Why natural numbers are generalized in $mathbb{Z}$ to ensure the group structure respect to the sum?












0












$begingroup$



The natural numbers $mathbb{N}$ are defined through the Peano axioms and then generalized in $mathbb{Z}$ to ensure the group structure with respect to the sum.




Why do we need to ensure such group structure?



The most complex structures are introduced in order to close the set with respect to the operations



$mathbb{Z}$ closes $mathbb{N}$ with respect to the sum
$mathbb{Q}$ closes $mathbb{Z}$ with respect to the product
$mathbb{R}$ includes the continuity axiom in $mathbb{Q}$
$mathbb{C}$ closes $mathbb{R}$ with respect to the roots of polynomials (fundamental theorem of algebra).



How general method/set rules are used to close and why we need to 'close' ?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    We do not need to ensure the group structure.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Jan 14 at 20:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    More accurately, $mathbb{Z}$ closes $mathbb{N}$ with respect to difference. [Already closed with respect to sum.] Similarly should be quotient not product for $mathbb{Q}.$ Your description for $mathbb{R}$ is not the usual "completeness" axiom.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 14 at 20:24










  • $begingroup$
    You are asking for an essay on the development of the concept of number. This is far too broad for MSE. I suggest you read the beautiful book Numbers. It will also help you with the technical glitches in your description of the relationships between the number systems.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Arthan
    Jan 14 at 20:58
















0












$begingroup$



The natural numbers $mathbb{N}$ are defined through the Peano axioms and then generalized in $mathbb{Z}$ to ensure the group structure with respect to the sum.




Why do we need to ensure such group structure?



The most complex structures are introduced in order to close the set with respect to the operations



$mathbb{Z}$ closes $mathbb{N}$ with respect to the sum
$mathbb{Q}$ closes $mathbb{Z}$ with respect to the product
$mathbb{R}$ includes the continuity axiom in $mathbb{Q}$
$mathbb{C}$ closes $mathbb{R}$ with respect to the roots of polynomials (fundamental theorem of algebra).



How general method/set rules are used to close and why we need to 'close' ?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    We do not need to ensure the group structure.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Jan 14 at 20:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    More accurately, $mathbb{Z}$ closes $mathbb{N}$ with respect to difference. [Already closed with respect to sum.] Similarly should be quotient not product for $mathbb{Q}.$ Your description for $mathbb{R}$ is not the usual "completeness" axiom.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 14 at 20:24










  • $begingroup$
    You are asking for an essay on the development of the concept of number. This is far too broad for MSE. I suggest you read the beautiful book Numbers. It will also help you with the technical glitches in your description of the relationships between the number systems.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Arthan
    Jan 14 at 20:58














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$



The natural numbers $mathbb{N}$ are defined through the Peano axioms and then generalized in $mathbb{Z}$ to ensure the group structure with respect to the sum.




Why do we need to ensure such group structure?



The most complex structures are introduced in order to close the set with respect to the operations



$mathbb{Z}$ closes $mathbb{N}$ with respect to the sum
$mathbb{Q}$ closes $mathbb{Z}$ with respect to the product
$mathbb{R}$ includes the continuity axiom in $mathbb{Q}$
$mathbb{C}$ closes $mathbb{R}$ with respect to the roots of polynomials (fundamental theorem of algebra).



How general method/set rules are used to close and why we need to 'close' ?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





The natural numbers $mathbb{N}$ are defined through the Peano axioms and then generalized in $mathbb{Z}$ to ensure the group structure with respect to the sum.




Why do we need to ensure such group structure?



The most complex structures are introduced in order to close the set with respect to the operations



$mathbb{Z}$ closes $mathbb{N}$ with respect to the sum
$mathbb{Q}$ closes $mathbb{Z}$ with respect to the product
$mathbb{R}$ includes the continuity axiom in $mathbb{Q}$
$mathbb{C}$ closes $mathbb{R}$ with respect to the roots of polynomials (fundamental theorem of algebra).



How general method/set rules are used to close and why we need to 'close' ?







peano-axioms






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 14 at 20:33









David G. Stork

10.9k31432




10.9k31432










asked Jan 14 at 20:15









KenKen

11




11








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    We do not need to ensure the group structure.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Jan 14 at 20:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    More accurately, $mathbb{Z}$ closes $mathbb{N}$ with respect to difference. [Already closed with respect to sum.] Similarly should be quotient not product for $mathbb{Q}.$ Your description for $mathbb{R}$ is not the usual "completeness" axiom.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 14 at 20:24










  • $begingroup$
    You are asking for an essay on the development of the concept of number. This is far too broad for MSE. I suggest you read the beautiful book Numbers. It will also help you with the technical glitches in your description of the relationships between the number systems.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Arthan
    Jan 14 at 20:58














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    We do not need to ensure the group structure.
    $endgroup$
    – Dietrich Burde
    Jan 14 at 20:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    More accurately, $mathbb{Z}$ closes $mathbb{N}$ with respect to difference. [Already closed with respect to sum.] Similarly should be quotient not product for $mathbb{Q}.$ Your description for $mathbb{R}$ is not the usual "completeness" axiom.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    Jan 14 at 20:24










  • $begingroup$
    You are asking for an essay on the development of the concept of number. This is far too broad for MSE. I suggest you read the beautiful book Numbers. It will also help you with the technical glitches in your description of the relationships between the number systems.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Arthan
    Jan 14 at 20:58








3




3




$begingroup$
We do not need to ensure the group structure.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 14 at 20:19






$begingroup$
We do not need to ensure the group structure.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 14 at 20:19






1




1




$begingroup$
More accurately, $mathbb{Z}$ closes $mathbb{N}$ with respect to difference. [Already closed with respect to sum.] Similarly should be quotient not product for $mathbb{Q}.$ Your description for $mathbb{R}$ is not the usual "completeness" axiom.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
Jan 14 at 20:24




$begingroup$
More accurately, $mathbb{Z}$ closes $mathbb{N}$ with respect to difference. [Already closed with respect to sum.] Similarly should be quotient not product for $mathbb{Q}.$ Your description for $mathbb{R}$ is not the usual "completeness" axiom.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
Jan 14 at 20:24












$begingroup$
You are asking for an essay on the development of the concept of number. This is far too broad for MSE. I suggest you read the beautiful book Numbers. It will also help you with the technical glitches in your description of the relationships between the number systems.
$endgroup$
– Rob Arthan
Jan 14 at 20:58




$begingroup$
You are asking for an essay on the development of the concept of number. This is far too broad for MSE. I suggest you read the beautiful book Numbers. It will also help you with the technical glitches in your description of the relationships between the number systems.
$endgroup$
– Rob Arthan
Jan 14 at 20:58










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073694%2fwhy-natural-numbers-are-generalized-in-mathbbz-to-ensure-the-group-structur%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073694%2fwhy-natural-numbers-are-generalized-in-mathbbz-to-ensure-the-group-structur%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?