2}{x} int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{|sin y|}{y^3} , dy \ leqslant x + frac{2}{x} int_{x^{-1}}^infty frac{1}{y^3} , dy = 2x$$



By the squeeze theorem it follows that



$$F'(0) = lim_{x searrow 0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x} = 0 $$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 24 at 8:57

























answered Jan 24 at 5:48









RRLRRL

52.3k42573




52.3k42573












  • $begingroup$
    Well, I'm replying to your comment here. Yes, I agree with you. All I was saying is that the OP hadn't worded the question as precisely as possible. Anyway, +1 for your answer.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 6:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: Thank you. It would be appropriate for OP to respond to your request for clarification. Although think the first comment does it for me.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 6:33












  • $begingroup$
    @RRL, can you give a proof of your claim i.e. $F'(0) = f(0) = 0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Jan 24 at 8:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Tom: I added the proof of that. Note that functions which are derivatives on an interval $[a,b]$ are said to belong to the space $mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ and I am sure (aside from the counterexample I came up with) that $f in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ does not imply $|f| in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$, but I have not found a reference yet.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 8:51








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Tom: If $f$ is Riemann integrable then $g = |f|$ is always Riemann integrable. In my example $f$ is Riemann integrable. I don’t know what you mean by “I assumed”. In general if $g$ is a derivative it does not have to be integrable. Look up Volterra’s function.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 15:09


















  • $begingroup$
    Well, I'm replying to your comment here. Yes, I agree with you. All I was saying is that the OP hadn't worded the question as precisely as possible. Anyway, +1 for your answer.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 6:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: Thank you. It would be appropriate for OP to respond to your request for clarification. Although think the first comment does it for me.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 6:33












  • $begingroup$
    @RRL, can you give a proof of your claim i.e. $F'(0) = f(0) = 0$?
    $endgroup$
    – Tom.
    Jan 24 at 8:19










  • $begingroup$
    @Tom: I added the proof of that. Note that functions which are derivatives on an interval $[a,b]$ are said to belong to the space $mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ and I am sure (aside from the counterexample I came up with) that $f in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ does not imply $|f| in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$, but I have not found a reference yet.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 8:51








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Tom: If $f$ is Riemann integrable then $g = |f|$ is always Riemann integrable. In my example $f$ is Riemann integrable. I don’t know what you mean by “I assumed”. In general if $g$ is a derivative it does not have to be integrable. Look up Volterra’s function.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 15:09
















$begingroup$
Well, I'm replying to your comment here. Yes, I agree with you. All I was saying is that the OP hadn't worded the question as precisely as possible. Anyway, +1 for your answer.
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 24 at 6:31




$begingroup$
Well, I'm replying to your comment here. Yes, I agree with you. All I was saying is that the OP hadn't worded the question as precisely as possible. Anyway, +1 for your answer.
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 24 at 6:31




1




1




$begingroup$
@stressedout: Thank you. It would be appropriate for OP to respond to your request for clarification. Although think the first comment does it for me.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 24 at 6:33






$begingroup$
@stressedout: Thank you. It would be appropriate for OP to respond to your request for clarification. Although think the first comment does it for me.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 24 at 6:33














$begingroup$
@RRL, can you give a proof of your claim i.e. $F'(0) = f(0) = 0$?
$endgroup$
– Tom.
Jan 24 at 8:19




$begingroup$
@RRL, can you give a proof of your claim i.e. $F'(0) = f(0) = 0$?
$endgroup$
– Tom.
Jan 24 at 8:19












$begingroup$
@Tom: I added the proof of that. Note that functions which are derivatives on an interval $[a,b]$ are said to belong to the space $mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ and I am sure (aside from the counterexample I came up with) that $f in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ does not imply $|f| in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$, but I have not found a reference yet.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 24 at 8:51






$begingroup$
@Tom: I added the proof of that. Note that functions which are derivatives on an interval $[a,b]$ are said to belong to the space $mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ and I am sure (aside from the counterexample I came up with) that $f in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$ does not imply $|f| in mathcal{D}^1([a,b])$, but I have not found a reference yet.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 24 at 8:51






1




1




$begingroup$
@Tom: If $f$ is Riemann integrable then $g = |f|$ is always Riemann integrable. In my example $f$ is Riemann integrable. I don’t know what you mean by “I assumed”. In general if $g$ is a derivative it does not have to be integrable. Look up Volterra’s function.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 24 at 15:09




$begingroup$
@Tom: If $f$ is Riemann integrable then $g = |f|$ is always Riemann integrable. In my example $f$ is Riemann integrable. I don’t know what you mean by “I assumed”. In general if $g$ is a derivative it does not have to be integrable. Look up Volterra’s function.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 24 at 15:09











0












$begingroup$

Consider $f(x)=x$ which is differentiable everywhere but $|f(x)|$ is not differentiable at zero.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Did you answer the question?
    $endgroup$
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 24 at 4:48










  • $begingroup$
    It's not your fault. The question is ambiguous. You haven't actually answered the question. Check the comments.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 4:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: The question is not ambiguous. This answer is about differentiability of $|f|$ -- which does not answer the OP. OP is asking if $f = F'$ on some domain does that mean that $|f| = G'$ for some differentiable function $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 5:50










  • $begingroup$
    @RRL The question is ambiguous in the sense that the OP has not defined what a 'derivative' function is. I left a comment under their post asking for more explanation because it sounded ambiguous to me at first. Plus, if $f$ is not Riemann integrable, then I don't see how $f=F'$ can hold in the first place. Because if it does, then $int f = f$ exists. No?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 5:55












  • $begingroup$
    @stressedout: Good you asked for clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 6:02
















0












$begingroup$

Consider $f(x)=x$ which is differentiable everywhere but $|f(x)|$ is not differentiable at zero.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Did you answer the question?
    $endgroup$
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 24 at 4:48










  • $begingroup$
    It's not your fault. The question is ambiguous. You haven't actually answered the question. Check the comments.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 4:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: The question is not ambiguous. This answer is about differentiability of $|f|$ -- which does not answer the OP. OP is asking if $f = F'$ on some domain does that mean that $|f| = G'$ for some differentiable function $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 5:50










  • $begingroup$
    @RRL The question is ambiguous in the sense that the OP has not defined what a 'derivative' function is. I left a comment under their post asking for more explanation because it sounded ambiguous to me at first. Plus, if $f$ is not Riemann integrable, then I don't see how $f=F'$ can hold in the first place. Because if it does, then $int f = f$ exists. No?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 5:55












  • $begingroup$
    @stressedout: Good you asked for clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 6:02














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Consider $f(x)=x$ which is differentiable everywhere but $|f(x)|$ is not differentiable at zero.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Consider $f(x)=x$ which is differentiable everywhere but $|f(x)|$ is not differentiable at zero.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 24 at 4:48









CyclotomicFieldCyclotomicField

2,4431314




2,4431314








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Did you answer the question?
    $endgroup$
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 24 at 4:48










  • $begingroup$
    It's not your fault. The question is ambiguous. You haven't actually answered the question. Check the comments.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 4:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: The question is not ambiguous. This answer is about differentiability of $|f|$ -- which does not answer the OP. OP is asking if $f = F'$ on some domain does that mean that $|f| = G'$ for some differentiable function $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 5:50










  • $begingroup$
    @RRL The question is ambiguous in the sense that the OP has not defined what a 'derivative' function is. I left a comment under their post asking for more explanation because it sounded ambiguous to me at first. Plus, if $f$ is not Riemann integrable, then I don't see how $f=F'$ can hold in the first place. Because if it does, then $int f = f$ exists. No?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 5:55












  • $begingroup$
    @stressedout: Good you asked for clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 6:02














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Did you answer the question?
    $endgroup$
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 24 at 4:48










  • $begingroup$
    It's not your fault. The question is ambiguous. You haven't actually answered the question. Check the comments.
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 4:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @stressedout: The question is not ambiguous. This answer is about differentiability of $|f|$ -- which does not answer the OP. OP is asking if $f = F'$ on some domain does that mean that $|f| = G'$ for some differentiable function $G$.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 5:50










  • $begingroup$
    @RRL The question is ambiguous in the sense that the OP has not defined what a 'derivative' function is. I left a comment under their post asking for more explanation because it sounded ambiguous to me at first. Plus, if $f$ is not Riemann integrable, then I don't see how $f=F'$ can hold in the first place. Because if it does, then $int f = f$ exists. No?
    $endgroup$
    – stressed out
    Jan 24 at 5:55












  • $begingroup$
    @stressedout: Good you asked for clarification.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 24 at 6:02








1




1




$begingroup$
Did you answer the question?
$endgroup$
– Jacky Chong
Jan 24 at 4:48




$begingroup$
Did you answer the question?
$endgroup$
– Jacky Chong
Jan 24 at 4:48












$begingroup$
It's not your fault. The question is ambiguous. You haven't actually answered the question. Check the comments.
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 24 at 4:50




$begingroup$
It's not your fault. The question is ambiguous. You haven't actually answered the question. Check the comments.
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 24 at 4:50




1




1




$begingroup$
@stressedout: The question is not ambiguous. This answer is about differentiability of $|f|$ -- which does not answer the OP. OP is asking if $f = F'$ on some domain does that mean that $|f| = G'$ for some differentiable function $G$.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 24 at 5:50




$begingroup$
@stressedout: The question is not ambiguous. This answer is about differentiability of $|f|$ -- which does not answer the OP. OP is asking if $f = F'$ on some domain does that mean that $|f| = G'$ for some differentiable function $G$.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 24 at 5:50












$begingroup$
@RRL The question is ambiguous in the sense that the OP has not defined what a 'derivative' function is. I left a comment under their post asking for more explanation because it sounded ambiguous to me at first. Plus, if $f$ is not Riemann integrable, then I don't see how $f=F'$ can hold in the first place. Because if it does, then $int f = f$ exists. No?
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 24 at 5:55






$begingroup$
@RRL The question is ambiguous in the sense that the OP has not defined what a 'derivative' function is. I left a comment under their post asking for more explanation because it sounded ambiguous to me at first. Plus, if $f$ is not Riemann integrable, then I don't see how $f=F'$ can hold in the first place. Because if it does, then $int f = f$ exists. No?
$endgroup$
– stressed out
Jan 24 at 5:55














$begingroup$
@stressedout: Good you asked for clarification.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 24 at 6:02




$begingroup$
@stressedout: Good you asked for clarification.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 24 at 6:02


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085455%2fif-f-is-a-derivative-then-is-f-also-a-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

Image
Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
Read more

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Image
5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
Read more

Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

Image
Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
Read more