Why is the indicator function of rational numbers a simple function?












1












$begingroup$


I understand the simple function is one that is measurable and takes on finitely many values. However, the amount of values in the set Q are infinite. Thanks










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The indicator function, any indicator function, takes on at most two values.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 14 at 21:09










  • $begingroup$
    The indicator function of the rationals is $fcolon mathbb R to {0,1}$ with $f(x)=1$ iff $xin mathbb Q$. It only takes two values.
    $endgroup$
    – Ittay Weiss
    Jan 14 at 21:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is it because it only takes on the value 0 and 1?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Mc Donald
    Jan 14 at 21:09










  • $begingroup$
    Ah I see, very stupid, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Mc Donald
    Jan 14 at 21:10










  • $begingroup$
    Yes! Well, you also have to argue that $mathbb Q$ is measurable, but as it is countable it has measure $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 14 at 21:10
















1












$begingroup$


I understand the simple function is one that is measurable and takes on finitely many values. However, the amount of values in the set Q are infinite. Thanks










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The indicator function, any indicator function, takes on at most two values.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 14 at 21:09










  • $begingroup$
    The indicator function of the rationals is $fcolon mathbb R to {0,1}$ with $f(x)=1$ iff $xin mathbb Q$. It only takes two values.
    $endgroup$
    – Ittay Weiss
    Jan 14 at 21:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is it because it only takes on the value 0 and 1?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Mc Donald
    Jan 14 at 21:09










  • $begingroup$
    Ah I see, very stupid, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Mc Donald
    Jan 14 at 21:10










  • $begingroup$
    Yes! Well, you also have to argue that $mathbb Q$ is measurable, but as it is countable it has measure $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 14 at 21:10














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I understand the simple function is one that is measurable and takes on finitely many values. However, the amount of values in the set Q are infinite. Thanks










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I understand the simple function is one that is measurable and takes on finitely many values. However, the amount of values in the set Q are infinite. Thanks







real-analysis measure-theory simple-functions






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 14 at 21:08









Thomas Mc DonaldThomas Mc Donald

63




63












  • $begingroup$
    The indicator function, any indicator function, takes on at most two values.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 14 at 21:09










  • $begingroup$
    The indicator function of the rationals is $fcolon mathbb R to {0,1}$ with $f(x)=1$ iff $xin mathbb Q$. It only takes two values.
    $endgroup$
    – Ittay Weiss
    Jan 14 at 21:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is it because it only takes on the value 0 and 1?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Mc Donald
    Jan 14 at 21:09










  • $begingroup$
    Ah I see, very stupid, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Mc Donald
    Jan 14 at 21:10










  • $begingroup$
    Yes! Well, you also have to argue that $mathbb Q$ is measurable, but as it is countable it has measure $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 14 at 21:10


















  • $begingroup$
    The indicator function, any indicator function, takes on at most two values.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 14 at 21:09










  • $begingroup$
    The indicator function of the rationals is $fcolon mathbb R to {0,1}$ with $f(x)=1$ iff $xin mathbb Q$. It only takes two values.
    $endgroup$
    – Ittay Weiss
    Jan 14 at 21:09






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is it because it only takes on the value 0 and 1?
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Mc Donald
    Jan 14 at 21:09










  • $begingroup$
    Ah I see, very stupid, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Mc Donald
    Jan 14 at 21:10










  • $begingroup$
    Yes! Well, you also have to argue that $mathbb Q$ is measurable, but as it is countable it has measure $0$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 14 at 21:10
















$begingroup$
The indicator function, any indicator function, takes on at most two values.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:09




$begingroup$
The indicator function, any indicator function, takes on at most two values.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:09












$begingroup$
The indicator function of the rationals is $fcolon mathbb R to {0,1}$ with $f(x)=1$ iff $xin mathbb Q$. It only takes two values.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 14 at 21:09




$begingroup$
The indicator function of the rationals is $fcolon mathbb R to {0,1}$ with $f(x)=1$ iff $xin mathbb Q$. It only takes two values.
$endgroup$
– Ittay Weiss
Jan 14 at 21:09




2




2




$begingroup$
Is it because it only takes on the value 0 and 1?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:09




$begingroup$
Is it because it only takes on the value 0 and 1?
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:09












$begingroup$
Ah I see, very stupid, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:10




$begingroup$
Ah I see, very stupid, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Thomas Mc Donald
Jan 14 at 21:10












$begingroup$
Yes! Well, you also have to argue that $mathbb Q$ is measurable, but as it is countable it has measure $0$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:10




$begingroup$
Yes! Well, you also have to argue that $mathbb Q$ is measurable, but as it is countable it has measure $0$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 14 at 21:10










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073746%2fwhy-is-the-indicator-function-of-rational-numbers-a-simple-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073746%2fwhy-is-the-indicator-function-of-rational-numbers-a-simple-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?