How can I show that $sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrtldots}}}$ exists?












51












$begingroup$


I would like to investigate the convergence of



$$sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{4+sqrtldots}}}}$$



Or more precisely, let $$begin{align}
a_1 & = sqrt 1\
a_2 & = sqrt{1+sqrt2}\
a_3 & = sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt 3}}\
a_4 & = sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt 4}}}\
&vdots
end{align}$$



Easy computer calculations suggest that this sequence converges rapidly to the value 1.75793275661800453265, so I handed this number to the all-seeing Google, which produced:




  • OEIS A072449

  • "Nested Radical Constant" from MathWorld


Henceforth let us write $sqrt{r_1 + sqrt{r_2 + sqrt{cdots + sqrt{r_n}}}}$ as $[r_1, r_2, ldots r_n]$ for short, in the manner of continued fractions.



Obviously we have $$a_n= [1,2,ldots n] le underbrace{[n, n,ldots, n]}_n$$



but as the right-hand side grows without bound (It's $O(sqrt n)$) this is unhelpful. I thought maybe to do something like:



$$a_{n^2}le [1, underbrace{4, 4, 4}_3, underbrace{9, 9, 9, 9, 9}_5, ldots,
underbrace{n^2,n^2,ldots,n^2}_{2n-1}] $$



but I haven't been able to make it work.




I would like a proof that the limit $$lim_{ntoinfty} a_n$$
exists. The methods I know are not getting me anywhere.




I originally planned to ask "and what the limit is", but OEIS says "No closed-form expression is known for this constant".



The references it cites are unavailable to me at present.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 18




    $begingroup$
    This is probably a good place to start: "It was discovered by T. Vijayaraghavan that the infinite radical $sqrt{ a_1 + sqrt{ a_2 + sqrt{ a_3 + sqrt{a_4 + ldots }}}}$ where $a_n ge 0$, will converge to a limit if and only if the limit of $log a_n / 2^n$ exists" - Clawson, p. 229. (Taken from OEIS.)
    $endgroup$
    – George V. Williams
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:23










  • $begingroup$
    possible duplicate of Sum and Product of Infinite Radicals
    $endgroup$
    – MJD
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:26






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I misread the solution at Sum and Product of Infinite Radicals. It asks several questions, one of which is mine, but all the answers provided are for the other questions.
    $endgroup$
    – MJD
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:28










  • $begingroup$
    Related: Nested radicals
    $endgroup$
    – MJD
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This may help.
    $endgroup$
    – Maazul
    Jul 6 '13 at 4:44
















51












$begingroup$


I would like to investigate the convergence of



$$sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{4+sqrtldots}}}}$$



Or more precisely, let $$begin{align}
a_1 & = sqrt 1\
a_2 & = sqrt{1+sqrt2}\
a_3 & = sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt 3}}\
a_4 & = sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt 4}}}\
&vdots
end{align}$$



Easy computer calculations suggest that this sequence converges rapidly to the value 1.75793275661800453265, so I handed this number to the all-seeing Google, which produced:




  • OEIS A072449

  • "Nested Radical Constant" from MathWorld


Henceforth let us write $sqrt{r_1 + sqrt{r_2 + sqrt{cdots + sqrt{r_n}}}}$ as $[r_1, r_2, ldots r_n]$ for short, in the manner of continued fractions.



Obviously we have $$a_n= [1,2,ldots n] le underbrace{[n, n,ldots, n]}_n$$



but as the right-hand side grows without bound (It's $O(sqrt n)$) this is unhelpful. I thought maybe to do something like:



$$a_{n^2}le [1, underbrace{4, 4, 4}_3, underbrace{9, 9, 9, 9, 9}_5, ldots,
underbrace{n^2,n^2,ldots,n^2}_{2n-1}] $$



but I haven't been able to make it work.




I would like a proof that the limit $$lim_{ntoinfty} a_n$$
exists. The methods I know are not getting me anywhere.




I originally planned to ask "and what the limit is", but OEIS says "No closed-form expression is known for this constant".



The references it cites are unavailable to me at present.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 18




    $begingroup$
    This is probably a good place to start: "It was discovered by T. Vijayaraghavan that the infinite radical $sqrt{ a_1 + sqrt{ a_2 + sqrt{ a_3 + sqrt{a_4 + ldots }}}}$ where $a_n ge 0$, will converge to a limit if and only if the limit of $log a_n / 2^n$ exists" - Clawson, p. 229. (Taken from OEIS.)
    $endgroup$
    – George V. Williams
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:23










  • $begingroup$
    possible duplicate of Sum and Product of Infinite Radicals
    $endgroup$
    – MJD
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:26






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I misread the solution at Sum and Product of Infinite Radicals. It asks several questions, one of which is mine, but all the answers provided are for the other questions.
    $endgroup$
    – MJD
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:28










  • $begingroup$
    Related: Nested radicals
    $endgroup$
    – MJD
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This may help.
    $endgroup$
    – Maazul
    Jul 6 '13 at 4:44














51












51








51


30



$begingroup$


I would like to investigate the convergence of



$$sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{4+sqrtldots}}}}$$



Or more precisely, let $$begin{align}
a_1 & = sqrt 1\
a_2 & = sqrt{1+sqrt2}\
a_3 & = sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt 3}}\
a_4 & = sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt 4}}}\
&vdots
end{align}$$



Easy computer calculations suggest that this sequence converges rapidly to the value 1.75793275661800453265, so I handed this number to the all-seeing Google, which produced:




  • OEIS A072449

  • "Nested Radical Constant" from MathWorld


Henceforth let us write $sqrt{r_1 + sqrt{r_2 + sqrt{cdots + sqrt{r_n}}}}$ as $[r_1, r_2, ldots r_n]$ for short, in the manner of continued fractions.



Obviously we have $$a_n= [1,2,ldots n] le underbrace{[n, n,ldots, n]}_n$$



but as the right-hand side grows without bound (It's $O(sqrt n)$) this is unhelpful. I thought maybe to do something like:



$$a_{n^2}le [1, underbrace{4, 4, 4}_3, underbrace{9, 9, 9, 9, 9}_5, ldots,
underbrace{n^2,n^2,ldots,n^2}_{2n-1}] $$



but I haven't been able to make it work.




I would like a proof that the limit $$lim_{ntoinfty} a_n$$
exists. The methods I know are not getting me anywhere.




I originally planned to ask "and what the limit is", but OEIS says "No closed-form expression is known for this constant".



The references it cites are unavailable to me at present.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I would like to investigate the convergence of



$$sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{4+sqrtldots}}}}$$



Or more precisely, let $$begin{align}
a_1 & = sqrt 1\
a_2 & = sqrt{1+sqrt2}\
a_3 & = sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt 3}}\
a_4 & = sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt 4}}}\
&vdots
end{align}$$



Easy computer calculations suggest that this sequence converges rapidly to the value 1.75793275661800453265, so I handed this number to the all-seeing Google, which produced:




  • OEIS A072449

  • "Nested Radical Constant" from MathWorld


Henceforth let us write $sqrt{r_1 + sqrt{r_2 + sqrt{cdots + sqrt{r_n}}}}$ as $[r_1, r_2, ldots r_n]$ for short, in the manner of continued fractions.



Obviously we have $$a_n= [1,2,ldots n] le underbrace{[n, n,ldots, n]}_n$$



but as the right-hand side grows without bound (It's $O(sqrt n)$) this is unhelpful. I thought maybe to do something like:



$$a_{n^2}le [1, underbrace{4, 4, 4}_3, underbrace{9, 9, 9, 9, 9}_5, ldots,
underbrace{n^2,n^2,ldots,n^2}_{2n-1}] $$



but I haven't been able to make it work.




I would like a proof that the limit $$lim_{ntoinfty} a_n$$
exists. The methods I know are not getting me anywhere.




I originally planned to ask "and what the limit is", but OEIS says "No closed-form expression is known for this constant".



The references it cites are unavailable to me at present.







sequences-and-series limits nested-radicals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 17 '14 at 5:23







MJD

















asked Jul 6 '13 at 3:19









MJDMJD

47.3k29213396




47.3k29213396








  • 18




    $begingroup$
    This is probably a good place to start: "It was discovered by T. Vijayaraghavan that the infinite radical $sqrt{ a_1 + sqrt{ a_2 + sqrt{ a_3 + sqrt{a_4 + ldots }}}}$ where $a_n ge 0$, will converge to a limit if and only if the limit of $log a_n / 2^n$ exists" - Clawson, p. 229. (Taken from OEIS.)
    $endgroup$
    – George V. Williams
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:23










  • $begingroup$
    possible duplicate of Sum and Product of Infinite Radicals
    $endgroup$
    – MJD
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:26






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I misread the solution at Sum and Product of Infinite Radicals. It asks several questions, one of which is mine, but all the answers provided are for the other questions.
    $endgroup$
    – MJD
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:28










  • $begingroup$
    Related: Nested radicals
    $endgroup$
    – MJD
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This may help.
    $endgroup$
    – Maazul
    Jul 6 '13 at 4:44














  • 18




    $begingroup$
    This is probably a good place to start: "It was discovered by T. Vijayaraghavan that the infinite radical $sqrt{ a_1 + sqrt{ a_2 + sqrt{ a_3 + sqrt{a_4 + ldots }}}}$ where $a_n ge 0$, will converge to a limit if and only if the limit of $log a_n / 2^n$ exists" - Clawson, p. 229. (Taken from OEIS.)
    $endgroup$
    – George V. Williams
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:23










  • $begingroup$
    possible duplicate of Sum and Product of Infinite Radicals
    $endgroup$
    – MJD
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:26






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I misread the solution at Sum and Product of Infinite Radicals. It asks several questions, one of which is mine, but all the answers provided are for the other questions.
    $endgroup$
    – MJD
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:28










  • $begingroup$
    Related: Nested radicals
    $endgroup$
    – MJD
    Jul 6 '13 at 3:31






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This may help.
    $endgroup$
    – Maazul
    Jul 6 '13 at 4:44








18




18




$begingroup$
This is probably a good place to start: "It was discovered by T. Vijayaraghavan that the infinite radical $sqrt{ a_1 + sqrt{ a_2 + sqrt{ a_3 + sqrt{a_4 + ldots }}}}$ where $a_n ge 0$, will converge to a limit if and only if the limit of $log a_n / 2^n$ exists" - Clawson, p. 229. (Taken from OEIS.)
$endgroup$
– George V. Williams
Jul 6 '13 at 3:23




$begingroup$
This is probably a good place to start: "It was discovered by T. Vijayaraghavan that the infinite radical $sqrt{ a_1 + sqrt{ a_2 + sqrt{ a_3 + sqrt{a_4 + ldots }}}}$ where $a_n ge 0$, will converge to a limit if and only if the limit of $log a_n / 2^n$ exists" - Clawson, p. 229. (Taken from OEIS.)
$endgroup$
– George V. Williams
Jul 6 '13 at 3:23












$begingroup$
possible duplicate of Sum and Product of Infinite Radicals
$endgroup$
– MJD
Jul 6 '13 at 3:26




$begingroup$
possible duplicate of Sum and Product of Infinite Radicals
$endgroup$
– MJD
Jul 6 '13 at 3:26




3




3




$begingroup$
I misread the solution at Sum and Product of Infinite Radicals. It asks several questions, one of which is mine, but all the answers provided are for the other questions.
$endgroup$
– MJD
Jul 6 '13 at 3:28




$begingroup$
I misread the solution at Sum and Product of Infinite Radicals. It asks several questions, one of which is mine, but all the answers provided are for the other questions.
$endgroup$
– MJD
Jul 6 '13 at 3:28












$begingroup$
Related: Nested radicals
$endgroup$
– MJD
Jul 6 '13 at 3:31




$begingroup$
Related: Nested radicals
$endgroup$
– MJD
Jul 6 '13 at 3:31




1




1




$begingroup$
This may help.
$endgroup$
– Maazul
Jul 6 '13 at 4:44




$begingroup$
This may help.
$endgroup$
– Maazul
Jul 6 '13 at 4:44










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















28












$begingroup$

For any $nge4$, we have $sqrt{2n} le n-1$. Therefore
begin{align*}
a_n
&le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{ldots+sqrt{(n-2)+sqrt{(n-1) + sqrt{2n}}}}}}\
&le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{ldots+sqrt{(n-2)+sqrt{2(n-1)}}}}}\
&leldots\
&le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{2(4)}}}}.
end{align*}
Hence ${a_n}$ is a monotonic increasing sequence that is bounded above.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    The first part following from $n^2 -4n +1 >0$ for $nge 4$.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom Collinge
    Jun 6 '14 at 14:17










  • $begingroup$
    Very elegant estimate! +1
    $endgroup$
    – ZFR
    Nov 15 '15 at 17:06



















33












$begingroup$

The first number $1$ is a nuisance, so at first we disregard it.



We proceed by induction, and deal with finite nested radicals that start with $sqrt{k+sqrt{(k+1)+cdots}}$, where $kge 2$.



We will show that such a radical is $lt 2k$, by induction on depth. The result is certainly true for all nested radicals of depth $1$, since $sqrt{q}lt 2q$.



For the induction step, a nested radical of depth $n$ that starts with $k$ is $sqrt{k+R}$, where $R$ is a nested radical of depth $n-1$ that starts with $k+1$. By the induction assumption, we have $Rlt 2k+2$. But then $sqrt{k+R}lt sqrt{3k+2}lt 2k$ if $k ge 2$.



So (finite) nested radicals of any depth that start with $2$ are $lt 4$. The sequence of nested radicals is clearly increasing, so it converges. It follows that the nested radical of the post is $le sqrt{1+4}$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    13












    $begingroup$

    An easy sloppy way to see it:
    You know that $sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=phi$. Now multiply by $2$ to get $2phi=2sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=sqrt{4+4sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=sqrt{4+sqrt{16+sqrt{256+sqrt{256^2+dots}}}}>sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{4+dots}}}}$. Of course this should be done more rigorous.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      12












      $begingroup$

      If $( a_k )_{kinmathbb{N}}$ is any sequences of positive numbers such that:



      $$0 le a_k le alpha lambda^{2^k}quadtext{ for some }quad alpha, lambda in mathbb{R}_{+}$$



      Using same convention $;[r_1,r_2ldots] = sqrt{r_1 + sqrt{r_2 + ldots}};$ as in the question,
      we have:



      $$begin{align}
      [a_n] & le sqrt{alpha lambda^{2^n}} = sqrt{alpha}lambda^{2^{n-1}} = [alpha] lambda^{2^{n-1}}\
      implies [a_{n-1},a_n ] &le sqrt{alphalambda^{2^{n-1}}+sqrt{alpha}lambda^{2^{n-1}}}
      =sqrt{alpha+sqrt{alpha}}lambda^{2^{n-2}} = [alpha,alpha]lambda^{2^{n-2}}\
      implies [a_{n-2},a_{n-1},a_n]&le sqrt{alphalambda^{2^{n-2}} + sqrt{alpha+sqrt{alpha}}lambda^{2^{n-2}}} = [alpha,alpha,alpha]lambda^{2^{n-3}}\
      &;vdots\
      implies [a_1,ldots,a_n] & le underbrace{ [ alpha,ldots,alpha ] }_{ntext{ terms}} lambda\
      implies [a_1, ldots,a_n] & le [ alpha, alpha, ldots ]lambda = frac{1 + sqrt{1+4alpha}}{2}lambda
      end{align}$$



      Since $n le sqrt{2}^{2^n-2}$, we can take $alpha = frac12$ and $lambda = sqrt{2}$ to get:



      $$[1,2,ldots,n] le underbrace{ [ frac12,ldots,frac12 ]}_{ntext{ terms}} lambda le frac{1+sqrt{3}}{sqrt{2}} sim 1.931851 $$



      To get a better bound, observe for any $m, k in mathbb{Z}_{+}$, we have:



      $$ m + k - 1 le frac{m^2}{m+1}left(sqrt{frac{m+1}{m}}right)^{2^k}$$



      Using the same approach as above, we get:
      $$[m,m+1,m+2,ldots] le frac{sqrt{m+1}+sqrt{4m^2+m+1}}{2sqrt{m}}$$



      Take $m = 3$, we already get a bound accurate up to $O(10^{-2})$.



      $$[3,4,ldots] le frac{1+sqrt{10}}{sqrt{3}}
      implies [1,2,3,ldots] le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+frac{1+sqrt{10}}{sqrt{3}}}} sim 1.760214368
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$





















        4












        $begingroup$

        Take a positive sequence ${a_n}$ and a constant $c>0$ such that $sqrt{a_{n+1}}<ca_n$.



        Set $b_n=sqrt{a_1+sqrt{a_2+cdots sqrt{a_n}}}$. By induction, $$log_{c+1} left(frac{b_n}{sqrt{a_1}}right)<sum_{i=1}^{n-1}2^{-i}<1$$
        So $b_n<(c+1)sqrt{a_1}$ and $b_n$ is monotonic increasing; by the Monotone Convergence Theorem, $lim_{ntoinfty}b_n$ exists. Taking $a_n=n$ and $c>sqrt{2}$ answers this question.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$





















          3












          $begingroup$

          By linear approximations.



          Since the sequence is increasing, it converges iff it doesn't go to infinity. Therefore we need only to construct an upper bound.



          Notice that all tangents to $sqrt{x}$ are always above $sqrt{x}$. The slope of each tangent is $frac12frac1{sqrt x}$; but we can construct a simpler bound by noticing that the line through $(x,sqrt x)$ with slope $frac 1 2$ is above $sqrt{u}$ for all $u > x$ if $x geq 1$.



          So $$sqrt{1 + sqrt{2 + sqrt{3 + dotsc}}} leq 1 + frac12(sqrt 2 + frac12(sqrt{3} + frac12(dotsc))) = sum_{i=1}^infty frac{sqrt i}{2^{i-1}}$$ and it's easier to see that that converges.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The last term is just $2 text{Li}_{-frac{1}{2}}left(frac{1}{2}right)approx 2.69451$
            $endgroup$
            – Claude Leibovici
            Oct 17 '17 at 6:44











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f437209%2fhow-can-i-show-that-sqrt1-sqrt2-sqrt3-sqrt-ldots-exists%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes








          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          28












          $begingroup$

          For any $nge4$, we have $sqrt{2n} le n-1$. Therefore
          begin{align*}
          a_n
          &le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{ldots+sqrt{(n-2)+sqrt{(n-1) + sqrt{2n}}}}}}\
          &le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{ldots+sqrt{(n-2)+sqrt{2(n-1)}}}}}\
          &leldots\
          &le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{2(4)}}}}.
          end{align*}
          Hence ${a_n}$ is a monotonic increasing sequence that is bounded above.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The first part following from $n^2 -4n +1 >0$ for $nge 4$.
            $endgroup$
            – Tom Collinge
            Jun 6 '14 at 14:17










          • $begingroup$
            Very elegant estimate! +1
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Nov 15 '15 at 17:06
















          28












          $begingroup$

          For any $nge4$, we have $sqrt{2n} le n-1$. Therefore
          begin{align*}
          a_n
          &le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{ldots+sqrt{(n-2)+sqrt{(n-1) + sqrt{2n}}}}}}\
          &le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{ldots+sqrt{(n-2)+sqrt{2(n-1)}}}}}\
          &leldots\
          &le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{2(4)}}}}.
          end{align*}
          Hence ${a_n}$ is a monotonic increasing sequence that is bounded above.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            The first part following from $n^2 -4n +1 >0$ for $nge 4$.
            $endgroup$
            – Tom Collinge
            Jun 6 '14 at 14:17










          • $begingroup$
            Very elegant estimate! +1
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Nov 15 '15 at 17:06














          28












          28








          28





          $begingroup$

          For any $nge4$, we have $sqrt{2n} le n-1$. Therefore
          begin{align*}
          a_n
          &le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{ldots+sqrt{(n-2)+sqrt{(n-1) + sqrt{2n}}}}}}\
          &le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{ldots+sqrt{(n-2)+sqrt{2(n-1)}}}}}\
          &leldots\
          &le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{2(4)}}}}.
          end{align*}
          Hence ${a_n}$ is a monotonic increasing sequence that is bounded above.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          For any $nge4$, we have $sqrt{2n} le n-1$. Therefore
          begin{align*}
          a_n
          &le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{ldots+sqrt{(n-2)+sqrt{(n-1) + sqrt{2n}}}}}}\
          &le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{ldots+sqrt{(n-2)+sqrt{2(n-1)}}}}}\
          &leldots\
          &le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{2(4)}}}}.
          end{align*}
          Hence ${a_n}$ is a monotonic increasing sequence that is bounded above.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jul 6 '13 at 5:54









          user1551user1551

          72.8k566127




          72.8k566127












          • $begingroup$
            The first part following from $n^2 -4n +1 >0$ for $nge 4$.
            $endgroup$
            – Tom Collinge
            Jun 6 '14 at 14:17










          • $begingroup$
            Very elegant estimate! +1
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Nov 15 '15 at 17:06


















          • $begingroup$
            The first part following from $n^2 -4n +1 >0$ for $nge 4$.
            $endgroup$
            – Tom Collinge
            Jun 6 '14 at 14:17










          • $begingroup$
            Very elegant estimate! +1
            $endgroup$
            – ZFR
            Nov 15 '15 at 17:06
















          $begingroup$
          The first part following from $n^2 -4n +1 >0$ for $nge 4$.
          $endgroup$
          – Tom Collinge
          Jun 6 '14 at 14:17




          $begingroup$
          The first part following from $n^2 -4n +1 >0$ for $nge 4$.
          $endgroup$
          – Tom Collinge
          Jun 6 '14 at 14:17












          $begingroup$
          Very elegant estimate! +1
          $endgroup$
          – ZFR
          Nov 15 '15 at 17:06




          $begingroup$
          Very elegant estimate! +1
          $endgroup$
          – ZFR
          Nov 15 '15 at 17:06











          33












          $begingroup$

          The first number $1$ is a nuisance, so at first we disregard it.



          We proceed by induction, and deal with finite nested radicals that start with $sqrt{k+sqrt{(k+1)+cdots}}$, where $kge 2$.



          We will show that such a radical is $lt 2k$, by induction on depth. The result is certainly true for all nested radicals of depth $1$, since $sqrt{q}lt 2q$.



          For the induction step, a nested radical of depth $n$ that starts with $k$ is $sqrt{k+R}$, where $R$ is a nested radical of depth $n-1$ that starts with $k+1$. By the induction assumption, we have $Rlt 2k+2$. But then $sqrt{k+R}lt sqrt{3k+2}lt 2k$ if $k ge 2$.



          So (finite) nested radicals of any depth that start with $2$ are $lt 4$. The sequence of nested radicals is clearly increasing, so it converges. It follows that the nested radical of the post is $le sqrt{1+4}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$


















            33












            $begingroup$

            The first number $1$ is a nuisance, so at first we disregard it.



            We proceed by induction, and deal with finite nested radicals that start with $sqrt{k+sqrt{(k+1)+cdots}}$, where $kge 2$.



            We will show that such a radical is $lt 2k$, by induction on depth. The result is certainly true for all nested radicals of depth $1$, since $sqrt{q}lt 2q$.



            For the induction step, a nested radical of depth $n$ that starts with $k$ is $sqrt{k+R}$, where $R$ is a nested radical of depth $n-1$ that starts with $k+1$. By the induction assumption, we have $Rlt 2k+2$. But then $sqrt{k+R}lt sqrt{3k+2}lt 2k$ if $k ge 2$.



            So (finite) nested radicals of any depth that start with $2$ are $lt 4$. The sequence of nested radicals is clearly increasing, so it converges. It follows that the nested radical of the post is $le sqrt{1+4}$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$
















              33












              33








              33





              $begingroup$

              The first number $1$ is a nuisance, so at first we disregard it.



              We proceed by induction, and deal with finite nested radicals that start with $sqrt{k+sqrt{(k+1)+cdots}}$, where $kge 2$.



              We will show that such a radical is $lt 2k$, by induction on depth. The result is certainly true for all nested radicals of depth $1$, since $sqrt{q}lt 2q$.



              For the induction step, a nested radical of depth $n$ that starts with $k$ is $sqrt{k+R}$, where $R$ is a nested radical of depth $n-1$ that starts with $k+1$. By the induction assumption, we have $Rlt 2k+2$. But then $sqrt{k+R}lt sqrt{3k+2}lt 2k$ if $k ge 2$.



              So (finite) nested radicals of any depth that start with $2$ are $lt 4$. The sequence of nested radicals is clearly increasing, so it converges. It follows that the nested radical of the post is $le sqrt{1+4}$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              The first number $1$ is a nuisance, so at first we disregard it.



              We proceed by induction, and deal with finite nested radicals that start with $sqrt{k+sqrt{(k+1)+cdots}}$, where $kge 2$.



              We will show that such a radical is $lt 2k$, by induction on depth. The result is certainly true for all nested radicals of depth $1$, since $sqrt{q}lt 2q$.



              For the induction step, a nested radical of depth $n$ that starts with $k$ is $sqrt{k+R}$, where $R$ is a nested radical of depth $n-1$ that starts with $k+1$. By the induction assumption, we have $Rlt 2k+2$. But then $sqrt{k+R}lt sqrt{3k+2}lt 2k$ if $k ge 2$.



              So (finite) nested radicals of any depth that start with $2$ are $lt 4$. The sequence of nested radicals is clearly increasing, so it converges. It follows that the nested radical of the post is $le sqrt{1+4}$.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Jul 6 '13 at 4:49

























              answered Jul 6 '13 at 4:28









              André NicolasAndré Nicolas

              453k36425812




              453k36425812























                  13












                  $begingroup$

                  An easy sloppy way to see it:
                  You know that $sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=phi$. Now multiply by $2$ to get $2phi=2sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=sqrt{4+4sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=sqrt{4+sqrt{16+sqrt{256+sqrt{256^2+dots}}}}>sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{4+dots}}}}$. Of course this should be done more rigorous.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$


















                    13












                    $begingroup$

                    An easy sloppy way to see it:
                    You know that $sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=phi$. Now multiply by $2$ to get $2phi=2sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=sqrt{4+4sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=sqrt{4+sqrt{16+sqrt{256+sqrt{256^2+dots}}}}>sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{4+dots}}}}$. Of course this should be done more rigorous.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$
















                      13












                      13








                      13





                      $begingroup$

                      An easy sloppy way to see it:
                      You know that $sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=phi$. Now multiply by $2$ to get $2phi=2sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=sqrt{4+4sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=sqrt{4+sqrt{16+sqrt{256+sqrt{256^2+dots}}}}>sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{4+dots}}}}$. Of course this should be done more rigorous.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      An easy sloppy way to see it:
                      You know that $sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=phi$. Now multiply by $2$ to get $2phi=2sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=sqrt{4+4sqrt{1+sqrt{1+sqrt{1+dots}}}}=sqrt{4+sqrt{16+sqrt{256+sqrt{256^2+dots}}}}>sqrt{1+sqrt{2+sqrt{3+sqrt{4+dots}}}}$. Of course this should be done more rigorous.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Jun 6 '14 at 13:08









                      heiniheini

                      13112




                      13112























                          12












                          $begingroup$

                          If $( a_k )_{kinmathbb{N}}$ is any sequences of positive numbers such that:



                          $$0 le a_k le alpha lambda^{2^k}quadtext{ for some }quad alpha, lambda in mathbb{R}_{+}$$



                          Using same convention $;[r_1,r_2ldots] = sqrt{r_1 + sqrt{r_2 + ldots}};$ as in the question,
                          we have:



                          $$begin{align}
                          [a_n] & le sqrt{alpha lambda^{2^n}} = sqrt{alpha}lambda^{2^{n-1}} = [alpha] lambda^{2^{n-1}}\
                          implies [a_{n-1},a_n ] &le sqrt{alphalambda^{2^{n-1}}+sqrt{alpha}lambda^{2^{n-1}}}
                          =sqrt{alpha+sqrt{alpha}}lambda^{2^{n-2}} = [alpha,alpha]lambda^{2^{n-2}}\
                          implies [a_{n-2},a_{n-1},a_n]&le sqrt{alphalambda^{2^{n-2}} + sqrt{alpha+sqrt{alpha}}lambda^{2^{n-2}}} = [alpha,alpha,alpha]lambda^{2^{n-3}}\
                          &;vdots\
                          implies [a_1,ldots,a_n] & le underbrace{ [ alpha,ldots,alpha ] }_{ntext{ terms}} lambda\
                          implies [a_1, ldots,a_n] & le [ alpha, alpha, ldots ]lambda = frac{1 + sqrt{1+4alpha}}{2}lambda
                          end{align}$$



                          Since $n le sqrt{2}^{2^n-2}$, we can take $alpha = frac12$ and $lambda = sqrt{2}$ to get:



                          $$[1,2,ldots,n] le underbrace{ [ frac12,ldots,frac12 ]}_{ntext{ terms}} lambda le frac{1+sqrt{3}}{sqrt{2}} sim 1.931851 $$



                          To get a better bound, observe for any $m, k in mathbb{Z}_{+}$, we have:



                          $$ m + k - 1 le frac{m^2}{m+1}left(sqrt{frac{m+1}{m}}right)^{2^k}$$



                          Using the same approach as above, we get:
                          $$[m,m+1,m+2,ldots] le frac{sqrt{m+1}+sqrt{4m^2+m+1}}{2sqrt{m}}$$



                          Take $m = 3$, we already get a bound accurate up to $O(10^{-2})$.



                          $$[3,4,ldots] le frac{1+sqrt{10}}{sqrt{3}}
                          implies [1,2,3,ldots] le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+frac{1+sqrt{10}}{sqrt{3}}}} sim 1.760214368
                          $$






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$


















                            12












                            $begingroup$

                            If $( a_k )_{kinmathbb{N}}$ is any sequences of positive numbers such that:



                            $$0 le a_k le alpha lambda^{2^k}quadtext{ for some }quad alpha, lambda in mathbb{R}_{+}$$



                            Using same convention $;[r_1,r_2ldots] = sqrt{r_1 + sqrt{r_2 + ldots}};$ as in the question,
                            we have:



                            $$begin{align}
                            [a_n] & le sqrt{alpha lambda^{2^n}} = sqrt{alpha}lambda^{2^{n-1}} = [alpha] lambda^{2^{n-1}}\
                            implies [a_{n-1},a_n ] &le sqrt{alphalambda^{2^{n-1}}+sqrt{alpha}lambda^{2^{n-1}}}
                            =sqrt{alpha+sqrt{alpha}}lambda^{2^{n-2}} = [alpha,alpha]lambda^{2^{n-2}}\
                            implies [a_{n-2},a_{n-1},a_n]&le sqrt{alphalambda^{2^{n-2}} + sqrt{alpha+sqrt{alpha}}lambda^{2^{n-2}}} = [alpha,alpha,alpha]lambda^{2^{n-3}}\
                            &;vdots\
                            implies [a_1,ldots,a_n] & le underbrace{ [ alpha,ldots,alpha ] }_{ntext{ terms}} lambda\
                            implies [a_1, ldots,a_n] & le [ alpha, alpha, ldots ]lambda = frac{1 + sqrt{1+4alpha}}{2}lambda
                            end{align}$$



                            Since $n le sqrt{2}^{2^n-2}$, we can take $alpha = frac12$ and $lambda = sqrt{2}$ to get:



                            $$[1,2,ldots,n] le underbrace{ [ frac12,ldots,frac12 ]}_{ntext{ terms}} lambda le frac{1+sqrt{3}}{sqrt{2}} sim 1.931851 $$



                            To get a better bound, observe for any $m, k in mathbb{Z}_{+}$, we have:



                            $$ m + k - 1 le frac{m^2}{m+1}left(sqrt{frac{m+1}{m}}right)^{2^k}$$



                            Using the same approach as above, we get:
                            $$[m,m+1,m+2,ldots] le frac{sqrt{m+1}+sqrt{4m^2+m+1}}{2sqrt{m}}$$



                            Take $m = 3$, we already get a bound accurate up to $O(10^{-2})$.



                            $$[3,4,ldots] le frac{1+sqrt{10}}{sqrt{3}}
                            implies [1,2,3,ldots] le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+frac{1+sqrt{10}}{sqrt{3}}}} sim 1.760214368
                            $$






                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            $endgroup$
















                              12












                              12








                              12





                              $begingroup$

                              If $( a_k )_{kinmathbb{N}}$ is any sequences of positive numbers such that:



                              $$0 le a_k le alpha lambda^{2^k}quadtext{ for some }quad alpha, lambda in mathbb{R}_{+}$$



                              Using same convention $;[r_1,r_2ldots] = sqrt{r_1 + sqrt{r_2 + ldots}};$ as in the question,
                              we have:



                              $$begin{align}
                              [a_n] & le sqrt{alpha lambda^{2^n}} = sqrt{alpha}lambda^{2^{n-1}} = [alpha] lambda^{2^{n-1}}\
                              implies [a_{n-1},a_n ] &le sqrt{alphalambda^{2^{n-1}}+sqrt{alpha}lambda^{2^{n-1}}}
                              =sqrt{alpha+sqrt{alpha}}lambda^{2^{n-2}} = [alpha,alpha]lambda^{2^{n-2}}\
                              implies [a_{n-2},a_{n-1},a_n]&le sqrt{alphalambda^{2^{n-2}} + sqrt{alpha+sqrt{alpha}}lambda^{2^{n-2}}} = [alpha,alpha,alpha]lambda^{2^{n-3}}\
                              &;vdots\
                              implies [a_1,ldots,a_n] & le underbrace{ [ alpha,ldots,alpha ] }_{ntext{ terms}} lambda\
                              implies [a_1, ldots,a_n] & le [ alpha, alpha, ldots ]lambda = frac{1 + sqrt{1+4alpha}}{2}lambda
                              end{align}$$



                              Since $n le sqrt{2}^{2^n-2}$, we can take $alpha = frac12$ and $lambda = sqrt{2}$ to get:



                              $$[1,2,ldots,n] le underbrace{ [ frac12,ldots,frac12 ]}_{ntext{ terms}} lambda le frac{1+sqrt{3}}{sqrt{2}} sim 1.931851 $$



                              To get a better bound, observe for any $m, k in mathbb{Z}_{+}$, we have:



                              $$ m + k - 1 le frac{m^2}{m+1}left(sqrt{frac{m+1}{m}}right)^{2^k}$$



                              Using the same approach as above, we get:
                              $$[m,m+1,m+2,ldots] le frac{sqrt{m+1}+sqrt{4m^2+m+1}}{2sqrt{m}}$$



                              Take $m = 3$, we already get a bound accurate up to $O(10^{-2})$.



                              $$[3,4,ldots] le frac{1+sqrt{10}}{sqrt{3}}
                              implies [1,2,3,ldots] le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+frac{1+sqrt{10}}{sqrt{3}}}} sim 1.760214368
                              $$






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$



                              If $( a_k )_{kinmathbb{N}}$ is any sequences of positive numbers such that:



                              $$0 le a_k le alpha lambda^{2^k}quadtext{ for some }quad alpha, lambda in mathbb{R}_{+}$$



                              Using same convention $;[r_1,r_2ldots] = sqrt{r_1 + sqrt{r_2 + ldots}};$ as in the question,
                              we have:



                              $$begin{align}
                              [a_n] & le sqrt{alpha lambda^{2^n}} = sqrt{alpha}lambda^{2^{n-1}} = [alpha] lambda^{2^{n-1}}\
                              implies [a_{n-1},a_n ] &le sqrt{alphalambda^{2^{n-1}}+sqrt{alpha}lambda^{2^{n-1}}}
                              =sqrt{alpha+sqrt{alpha}}lambda^{2^{n-2}} = [alpha,alpha]lambda^{2^{n-2}}\
                              implies [a_{n-2},a_{n-1},a_n]&le sqrt{alphalambda^{2^{n-2}} + sqrt{alpha+sqrt{alpha}}lambda^{2^{n-2}}} = [alpha,alpha,alpha]lambda^{2^{n-3}}\
                              &;vdots\
                              implies [a_1,ldots,a_n] & le underbrace{ [ alpha,ldots,alpha ] }_{ntext{ terms}} lambda\
                              implies [a_1, ldots,a_n] & le [ alpha, alpha, ldots ]lambda = frac{1 + sqrt{1+4alpha}}{2}lambda
                              end{align}$$



                              Since $n le sqrt{2}^{2^n-2}$, we can take $alpha = frac12$ and $lambda = sqrt{2}$ to get:



                              $$[1,2,ldots,n] le underbrace{ [ frac12,ldots,frac12 ]}_{ntext{ terms}} lambda le frac{1+sqrt{3}}{sqrt{2}} sim 1.931851 $$



                              To get a better bound, observe for any $m, k in mathbb{Z}_{+}$, we have:



                              $$ m + k - 1 le frac{m^2}{m+1}left(sqrt{frac{m+1}{m}}right)^{2^k}$$



                              Using the same approach as above, we get:
                              $$[m,m+1,m+2,ldots] le frac{sqrt{m+1}+sqrt{4m^2+m+1}}{2sqrt{m}}$$



                              Take $m = 3$, we already get a bound accurate up to $O(10^{-2})$.



                              $$[3,4,ldots] le frac{1+sqrt{10}}{sqrt{3}}
                              implies [1,2,3,ldots] le sqrt{1+sqrt{2+frac{1+sqrt{10}}{sqrt{3}}}} sim 1.760214368
                              $$







                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer








                              edited Jul 6 '13 at 6:01

























                              answered Jul 6 '13 at 5:39









                              achille huiachille hui

                              96k5132258




                              96k5132258























                                  4












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Take a positive sequence ${a_n}$ and a constant $c>0$ such that $sqrt{a_{n+1}}<ca_n$.



                                  Set $b_n=sqrt{a_1+sqrt{a_2+cdots sqrt{a_n}}}$. By induction, $$log_{c+1} left(frac{b_n}{sqrt{a_1}}right)<sum_{i=1}^{n-1}2^{-i}<1$$
                                  So $b_n<(c+1)sqrt{a_1}$ and $b_n$ is monotonic increasing; by the Monotone Convergence Theorem, $lim_{ntoinfty}b_n$ exists. Taking $a_n=n$ and $c>sqrt{2}$ answers this question.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$


















                                    4












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Take a positive sequence ${a_n}$ and a constant $c>0$ such that $sqrt{a_{n+1}}<ca_n$.



                                    Set $b_n=sqrt{a_1+sqrt{a_2+cdots sqrt{a_n}}}$. By induction, $$log_{c+1} left(frac{b_n}{sqrt{a_1}}right)<sum_{i=1}^{n-1}2^{-i}<1$$
                                    So $b_n<(c+1)sqrt{a_1}$ and $b_n$ is monotonic increasing; by the Monotone Convergence Theorem, $lim_{ntoinfty}b_n$ exists. Taking $a_n=n$ and $c>sqrt{2}$ answers this question.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$
















                                      4












                                      4








                                      4





                                      $begingroup$

                                      Take a positive sequence ${a_n}$ and a constant $c>0$ such that $sqrt{a_{n+1}}<ca_n$.



                                      Set $b_n=sqrt{a_1+sqrt{a_2+cdots sqrt{a_n}}}$. By induction, $$log_{c+1} left(frac{b_n}{sqrt{a_1}}right)<sum_{i=1}^{n-1}2^{-i}<1$$
                                      So $b_n<(c+1)sqrt{a_1}$ and $b_n$ is monotonic increasing; by the Monotone Convergence Theorem, $lim_{ntoinfty}b_n$ exists. Taking $a_n=n$ and $c>sqrt{2}$ answers this question.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      Take a positive sequence ${a_n}$ and a constant $c>0$ such that $sqrt{a_{n+1}}<ca_n$.



                                      Set $b_n=sqrt{a_1+sqrt{a_2+cdots sqrt{a_n}}}$. By induction, $$log_{c+1} left(frac{b_n}{sqrt{a_1}}right)<sum_{i=1}^{n-1}2^{-i}<1$$
                                      So $b_n<(c+1)sqrt{a_1}$ and $b_n$ is monotonic increasing; by the Monotone Convergence Theorem, $lim_{ntoinfty}b_n$ exists. Taking $a_n=n$ and $c>sqrt{2}$ answers this question.







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Jul 6 '13 at 19:13









                                      pre-kidneypre-kidney

                                      12.9k1748




                                      12.9k1748























                                          3












                                          $begingroup$

                                          By linear approximations.



                                          Since the sequence is increasing, it converges iff it doesn't go to infinity. Therefore we need only to construct an upper bound.



                                          Notice that all tangents to $sqrt{x}$ are always above $sqrt{x}$. The slope of each tangent is $frac12frac1{sqrt x}$; but we can construct a simpler bound by noticing that the line through $(x,sqrt x)$ with slope $frac 1 2$ is above $sqrt{u}$ for all $u > x$ if $x geq 1$.



                                          So $$sqrt{1 + sqrt{2 + sqrt{3 + dotsc}}} leq 1 + frac12(sqrt 2 + frac12(sqrt{3} + frac12(dotsc))) = sum_{i=1}^infty frac{sqrt i}{2^{i-1}}$$ and it's easier to see that that converges.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer











                                          $endgroup$













                                          • $begingroup$
                                            The last term is just $2 text{Li}_{-frac{1}{2}}left(frac{1}{2}right)approx 2.69451$
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Claude Leibovici
                                            Oct 17 '17 at 6:44
















                                          3












                                          $begingroup$

                                          By linear approximations.



                                          Since the sequence is increasing, it converges iff it doesn't go to infinity. Therefore we need only to construct an upper bound.



                                          Notice that all tangents to $sqrt{x}$ are always above $sqrt{x}$. The slope of each tangent is $frac12frac1{sqrt x}$; but we can construct a simpler bound by noticing that the line through $(x,sqrt x)$ with slope $frac 1 2$ is above $sqrt{u}$ for all $u > x$ if $x geq 1$.



                                          So $$sqrt{1 + sqrt{2 + sqrt{3 + dotsc}}} leq 1 + frac12(sqrt 2 + frac12(sqrt{3} + frac12(dotsc))) = sum_{i=1}^infty frac{sqrt i}{2^{i-1}}$$ and it's easier to see that that converges.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer











                                          $endgroup$













                                          • $begingroup$
                                            The last term is just $2 text{Li}_{-frac{1}{2}}left(frac{1}{2}right)approx 2.69451$
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Claude Leibovici
                                            Oct 17 '17 at 6:44














                                          3












                                          3








                                          3





                                          $begingroup$

                                          By linear approximations.



                                          Since the sequence is increasing, it converges iff it doesn't go to infinity. Therefore we need only to construct an upper bound.



                                          Notice that all tangents to $sqrt{x}$ are always above $sqrt{x}$. The slope of each tangent is $frac12frac1{sqrt x}$; but we can construct a simpler bound by noticing that the line through $(x,sqrt x)$ with slope $frac 1 2$ is above $sqrt{u}$ for all $u > x$ if $x geq 1$.



                                          So $$sqrt{1 + sqrt{2 + sqrt{3 + dotsc}}} leq 1 + frac12(sqrt 2 + frac12(sqrt{3} + frac12(dotsc))) = sum_{i=1}^infty frac{sqrt i}{2^{i-1}}$$ and it's easier to see that that converges.






                                          share|cite|improve this answer











                                          $endgroup$



                                          By linear approximations.



                                          Since the sequence is increasing, it converges iff it doesn't go to infinity. Therefore we need only to construct an upper bound.



                                          Notice that all tangents to $sqrt{x}$ are always above $sqrt{x}$. The slope of each tangent is $frac12frac1{sqrt x}$; but we can construct a simpler bound by noticing that the line through $(x,sqrt x)$ with slope $frac 1 2$ is above $sqrt{u}$ for all $u > x$ if $x geq 1$.



                                          So $$sqrt{1 + sqrt{2 + sqrt{3 + dotsc}}} leq 1 + frac12(sqrt 2 + frac12(sqrt{3} + frac12(dotsc))) = sum_{i=1}^infty frac{sqrt i}{2^{i-1}}$$ and it's easier to see that that converges.







                                          share|cite|improve this answer














                                          share|cite|improve this answer



                                          share|cite|improve this answer








                                          edited Jun 24 '15 at 18:39

























                                          answered Jun 24 '15 at 15:08









                                          man on laptopman on laptop

                                          5,74611238




                                          5,74611238












                                          • $begingroup$
                                            The last term is just $2 text{Li}_{-frac{1}{2}}left(frac{1}{2}right)approx 2.69451$
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Claude Leibovici
                                            Oct 17 '17 at 6:44


















                                          • $begingroup$
                                            The last term is just $2 text{Li}_{-frac{1}{2}}left(frac{1}{2}right)approx 2.69451$
                                            $endgroup$
                                            – Claude Leibovici
                                            Oct 17 '17 at 6:44
















                                          $begingroup$
                                          The last term is just $2 text{Li}_{-frac{1}{2}}left(frac{1}{2}right)approx 2.69451$
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Claude Leibovici
                                          Oct 17 '17 at 6:44




                                          $begingroup$
                                          The last term is just $2 text{Li}_{-frac{1}{2}}left(frac{1}{2}right)approx 2.69451$
                                          $endgroup$
                                          – Claude Leibovici
                                          Oct 17 '17 at 6:44


















                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f437209%2fhow-can-i-show-that-sqrt1-sqrt2-sqrt3-sqrt-ldots-exists%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Mario Kart Wii

                                          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                                          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese