The Kernel is inside the radical when we have an essential epimorphism
$begingroup$
This is a proposition in Auslander's book (Representation Theory of Artin algebras). I want proof that:
If $f$ is an essential epimorphism then Ker$f subset rad A$, where
$f: Arightarrow B$, and $A$, $B$ are finitely generated modules over a left Artin ring.
I try to prove this proposition unsuccessfully. In the book says that is an easy consequence of the following fact: $rad A= radLambda*A$, when $A$ is a finitely generated module over a left Artin ring $Lambda$. I really appreciate any help for proving this, I use this result every time in my new studies.
abstract-algebra modules representation-theory artinian
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a proposition in Auslander's book (Representation Theory of Artin algebras). I want proof that:
If $f$ is an essential epimorphism then Ker$f subset rad A$, where
$f: Arightarrow B$, and $A$, $B$ are finitely generated modules over a left Artin ring.
I try to prove this proposition unsuccessfully. In the book says that is an easy consequence of the following fact: $rad A= radLambda*A$, when $A$ is a finitely generated module over a left Artin ring $Lambda$. I really appreciate any help for proving this, I use this result every time in my new studies.
abstract-algebra modules representation-theory artinian
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a proposition in Auslander's book (Representation Theory of Artin algebras). I want proof that:
If $f$ is an essential epimorphism then Ker$f subset rad A$, where
$f: Arightarrow B$, and $A$, $B$ are finitely generated modules over a left Artin ring.
I try to prove this proposition unsuccessfully. In the book says that is an easy consequence of the following fact: $rad A= radLambda*A$, when $A$ is a finitely generated module over a left Artin ring $Lambda$. I really appreciate any help for proving this, I use this result every time in my new studies.
abstract-algebra modules representation-theory artinian
$endgroup$
This is a proposition in Auslander's book (Representation Theory of Artin algebras). I want proof that:
If $f$ is an essential epimorphism then Ker$f subset rad A$, where
$f: Arightarrow B$, and $A$, $B$ are finitely generated modules over a left Artin ring.
I try to prove this proposition unsuccessfully. In the book says that is an easy consequence of the following fact: $rad A= radLambda*A$, when $A$ is a finitely generated module over a left Artin ring $Lambda$. I really appreciate any help for proving this, I use this result every time in my new studies.
abstract-algebra modules representation-theory artinian
abstract-algebra modules representation-theory artinian
edited Jan 17 at 12:40
Júlio César M. Marques
asked Jan 14 at 21:16
Júlio César M. MarquesJúlio César M. Marques
616
616
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Take $X$ a maximal submodule of $A$. Suppose there is $ain$ Ker$f$ and $anotin X$. So we have $X+$ Ker$f=A$ and consider the following:
$g:Xrightarrow A$ an imbedding and $f: Arightarrow B$.
Since $f$ is an epimorphism, given $bin B$ there is $ain A$ that $b=f(a)=f(x+d)$, where $xin X$ and $din$Ker$f$. Then $b=f(a)=f(x+d)=f(x)=f(g(x))$, and $fg$ is epimorphism, so on $g$ is epimorphism since $f$ is essential. But this is a contradiction with definition of $g$.
Then Ker$fsubset$ rad$A$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073756%2fthe-kernel-is-inside-the-radical-when-we-have-an-essential-epimorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Take $X$ a maximal submodule of $A$. Suppose there is $ain$ Ker$f$ and $anotin X$. So we have $X+$ Ker$f=A$ and consider the following:
$g:Xrightarrow A$ an imbedding and $f: Arightarrow B$.
Since $f$ is an epimorphism, given $bin B$ there is $ain A$ that $b=f(a)=f(x+d)$, where $xin X$ and $din$Ker$f$. Then $b=f(a)=f(x+d)=f(x)=f(g(x))$, and $fg$ is epimorphism, so on $g$ is epimorphism since $f$ is essential. But this is a contradiction with definition of $g$.
Then Ker$fsubset$ rad$A$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take $X$ a maximal submodule of $A$. Suppose there is $ain$ Ker$f$ and $anotin X$. So we have $X+$ Ker$f=A$ and consider the following:
$g:Xrightarrow A$ an imbedding and $f: Arightarrow B$.
Since $f$ is an epimorphism, given $bin B$ there is $ain A$ that $b=f(a)=f(x+d)$, where $xin X$ and $din$Ker$f$. Then $b=f(a)=f(x+d)=f(x)=f(g(x))$, and $fg$ is epimorphism, so on $g$ is epimorphism since $f$ is essential. But this is a contradiction with definition of $g$.
Then Ker$fsubset$ rad$A$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Take $X$ a maximal submodule of $A$. Suppose there is $ain$ Ker$f$ and $anotin X$. So we have $X+$ Ker$f=A$ and consider the following:
$g:Xrightarrow A$ an imbedding and $f: Arightarrow B$.
Since $f$ is an epimorphism, given $bin B$ there is $ain A$ that $b=f(a)=f(x+d)$, where $xin X$ and $din$Ker$f$. Then $b=f(a)=f(x+d)=f(x)=f(g(x))$, and $fg$ is epimorphism, so on $g$ is epimorphism since $f$ is essential. But this is a contradiction with definition of $g$.
Then Ker$fsubset$ rad$A$.
$endgroup$
Take $X$ a maximal submodule of $A$. Suppose there is $ain$ Ker$f$ and $anotin X$. So we have $X+$ Ker$f=A$ and consider the following:
$g:Xrightarrow A$ an imbedding and $f: Arightarrow B$.
Since $f$ is an epimorphism, given $bin B$ there is $ain A$ that $b=f(a)=f(x+d)$, where $xin X$ and $din$Ker$f$. Then $b=f(a)=f(x+d)=f(x)=f(g(x))$, and $fg$ is epimorphism, so on $g$ is epimorphism since $f$ is essential. But this is a contradiction with definition of $g$.
Then Ker$fsubset$ rad$A$.
answered 2 days ago
Júlio César M. MarquesJúlio César M. Marques
616
616
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073756%2fthe-kernel-is-inside-the-radical-when-we-have-an-essential-epimorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown