Errata for Mathematics: Its Content, Methods and Meaning?












4












$begingroup$


I'm new here, so I hope this is the right place to post this!



I am currently reading through the Dover edition of the textbook Mathematics: Its Content, Methods and Meaning, by Aleksandrov, Kolmogorov, and Lavrent'ev.



So here is my dilemma: I think that I've come across a couple errors, so far, in the second chapter, but I can't be sure because I haven't been able to find an existing compilation of Errata! (UGH!). Obviously I'd like to be sure, since if they aren't actual errors, then that must mean I am misunderstanding something.



The book itself was written in the 50's and translated in the 60's. Amazon says my version was published in 1999, but the inside page says that my copy was manufactured in 2014. Considering how old this book is I feel certain that here has to be either: an existing Errata page, or no errors. So my question is, does anyone have the Errata for this book, or know where I can find it?



Thank you very sincerely for your time.



Best regards,



Baer



Edit: Here is a link to a pdf of chapter 2:
http://www.ees.nmt.edu/outside/courses/hyd510/PDFs/SupplementaryReadings/Mathematics_its%20content,%20methods,%20and%20meaning.pdf



The errors I think I found are below. It would be great if someone could even just take a minute to confirm whether or not I've actually found errors! Please help!




Pg. 103, volume 1:



Here is the equation taken from the book..
$$ frac{Δy}{Δx} = frac{v frac{Δy}{Δx} - u frac{Δv}{Δx}}{v + Δv} $$
which is explaining the quotient rule. But shouldn't it actually be...
$$ frac{Δy}{Δx} = frac{v frac{Δu}{Δx} - u frac{Δv}{Δx}}{v + Δv} $$
replacing Δy with Δu in the first nested fraction?




Pg. 107, volume 1:



Shouldn't this equation explaining the chain rule... $$y_x' = y_u' * u_x$$ actually be replaced with this? $$y_x' = y_u' * u_x'$$




Pg. 112, volume 1:



Here it claims that the function $$ y=e^{-x^2} $$ attains it's maximum at the point x = 1. But shouldn't that actually be at the point x = 0?






reference-request proof-verification







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That "feature" has driven away at least one very gifted community member. Still, this would be more valuable as an Edit to the Question. There is an introduction to posting mathematical expressions with $LaTeX$.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:42








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed! I edited the (suspected) errors into the original post.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 2:15








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Book reviews often mention errata. Here are two that I know of, although I don't know if either mentions any errata because I don't have access to them -- they are not freely available on the internet, but if you have access to a university library you should be able to look them up: Hubert Edwin Chrestenson, Burrowes Hunt, and Joseph [Joe] Buffington Roberts, American Mathematical Monthly 73 #8 (October 1966), pp. 913-914 AND Leslie Frank Newbold, Mathematical Gazette 52 #382 (December 1968), p. 395.
    $endgroup$
    – Dave L. Renfro
    Apr 25 '16 at 14:06
















4












$begingroup$


I'm new here, so I hope this is the right place to post this!



I am currently reading through the Dover edition of the textbook Mathematics: Its Content, Methods and Meaning, by Aleksandrov, Kolmogorov, and Lavrent'ev.



So here is my dilemma: I think that I've come across a couple errors, so far, in the second chapter, but I can't be sure because I haven't been able to find an existing compilation of Errata! (UGH!). Obviously I'd like to be sure, since if they aren't actual errors, then that must mean I am misunderstanding something.



The book itself was written in the 50's and translated in the 60's. Amazon says my version was published in 1999, but the inside page says that my copy was manufactured in 2014. Considering how old this book is I feel certain that here has to be either: an existing Errata page, or no errors. So my question is, does anyone have the Errata for this book, or know where I can find it?



Thank you very sincerely for your time.



Best regards,



Baer



Edit: Here is a link to a pdf of chapter 2:
http://www.ees.nmt.edu/outside/courses/hyd510/PDFs/SupplementaryReadings/Mathematics_its%20content,%20methods,%20and%20meaning.pdf



The errors I think I found are below. It would be great if someone could even just take a minute to confirm whether or not I've actually found errors! Please help!




Pg. 103, volume 1:



Here is the equation taken from the book..
$$ frac{Δy}{Δx} = frac{v frac{Δy}{Δx} - u frac{Δv}{Δx}}{v + Δv} $$
which is explaining the quotient rule. But shouldn't it actually be...
$$ frac{Δy}{Δx} = frac{v frac{Δu}{Δx} - u frac{Δv}{Δx}}{v + Δv} $$
replacing Δy with Δu in the first nested fraction?




Pg. 107, volume 1:



Shouldn't this equation explaining the chain rule... $$y_x' = y_u' * u_x$$ actually be replaced with this? $$y_x' = y_u' * u_x'$$




Pg. 112, volume 1:



Here it claims that the function $$ y=e^{-x^2} $$ attains it's maximum at the point x = 1. But shouldn't that actually be at the point x = 0?






reference-request proof-verification







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That "feature" has driven away at least one very gifted community member. Still, this would be more valuable as an Edit to the Question. There is an introduction to posting mathematical expressions with $LaTeX$.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:42








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed! I edited the (suspected) errors into the original post.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 2:15








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Book reviews often mention errata. Here are two that I know of, although I don't know if either mentions any errata because I don't have access to them -- they are not freely available on the internet, but if you have access to a university library you should be able to look them up: Hubert Edwin Chrestenson, Burrowes Hunt, and Joseph [Joe] Buffington Roberts, American Mathematical Monthly 73 #8 (October 1966), pp. 913-914 AND Leslie Frank Newbold, Mathematical Gazette 52 #382 (December 1968), p. 395.
    $endgroup$
    – Dave L. Renfro
    Apr 25 '16 at 14:06














4












4








4





$begingroup$


I'm new here, so I hope this is the right place to post this!



I am currently reading through the Dover edition of the textbook Mathematics: Its Content, Methods and Meaning, by Aleksandrov, Kolmogorov, and Lavrent'ev.



So here is my dilemma: I think that I've come across a couple errors, so far, in the second chapter, but I can't be sure because I haven't been able to find an existing compilation of Errata! (UGH!). Obviously I'd like to be sure, since if they aren't actual errors, then that must mean I am misunderstanding something.



The book itself was written in the 50's and translated in the 60's. Amazon says my version was published in 1999, but the inside page says that my copy was manufactured in 2014. Considering how old this book is I feel certain that here has to be either: an existing Errata page, or no errors. So my question is, does anyone have the Errata for this book, or know where I can find it?



Thank you very sincerely for your time.



Best regards,



Baer



Edit: Here is a link to a pdf of chapter 2:
http://www.ees.nmt.edu/outside/courses/hyd510/PDFs/SupplementaryReadings/Mathematics_its%20content,%20methods,%20and%20meaning.pdf



The errors I think I found are below. It would be great if someone could even just take a minute to confirm whether or not I've actually found errors! Please help!




Pg. 103, volume 1:



Here is the equation taken from the book..
$$ frac{Δy}{Δx} = frac{v frac{Δy}{Δx} - u frac{Δv}{Δx}}{v + Δv} $$
which is explaining the quotient rule. But shouldn't it actually be...
$$ frac{Δy}{Δx} = frac{v frac{Δu}{Δx} - u frac{Δv}{Δx}}{v + Δv} $$
replacing Δy with Δu in the first nested fraction?




Pg. 107, volume 1:



Shouldn't this equation explaining the chain rule... $$y_x' = y_u' * u_x$$ actually be replaced with this? $$y_x' = y_u' * u_x'$$




Pg. 112, volume 1:



Here it claims that the function $$ y=e^{-x^2} $$ attains it's maximum at the point x = 1. But shouldn't that actually be at the point x = 0?






reference-request proof-verification







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm new here, so I hope this is the right place to post this!



I am currently reading through the Dover edition of the textbook Mathematics: Its Content, Methods and Meaning, by Aleksandrov, Kolmogorov, and Lavrent'ev.



So here is my dilemma: I think that I've come across a couple errors, so far, in the second chapter, but I can't be sure because I haven't been able to find an existing compilation of Errata! (UGH!). Obviously I'd like to be sure, since if they aren't actual errors, then that must mean I am misunderstanding something.



The book itself was written in the 50's and translated in the 60's. Amazon says my version was published in 1999, but the inside page says that my copy was manufactured in 2014. Considering how old this book is I feel certain that here has to be either: an existing Errata page, or no errors. So my question is, does anyone have the Errata for this book, or know where I can find it?



Thank you very sincerely for your time.



Best regards,



Baer



Edit: Here is a link to a pdf of chapter 2:
http://www.ees.nmt.edu/outside/courses/hyd510/PDFs/SupplementaryReadings/Mathematics_its%20content,%20methods,%20and%20meaning.pdf



The errors I think I found are below. It would be great if someone could even just take a minute to confirm whether or not I've actually found errors! Please help!




Pg. 103, volume 1:



Here is the equation taken from the book..
$$ frac{Δy}{Δx} = frac{v frac{Δy}{Δx} - u frac{Δv}{Δx}}{v + Δv} $$
which is explaining the quotient rule. But shouldn't it actually be...
$$ frac{Δy}{Δx} = frac{v frac{Δu}{Δx} - u frac{Δv}{Δx}}{v + Δv} $$
replacing Δy with Δu in the first nested fraction?




Pg. 107, volume 1:



Shouldn't this equation explaining the chain rule... $$y_x' = y_u' * u_x$$ actually be replaced with this? $$y_x' = y_u' * u_x'$$




Pg. 112, volume 1:



Here it claims that the function $$ y=e^{-x^2} $$ attains it's maximum at the point x = 1. But shouldn't that actually be at the point x = 0?






reference-request proof-verification




reference-request proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 24 '16 at 16:38







baer

















asked Apr 24 '16 at 1:20









baerbaer

212




212












  • $begingroup$
    That "feature" has driven away at least one very gifted community member. Still, this would be more valuable as an Edit to the Question. There is an introduction to posting mathematical expressions with $LaTeX$.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:42








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed! I edited the (suspected) errors into the original post.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 2:15








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Book reviews often mention errata. Here are two that I know of, although I don't know if either mentions any errata because I don't have access to them -- they are not freely available on the internet, but if you have access to a university library you should be able to look them up: Hubert Edwin Chrestenson, Burrowes Hunt, and Joseph [Joe] Buffington Roberts, American Mathematical Monthly 73 #8 (October 1966), pp. 913-914 AND Leslie Frank Newbold, Mathematical Gazette 52 #382 (December 1968), p. 395.
    $endgroup$
    – Dave L. Renfro
    Apr 25 '16 at 14:06


















  • $begingroup$
    That "feature" has driven away at least one very gifted community member. Still, this would be more valuable as an Edit to the Question. There is an introduction to posting mathematical expressions with $LaTeX$.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:42








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Fixed! I edited the (suspected) errors into the original post.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 2:15








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Book reviews often mention errata. Here are two that I know of, although I don't know if either mentions any errata because I don't have access to them -- they are not freely available on the internet, but if you have access to a university library you should be able to look them up: Hubert Edwin Chrestenson, Burrowes Hunt, and Joseph [Joe] Buffington Roberts, American Mathematical Monthly 73 #8 (October 1966), pp. 913-914 AND Leslie Frank Newbold, Mathematical Gazette 52 #382 (December 1968), p. 395.
    $endgroup$
    – Dave L. Renfro
    Apr 25 '16 at 14:06
















$begingroup$
That "feature" has driven away at least one very gifted community member. Still, this would be more valuable as an Edit to the Question. There is an introduction to posting mathematical expressions with $LaTeX$.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Apr 24 '16 at 1:42






$begingroup$
That "feature" has driven away at least one very gifted community member. Still, this would be more valuable as an Edit to the Question. There is an introduction to posting mathematical expressions with $LaTeX$.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
Apr 24 '16 at 1:42






1




1




$begingroup$
Fixed! I edited the (suspected) errors into the original post.
$endgroup$
– baer
Apr 24 '16 at 2:15






$begingroup$
Fixed! I edited the (suspected) errors into the original post.
$endgroup$
– baer
Apr 24 '16 at 2:15






1




1




$begingroup$
Book reviews often mention errata. Here are two that I know of, although I don't know if either mentions any errata because I don't have access to them -- they are not freely available on the internet, but if you have access to a university library you should be able to look them up: Hubert Edwin Chrestenson, Burrowes Hunt, and Joseph [Joe] Buffington Roberts, American Mathematical Monthly 73 #8 (October 1966), pp. 913-914 AND Leslie Frank Newbold, Mathematical Gazette 52 #382 (December 1968), p. 395.
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
Apr 25 '16 at 14:06




$begingroup$
Book reviews often mention errata. Here are two that I know of, although I don't know if either mentions any errata because I don't have access to them -- they are not freely available on the internet, but if you have access to a university library you should be able to look them up: Hubert Edwin Chrestenson, Burrowes Hunt, and Joseph [Joe] Buffington Roberts, American Mathematical Monthly 73 #8 (October 1966), pp. 913-914 AND Leslie Frank Newbold, Mathematical Gazette 52 #382 (December 1968), p. 395.
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
Apr 25 '16 at 14:06










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

http://www.maa.org/press/maa-reviews/mathematics-its-content-methods-and-meaning



This one should be ok, I've read it and I didn't find any.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That's actually the same version I have.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:49










  • $begingroup$
    okay, then I probably missed it out
    $endgroup$
    – deathabc1
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:51










  • $begingroup$
    no problem. I just edited in the suspected errors, if you wanted to take a look at them.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 2:19











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1756066%2ferrata-for-mathematics-its-content-methods-and-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

http://www.maa.org/press/maa-reviews/mathematics-its-content-methods-and-meaning



This one should be ok, I've read it and I didn't find any.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That's actually the same version I have.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:49










  • $begingroup$
    okay, then I probably missed it out
    $endgroup$
    – deathabc1
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:51










  • $begingroup$
    no problem. I just edited in the suspected errors, if you wanted to take a look at them.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 2:19
















0












$begingroup$

http://www.maa.org/press/maa-reviews/mathematics-its-content-methods-and-meaning



This one should be ok, I've read it and I didn't find any.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That's actually the same version I have.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:49










  • $begingroup$
    okay, then I probably missed it out
    $endgroup$
    – deathabc1
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:51










  • $begingroup$
    no problem. I just edited in the suspected errors, if you wanted to take a look at them.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 2:19














0












0








0





$begingroup$

http://www.maa.org/press/maa-reviews/mathematics-its-content-methods-and-meaning



This one should be ok, I've read it and I didn't find any.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



http://www.maa.org/press/maa-reviews/mathematics-its-content-methods-and-meaning



This one should be ok, I've read it and I didn't find any.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Apr 24 '16 at 1:38









deathabc1deathabc1

1369




1369








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That's actually the same version I have.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:49










  • $begingroup$
    okay, then I probably missed it out
    $endgroup$
    – deathabc1
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:51










  • $begingroup$
    no problem. I just edited in the suspected errors, if you wanted to take a look at them.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 2:19














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    That's actually the same version I have.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:49










  • $begingroup$
    okay, then I probably missed it out
    $endgroup$
    – deathabc1
    Apr 24 '16 at 1:51










  • $begingroup$
    no problem. I just edited in the suspected errors, if you wanted to take a look at them.
    $endgroup$
    – baer
    Apr 24 '16 at 2:19








1




1




$begingroup$
That's actually the same version I have.
$endgroup$
– baer
Apr 24 '16 at 1:49




$begingroup$
That's actually the same version I have.
$endgroup$
– baer
Apr 24 '16 at 1:49












$begingroup$
okay, then I probably missed it out
$endgroup$
– deathabc1
Apr 24 '16 at 1:51




$begingroup$
okay, then I probably missed it out
$endgroup$
– deathabc1
Apr 24 '16 at 1:51












$begingroup$
no problem. I just edited in the suspected errors, if you wanted to take a look at them.
$endgroup$
– baer
Apr 24 '16 at 2:19




$begingroup$
no problem. I just edited in the suspected errors, if you wanted to take a look at them.
$endgroup$
– baer
Apr 24 '16 at 2:19


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1756066%2ferrata-for-mathematics-its-content-methods-and-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

Image
Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro...
Read more

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

Image
Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth From The Cutting Room Floor < The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth Jump to: navigation, search This is a sub-page of The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth . Afterbirth is the first expansion pack for Rebirth and features a variety of improvements. Contents 1 Unused Graphics 1.1 Old Man Keeper 1.2 Skinless Hush 1.3 Miscellaneous Unused Hush Sprites 1.4 Generosity achievement 1.5 Afterbirth+ Room Editor 1.6 Bearded Ultra Greed 1.7 Early Ultra Greed 1.8 Unused Brownie Expression 1.9 Frail's Spinning Head 1.10 Mom's Dead Hand Alt 2 Unused Audio 2.1 Unused Dead Womb Layer 2.2 Unused Hush Battle Outro 2.3 The Stain Grunt Unused Graphics Old Man Keeper Image file: gfxuimain me...
Read more

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Image
5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1 ...
Read more