Bounded Linear Operators on Banach Spaces












5












$begingroup$


let $1<p_1<p<p_2<infty$. Let $Y$ be a Banach space and let $T$ be a bounded linear operator from $L^{p_1}$ to $Y$ and from $L^{p_2}$ to $Y$. Show that $T$ is then also a bounded linear operator from $L^p$ to Y.



I'm trying to use the lemma which states that for any $uin L^p$ there exist $u_1in L^{p_1}$ and $u_2in L^{p_2}$ such that $u=u_1+u_2$.



So there exists $C_1$ such that $$||Tx||_yleq C_1||x||_{p_1}$$ for any $xin L^{p_1}$.



Also there exists $C_2$ such that $$||Tx||_yleq C_2||x||_{p_2}$$ for any $xin L^{p_2}$.



Hence if $sin L^p$ then we can write $s=u_1+u_2$ such that $u_1in L^{p_1}$ and $u_2in L^{p_2}$. Then $$||Ts||_yleq||Tu_1||_y+||Tu_2||_yleq C_1||u_1||_{p_1}+C_2||u_2||_{p_2}leq C[||u_1||_{p_1}+||u_2||_{p_2}],$$ for some constant $C$.



I don't know if it's possible to have inequality like $$||u_1||_{p_1}+||u_2||_{p_2}leq C^* ||u_1+u_2||_p ??$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    As is, no. However, you should be able to construct a pair $(u_1,u_2)$ such that $|u_1|_{p_1} leq C’_1|x|_p$ and same for $u_2$. Do not forget to show that the value of $T$ will not depend on the decomposition chosen!
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 18 at 20:24


















5












$begingroup$


let $1<p_1<p<p_2<infty$. Let $Y$ be a Banach space and let $T$ be a bounded linear operator from $L^{p_1}$ to $Y$ and from $L^{p_2}$ to $Y$. Show that $T$ is then also a bounded linear operator from $L^p$ to Y.



I'm trying to use the lemma which states that for any $uin L^p$ there exist $u_1in L^{p_1}$ and $u_2in L^{p_2}$ such that $u=u_1+u_2$.



So there exists $C_1$ such that $$||Tx||_yleq C_1||x||_{p_1}$$ for any $xin L^{p_1}$.



Also there exists $C_2$ such that $$||Tx||_yleq C_2||x||_{p_2}$$ for any $xin L^{p_2}$.



Hence if $sin L^p$ then we can write $s=u_1+u_2$ such that $u_1in L^{p_1}$ and $u_2in L^{p_2}$. Then $$||Ts||_yleq||Tu_1||_y+||Tu_2||_yleq C_1||u_1||_{p_1}+C_2||u_2||_{p_2}leq C[||u_1||_{p_1}+||u_2||_{p_2}],$$ for some constant $C$.



I don't know if it's possible to have inequality like $$||u_1||_{p_1}+||u_2||_{p_2}leq C^* ||u_1+u_2||_p ??$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    As is, no. However, you should be able to construct a pair $(u_1,u_2)$ such that $|u_1|_{p_1} leq C’_1|x|_p$ and same for $u_2$. Do not forget to show that the value of $T$ will not depend on the decomposition chosen!
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 18 at 20:24
















5












5








5





$begingroup$


let $1<p_1<p<p_2<infty$. Let $Y$ be a Banach space and let $T$ be a bounded linear operator from $L^{p_1}$ to $Y$ and from $L^{p_2}$ to $Y$. Show that $T$ is then also a bounded linear operator from $L^p$ to Y.



I'm trying to use the lemma which states that for any $uin L^p$ there exist $u_1in L^{p_1}$ and $u_2in L^{p_2}$ such that $u=u_1+u_2$.



So there exists $C_1$ such that $$||Tx||_yleq C_1||x||_{p_1}$$ for any $xin L^{p_1}$.



Also there exists $C_2$ such that $$||Tx||_yleq C_2||x||_{p_2}$$ for any $xin L^{p_2}$.



Hence if $sin L^p$ then we can write $s=u_1+u_2$ such that $u_1in L^{p_1}$ and $u_2in L^{p_2}$. Then $$||Ts||_yleq||Tu_1||_y+||Tu_2||_yleq C_1||u_1||_{p_1}+C_2||u_2||_{p_2}leq C[||u_1||_{p_1}+||u_2||_{p_2}],$$ for some constant $C$.



I don't know if it's possible to have inequality like $$||u_1||_{p_1}+||u_2||_{p_2}leq C^* ||u_1+u_2||_p ??$$










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




let $1<p_1<p<p_2<infty$. Let $Y$ be a Banach space and let $T$ be a bounded linear operator from $L^{p_1}$ to $Y$ and from $L^{p_2}$ to $Y$. Show that $T$ is then also a bounded linear operator from $L^p$ to Y.



I'm trying to use the lemma which states that for any $uin L^p$ there exist $u_1in L^{p_1}$ and $u_2in L^{p_2}$ such that $u=u_1+u_2$.



So there exists $C_1$ such that $$||Tx||_yleq C_1||x||_{p_1}$$ for any $xin L^{p_1}$.



Also there exists $C_2$ such that $$||Tx||_yleq C_2||x||_{p_2}$$ for any $xin L^{p_2}$.



Hence if $sin L^p$ then we can write $s=u_1+u_2$ such that $u_1in L^{p_1}$ and $u_2in L^{p_2}$. Then $$||Ts||_yleq||Tu_1||_y+||Tu_2||_yleq C_1||u_1||_{p_1}+C_2||u_2||_{p_2}leq C[||u_1||_{p_1}+||u_2||_{p_2}],$$ for some constant $C$.



I don't know if it's possible to have inequality like $$||u_1||_{p_1}+||u_2||_{p_2}leq C^* ||u_1+u_2||_p ??$$







real-analysis banach-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 18 at 19:37









S_AlexS_Alex

1679




1679












  • $begingroup$
    As is, no. However, you should be able to construct a pair $(u_1,u_2)$ such that $|u_1|_{p_1} leq C’_1|x|_p$ and same for $u_2$. Do not forget to show that the value of $T$ will not depend on the decomposition chosen!
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 18 at 20:24




















  • $begingroup$
    As is, no. However, you should be able to construct a pair $(u_1,u_2)$ such that $|u_1|_{p_1} leq C’_1|x|_p$ and same for $u_2$. Do not forget to show that the value of $T$ will not depend on the decomposition chosen!
    $endgroup$
    – Mindlack
    Jan 18 at 20:24


















$begingroup$
As is, no. However, you should be able to construct a pair $(u_1,u_2)$ such that $|u_1|_{p_1} leq C’_1|x|_p$ and same for $u_2$. Do not forget to show that the value of $T$ will not depend on the decomposition chosen!
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 18 at 20:24






$begingroup$
As is, no. However, you should be able to construct a pair $(u_1,u_2)$ such that $|u_1|_{p_1} leq C’_1|x|_p$ and same for $u_2$. Do not forget to show that the value of $T$ will not depend on the decomposition chosen!
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 18 at 20:24












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Assume $fin L^p$ such that $|f|_p = 1$ is given. What we want to show is the existence of $C>0$ (which does not depend on $f$) such that $$
|Tf|_Yle C.
$$
Now, we can decompose
$$
f=f1_{{|f|le 1}}+f1_{{|f|>1}}=f_1+f_2.
$$
Note that $int |f_1|^{p_1}leint |f|^p= 1$ and $int |f_2|^{p_2}leint |f|^p= 1$. Hence, $|f_1|_{p_1}le$ and $|f_2|_{p_2}le 1$ holds. Thus, we have
$$
|Tf|_Yle |Tf_1|_Y+|Tf_2|_Yle C_1+C_2
$$
and the desired conclusion holds for $C=C_1+C_2$.



Note: In fact, Riesz-Thorin method (using complex method) provides a better bound
$$
|T|_{p}le |T|_{p_1}^alpha|T|_{p_2}^{1-alpha}
$$
where $frac{1}{p}=frac{alpha}{p_1}+frac{1-alpha}{p_2}.$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Oh, never mind. I misread the problem and was thinking of something more like Riesz-Thorin, where $T$ is bounded from $L^{p_1} to L^{p_1}$ and from $L^{p_2} to L^{p_2}$. Didn't realize that the codomain was the same space everywhere.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Jan 18 at 22:03












  • $begingroup$
    @NateEldredge Never mind! I think your concern is legitimate :)
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 18 at 22:04











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078667%2fbounded-linear-operators-on-banach-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Assume $fin L^p$ such that $|f|_p = 1$ is given. What we want to show is the existence of $C>0$ (which does not depend on $f$) such that $$
|Tf|_Yle C.
$$
Now, we can decompose
$$
f=f1_{{|f|le 1}}+f1_{{|f|>1}}=f_1+f_2.
$$
Note that $int |f_1|^{p_1}leint |f|^p= 1$ and $int |f_2|^{p_2}leint |f|^p= 1$. Hence, $|f_1|_{p_1}le$ and $|f_2|_{p_2}le 1$ holds. Thus, we have
$$
|Tf|_Yle |Tf_1|_Y+|Tf_2|_Yle C_1+C_2
$$
and the desired conclusion holds for $C=C_1+C_2$.



Note: In fact, Riesz-Thorin method (using complex method) provides a better bound
$$
|T|_{p}le |T|_{p_1}^alpha|T|_{p_2}^{1-alpha}
$$
where $frac{1}{p}=frac{alpha}{p_1}+frac{1-alpha}{p_2}.$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Oh, never mind. I misread the problem and was thinking of something more like Riesz-Thorin, where $T$ is bounded from $L^{p_1} to L^{p_1}$ and from $L^{p_2} to L^{p_2}$. Didn't realize that the codomain was the same space everywhere.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Jan 18 at 22:03












  • $begingroup$
    @NateEldredge Never mind! I think your concern is legitimate :)
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 18 at 22:04
















3












$begingroup$

Assume $fin L^p$ such that $|f|_p = 1$ is given. What we want to show is the existence of $C>0$ (which does not depend on $f$) such that $$
|Tf|_Yle C.
$$
Now, we can decompose
$$
f=f1_{{|f|le 1}}+f1_{{|f|>1}}=f_1+f_2.
$$
Note that $int |f_1|^{p_1}leint |f|^p= 1$ and $int |f_2|^{p_2}leint |f|^p= 1$. Hence, $|f_1|_{p_1}le$ and $|f_2|_{p_2}le 1$ holds. Thus, we have
$$
|Tf|_Yle |Tf_1|_Y+|Tf_2|_Yle C_1+C_2
$$
and the desired conclusion holds for $C=C_1+C_2$.



Note: In fact, Riesz-Thorin method (using complex method) provides a better bound
$$
|T|_{p}le |T|_{p_1}^alpha|T|_{p_2}^{1-alpha}
$$
where $frac{1}{p}=frac{alpha}{p_1}+frac{1-alpha}{p_2}.$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Oh, never mind. I misread the problem and was thinking of something more like Riesz-Thorin, where $T$ is bounded from $L^{p_1} to L^{p_1}$ and from $L^{p_2} to L^{p_2}$. Didn't realize that the codomain was the same space everywhere.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Jan 18 at 22:03












  • $begingroup$
    @NateEldredge Never mind! I think your concern is legitimate :)
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 18 at 22:04














3












3








3





$begingroup$

Assume $fin L^p$ such that $|f|_p = 1$ is given. What we want to show is the existence of $C>0$ (which does not depend on $f$) such that $$
|Tf|_Yle C.
$$
Now, we can decompose
$$
f=f1_{{|f|le 1}}+f1_{{|f|>1}}=f_1+f_2.
$$
Note that $int |f_1|^{p_1}leint |f|^p= 1$ and $int |f_2|^{p_2}leint |f|^p= 1$. Hence, $|f_1|_{p_1}le$ and $|f_2|_{p_2}le 1$ holds. Thus, we have
$$
|Tf|_Yle |Tf_1|_Y+|Tf_2|_Yle C_1+C_2
$$
and the desired conclusion holds for $C=C_1+C_2$.



Note: In fact, Riesz-Thorin method (using complex method) provides a better bound
$$
|T|_{p}le |T|_{p_1}^alpha|T|_{p_2}^{1-alpha}
$$
where $frac{1}{p}=frac{alpha}{p_1}+frac{1-alpha}{p_2}.$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Assume $fin L^p$ such that $|f|_p = 1$ is given. What we want to show is the existence of $C>0$ (which does not depend on $f$) such that $$
|Tf|_Yle C.
$$
Now, we can decompose
$$
f=f1_{{|f|le 1}}+f1_{{|f|>1}}=f_1+f_2.
$$
Note that $int |f_1|^{p_1}leint |f|^p= 1$ and $int |f_2|^{p_2}leint |f|^p= 1$. Hence, $|f_1|_{p_1}le$ and $|f_2|_{p_2}le 1$ holds. Thus, we have
$$
|Tf|_Yle |Tf_1|_Y+|Tf_2|_Yle C_1+C_2
$$
and the desired conclusion holds for $C=C_1+C_2$.



Note: In fact, Riesz-Thorin method (using complex method) provides a better bound
$$
|T|_{p}le |T|_{p_1}^alpha|T|_{p_2}^{1-alpha}
$$
where $frac{1}{p}=frac{alpha}{p_1}+frac{1-alpha}{p_2}.$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 18 at 22:08

























answered Jan 18 at 21:58









SongSong

13.1k632




13.1k632












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, never mind. I misread the problem and was thinking of something more like Riesz-Thorin, where $T$ is bounded from $L^{p_1} to L^{p_1}$ and from $L^{p_2} to L^{p_2}$. Didn't realize that the codomain was the same space everywhere.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Jan 18 at 22:03












  • $begingroup$
    @NateEldredge Never mind! I think your concern is legitimate :)
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 18 at 22:04


















  • $begingroup$
    Oh, never mind. I misread the problem and was thinking of something more like Riesz-Thorin, where $T$ is bounded from $L^{p_1} to L^{p_1}$ and from $L^{p_2} to L^{p_2}$. Didn't realize that the codomain was the same space everywhere.
    $endgroup$
    – Nate Eldredge
    Jan 18 at 22:03












  • $begingroup$
    @NateEldredge Never mind! I think your concern is legitimate :)
    $endgroup$
    – Song
    Jan 18 at 22:04
















$begingroup$
Oh, never mind. I misread the problem and was thinking of something more like Riesz-Thorin, where $T$ is bounded from $L^{p_1} to L^{p_1}$ and from $L^{p_2} to L^{p_2}$. Didn't realize that the codomain was the same space everywhere.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Jan 18 at 22:03






$begingroup$
Oh, never mind. I misread the problem and was thinking of something more like Riesz-Thorin, where $T$ is bounded from $L^{p_1} to L^{p_1}$ and from $L^{p_2} to L^{p_2}$. Didn't realize that the codomain was the same space everywhere.
$endgroup$
– Nate Eldredge
Jan 18 at 22:03














$begingroup$
@NateEldredge Never mind! I think your concern is legitimate :)
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 18 at 22:04




$begingroup$
@NateEldredge Never mind! I think your concern is legitimate :)
$endgroup$
– Song
Jan 18 at 22:04


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3078667%2fbounded-linear-operators-on-banach-spaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Antonio Litta Visconti Arese