Is this symbol another version of a ferrite bead symbol?












3












$begingroup$


I saw this symbol in the schematic of the ADPD2140z eval board. From what Ive seen online, ferrite bead symbols are usually slanted rectangles with right angled corners. This is slightly different, but is this also a symbol for a ferrite bead?



From ADPD2140z Eval-Board Schematic



Here is an image of the component E1 in question:
Eval board






schematics symbol ferrite







share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @jsotola Yea as I mentioned in the description Ive already done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Tapatio Sombrero
    Jan 18 at 22:56


















3












$begingroup$


I saw this symbol in the schematic of the ADPD2140z eval board. From what Ive seen online, ferrite bead symbols are usually slanted rectangles with right angled corners. This is slightly different, but is this also a symbol for a ferrite bead?



From ADPD2140z Eval-Board Schematic



Here is an image of the component E1 in question:
Eval board






schematics symbol ferrite







share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @jsotola Yea as I mentioned in the description Ive already done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Tapatio Sombrero
    Jan 18 at 22:56
















3












3








3





$begingroup$


I saw this symbol in the schematic of the ADPD2140z eval board. From what Ive seen online, ferrite bead symbols are usually slanted rectangles with right angled corners. This is slightly different, but is this also a symbol for a ferrite bead?



From ADPD2140z Eval-Board Schematic



Here is an image of the component E1 in question:
Eval board






schematics symbol ferrite







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I saw this symbol in the schematic of the ADPD2140z eval board. From what Ive seen online, ferrite bead symbols are usually slanted rectangles with right angled corners. This is slightly different, but is this also a symbol for a ferrite bead?



From ADPD2140z Eval-Board Schematic



Here is an image of the component E1 in question:
Eval board






schematics symbol ferrite




schematics symbol ferrite






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 18 at 23:42









rdtsc

5,04531239




5,04531239










asked Jan 18 at 22:09









Tapatio SombreroTapatio Sombrero

15217




15217












  • $begingroup$
    @jsotola Yea as I mentioned in the description Ive already done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Tapatio Sombrero
    Jan 18 at 22:56




















  • $begingroup$
    @jsotola Yea as I mentioned in the description Ive already done that.
    $endgroup$
    – Tapatio Sombrero
    Jan 18 at 22:56


















$begingroup$
@jsotola Yea as I mentioned in the description Ive already done that.
$endgroup$
– Tapatio Sombrero
Jan 18 at 22:56






$begingroup$
@jsotola Yea as I mentioned in the description Ive already done that.
$endgroup$
– Tapatio Sombrero
Jan 18 at 22:56












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Yes, it is indeed a ferrite bead symbol.




There are standards for component symbols, however as with all standards, people choose not to follow them, and instead make up their own variants (obligatory XKCD Comic).






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom Carpenter
    Jan 18 at 23:57



















2












$begingroup$

Yes, its a 50Ohm ferrite. Usually manufacturers post BOM's with their eval boards but with analog deveices it's hit or miss. So its hard to say what the part number is but I'll bet its an 0805 or 1206 (or metric equivalent) size.



Analog really likes to separate out ground planes which is interesting but not necessary to control noise (you can do this with proper layout to control return currents). So I would think this not necessary but it depends on the board layout.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    });
    }, "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f417732%2fis-this-symbol-another-version-of-a-ferrite-bead-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    Yes, it is indeed a ferrite bead symbol.




    There are standards for component symbols, however as with all standards, people choose not to follow them, and instead make up their own variants (obligatory XKCD Comic).






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
      $endgroup$
      – Tom Carpenter
      Jan 18 at 23:57
















    5












    $begingroup$

    Yes, it is indeed a ferrite bead symbol.




    There are standards for component symbols, however as with all standards, people choose not to follow them, and instead make up their own variants (obligatory XKCD Comic).






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
      $endgroup$
      – Tom Carpenter
      Jan 18 at 23:57














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    Yes, it is indeed a ferrite bead symbol.




    There are standards for component symbols, however as with all standards, people choose not to follow them, and instead make up their own variants (obligatory XKCD Comic).






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Yes, it is indeed a ferrite bead symbol.




    There are standards for component symbols, however as with all standards, people choose not to follow them, and instead make up their own variants (obligatory XKCD Comic).







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jan 18 at 23:56









    Tom CarpenterTom Carpenter

    39k271118




    39k271118












    • $begingroup$
      Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
      $endgroup$
      – Tom Carpenter
      Jan 18 at 23:57


















    • $begingroup$
      Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
      $endgroup$
      – Tom Carpenter
      Jan 18 at 23:57
















    $begingroup$
    Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom Carpenter
    Jan 18 at 23:57




    $begingroup$
    Normally I wouldn't go for such a short answer, but there isn't much else to say.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom Carpenter
    Jan 18 at 23:57













    2












    $begingroup$

    Yes, its a 50Ohm ferrite. Usually manufacturers post BOM's with their eval boards but with analog deveices it's hit or miss. So its hard to say what the part number is but I'll bet its an 0805 or 1206 (or metric equivalent) size.



    Analog really likes to separate out ground planes which is interesting but not necessary to control noise (you can do this with proper layout to control return currents). So I would think this not necessary but it depends on the board layout.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Yes, its a 50Ohm ferrite. Usually manufacturers post BOM's with their eval boards but with analog deveices it's hit or miss. So its hard to say what the part number is but I'll bet its an 0805 or 1206 (or metric equivalent) size.



      Analog really likes to separate out ground planes which is interesting but not necessary to control noise (you can do this with proper layout to control return currents). So I would think this not necessary but it depends on the board layout.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Yes, its a 50Ohm ferrite. Usually manufacturers post BOM's with their eval boards but with analog deveices it's hit or miss. So its hard to say what the part number is but I'll bet its an 0805 or 1206 (or metric equivalent) size.



        Analog really likes to separate out ground planes which is interesting but not necessary to control noise (you can do this with proper layout to control return currents). So I would think this not necessary but it depends on the board layout.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Yes, its a 50Ohm ferrite. Usually manufacturers post BOM's with their eval boards but with analog deveices it's hit or miss. So its hard to say what the part number is but I'll bet its an 0805 or 1206 (or metric equivalent) size.



        Analog really likes to separate out ground planes which is interesting but not necessary to control noise (you can do this with proper layout to control return currents). So I would think this not necessary but it depends on the board layout.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 19 at 0:05









        laptop2dlaptop2d

        25.2k123278




        25.2k123278






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f417732%2fis-this-symbol-another-version-of-a-ferrite-bead-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            Image
            Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro...
            Read more

            Partial Derivative Guidance.

            Image
            0 $begingroup$ I was given this tricky problem in which I'm confuse on how to solve it and I would like some help: Let $v(x,y)$ be continuously differentiable function. Let the function $u(s,t)$ be given by $u(s,t) = sin(s)*v(s-2t,t^2)$ . Compute $du/ds$ and $du/dt$ in terms of $v$ and it's partial derivatives. My attempt (which is wrong): Using chain rule: $du/ds=(du/dx)(dx/ds) + (du/dy)(dy/ds)$ $du/dt=(du/dx)(dx/dt) + (du/dx)(dy/dt)$ So, $du/ds = sin(s)*v(x,y)*s + sin(s)*v(x,y)*0$ $du/dt = 2t*sin(s)*v(x,y) - 2*sin(s)*v(x,y)$ Thanks, calculus multivariable-calculus share | cite | improve this question edited Jan 19 at 19:38...
            Read more

            Understanding the size os this class of aleatory events

            Image
            0 1 $begingroup$ Hi I am having problems to understand this: I have: $Omega = [0,1]$ , $Lambda =$ all subsets with defined length Let $A_{0}$ = {A $subset$ [0,1]: A is finite union of intervals} 1º: My doubt is that $A_{0}$ is a algebra but its not a sigma algebra. Why? Also, A = $(0,1/2) cup (1/2,3/4) cup (3/4,7/8) cup ... cup(1-1/2^{n},1-1/2^{n+1})...$ 2º: So the class of aleatory events would be bigger than $A_{0}$ . Why? How the set A is greater than $A_{0}$ ? measure-theory share | cite | improve this question asked Jan 8 at 19:17 Diogo Bastos Diogo Bastos 116 6 ...
            Read more