Sequences of sequences: question about Cauchy's construction of the real numbers












1














As is well known, one way of constructing the real numbers is to consider Cauchy sequences and call two of them equivalent if they have the same limit. I got to thinking about the Cauchy sequences themselves (ignoring the equivalence relation).



If we have a Cauchy sequence, we can make it shorter by removing the first element, or adding the first two elements. In fact we can do this arbitrarily often, creating a sequence of sequences.



Let the Cauchy sequence be $(a_n)_n$ and define $b_1 = (a_n)_n$ and $b_{n+1}$ by adding the first two elements of $b_n$ and attaching the remaining elements. Thus $b_2=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,dots), b_3=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,dots)$ etc.



I am having a hard time determining what the limit of $(b_n)_n$ would be as $n$ tends to infinity. Am I correct in surmising that the limit of $(b_n)_n$ generally does not exist, and even if it exists, the limit is not a sequence? Is it therefore correct to state that the set of Cauchy sequences is not complete, even though the set of their equivalence classes (= the real numbers) obviously is complete?






real-analysis cauchy-sequences







share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    As is well known, one way of constructing the real numbers is to consider Cauchy sequences and call two of them equivalent if they have the same limit. I got to thinking about the Cauchy sequences themselves (ignoring the equivalence relation).



    If we have a Cauchy sequence, we can make it shorter by removing the first element, or adding the first two elements. In fact we can do this arbitrarily often, creating a sequence of sequences.



    Let the Cauchy sequence be $(a_n)_n$ and define $b_1 = (a_n)_n$ and $b_{n+1}$ by adding the first two elements of $b_n$ and attaching the remaining elements. Thus $b_2=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,dots), b_3=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,dots)$ etc.



    I am having a hard time determining what the limit of $(b_n)_n$ would be as $n$ tends to infinity. Am I correct in surmising that the limit of $(b_n)_n$ generally does not exist, and even if it exists, the limit is not a sequence? Is it therefore correct to state that the set of Cauchy sequences is not complete, even though the set of their equivalence classes (= the real numbers) obviously is complete?






    real-analysis cauchy-sequences







    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      As is well known, one way of constructing the real numbers is to consider Cauchy sequences and call two of them equivalent if they have the same limit. I got to thinking about the Cauchy sequences themselves (ignoring the equivalence relation).



      If we have a Cauchy sequence, we can make it shorter by removing the first element, or adding the first two elements. In fact we can do this arbitrarily often, creating a sequence of sequences.



      Let the Cauchy sequence be $(a_n)_n$ and define $b_1 = (a_n)_n$ and $b_{n+1}$ by adding the first two elements of $b_n$ and attaching the remaining elements. Thus $b_2=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,dots), b_3=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,dots)$ etc.



      I am having a hard time determining what the limit of $(b_n)_n$ would be as $n$ tends to infinity. Am I correct in surmising that the limit of $(b_n)_n$ generally does not exist, and even if it exists, the limit is not a sequence? Is it therefore correct to state that the set of Cauchy sequences is not complete, even though the set of their equivalence classes (= the real numbers) obviously is complete?






      real-analysis cauchy-sequences







      share|cite|improve this question













      As is well known, one way of constructing the real numbers is to consider Cauchy sequences and call two of them equivalent if they have the same limit. I got to thinking about the Cauchy sequences themselves (ignoring the equivalence relation).



      If we have a Cauchy sequence, we can make it shorter by removing the first element, or adding the first two elements. In fact we can do this arbitrarily often, creating a sequence of sequences.



      Let the Cauchy sequence be $(a_n)_n$ and define $b_1 = (a_n)_n$ and $b_{n+1}$ by adding the first two elements of $b_n$ and attaching the remaining elements. Thus $b_2=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,dots), b_3=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,dots)$ etc.



      I am having a hard time determining what the limit of $(b_n)_n$ would be as $n$ tends to infinity. Am I correct in surmising that the limit of $(b_n)_n$ generally does not exist, and even if it exists, the limit is not a sequence? Is it therefore correct to state that the set of Cauchy sequences is not complete, even though the set of their equivalence classes (= the real numbers) obviously is complete?






      real-analysis cauchy-sequences




      real-analysis cauchy-sequences






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      Stefanie

      485




      485






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          You are mixing up two systems of enumeration different things.



          Your $a_n$ are numbers, given for each $ngeq1$, and the $n$ enumerates these numbers in the list $(a_n)_{ngeq1}$. Assume that $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n=alphain{mathbb R}$. On the other hand, your $b_n$ are not numbers, but sequences, and the $n$ enumerates these sequences. I'd write it in the following way:
          $$eqalign{
          {bf b}_1&=(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_2&=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_3&=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          &vdotscr
          {bf b}_j&=(a_1+a_2+ldots+a_j,a_{j+1},a_{j+2},a_{j+3},ldots)qquad(jgeq1).cr}$$
          Let ${bf b}_{j.k}$ be the $k^{rm th}$ element of the sequence ${bf b}_j$. Then it is easy to see that for every $jgeq1$ one has $lim_{ktoinfty}{bf b}_{j.k}=alpha$.



          That's all one can say about the sequences ${bf b}_j$, $>jgeq1$. In particular; this has nothing to do with the completeness of ${mathbb R}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
            – Stefanie
            yesterday











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061924%2fsequences-of-sequences-question-about-cauchys-construction-of-the-real-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          You are mixing up two systems of enumeration different things.



          Your $a_n$ are numbers, given for each $ngeq1$, and the $n$ enumerates these numbers in the list $(a_n)_{ngeq1}$. Assume that $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n=alphain{mathbb R}$. On the other hand, your $b_n$ are not numbers, but sequences, and the $n$ enumerates these sequences. I'd write it in the following way:
          $$eqalign{
          {bf b}_1&=(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_2&=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_3&=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          &vdotscr
          {bf b}_j&=(a_1+a_2+ldots+a_j,a_{j+1},a_{j+2},a_{j+3},ldots)qquad(jgeq1).cr}$$
          Let ${bf b}_{j.k}$ be the $k^{rm th}$ element of the sequence ${bf b}_j$. Then it is easy to see that for every $jgeq1$ one has $lim_{ktoinfty}{bf b}_{j.k}=alpha$.



          That's all one can say about the sequences ${bf b}_j$, $>jgeq1$. In particular; this has nothing to do with the completeness of ${mathbb R}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
            – Stefanie
            yesterday
















          0














          You are mixing up two systems of enumeration different things.



          Your $a_n$ are numbers, given for each $ngeq1$, and the $n$ enumerates these numbers in the list $(a_n)_{ngeq1}$. Assume that $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n=alphain{mathbb R}$. On the other hand, your $b_n$ are not numbers, but sequences, and the $n$ enumerates these sequences. I'd write it in the following way:
          $$eqalign{
          {bf b}_1&=(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_2&=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_3&=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          &vdotscr
          {bf b}_j&=(a_1+a_2+ldots+a_j,a_{j+1},a_{j+2},a_{j+3},ldots)qquad(jgeq1).cr}$$
          Let ${bf b}_{j.k}$ be the $k^{rm th}$ element of the sequence ${bf b}_j$. Then it is easy to see that for every $jgeq1$ one has $lim_{ktoinfty}{bf b}_{j.k}=alpha$.



          That's all one can say about the sequences ${bf b}_j$, $>jgeq1$. In particular; this has nothing to do with the completeness of ${mathbb R}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
            – Stefanie
            yesterday














          0












          0








          0






          You are mixing up two systems of enumeration different things.



          Your $a_n$ are numbers, given for each $ngeq1$, and the $n$ enumerates these numbers in the list $(a_n)_{ngeq1}$. Assume that $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n=alphain{mathbb R}$. On the other hand, your $b_n$ are not numbers, but sequences, and the $n$ enumerates these sequences. I'd write it in the following way:
          $$eqalign{
          {bf b}_1&=(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_2&=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_3&=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          &vdotscr
          {bf b}_j&=(a_1+a_2+ldots+a_j,a_{j+1},a_{j+2},a_{j+3},ldots)qquad(jgeq1).cr}$$
          Let ${bf b}_{j.k}$ be the $k^{rm th}$ element of the sequence ${bf b}_j$. Then it is easy to see that for every $jgeq1$ one has $lim_{ktoinfty}{bf b}_{j.k}=alpha$.



          That's all one can say about the sequences ${bf b}_j$, $>jgeq1$. In particular; this has nothing to do with the completeness of ${mathbb R}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          You are mixing up two systems of enumeration different things.



          Your $a_n$ are numbers, given for each $ngeq1$, and the $n$ enumerates these numbers in the list $(a_n)_{ngeq1}$. Assume that $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n=alphain{mathbb R}$. On the other hand, your $b_n$ are not numbers, but sequences, and the $n$ enumerates these sequences. I'd write it in the following way:
          $$eqalign{
          {bf b}_1&=(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_2&=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_3&=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          &vdotscr
          {bf b}_j&=(a_1+a_2+ldots+a_j,a_{j+1},a_{j+2},a_{j+3},ldots)qquad(jgeq1).cr}$$
          Let ${bf b}_{j.k}$ be the $k^{rm th}$ element of the sequence ${bf b}_j$. Then it is easy to see that for every $jgeq1$ one has $lim_{ktoinfty}{bf b}_{j.k}=alpha$.



          That's all one can say about the sequences ${bf b}_j$, $>jgeq1$. In particular; this has nothing to do with the completeness of ${mathbb R}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          Christian Blatter

          172k7112326




          172k7112326












          • Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
            – Stefanie
            yesterday


















          • Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
            – Stefanie
            yesterday
















          Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
          – Stefanie
          yesterday




          Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
          – Stefanie
          yesterday


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061924%2fsequences-of-sequences-question-about-cauchys-construction-of-the-real-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          Image
          Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro...
          Read more

          The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

          Image
          Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth From The Cutting Room Floor < The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth Jump to: navigation, search This is a sub-page of The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth . Afterbirth is the first expansion pack for Rebirth and features a variety of improvements. Contents 1 Unused Graphics 1.1 Old Man Keeper 1.2 Skinless Hush 1.3 Miscellaneous Unused Hush Sprites 1.4 Generosity achievement 1.5 Afterbirth+ Room Editor 1.6 Bearded Ultra Greed 1.7 Early Ultra Greed 1.8 Unused Brownie Expression 1.9 Frail's Spinning Head 1.10 Mom's Dead Hand Alt 2 Unused Audio 2.1 Unused Dead Womb Layer 2.2 Unused Hush Battle Outro 2.3 The Stain Grunt Unused Graphics Old Man Keeper Image file: gfxuimain me...
          Read more

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

          Image
          5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1 ...
          Read more