Question on Convergent Series












-2












$begingroup$


This is the last question on my real analysis final exam. I didn't get to spend much time on it. Hopefully I remember the problem correctly.



${a_n}_{ngeq1}$ is a sequence of real numbers such that $sum_{ngeq1}a_n$ converges. Let $b_n$ be the cardinality of the set ${kin N:a_k>frac{1}{2^n}}$. Show that $limsup_{nrightarrowinfty}frac{1}{2^n}b_n=0$.



My thought is since $sum frac{1}{2^n}$ converges and $sum a_n$ converges, their terms need to be "comparable", but I don't know how to capture this.






real-analysis sequences-and-series







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    -2












    $begingroup$


    This is the last question on my real analysis final exam. I didn't get to spend much time on it. Hopefully I remember the problem correctly.



    ${a_n}_{ngeq1}$ is a sequence of real numbers such that $sum_{ngeq1}a_n$ converges. Let $b_n$ be the cardinality of the set ${kin N:a_k>frac{1}{2^n}}$. Show that $limsup_{nrightarrowinfty}frac{1}{2^n}b_n=0$.



    My thought is since $sum frac{1}{2^n}$ converges and $sum a_n$ converges, their terms need to be "comparable", but I don't know how to capture this.






    real-analysis sequences-and-series







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      -2












      -2








      -2


      1



      $begingroup$


      This is the last question on my real analysis final exam. I didn't get to spend much time on it. Hopefully I remember the problem correctly.



      ${a_n}_{ngeq1}$ is a sequence of real numbers such that $sum_{ngeq1}a_n$ converges. Let $b_n$ be the cardinality of the set ${kin N:a_k>frac{1}{2^n}}$. Show that $limsup_{nrightarrowinfty}frac{1}{2^n}b_n=0$.



      My thought is since $sum frac{1}{2^n}$ converges and $sum a_n$ converges, their terms need to be "comparable", but I don't know how to capture this.






      real-analysis sequences-and-series







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      This is the last question on my real analysis final exam. I didn't get to spend much time on it. Hopefully I remember the problem correctly.



      ${a_n}_{ngeq1}$ is a sequence of real numbers such that $sum_{ngeq1}a_n$ converges. Let $b_n$ be the cardinality of the set ${kin N:a_k>frac{1}{2^n}}$. Show that $limsup_{nrightarrowinfty}frac{1}{2^n}b_n=0$.



      My thought is since $sum frac{1}{2^n}$ converges and $sum a_n$ converges, their terms need to be "comparable", but I don't know how to capture this.






      real-analysis sequences-and-series




      real-analysis sequences-and-series






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 19 at 3:58









      Martin Sleziak

      44.8k10118272




      44.8k10118272










      asked Dec 19 '18 at 11:11









      Fluffy SkyeFluffy Skye

      1148




      1148






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Fix some positive sequence $(c_n)$ with limit $0$, and, for every $n$ and $m$, let $$A_m=sumlimits_{k=m}^infty a_kqquad B_n={kmid a_kgeqslant c_n}$$ Then, $$A_mgeqslantsum_{k=m}^inftymathbf 1_{kin B_n}a_kgeqslantsum_{k=m}^inftymathbf 1_{kin B_n}c_n=c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)$$ hence $$c_ncdot#B_nleqslant c_ncdot m+c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)leqslant c_ncdot m+A_m$$ In the limit $ntoinfty$, one gets, for every fixed $m$, $$limsup_{ntoinfty},c_ncdot#B_nleqslantlimsup_{ntoinfty},(c_ncdot m+A_m)=A_m$$ The series $sum a_k$ converges hence $inflimits_mA_m=0$, thus, $$limsup_{ntoinfty},c_ncdot#B_n=0$$ If $c_n=2^{-n}$ for every $n$, then $#B_n=b_n$ hence we are done.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            In the first chain of inequality, should it be $c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 12:40












          • $begingroup$
            True! Well spotted, thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Did
            Dec 19 '18 at 12:45










          • $begingroup$
            Emmm, I'm still a bit confused about the last part. You first take n to infinity and then take m to infinity? But then why $#B_m = b_n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:01












          • $begingroup$
            ?? $b_n=#B_n$ by definition.
            $endgroup$
            – Did
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:03










          • $begingroup$
            Yeah I know that. But the subscript is different? In the end you have c_n * #B_m not #B_n?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:10













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046266%2fquestion-on-convergent-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          Fix some positive sequence $(c_n)$ with limit $0$, and, for every $n$ and $m$, let $$A_m=sumlimits_{k=m}^infty a_kqquad B_n={kmid a_kgeqslant c_n}$$ Then, $$A_mgeqslantsum_{k=m}^inftymathbf 1_{kin B_n}a_kgeqslantsum_{k=m}^inftymathbf 1_{kin B_n}c_n=c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)$$ hence $$c_ncdot#B_nleqslant c_ncdot m+c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)leqslant c_ncdot m+A_m$$ In the limit $ntoinfty$, one gets, for every fixed $m$, $$limsup_{ntoinfty},c_ncdot#B_nleqslantlimsup_{ntoinfty},(c_ncdot m+A_m)=A_m$$ The series $sum a_k$ converges hence $inflimits_mA_m=0$, thus, $$limsup_{ntoinfty},c_ncdot#B_n=0$$ If $c_n=2^{-n}$ for every $n$, then $#B_n=b_n$ hence we are done.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            In the first chain of inequality, should it be $c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 12:40












          • $begingroup$
            True! Well spotted, thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Did
            Dec 19 '18 at 12:45










          • $begingroup$
            Emmm, I'm still a bit confused about the last part. You first take n to infinity and then take m to infinity? But then why $#B_m = b_n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:01












          • $begingroup$
            ?? $b_n=#B_n$ by definition.
            $endgroup$
            – Did
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:03










          • $begingroup$
            Yeah I know that. But the subscript is different? In the end you have c_n * #B_m not #B_n?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:10


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Fix some positive sequence $(c_n)$ with limit $0$, and, for every $n$ and $m$, let $$A_m=sumlimits_{k=m}^infty a_kqquad B_n={kmid a_kgeqslant c_n}$$ Then, $$A_mgeqslantsum_{k=m}^inftymathbf 1_{kin B_n}a_kgeqslantsum_{k=m}^inftymathbf 1_{kin B_n}c_n=c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)$$ hence $$c_ncdot#B_nleqslant c_ncdot m+c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)leqslant c_ncdot m+A_m$$ In the limit $ntoinfty$, one gets, for every fixed $m$, $$limsup_{ntoinfty},c_ncdot#B_nleqslantlimsup_{ntoinfty},(c_ncdot m+A_m)=A_m$$ The series $sum a_k$ converges hence $inflimits_mA_m=0$, thus, $$limsup_{ntoinfty},c_ncdot#B_n=0$$ If $c_n=2^{-n}$ for every $n$, then $#B_n=b_n$ hence we are done.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            In the first chain of inequality, should it be $c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 12:40












          • $begingroup$
            True! Well spotted, thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Did
            Dec 19 '18 at 12:45










          • $begingroup$
            Emmm, I'm still a bit confused about the last part. You first take n to infinity and then take m to infinity? But then why $#B_m = b_n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:01












          • $begingroup$
            ?? $b_n=#B_n$ by definition.
            $endgroup$
            – Did
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:03










          • $begingroup$
            Yeah I know that. But the subscript is different? In the end you have c_n * #B_m not #B_n?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:10
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Fix some positive sequence $(c_n)$ with limit $0$, and, for every $n$ and $m$, let $$A_m=sumlimits_{k=m}^infty a_kqquad B_n={kmid a_kgeqslant c_n}$$ Then, $$A_mgeqslantsum_{k=m}^inftymathbf 1_{kin B_n}a_kgeqslantsum_{k=m}^inftymathbf 1_{kin B_n}c_n=c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)$$ hence $$c_ncdot#B_nleqslant c_ncdot m+c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)leqslant c_ncdot m+A_m$$ In the limit $ntoinfty$, one gets, for every fixed $m$, $$limsup_{ntoinfty},c_ncdot#B_nleqslantlimsup_{ntoinfty},(c_ncdot m+A_m)=A_m$$ The series $sum a_k$ converges hence $inflimits_mA_m=0$, thus, $$limsup_{ntoinfty},c_ncdot#B_n=0$$ If $c_n=2^{-n}$ for every $n$, then $#B_n=b_n$ hence we are done.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Fix some positive sequence $(c_n)$ with limit $0$, and, for every $n$ and $m$, let $$A_m=sumlimits_{k=m}^infty a_kqquad B_n={kmid a_kgeqslant c_n}$$ Then, $$A_mgeqslantsum_{k=m}^inftymathbf 1_{kin B_n}a_kgeqslantsum_{k=m}^inftymathbf 1_{kin B_n}c_n=c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)$$ hence $$c_ncdot#B_nleqslant c_ncdot m+c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)leqslant c_ncdot m+A_m$$ In the limit $ntoinfty$, one gets, for every fixed $m$, $$limsup_{ntoinfty},c_ncdot#B_nleqslantlimsup_{ntoinfty},(c_ncdot m+A_m)=A_m$$ The series $sum a_k$ converges hence $inflimits_mA_m=0$, thus, $$limsup_{ntoinfty},c_ncdot#B_n=0$$ If $c_n=2^{-n}$ for every $n$, then $#B_n=b_n$ hence we are done.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Dec 19 '18 at 13:59

























          answered Dec 19 '18 at 12:07









          DidDid

          248k23224462




          248k23224462












          • $begingroup$
            In the first chain of inequality, should it be $c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 12:40












          • $begingroup$
            True! Well spotted, thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Did
            Dec 19 '18 at 12:45










          • $begingroup$
            Emmm, I'm still a bit confused about the last part. You first take n to infinity and then take m to infinity? But then why $#B_m = b_n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:01












          • $begingroup$
            ?? $b_n=#B_n$ by definition.
            $endgroup$
            – Did
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:03










          • $begingroup$
            Yeah I know that. But the subscript is different? In the end you have c_n * #B_m not #B_n?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:10




















          • $begingroup$
            In the first chain of inequality, should it be $c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)$?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 12:40












          • $begingroup$
            True! Well spotted, thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Did
            Dec 19 '18 at 12:45










          • $begingroup$
            Emmm, I'm still a bit confused about the last part. You first take n to infinity and then take m to infinity? But then why $#B_m = b_n$ ?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:01












          • $begingroup$
            ?? $b_n=#B_n$ by definition.
            $endgroup$
            – Did
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:03










          • $begingroup$
            Yeah I know that. But the subscript is different? In the end you have c_n * #B_m not #B_n?
            $endgroup$
            – Fluffy Skye
            Dec 19 '18 at 13:10


















          $begingroup$
          In the first chain of inequality, should it be $c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)$?
          $endgroup$
          – Fluffy Skye
          Dec 19 '18 at 12:40






          $begingroup$
          In the first chain of inequality, should it be $c_ncdot#B_ncap[m,infty)$?
          $endgroup$
          – Fluffy Skye
          Dec 19 '18 at 12:40














          $begingroup$
          True! Well spotted, thanks.
          $endgroup$
          – Did
          Dec 19 '18 at 12:45




          $begingroup$
          True! Well spotted, thanks.
          $endgroup$
          – Did
          Dec 19 '18 at 12:45












          $begingroup$
          Emmm, I'm still a bit confused about the last part. You first take n to infinity and then take m to infinity? But then why $#B_m = b_n$ ?
          $endgroup$
          – Fluffy Skye
          Dec 19 '18 at 13:01






          $begingroup$
          Emmm, I'm still a bit confused about the last part. You first take n to infinity and then take m to infinity? But then why $#B_m = b_n$ ?
          $endgroup$
          – Fluffy Skye
          Dec 19 '18 at 13:01














          $begingroup$
          ?? $b_n=#B_n$ by definition.
          $endgroup$
          – Did
          Dec 19 '18 at 13:03




          $begingroup$
          ?? $b_n=#B_n$ by definition.
          $endgroup$
          – Did
          Dec 19 '18 at 13:03












          $begingroup$
          Yeah I know that. But the subscript is different? In the end you have c_n * #B_m not #B_n?
          $endgroup$
          – Fluffy Skye
          Dec 19 '18 at 13:10






          $begingroup$
          Yeah I know that. But the subscript is different? In the end you have c_n * #B_m not #B_n?
          $endgroup$
          – Fluffy Skye
          Dec 19 '18 at 13:10




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046266%2fquestion-on-convergent-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          Image
          Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
          Read more

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

          Image
          5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
          Read more

          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

          Image
          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
          Read more