Orthogonal projection of an ellipsoid
$begingroup$
Suppose an ellipsoid given by ${{(x,y,z)| {x^{2}+frac{y^{2}}{4}+frac{z^{2}}{9}}}=1}$, find the area of the orthogonal projection of the ellipsoid on the plane ${2x+4y-5z=10}$.
What is the right direction to solve this question? Thanks in advance!
calculus area projection
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose an ellipsoid given by ${{(x,y,z)| {x^{2}+frac{y^{2}}{4}+frac{z^{2}}{9}}}=1}$, find the area of the orthogonal projection of the ellipsoid on the plane ${2x+4y-5z=10}$.
What is the right direction to solve this question? Thanks in advance!
calculus area projection
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Presumably you meant $x^2+y^2/4+z^2/9le1$ since otherwise your set-building expression is meaningless. Think about what the outline of the projected image is.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 14 at 21:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose an ellipsoid given by ${{(x,y,z)| {x^{2}+frac{y^{2}}{4}+frac{z^{2}}{9}}}=1}$, find the area of the orthogonal projection of the ellipsoid on the plane ${2x+4y-5z=10}$.
What is the right direction to solve this question? Thanks in advance!
calculus area projection
$endgroup$
Suppose an ellipsoid given by ${{(x,y,z)| {x^{2}+frac{y^{2}}{4}+frac{z^{2}}{9}}}=1}$, find the area of the orthogonal projection of the ellipsoid on the plane ${2x+4y-5z=10}$.
What is the right direction to solve this question? Thanks in advance!
calculus area projection
calculus area projection
edited Jan 17 at 15:31
alexander_yz
asked Jan 14 at 20:38
alexander_yzalexander_yz
165
165
1
$begingroup$
Presumably you meant $x^2+y^2/4+z^2/9le1$ since otherwise your set-building expression is meaningless. Think about what the outline of the projected image is.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 14 at 21:10
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Presumably you meant $x^2+y^2/4+z^2/9le1$ since otherwise your set-building expression is meaningless. Think about what the outline of the projected image is.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 14 at 21:10
1
1
$begingroup$
Presumably you meant $x^2+y^2/4+z^2/9le1$ since otherwise your set-building expression is meaningless. Think about what the outline of the projected image is.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 14 at 21:10
$begingroup$
Presumably you meant $x^2+y^2/4+z^2/9le1$ since otherwise your set-building expression is meaningless. Think about what the outline of the projected image is.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 14 at 21:10
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Given the ellipsoid
$$
Cto p'Mp=1, p = (x,y,z), M = mbox{diag}left({1,frac 14, frac 19}right)
$$
and the plane
$$
Pito(p-p_0)cdotvec v, vec v = (2,4,-5)
$$
the line
$$
Lto p=p_1+lambda vec v
$$
is by construction, orthogonal to $Pi$. Now making
$$
(p_1+lambdavec v)'M(p_1+lambdavec v)=1
$$
and solving for $lambda$ we have
$$
lambda = frac{-2p_1'Mvec vpm 2sqrt{(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)}}{2vec v'Mvec v}
$$
but if $L$ is tangent to $C$ then
$$
(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0
$$
now assuming that $p_1'$ is the generic tangency point, the sought projection is given by the solution
$$
(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0\
(p_1-p_0)'cdot vec v = 0
$$
for $p_1$
which eliminating $z$ gives
$$
7028 x^2 + 1088 x y + 2837 y^2 = 9700
$$
this is the trace projection on the $z=0$ plane. Eliminating the $x y$ term with a convenient rotation we get
$$
(1973 + sqrt{749929}) X^2 + (1973-sqrt{749929}) Y^2 = 3880
$$
with main axes
$$
r_X=2 sqrt{frac{970}{1973+sqrt{749929}}}\
r_Y=2 sqrt{frac{970}{1973-sqrt{749929}}}
$$
so the projected area is given by
$$
S_p = pi r_X r_Y = frac{2 sqrt{97} pi }{9}
$$
but
$$
S_p = S left(frac{vec v}{||vec v||}cdot hat e_zright)
$$
hence
$$
S = frac{2 sqrt{97} pi }{45}
$$
Attached the problem setup
In lightblue $(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0$ in light red $(p_1-p_0)'cdot vec v = 0$ and in light yellow $7028 x^2 + 1088 x y + 2837 y^2 = 9700$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What about the area? Aren't we supposed to make a surface integral?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 14 at 22:27
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz After the contour, you can rotate it into the $x, y$ plane and then integrate it using polar coordinates.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 14 at 22:36
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Attached a note about the area integration.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 15 at 3:46
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Please. See the modifications to obtain the numerical area value.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 17 at 15:32
$begingroup$
I'm very thankful sir this helped me a lot!
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 19 at 11:57
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Without calculus: The outline of the image of a quadric $Q$ under the central projection with matrix $P$ is a conic with a simple formula expressed via dual conics/quadrics: $C^*=PQ^*P^T$. What this formula says is that the outline of the image of $Q$ is the conic that is tangent to the images of the tangent planes of $Q$ that pass through the center of projection.
If we apply a rotation $R$ that aligns the projection direction with the $z$-axis, our orthogonal projection will then have the matrix $$P = begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&0\0&1&0&0\0&0&0&1end{bmatrix} R,$$ i.e., the projection consists of rotating and then dropping the $z$-coordinate. The first two rows of $P$ are therefore the first two rows of $R$, for which we can take any two orthogonal unit vectors perpendicular to the image plane’s normal. $(4,-2,0)^T$ is obviously one such vector, and we can obtain another via a cross product: $(2,4,-5)^Ttimes(4,-2,0)^T=(-10,-20,-20)^T$. Normalizing these two vectors gives us $$P=begin{bmatrix}{2oversqrt5} & -{1oversqrt5} & 0 & 0 \ -frac13 & -frac23 & -frac23 & 0 \ 0&0&0&1 end{bmatrix}.$$ The matrix $Q = operatorname{diag}(1,1/4,1/9,-1)$, so using $Q^{-1}$ for the dual conic $Q^*$ is convenient. Multiplying this all out produces $$C^* = begin{bmatrix}frac85 & {2oversqrt5} & 0 \ {2oversqrt5} & frac{53}9 &0 \ 0&0&-1 end{bmatrix}.$$ The inverse of this matrix represents an ellipse centered at the origin.
There’s no need to invert this matrix to obtain the equation of the ellipse, though, since the ellipse’s area can be computed directly from the dual matrix. The area of an ellipse is $pi$ times the product of its semiaxis lengths, and the latter are the reciprocal square roots of the eigenvalues of the quadratic part of $C$. Therefore, the area of this ellipse is equal to $${pioversqrt{-det C}} = pi sqrt{-det C^*} = frac23sqrt{97over5}pi.$$
With calculus: One possible approach is to find a parameterization of the outline of the projection. The generator of the outline of a quadric surface—the locus of intersection of rays from the projection center tangent to the surface—it itself a conic that lies in the polar plane of the projection center. For this parallel projection the center is the point at infinity $mathbf V=(2,4,-5,0)$, so the generator’s plane is $Qmathbf V = (2,1,-5/9,0)^T$, i.e., $2x+y-frac59z=0$. Since the ellipsoid is axis-aligned, a relatively easy way to find a parameterization for the intersection curve is to transform the surface to a unit sphere. This transformation changes the polar plane to $(2,2,-5/3,0)^T$. Proceeding as above, we find a pair of unit vectors orthogonal to this plane’s normal, leading to the circle $$cos(t)left(frac1{sqrt2},-frac1{sqrt2},0right)^T+sin(t)left(-{5oversqrt{194}},-{5oversqrt{194}}-6sqrt{2over97}right)^T.$$ Mapping this circle back to the original coordinate system produces $$cos(t)left(frac1{sqrt2},-sqrt2,0right)^T+sin(t)left(-{5oversqrt{194}},-5sqrt{2over97},-18sqrt{2over97}right)^T.$$
Since we’re working with a parallel projection, we can use any plane parallel to the image plane, so we project this onto $2x+4y-5z=0$. This is equivalent to projecting onto the original image plane and then translating the center of the resulting ellipse to the origin. The projection onto this plane is easily computed via the orthogonal rejection from the plane’s normal, resulting finally in a parameterization $mathbf r(t)$ for the outline of the ellipsoid’s projection. Its area is then equal to $frac12int_0^{2pi}|mathbf rtimes dmathbf r|$. You should find that the integrand simplifies nicely.
On the other hand, once we had the two unit vectors that generated the great circle of the unit sphere above, we could again proceed without calculus. Scaling and projecting these vectors produces the halves of a pair of conjugate diameters of the outline. A theorem of Appolonios states that the area of the triangle formed by them is equal to $frac12ab$, and so the area of the ellipse is equal to $2pi$ times this area. Calling these two vectors $mathbf u$ and $mathbf v$, the area of ellipsoid’s projection is therefore equal to $pi|mathbf utimesmathbf v|$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How can we do it with calculus?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 15 at 22:09
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Read the penultimate paragraph. It’s also possible to compute this by integrating $mathbf ncdot dS$, where $mathbf n$ is a unit normal to the image plane, over an appropriate piece of the ellipsoid, but getting the bounds right is not easy.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 0:39
$begingroup$
the bounds are my main problem
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 16 at 11:33
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz I would look for a change of coordinates such that you’re integrating over a hemisphere. It will involve much of the same scaling and rotation that’s in this answer.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 17:47
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot! :)
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 20 at 8:49
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073718%2forthogonal-projection-of-an-ellipsoid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Given the ellipsoid
$$
Cto p'Mp=1, p = (x,y,z), M = mbox{diag}left({1,frac 14, frac 19}right)
$$
and the plane
$$
Pito(p-p_0)cdotvec v, vec v = (2,4,-5)
$$
the line
$$
Lto p=p_1+lambda vec v
$$
is by construction, orthogonal to $Pi$. Now making
$$
(p_1+lambdavec v)'M(p_1+lambdavec v)=1
$$
and solving for $lambda$ we have
$$
lambda = frac{-2p_1'Mvec vpm 2sqrt{(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)}}{2vec v'Mvec v}
$$
but if $L$ is tangent to $C$ then
$$
(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0
$$
now assuming that $p_1'$ is the generic tangency point, the sought projection is given by the solution
$$
(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0\
(p_1-p_0)'cdot vec v = 0
$$
for $p_1$
which eliminating $z$ gives
$$
7028 x^2 + 1088 x y + 2837 y^2 = 9700
$$
this is the trace projection on the $z=0$ plane. Eliminating the $x y$ term with a convenient rotation we get
$$
(1973 + sqrt{749929}) X^2 + (1973-sqrt{749929}) Y^2 = 3880
$$
with main axes
$$
r_X=2 sqrt{frac{970}{1973+sqrt{749929}}}\
r_Y=2 sqrt{frac{970}{1973-sqrt{749929}}}
$$
so the projected area is given by
$$
S_p = pi r_X r_Y = frac{2 sqrt{97} pi }{9}
$$
but
$$
S_p = S left(frac{vec v}{||vec v||}cdot hat e_zright)
$$
hence
$$
S = frac{2 sqrt{97} pi }{45}
$$
Attached the problem setup
In lightblue $(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0$ in light red $(p_1-p_0)'cdot vec v = 0$ and in light yellow $7028 x^2 + 1088 x y + 2837 y^2 = 9700$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What about the area? Aren't we supposed to make a surface integral?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 14 at 22:27
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz After the contour, you can rotate it into the $x, y$ plane and then integrate it using polar coordinates.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 14 at 22:36
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Attached a note about the area integration.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 15 at 3:46
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Please. See the modifications to obtain the numerical area value.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 17 at 15:32
$begingroup$
I'm very thankful sir this helped me a lot!
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 19 at 11:57
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Given the ellipsoid
$$
Cto p'Mp=1, p = (x,y,z), M = mbox{diag}left({1,frac 14, frac 19}right)
$$
and the plane
$$
Pito(p-p_0)cdotvec v, vec v = (2,4,-5)
$$
the line
$$
Lto p=p_1+lambda vec v
$$
is by construction, orthogonal to $Pi$. Now making
$$
(p_1+lambdavec v)'M(p_1+lambdavec v)=1
$$
and solving for $lambda$ we have
$$
lambda = frac{-2p_1'Mvec vpm 2sqrt{(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)}}{2vec v'Mvec v}
$$
but if $L$ is tangent to $C$ then
$$
(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0
$$
now assuming that $p_1'$ is the generic tangency point, the sought projection is given by the solution
$$
(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0\
(p_1-p_0)'cdot vec v = 0
$$
for $p_1$
which eliminating $z$ gives
$$
7028 x^2 + 1088 x y + 2837 y^2 = 9700
$$
this is the trace projection on the $z=0$ plane. Eliminating the $x y$ term with a convenient rotation we get
$$
(1973 + sqrt{749929}) X^2 + (1973-sqrt{749929}) Y^2 = 3880
$$
with main axes
$$
r_X=2 sqrt{frac{970}{1973+sqrt{749929}}}\
r_Y=2 sqrt{frac{970}{1973-sqrt{749929}}}
$$
so the projected area is given by
$$
S_p = pi r_X r_Y = frac{2 sqrt{97} pi }{9}
$$
but
$$
S_p = S left(frac{vec v}{||vec v||}cdot hat e_zright)
$$
hence
$$
S = frac{2 sqrt{97} pi }{45}
$$
Attached the problem setup
In lightblue $(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0$ in light red $(p_1-p_0)'cdot vec v = 0$ and in light yellow $7028 x^2 + 1088 x y + 2837 y^2 = 9700$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What about the area? Aren't we supposed to make a surface integral?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 14 at 22:27
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz After the contour, you can rotate it into the $x, y$ plane and then integrate it using polar coordinates.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 14 at 22:36
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Attached a note about the area integration.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 15 at 3:46
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Please. See the modifications to obtain the numerical area value.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 17 at 15:32
$begingroup$
I'm very thankful sir this helped me a lot!
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 19 at 11:57
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Given the ellipsoid
$$
Cto p'Mp=1, p = (x,y,z), M = mbox{diag}left({1,frac 14, frac 19}right)
$$
and the plane
$$
Pito(p-p_0)cdotvec v, vec v = (2,4,-5)
$$
the line
$$
Lto p=p_1+lambda vec v
$$
is by construction, orthogonal to $Pi$. Now making
$$
(p_1+lambdavec v)'M(p_1+lambdavec v)=1
$$
and solving for $lambda$ we have
$$
lambda = frac{-2p_1'Mvec vpm 2sqrt{(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)}}{2vec v'Mvec v}
$$
but if $L$ is tangent to $C$ then
$$
(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0
$$
now assuming that $p_1'$ is the generic tangency point, the sought projection is given by the solution
$$
(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0\
(p_1-p_0)'cdot vec v = 0
$$
for $p_1$
which eliminating $z$ gives
$$
7028 x^2 + 1088 x y + 2837 y^2 = 9700
$$
this is the trace projection on the $z=0$ plane. Eliminating the $x y$ term with a convenient rotation we get
$$
(1973 + sqrt{749929}) X^2 + (1973-sqrt{749929}) Y^2 = 3880
$$
with main axes
$$
r_X=2 sqrt{frac{970}{1973+sqrt{749929}}}\
r_Y=2 sqrt{frac{970}{1973-sqrt{749929}}}
$$
so the projected area is given by
$$
S_p = pi r_X r_Y = frac{2 sqrt{97} pi }{9}
$$
but
$$
S_p = S left(frac{vec v}{||vec v||}cdot hat e_zright)
$$
hence
$$
S = frac{2 sqrt{97} pi }{45}
$$
Attached the problem setup
In lightblue $(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0$ in light red $(p_1-p_0)'cdot vec v = 0$ and in light yellow $7028 x^2 + 1088 x y + 2837 y^2 = 9700$
$endgroup$
Given the ellipsoid
$$
Cto p'Mp=1, p = (x,y,z), M = mbox{diag}left({1,frac 14, frac 19}right)
$$
and the plane
$$
Pito(p-p_0)cdotvec v, vec v = (2,4,-5)
$$
the line
$$
Lto p=p_1+lambda vec v
$$
is by construction, orthogonal to $Pi$. Now making
$$
(p_1+lambdavec v)'M(p_1+lambdavec v)=1
$$
and solving for $lambda$ we have
$$
lambda = frac{-2p_1'Mvec vpm 2sqrt{(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)}}{2vec v'Mvec v}
$$
but if $L$ is tangent to $C$ then
$$
(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0
$$
now assuming that $p_1'$ is the generic tangency point, the sought projection is given by the solution
$$
(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0\
(p_1-p_0)'cdot vec v = 0
$$
for $p_1$
which eliminating $z$ gives
$$
7028 x^2 + 1088 x y + 2837 y^2 = 9700
$$
this is the trace projection on the $z=0$ plane. Eliminating the $x y$ term with a convenient rotation we get
$$
(1973 + sqrt{749929}) X^2 + (1973-sqrt{749929}) Y^2 = 3880
$$
with main axes
$$
r_X=2 sqrt{frac{970}{1973+sqrt{749929}}}\
r_Y=2 sqrt{frac{970}{1973-sqrt{749929}}}
$$
so the projected area is given by
$$
S_p = pi r_X r_Y = frac{2 sqrt{97} pi }{9}
$$
but
$$
S_p = S left(frac{vec v}{||vec v||}cdot hat e_zright)
$$
hence
$$
S = frac{2 sqrt{97} pi }{45}
$$
Attached the problem setup
In lightblue $(p_1'Mvec v)^2-(p_1'M p_1-1)(vec v'Mvec v)=0$ in light red $(p_1-p_0)'cdot vec v = 0$ and in light yellow $7028 x^2 + 1088 x y + 2837 y^2 = 9700$
edited Jan 18 at 9:48
answered Jan 14 at 22:15
CesareoCesareo
8,6393516
8,6393516
$begingroup$
What about the area? Aren't we supposed to make a surface integral?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 14 at 22:27
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz After the contour, you can rotate it into the $x, y$ plane and then integrate it using polar coordinates.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 14 at 22:36
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Attached a note about the area integration.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 15 at 3:46
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Please. See the modifications to obtain the numerical area value.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 17 at 15:32
$begingroup$
I'm very thankful sir this helped me a lot!
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 19 at 11:57
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
What about the area? Aren't we supposed to make a surface integral?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 14 at 22:27
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz After the contour, you can rotate it into the $x, y$ plane and then integrate it using polar coordinates.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 14 at 22:36
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Attached a note about the area integration.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 15 at 3:46
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Please. See the modifications to obtain the numerical area value.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 17 at 15:32
$begingroup$
I'm very thankful sir this helped me a lot!
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 19 at 11:57
$begingroup$
What about the area? Aren't we supposed to make a surface integral?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 14 at 22:27
$begingroup$
What about the area? Aren't we supposed to make a surface integral?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 14 at 22:27
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz After the contour, you can rotate it into the $x, y$ plane and then integrate it using polar coordinates.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 14 at 22:36
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz After the contour, you can rotate it into the $x, y$ plane and then integrate it using polar coordinates.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 14 at 22:36
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Attached a note about the area integration.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 15 at 3:46
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Attached a note about the area integration.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 15 at 3:46
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Please. See the modifications to obtain the numerical area value.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 17 at 15:32
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Please. See the modifications to obtain the numerical area value.
$endgroup$
– Cesareo
Jan 17 at 15:32
$begingroup$
I'm very thankful sir this helped me a lot!
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 19 at 11:57
$begingroup$
I'm very thankful sir this helped me a lot!
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 19 at 11:57
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Without calculus: The outline of the image of a quadric $Q$ under the central projection with matrix $P$ is a conic with a simple formula expressed via dual conics/quadrics: $C^*=PQ^*P^T$. What this formula says is that the outline of the image of $Q$ is the conic that is tangent to the images of the tangent planes of $Q$ that pass through the center of projection.
If we apply a rotation $R$ that aligns the projection direction with the $z$-axis, our orthogonal projection will then have the matrix $$P = begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&0\0&1&0&0\0&0&0&1end{bmatrix} R,$$ i.e., the projection consists of rotating and then dropping the $z$-coordinate. The first two rows of $P$ are therefore the first two rows of $R$, for which we can take any two orthogonal unit vectors perpendicular to the image plane’s normal. $(4,-2,0)^T$ is obviously one such vector, and we can obtain another via a cross product: $(2,4,-5)^Ttimes(4,-2,0)^T=(-10,-20,-20)^T$. Normalizing these two vectors gives us $$P=begin{bmatrix}{2oversqrt5} & -{1oversqrt5} & 0 & 0 \ -frac13 & -frac23 & -frac23 & 0 \ 0&0&0&1 end{bmatrix}.$$ The matrix $Q = operatorname{diag}(1,1/4,1/9,-1)$, so using $Q^{-1}$ for the dual conic $Q^*$ is convenient. Multiplying this all out produces $$C^* = begin{bmatrix}frac85 & {2oversqrt5} & 0 \ {2oversqrt5} & frac{53}9 &0 \ 0&0&-1 end{bmatrix}.$$ The inverse of this matrix represents an ellipse centered at the origin.
There’s no need to invert this matrix to obtain the equation of the ellipse, though, since the ellipse’s area can be computed directly from the dual matrix. The area of an ellipse is $pi$ times the product of its semiaxis lengths, and the latter are the reciprocal square roots of the eigenvalues of the quadratic part of $C$. Therefore, the area of this ellipse is equal to $${pioversqrt{-det C}} = pi sqrt{-det C^*} = frac23sqrt{97over5}pi.$$
With calculus: One possible approach is to find a parameterization of the outline of the projection. The generator of the outline of a quadric surface—the locus of intersection of rays from the projection center tangent to the surface—it itself a conic that lies in the polar plane of the projection center. For this parallel projection the center is the point at infinity $mathbf V=(2,4,-5,0)$, so the generator’s plane is $Qmathbf V = (2,1,-5/9,0)^T$, i.e., $2x+y-frac59z=0$. Since the ellipsoid is axis-aligned, a relatively easy way to find a parameterization for the intersection curve is to transform the surface to a unit sphere. This transformation changes the polar plane to $(2,2,-5/3,0)^T$. Proceeding as above, we find a pair of unit vectors orthogonal to this plane’s normal, leading to the circle $$cos(t)left(frac1{sqrt2},-frac1{sqrt2},0right)^T+sin(t)left(-{5oversqrt{194}},-{5oversqrt{194}}-6sqrt{2over97}right)^T.$$ Mapping this circle back to the original coordinate system produces $$cos(t)left(frac1{sqrt2},-sqrt2,0right)^T+sin(t)left(-{5oversqrt{194}},-5sqrt{2over97},-18sqrt{2over97}right)^T.$$
Since we’re working with a parallel projection, we can use any plane parallel to the image plane, so we project this onto $2x+4y-5z=0$. This is equivalent to projecting onto the original image plane and then translating the center of the resulting ellipse to the origin. The projection onto this plane is easily computed via the orthogonal rejection from the plane’s normal, resulting finally in a parameterization $mathbf r(t)$ for the outline of the ellipsoid’s projection. Its area is then equal to $frac12int_0^{2pi}|mathbf rtimes dmathbf r|$. You should find that the integrand simplifies nicely.
On the other hand, once we had the two unit vectors that generated the great circle of the unit sphere above, we could again proceed without calculus. Scaling and projecting these vectors produces the halves of a pair of conjugate diameters of the outline. A theorem of Appolonios states that the area of the triangle formed by them is equal to $frac12ab$, and so the area of the ellipse is equal to $2pi$ times this area. Calling these two vectors $mathbf u$ and $mathbf v$, the area of ellipsoid’s projection is therefore equal to $pi|mathbf utimesmathbf v|$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How can we do it with calculus?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 15 at 22:09
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Read the penultimate paragraph. It’s also possible to compute this by integrating $mathbf ncdot dS$, where $mathbf n$ is a unit normal to the image plane, over an appropriate piece of the ellipsoid, but getting the bounds right is not easy.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 0:39
$begingroup$
the bounds are my main problem
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 16 at 11:33
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz I would look for a change of coordinates such that you’re integrating over a hemisphere. It will involve much of the same scaling and rotation that’s in this answer.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 17:47
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot! :)
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 20 at 8:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without calculus: The outline of the image of a quadric $Q$ under the central projection with matrix $P$ is a conic with a simple formula expressed via dual conics/quadrics: $C^*=PQ^*P^T$. What this formula says is that the outline of the image of $Q$ is the conic that is tangent to the images of the tangent planes of $Q$ that pass through the center of projection.
If we apply a rotation $R$ that aligns the projection direction with the $z$-axis, our orthogonal projection will then have the matrix $$P = begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&0\0&1&0&0\0&0&0&1end{bmatrix} R,$$ i.e., the projection consists of rotating and then dropping the $z$-coordinate. The first two rows of $P$ are therefore the first two rows of $R$, for which we can take any two orthogonal unit vectors perpendicular to the image plane’s normal. $(4,-2,0)^T$ is obviously one such vector, and we can obtain another via a cross product: $(2,4,-5)^Ttimes(4,-2,0)^T=(-10,-20,-20)^T$. Normalizing these two vectors gives us $$P=begin{bmatrix}{2oversqrt5} & -{1oversqrt5} & 0 & 0 \ -frac13 & -frac23 & -frac23 & 0 \ 0&0&0&1 end{bmatrix}.$$ The matrix $Q = operatorname{diag}(1,1/4,1/9,-1)$, so using $Q^{-1}$ for the dual conic $Q^*$ is convenient. Multiplying this all out produces $$C^* = begin{bmatrix}frac85 & {2oversqrt5} & 0 \ {2oversqrt5} & frac{53}9 &0 \ 0&0&-1 end{bmatrix}.$$ The inverse of this matrix represents an ellipse centered at the origin.
There’s no need to invert this matrix to obtain the equation of the ellipse, though, since the ellipse’s area can be computed directly from the dual matrix. The area of an ellipse is $pi$ times the product of its semiaxis lengths, and the latter are the reciprocal square roots of the eigenvalues of the quadratic part of $C$. Therefore, the area of this ellipse is equal to $${pioversqrt{-det C}} = pi sqrt{-det C^*} = frac23sqrt{97over5}pi.$$
With calculus: One possible approach is to find a parameterization of the outline of the projection. The generator of the outline of a quadric surface—the locus of intersection of rays from the projection center tangent to the surface—it itself a conic that lies in the polar plane of the projection center. For this parallel projection the center is the point at infinity $mathbf V=(2,4,-5,0)$, so the generator’s plane is $Qmathbf V = (2,1,-5/9,0)^T$, i.e., $2x+y-frac59z=0$. Since the ellipsoid is axis-aligned, a relatively easy way to find a parameterization for the intersection curve is to transform the surface to a unit sphere. This transformation changes the polar plane to $(2,2,-5/3,0)^T$. Proceeding as above, we find a pair of unit vectors orthogonal to this plane’s normal, leading to the circle $$cos(t)left(frac1{sqrt2},-frac1{sqrt2},0right)^T+sin(t)left(-{5oversqrt{194}},-{5oversqrt{194}}-6sqrt{2over97}right)^T.$$ Mapping this circle back to the original coordinate system produces $$cos(t)left(frac1{sqrt2},-sqrt2,0right)^T+sin(t)left(-{5oversqrt{194}},-5sqrt{2over97},-18sqrt{2over97}right)^T.$$
Since we’re working with a parallel projection, we can use any plane parallel to the image plane, so we project this onto $2x+4y-5z=0$. This is equivalent to projecting onto the original image plane and then translating the center of the resulting ellipse to the origin. The projection onto this plane is easily computed via the orthogonal rejection from the plane’s normal, resulting finally in a parameterization $mathbf r(t)$ for the outline of the ellipsoid’s projection. Its area is then equal to $frac12int_0^{2pi}|mathbf rtimes dmathbf r|$. You should find that the integrand simplifies nicely.
On the other hand, once we had the two unit vectors that generated the great circle of the unit sphere above, we could again proceed without calculus. Scaling and projecting these vectors produces the halves of a pair of conjugate diameters of the outline. A theorem of Appolonios states that the area of the triangle formed by them is equal to $frac12ab$, and so the area of the ellipse is equal to $2pi$ times this area. Calling these two vectors $mathbf u$ and $mathbf v$, the area of ellipsoid’s projection is therefore equal to $pi|mathbf utimesmathbf v|$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How can we do it with calculus?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 15 at 22:09
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Read the penultimate paragraph. It’s also possible to compute this by integrating $mathbf ncdot dS$, where $mathbf n$ is a unit normal to the image plane, over an appropriate piece of the ellipsoid, but getting the bounds right is not easy.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 0:39
$begingroup$
the bounds are my main problem
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 16 at 11:33
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz I would look for a change of coordinates such that you’re integrating over a hemisphere. It will involve much of the same scaling and rotation that’s in this answer.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 17:47
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot! :)
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 20 at 8:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Without calculus: The outline of the image of a quadric $Q$ under the central projection with matrix $P$ is a conic with a simple formula expressed via dual conics/quadrics: $C^*=PQ^*P^T$. What this formula says is that the outline of the image of $Q$ is the conic that is tangent to the images of the tangent planes of $Q$ that pass through the center of projection.
If we apply a rotation $R$ that aligns the projection direction with the $z$-axis, our orthogonal projection will then have the matrix $$P = begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&0\0&1&0&0\0&0&0&1end{bmatrix} R,$$ i.e., the projection consists of rotating and then dropping the $z$-coordinate. The first two rows of $P$ are therefore the first two rows of $R$, for which we can take any two orthogonal unit vectors perpendicular to the image plane’s normal. $(4,-2,0)^T$ is obviously one such vector, and we can obtain another via a cross product: $(2,4,-5)^Ttimes(4,-2,0)^T=(-10,-20,-20)^T$. Normalizing these two vectors gives us $$P=begin{bmatrix}{2oversqrt5} & -{1oversqrt5} & 0 & 0 \ -frac13 & -frac23 & -frac23 & 0 \ 0&0&0&1 end{bmatrix}.$$ The matrix $Q = operatorname{diag}(1,1/4,1/9,-1)$, so using $Q^{-1}$ for the dual conic $Q^*$ is convenient. Multiplying this all out produces $$C^* = begin{bmatrix}frac85 & {2oversqrt5} & 0 \ {2oversqrt5} & frac{53}9 &0 \ 0&0&-1 end{bmatrix}.$$ The inverse of this matrix represents an ellipse centered at the origin.
There’s no need to invert this matrix to obtain the equation of the ellipse, though, since the ellipse’s area can be computed directly from the dual matrix. The area of an ellipse is $pi$ times the product of its semiaxis lengths, and the latter are the reciprocal square roots of the eigenvalues of the quadratic part of $C$. Therefore, the area of this ellipse is equal to $${pioversqrt{-det C}} = pi sqrt{-det C^*} = frac23sqrt{97over5}pi.$$
With calculus: One possible approach is to find a parameterization of the outline of the projection. The generator of the outline of a quadric surface—the locus of intersection of rays from the projection center tangent to the surface—it itself a conic that lies in the polar plane of the projection center. For this parallel projection the center is the point at infinity $mathbf V=(2,4,-5,0)$, so the generator’s plane is $Qmathbf V = (2,1,-5/9,0)^T$, i.e., $2x+y-frac59z=0$. Since the ellipsoid is axis-aligned, a relatively easy way to find a parameterization for the intersection curve is to transform the surface to a unit sphere. This transformation changes the polar plane to $(2,2,-5/3,0)^T$. Proceeding as above, we find a pair of unit vectors orthogonal to this plane’s normal, leading to the circle $$cos(t)left(frac1{sqrt2},-frac1{sqrt2},0right)^T+sin(t)left(-{5oversqrt{194}},-{5oversqrt{194}}-6sqrt{2over97}right)^T.$$ Mapping this circle back to the original coordinate system produces $$cos(t)left(frac1{sqrt2},-sqrt2,0right)^T+sin(t)left(-{5oversqrt{194}},-5sqrt{2over97},-18sqrt{2over97}right)^T.$$
Since we’re working with a parallel projection, we can use any plane parallel to the image plane, so we project this onto $2x+4y-5z=0$. This is equivalent to projecting onto the original image plane and then translating the center of the resulting ellipse to the origin. The projection onto this plane is easily computed via the orthogonal rejection from the plane’s normal, resulting finally in a parameterization $mathbf r(t)$ for the outline of the ellipsoid’s projection. Its area is then equal to $frac12int_0^{2pi}|mathbf rtimes dmathbf r|$. You should find that the integrand simplifies nicely.
On the other hand, once we had the two unit vectors that generated the great circle of the unit sphere above, we could again proceed without calculus. Scaling and projecting these vectors produces the halves of a pair of conjugate diameters of the outline. A theorem of Appolonios states that the area of the triangle formed by them is equal to $frac12ab$, and so the area of the ellipse is equal to $2pi$ times this area. Calling these two vectors $mathbf u$ and $mathbf v$, the area of ellipsoid’s projection is therefore equal to $pi|mathbf utimesmathbf v|$.
$endgroup$
Without calculus: The outline of the image of a quadric $Q$ under the central projection with matrix $P$ is a conic with a simple formula expressed via dual conics/quadrics: $C^*=PQ^*P^T$. What this formula says is that the outline of the image of $Q$ is the conic that is tangent to the images of the tangent planes of $Q$ that pass through the center of projection.
If we apply a rotation $R$ that aligns the projection direction with the $z$-axis, our orthogonal projection will then have the matrix $$P = begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&0\0&1&0&0\0&0&0&1end{bmatrix} R,$$ i.e., the projection consists of rotating and then dropping the $z$-coordinate. The first two rows of $P$ are therefore the first two rows of $R$, for which we can take any two orthogonal unit vectors perpendicular to the image plane’s normal. $(4,-2,0)^T$ is obviously one such vector, and we can obtain another via a cross product: $(2,4,-5)^Ttimes(4,-2,0)^T=(-10,-20,-20)^T$. Normalizing these two vectors gives us $$P=begin{bmatrix}{2oversqrt5} & -{1oversqrt5} & 0 & 0 \ -frac13 & -frac23 & -frac23 & 0 \ 0&0&0&1 end{bmatrix}.$$ The matrix $Q = operatorname{diag}(1,1/4,1/9,-1)$, so using $Q^{-1}$ for the dual conic $Q^*$ is convenient. Multiplying this all out produces $$C^* = begin{bmatrix}frac85 & {2oversqrt5} & 0 \ {2oversqrt5} & frac{53}9 &0 \ 0&0&-1 end{bmatrix}.$$ The inverse of this matrix represents an ellipse centered at the origin.
There’s no need to invert this matrix to obtain the equation of the ellipse, though, since the ellipse’s area can be computed directly from the dual matrix. The area of an ellipse is $pi$ times the product of its semiaxis lengths, and the latter are the reciprocal square roots of the eigenvalues of the quadratic part of $C$. Therefore, the area of this ellipse is equal to $${pioversqrt{-det C}} = pi sqrt{-det C^*} = frac23sqrt{97over5}pi.$$
With calculus: One possible approach is to find a parameterization of the outline of the projection. The generator of the outline of a quadric surface—the locus of intersection of rays from the projection center tangent to the surface—it itself a conic that lies in the polar plane of the projection center. For this parallel projection the center is the point at infinity $mathbf V=(2,4,-5,0)$, so the generator’s plane is $Qmathbf V = (2,1,-5/9,0)^T$, i.e., $2x+y-frac59z=0$. Since the ellipsoid is axis-aligned, a relatively easy way to find a parameterization for the intersection curve is to transform the surface to a unit sphere. This transformation changes the polar plane to $(2,2,-5/3,0)^T$. Proceeding as above, we find a pair of unit vectors orthogonal to this plane’s normal, leading to the circle $$cos(t)left(frac1{sqrt2},-frac1{sqrt2},0right)^T+sin(t)left(-{5oversqrt{194}},-{5oversqrt{194}}-6sqrt{2over97}right)^T.$$ Mapping this circle back to the original coordinate system produces $$cos(t)left(frac1{sqrt2},-sqrt2,0right)^T+sin(t)left(-{5oversqrt{194}},-5sqrt{2over97},-18sqrt{2over97}right)^T.$$
Since we’re working with a parallel projection, we can use any plane parallel to the image plane, so we project this onto $2x+4y-5z=0$. This is equivalent to projecting onto the original image plane and then translating the center of the resulting ellipse to the origin. The projection onto this plane is easily computed via the orthogonal rejection from the plane’s normal, resulting finally in a parameterization $mathbf r(t)$ for the outline of the ellipsoid’s projection. Its area is then equal to $frac12int_0^{2pi}|mathbf rtimes dmathbf r|$. You should find that the integrand simplifies nicely.
On the other hand, once we had the two unit vectors that generated the great circle of the unit sphere above, we could again proceed without calculus. Scaling and projecting these vectors produces the halves of a pair of conjugate diameters of the outline. A theorem of Appolonios states that the area of the triangle formed by them is equal to $frac12ab$, and so the area of the ellipse is equal to $2pi$ times this area. Calling these two vectors $mathbf u$ and $mathbf v$, the area of ellipsoid’s projection is therefore equal to $pi|mathbf utimesmathbf v|$.
edited Jan 20 at 18:18
answered Jan 15 at 8:58
amdamd
29.8k21050
29.8k21050
$begingroup$
How can we do it with calculus?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 15 at 22:09
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Read the penultimate paragraph. It’s also possible to compute this by integrating $mathbf ncdot dS$, where $mathbf n$ is a unit normal to the image plane, over an appropriate piece of the ellipsoid, but getting the bounds right is not easy.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 0:39
$begingroup$
the bounds are my main problem
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 16 at 11:33
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz I would look for a change of coordinates such that you’re integrating over a hemisphere. It will involve much of the same scaling and rotation that’s in this answer.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 17:47
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot! :)
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 20 at 8:49
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How can we do it with calculus?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 15 at 22:09
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Read the penultimate paragraph. It’s also possible to compute this by integrating $mathbf ncdot dS$, where $mathbf n$ is a unit normal to the image plane, over an appropriate piece of the ellipsoid, but getting the bounds right is not easy.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 0:39
$begingroup$
the bounds are my main problem
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 16 at 11:33
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz I would look for a change of coordinates such that you’re integrating over a hemisphere. It will involve much of the same scaling and rotation that’s in this answer.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 17:47
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot! :)
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 20 at 8:49
$begingroup$
How can we do it with calculus?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 15 at 22:09
$begingroup$
How can we do it with calculus?
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 15 at 22:09
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Read the penultimate paragraph. It’s also possible to compute this by integrating $mathbf ncdot dS$, where $mathbf n$ is a unit normal to the image plane, over an appropriate piece of the ellipsoid, but getting the bounds right is not easy.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 0:39
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz Read the penultimate paragraph. It’s also possible to compute this by integrating $mathbf ncdot dS$, where $mathbf n$ is a unit normal to the image plane, over an appropriate piece of the ellipsoid, but getting the bounds right is not easy.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 0:39
$begingroup$
the bounds are my main problem
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 16 at 11:33
$begingroup$
the bounds are my main problem
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 16 at 11:33
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz I would look for a change of coordinates such that you’re integrating over a hemisphere. It will involve much of the same scaling and rotation that’s in this answer.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 17:47
$begingroup$
@alexander_yz I would look for a change of coordinates such that you’re integrating over a hemisphere. It will involve much of the same scaling and rotation that’s in this answer.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 16 at 17:47
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot! :)
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 20 at 8:49
$begingroup$
Thanks a lot! :)
$endgroup$
– alexander_yz
Jan 20 at 8:49
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073718%2forthogonal-projection-of-an-ellipsoid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Presumably you meant $x^2+y^2/4+z^2/9le1$ since otherwise your set-building expression is meaningless. Think about what the outline of the projected image is.
$endgroup$
– amd
Jan 14 at 21:10