Formalization of an Intuitive Proof of the Surface Area of a Sphere












0












$begingroup$


Consider the following proof that the surface area of a sphere is $4 pi r^2$.




First let's try to squash an arbitrary sphere into its net. If we cut the sphere in half then open it up, we get two tangent bowl shaped figures. Now we attempt to squash them to flatten them int a 2D net. This 'rips' them at the top and bottom and results in a new, thinner bowl shaped figure. We repeat this process over and over. Note that since there is always some finite height of the entire net, it is never 2D. So, if we perform this operation $n$ times, then the limit of the shape of the net as $n$ tends to $infty$ is a rectangle. Below is a diagram of an intermediate step in the squashification of the sphere.




enter image description here




The rectangle's length is the circumference of the great circle of the sphere which is $2 pi r$ and the height of the rectangle in the height of the sphere which is $2r$. Thus the surface area of the sphere is the area of the rectangle which is $2 pi r cdot 2 r = 4 pi r^2$.




Isn't it kind of sketchy how I said the limit of the entire figure as the number of 'rips' tends to infinity is a rectangle? How could one formalize this proof?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your attempt to link a picture didn't work for me; I don't think that's a valid URL.
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Jan 19 at 3:57










  • $begingroup$
    It's fixed now, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Shrey Joshi
    Jan 19 at 5:07










  • $begingroup$
    3Blue1Brown has a very intuitive approach to showing this: youtube.com/watch?v=GNcFjFmqEc8
    $endgroup$
    – Aniruddh Venkatesan
    Jan 19 at 5:09
















0












$begingroup$


Consider the following proof that the surface area of a sphere is $4 pi r^2$.




First let's try to squash an arbitrary sphere into its net. If we cut the sphere in half then open it up, we get two tangent bowl shaped figures. Now we attempt to squash them to flatten them int a 2D net. This 'rips' them at the top and bottom and results in a new, thinner bowl shaped figure. We repeat this process over and over. Note that since there is always some finite height of the entire net, it is never 2D. So, if we perform this operation $n$ times, then the limit of the shape of the net as $n$ tends to $infty$ is a rectangle. Below is a diagram of an intermediate step in the squashification of the sphere.




enter image description here




The rectangle's length is the circumference of the great circle of the sphere which is $2 pi r$ and the height of the rectangle in the height of the sphere which is $2r$. Thus the surface area of the sphere is the area of the rectangle which is $2 pi r cdot 2 r = 4 pi r^2$.




Isn't it kind of sketchy how I said the limit of the entire figure as the number of 'rips' tends to infinity is a rectangle? How could one formalize this proof?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your attempt to link a picture didn't work for me; I don't think that's a valid URL.
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Jan 19 at 3:57










  • $begingroup$
    It's fixed now, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Shrey Joshi
    Jan 19 at 5:07










  • $begingroup$
    3Blue1Brown has a very intuitive approach to showing this: youtube.com/watch?v=GNcFjFmqEc8
    $endgroup$
    – Aniruddh Venkatesan
    Jan 19 at 5:09














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Consider the following proof that the surface area of a sphere is $4 pi r^2$.




First let's try to squash an arbitrary sphere into its net. If we cut the sphere in half then open it up, we get two tangent bowl shaped figures. Now we attempt to squash them to flatten them int a 2D net. This 'rips' them at the top and bottom and results in a new, thinner bowl shaped figure. We repeat this process over and over. Note that since there is always some finite height of the entire net, it is never 2D. So, if we perform this operation $n$ times, then the limit of the shape of the net as $n$ tends to $infty$ is a rectangle. Below is a diagram of an intermediate step in the squashification of the sphere.




enter image description here




The rectangle's length is the circumference of the great circle of the sphere which is $2 pi r$ and the height of the rectangle in the height of the sphere which is $2r$. Thus the surface area of the sphere is the area of the rectangle which is $2 pi r cdot 2 r = 4 pi r^2$.




Isn't it kind of sketchy how I said the limit of the entire figure as the number of 'rips' tends to infinity is a rectangle? How could one formalize this proof?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Consider the following proof that the surface area of a sphere is $4 pi r^2$.




First let's try to squash an arbitrary sphere into its net. If we cut the sphere in half then open it up, we get two tangent bowl shaped figures. Now we attempt to squash them to flatten them int a 2D net. This 'rips' them at the top and bottom and results in a new, thinner bowl shaped figure. We repeat this process over and over. Note that since there is always some finite height of the entire net, it is never 2D. So, if we perform this operation $n$ times, then the limit of the shape of the net as $n$ tends to $infty$ is a rectangle. Below is a diagram of an intermediate step in the squashification of the sphere.




enter image description here




The rectangle's length is the circumference of the great circle of the sphere which is $2 pi r$ and the height of the rectangle in the height of the sphere which is $2r$. Thus the surface area of the sphere is the area of the rectangle which is $2 pi r cdot 2 r = 4 pi r^2$.




Isn't it kind of sketchy how I said the limit of the entire figure as the number of 'rips' tends to infinity is a rectangle? How could one formalize this proof?







proof-writing spheres proof-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 19 at 5:05







Shrey Joshi

















asked Jan 19 at 3:49









Shrey JoshiShrey Joshi

30913




30913












  • $begingroup$
    Your attempt to link a picture didn't work for me; I don't think that's a valid URL.
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Jan 19 at 3:57










  • $begingroup$
    It's fixed now, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Shrey Joshi
    Jan 19 at 5:07










  • $begingroup$
    3Blue1Brown has a very intuitive approach to showing this: youtube.com/watch?v=GNcFjFmqEc8
    $endgroup$
    – Aniruddh Venkatesan
    Jan 19 at 5:09


















  • $begingroup$
    Your attempt to link a picture didn't work for me; I don't think that's a valid URL.
    $endgroup$
    – jmerry
    Jan 19 at 3:57










  • $begingroup$
    It's fixed now, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Shrey Joshi
    Jan 19 at 5:07










  • $begingroup$
    3Blue1Brown has a very intuitive approach to showing this: youtube.com/watch?v=GNcFjFmqEc8
    $endgroup$
    – Aniruddh Venkatesan
    Jan 19 at 5:09
















$begingroup$
Your attempt to link a picture didn't work for me; I don't think that's a valid URL.
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Jan 19 at 3:57




$begingroup$
Your attempt to link a picture didn't work for me; I don't think that's a valid URL.
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Jan 19 at 3:57












$begingroup$
It's fixed now, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 19 at 5:07




$begingroup$
It's fixed now, thanks!
$endgroup$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 19 at 5:07












$begingroup$
3Blue1Brown has a very intuitive approach to showing this: youtube.com/watch?v=GNcFjFmqEc8
$endgroup$
– Aniruddh Venkatesan
Jan 19 at 5:09




$begingroup$
3Blue1Brown has a very intuitive approach to showing this: youtube.com/watch?v=GNcFjFmqEc8
$endgroup$
– Aniruddh Venkatesan
Jan 19 at 5:09










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079000%2fformalization-of-an-intuitive-proof-of-the-surface-area-of-a-sphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3079000%2fformalization-of-an-intuitive-proof-of-the-surface-area-of-a-sphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?