Guaranteeing isoperimetry constraint for non-extremal functional in PDE.
$begingroup$
First of all, hello and thank you for your time.
Context
I am making a program that solves the differential equation for the time evolution of a system from the equations: $$F[mathbf{y}]=intlimits_{Omegasubsetmathbb{R}^n}f(mathbf{x},mathbf{y}, mathbf{nabla y})dmathbf{x}$$
$$frac{partial y_i}{partial t}=kDeltafrac{delta F}{delta y_i}$$
Where $Delta$ is the Laplacian and $$frac{delta F}{delta y_i}=sumlimits_kfrac{partial}{partial x_k}frac{partial f}{partial (partial_ky_i)}-frac{partial f}{partial y_i}$$ is the variational derivative ($partial _k$ is the partial derivative with respect to $x_k$). Also: $mathbf{x}inmathbb{R}^n, mathbf{y}inmathbb{R}^m$
The system should satisfy the global conservation constraints:
$$J_i[mathbf{y}]=intlimits_{Omegasubsetmathbb{R}^n}y_idmathbf{x}=k_i$$
Where the $k_i$ are constants.
I ran the program (without adding the Lagrange multipliers to the integral). And noticed that the $J_i$ increased with time, which was obviously not intended.
Question
I want to add the constraints to the solution. At first I naïvely thought that I could just modify the functional by adding lagrange mutipliers: $$K[mathbf{y}]=F[mathbf{y}]-sumlimits_ilambda_i J_i[mathbf{y}]$$
But when checking my reference book I noticed the Theorem said (I modified and omitted parts to take what's most relevant to the current question):
Suppose that $F$ has an extremum at $yin C^2[x_0, x_1]$ subject to the boundary conditions [...]. Then there exist two numbers $lambda_0, lambda_1$ not both zero such that $$frac{delta K}{delta y}=0$$
Where $K=lambda_0 F-lambda_1 J$
As the theorem says, this works when one wishes to find the extremum so my naïve assumption is probably wrong since the system I described only reaches the extremum of the functional when $mathbf{y}$ gets to the steady state (i.e. it approaches it asymptotically).
Is there a way to satisfy the constraint continuously throughout the time evolution of the system despite $F$ not being stationary?
I understand this may be more involved than what an answer in the site may allow so if you know of any good textbook where I could find it I would also be very grateful.
pde calculus-of-variations lagrange-multiplier euler-lagrange-equation variational-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all, hello and thank you for your time.
Context
I am making a program that solves the differential equation for the time evolution of a system from the equations: $$F[mathbf{y}]=intlimits_{Omegasubsetmathbb{R}^n}f(mathbf{x},mathbf{y}, mathbf{nabla y})dmathbf{x}$$
$$frac{partial y_i}{partial t}=kDeltafrac{delta F}{delta y_i}$$
Where $Delta$ is the Laplacian and $$frac{delta F}{delta y_i}=sumlimits_kfrac{partial}{partial x_k}frac{partial f}{partial (partial_ky_i)}-frac{partial f}{partial y_i}$$ is the variational derivative ($partial _k$ is the partial derivative with respect to $x_k$). Also: $mathbf{x}inmathbb{R}^n, mathbf{y}inmathbb{R}^m$
The system should satisfy the global conservation constraints:
$$J_i[mathbf{y}]=intlimits_{Omegasubsetmathbb{R}^n}y_idmathbf{x}=k_i$$
Where the $k_i$ are constants.
I ran the program (without adding the Lagrange multipliers to the integral). And noticed that the $J_i$ increased with time, which was obviously not intended.
Question
I want to add the constraints to the solution. At first I naïvely thought that I could just modify the functional by adding lagrange mutipliers: $$K[mathbf{y}]=F[mathbf{y}]-sumlimits_ilambda_i J_i[mathbf{y}]$$
But when checking my reference book I noticed the Theorem said (I modified and omitted parts to take what's most relevant to the current question):
Suppose that $F$ has an extremum at $yin C^2[x_0, x_1]$ subject to the boundary conditions [...]. Then there exist two numbers $lambda_0, lambda_1$ not both zero such that $$frac{delta K}{delta y}=0$$
Where $K=lambda_0 F-lambda_1 J$
As the theorem says, this works when one wishes to find the extremum so my naïve assumption is probably wrong since the system I described only reaches the extremum of the functional when $mathbf{y}$ gets to the steady state (i.e. it approaches it asymptotically).
Is there a way to satisfy the constraint continuously throughout the time evolution of the system despite $F$ not being stationary?
I understand this may be more involved than what an answer in the site may allow so if you know of any good textbook where I could find it I would also be very grateful.
pde calculus-of-variations lagrange-multiplier euler-lagrange-equation variational-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all, hello and thank you for your time.
Context
I am making a program that solves the differential equation for the time evolution of a system from the equations: $$F[mathbf{y}]=intlimits_{Omegasubsetmathbb{R}^n}f(mathbf{x},mathbf{y}, mathbf{nabla y})dmathbf{x}$$
$$frac{partial y_i}{partial t}=kDeltafrac{delta F}{delta y_i}$$
Where $Delta$ is the Laplacian and $$frac{delta F}{delta y_i}=sumlimits_kfrac{partial}{partial x_k}frac{partial f}{partial (partial_ky_i)}-frac{partial f}{partial y_i}$$ is the variational derivative ($partial _k$ is the partial derivative with respect to $x_k$). Also: $mathbf{x}inmathbb{R}^n, mathbf{y}inmathbb{R}^m$
The system should satisfy the global conservation constraints:
$$J_i[mathbf{y}]=intlimits_{Omegasubsetmathbb{R}^n}y_idmathbf{x}=k_i$$
Where the $k_i$ are constants.
I ran the program (without adding the Lagrange multipliers to the integral). And noticed that the $J_i$ increased with time, which was obviously not intended.
Question
I want to add the constraints to the solution. At first I naïvely thought that I could just modify the functional by adding lagrange mutipliers: $$K[mathbf{y}]=F[mathbf{y}]-sumlimits_ilambda_i J_i[mathbf{y}]$$
But when checking my reference book I noticed the Theorem said (I modified and omitted parts to take what's most relevant to the current question):
Suppose that $F$ has an extremum at $yin C^2[x_0, x_1]$ subject to the boundary conditions [...]. Then there exist two numbers $lambda_0, lambda_1$ not both zero such that $$frac{delta K}{delta y}=0$$
Where $K=lambda_0 F-lambda_1 J$
As the theorem says, this works when one wishes to find the extremum so my naïve assumption is probably wrong since the system I described only reaches the extremum of the functional when $mathbf{y}$ gets to the steady state (i.e. it approaches it asymptotically).
Is there a way to satisfy the constraint continuously throughout the time evolution of the system despite $F$ not being stationary?
I understand this may be more involved than what an answer in the site may allow so if you know of any good textbook where I could find it I would also be very grateful.
pde calculus-of-variations lagrange-multiplier euler-lagrange-equation variational-analysis
$endgroup$
First of all, hello and thank you for your time.
Context
I am making a program that solves the differential equation for the time evolution of a system from the equations: $$F[mathbf{y}]=intlimits_{Omegasubsetmathbb{R}^n}f(mathbf{x},mathbf{y}, mathbf{nabla y})dmathbf{x}$$
$$frac{partial y_i}{partial t}=kDeltafrac{delta F}{delta y_i}$$
Where $Delta$ is the Laplacian and $$frac{delta F}{delta y_i}=sumlimits_kfrac{partial}{partial x_k}frac{partial f}{partial (partial_ky_i)}-frac{partial f}{partial y_i}$$ is the variational derivative ($partial _k$ is the partial derivative with respect to $x_k$). Also: $mathbf{x}inmathbb{R}^n, mathbf{y}inmathbb{R}^m$
The system should satisfy the global conservation constraints:
$$J_i[mathbf{y}]=intlimits_{Omegasubsetmathbb{R}^n}y_idmathbf{x}=k_i$$
Where the $k_i$ are constants.
I ran the program (without adding the Lagrange multipliers to the integral). And noticed that the $J_i$ increased with time, which was obviously not intended.
Question
I want to add the constraints to the solution. At first I naïvely thought that I could just modify the functional by adding lagrange mutipliers: $$K[mathbf{y}]=F[mathbf{y}]-sumlimits_ilambda_i J_i[mathbf{y}]$$
But when checking my reference book I noticed the Theorem said (I modified and omitted parts to take what's most relevant to the current question):
Suppose that $F$ has an extremum at $yin C^2[x_0, x_1]$ subject to the boundary conditions [...]. Then there exist two numbers $lambda_0, lambda_1$ not both zero such that $$frac{delta K}{delta y}=0$$
Where $K=lambda_0 F-lambda_1 J$
As the theorem says, this works when one wishes to find the extremum so my naïve assumption is probably wrong since the system I described only reaches the extremum of the functional when $mathbf{y}$ gets to the steady state (i.e. it approaches it asymptotically).
Is there a way to satisfy the constraint continuously throughout the time evolution of the system despite $F$ not being stationary?
I understand this may be more involved than what an answer in the site may allow so if you know of any good textbook where I could find it I would also be very grateful.
pde calculus-of-variations lagrange-multiplier euler-lagrange-equation variational-analysis
pde calculus-of-variations lagrange-multiplier euler-lagrange-equation variational-analysis
edited Jan 21 at 16:53
Salvador Villarreal
asked Jan 18 at 18:26
Salvador VillarrealSalvador Villarreal
1107
1107
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078598%2fguaranteeing-isoperimetry-constraint-for-non-extremal-functional-in-pde%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078598%2fguaranteeing-isoperimetry-constraint-for-non-extremal-functional-in-pde%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown