What is the probability that the organizers win?












0












$begingroup$



A local fraternity is conducting a raffle where 50 tickets are to be sold - one per customer. There are three prizes to be awarded. If the four organizers of the raffle each buy one ticket, what is the probability that the four organizers win exactly two prizes?




I want to do this using combinations. I know that the probability of them winning all three of the prizes equals $dfrac{4 choose 3}{50 choose 3} = dfrac{1}{4900}$. So intuitively, I'd guess that the probability of them winning two prizes is $dfrac{4 choose 2}{binom{50}{2} times binom{3}{2}}$, the $binom{3}{2}$ being because there are 3 tickets to choose from in total. But this is apparently wrong. Why?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    A local fraternity is conducting a raffle where 50 tickets are to be sold - one per customer. There are three prizes to be awarded. If the four organizers of the raffle each buy one ticket, what is the probability that the four organizers win exactly two prizes?




    I want to do this using combinations. I know that the probability of them winning all three of the prizes equals $dfrac{4 choose 3}{50 choose 3} = dfrac{1}{4900}$. So intuitively, I'd guess that the probability of them winning two prizes is $dfrac{4 choose 2}{binom{50}{2} times binom{3}{2}}$, the $binom{3}{2}$ being because there are 3 tickets to choose from in total. But this is apparently wrong. Why?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      A local fraternity is conducting a raffle where 50 tickets are to be sold - one per customer. There are three prizes to be awarded. If the four organizers of the raffle each buy one ticket, what is the probability that the four organizers win exactly two prizes?




      I want to do this using combinations. I know that the probability of them winning all three of the prizes equals $dfrac{4 choose 3}{50 choose 3} = dfrac{1}{4900}$. So intuitively, I'd guess that the probability of them winning two prizes is $dfrac{4 choose 2}{binom{50}{2} times binom{3}{2}}$, the $binom{3}{2}$ being because there are 3 tickets to choose from in total. But this is apparently wrong. Why?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      A local fraternity is conducting a raffle where 50 tickets are to be sold - one per customer. There are three prizes to be awarded. If the four organizers of the raffle each buy one ticket, what is the probability that the four organizers win exactly two prizes?




      I want to do this using combinations. I know that the probability of them winning all three of the prizes equals $dfrac{4 choose 3}{50 choose 3} = dfrac{1}{4900}$. So intuitively, I'd guess that the probability of them winning two prizes is $dfrac{4 choose 2}{binom{50}{2} times binom{3}{2}}$, the $binom{3}{2}$ being because there are 3 tickets to choose from in total. But this is apparently wrong. Why?







      probability






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Sep 14 '16 at 7:34









      MaximeMaxime

      153




      153






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$


          But this is apparently wrong. Why?




          You have calculated the probability of selecting two from four winning tickets, out of all ways to select two from fifty tickets and two from other three things. This is not ... like anything that you want to find.





          You want the probability of selecting two from four winning tickets and one from forty-six losing tickets, out of all the ways to select any three from all fifty tickets.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ah, I overlooked that technique, it sounds much more logical. But could you explain what is exactly wrong about my idea?
            $endgroup$
            – Maxime
            Sep 14 '16 at 7:46











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1926266%2fwhat-is-the-probability-that-the-organizers-win%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$


          But this is apparently wrong. Why?




          You have calculated the probability of selecting two from four winning tickets, out of all ways to select two from fifty tickets and two from other three things. This is not ... like anything that you want to find.





          You want the probability of selecting two from four winning tickets and one from forty-six losing tickets, out of all the ways to select any three from all fifty tickets.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ah, I overlooked that technique, it sounds much more logical. But could you explain what is exactly wrong about my idea?
            $endgroup$
            – Maxime
            Sep 14 '16 at 7:46
















          0












          $begingroup$


          But this is apparently wrong. Why?




          You have calculated the probability of selecting two from four winning tickets, out of all ways to select two from fifty tickets and two from other three things. This is not ... like anything that you want to find.





          You want the probability of selecting two from four winning tickets and one from forty-six losing tickets, out of all the ways to select any three from all fifty tickets.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Ah, I overlooked that technique, it sounds much more logical. But could you explain what is exactly wrong about my idea?
            $endgroup$
            – Maxime
            Sep 14 '16 at 7:46














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$


          But this is apparently wrong. Why?




          You have calculated the probability of selecting two from four winning tickets, out of all ways to select two from fifty tickets and two from other three things. This is not ... like anything that you want to find.





          You want the probability of selecting two from four winning tickets and one from forty-six losing tickets, out of all the ways to select any three from all fifty tickets.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




          But this is apparently wrong. Why?




          You have calculated the probability of selecting two from four winning tickets, out of all ways to select two from fifty tickets and two from other three things. This is not ... like anything that you want to find.





          You want the probability of selecting two from four winning tickets and one from forty-six losing tickets, out of all the ways to select any three from all fifty tickets.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Sep 14 '16 at 7:52

























          answered Sep 14 '16 at 7:45









          Graham KempGraham Kemp

          85.8k43378




          85.8k43378












          • $begingroup$
            Ah, I overlooked that technique, it sounds much more logical. But could you explain what is exactly wrong about my idea?
            $endgroup$
            – Maxime
            Sep 14 '16 at 7:46


















          • $begingroup$
            Ah, I overlooked that technique, it sounds much more logical. But could you explain what is exactly wrong about my idea?
            $endgroup$
            – Maxime
            Sep 14 '16 at 7:46
















          $begingroup$
          Ah, I overlooked that technique, it sounds much more logical. But could you explain what is exactly wrong about my idea?
          $endgroup$
          – Maxime
          Sep 14 '16 at 7:46




          $begingroup$
          Ah, I overlooked that technique, it sounds much more logical. But could you explain what is exactly wrong about my idea?
          $endgroup$
          – Maxime
          Sep 14 '16 at 7:46


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1926266%2fwhat-is-the-probability-that-the-organizers-win%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          Partial Derivative Guidance.

          Understanding the size os this class of aleatory events