Dual of each of these compound propositions.












1












$begingroup$


I'm doing my Discrete Structure assignment. The question asked to find the dual of each of these compound propositions. Note that T denotes a tautology and F denotes a contradiction. The questions are:



a) $p∧¬q∧¬r$



b) $(p∧q∧r)∨s$



c) $(p∨F)∧(q∨T)$



My answers:



a) $¬p∨q∨r$



b) $(¬p∨¬q∨¬r)∧¬s$



c) $(¬p∧T)∨(¬q∧F)$



Did I got it right?
Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is your question?
    $endgroup$
    – Yeah..
    Feb 17 '16 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Yeah. The question appears to be : "Did I get it right?"
    $endgroup$
    – Graham Kemp
    Feb 17 '16 at 2:23










  • $begingroup$
    @GrahamKemp YES! :P
    $endgroup$
    – Krin Yongvongphaiboon
    Feb 17 '16 at 2:24
















1












$begingroup$


I'm doing my Discrete Structure assignment. The question asked to find the dual of each of these compound propositions. Note that T denotes a tautology and F denotes a contradiction. The questions are:



a) $p∧¬q∧¬r$



b) $(p∧q∧r)∨s$



c) $(p∨F)∧(q∨T)$



My answers:



a) $¬p∨q∨r$



b) $(¬p∨¬q∨¬r)∧¬s$



c) $(¬p∧T)∨(¬q∧F)$



Did I got it right?
Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is your question?
    $endgroup$
    – Yeah..
    Feb 17 '16 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Yeah. The question appears to be : "Did I get it right?"
    $endgroup$
    – Graham Kemp
    Feb 17 '16 at 2:23










  • $begingroup$
    @GrahamKemp YES! :P
    $endgroup$
    – Krin Yongvongphaiboon
    Feb 17 '16 at 2:24














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I'm doing my Discrete Structure assignment. The question asked to find the dual of each of these compound propositions. Note that T denotes a tautology and F denotes a contradiction. The questions are:



a) $p∧¬q∧¬r$



b) $(p∧q∧r)∨s$



c) $(p∨F)∧(q∨T)$



My answers:



a) $¬p∨q∨r$



b) $(¬p∨¬q∨¬r)∧¬s$



c) $(¬p∧T)∨(¬q∧F)$



Did I got it right?
Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm doing my Discrete Structure assignment. The question asked to find the dual of each of these compound propositions. Note that T denotes a tautology and F denotes a contradiction. The questions are:



a) $p∧¬q∧¬r$



b) $(p∧q∧r)∨s$



c) $(p∨F)∧(q∨T)$



My answers:



a) $¬p∨q∨r$



b) $(¬p∨¬q∨¬r)∧¬s$



c) $(¬p∧T)∨(¬q∧F)$



Did I got it right?
Thank you!







discrete-mathematics logic proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 17 '16 at 2:25







Krin Yongvongphaiboon

















asked Feb 17 '16 at 2:17









Krin YongvongphaiboonKrin Yongvongphaiboon

64




64












  • $begingroup$
    What is your question?
    $endgroup$
    – Yeah..
    Feb 17 '16 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Yeah. The question appears to be : "Did I get it right?"
    $endgroup$
    – Graham Kemp
    Feb 17 '16 at 2:23










  • $begingroup$
    @GrahamKemp YES! :P
    $endgroup$
    – Krin Yongvongphaiboon
    Feb 17 '16 at 2:24


















  • $begingroup$
    What is your question?
    $endgroup$
    – Yeah..
    Feb 17 '16 at 2:22










  • $begingroup$
    @Yeah. The question appears to be : "Did I get it right?"
    $endgroup$
    – Graham Kemp
    Feb 17 '16 at 2:23










  • $begingroup$
    @GrahamKemp YES! :P
    $endgroup$
    – Krin Yongvongphaiboon
    Feb 17 '16 at 2:24
















$begingroup$
What is your question?
$endgroup$
– Yeah..
Feb 17 '16 at 2:22




$begingroup$
What is your question?
$endgroup$
– Yeah..
Feb 17 '16 at 2:22












$begingroup$
@Yeah. The question appears to be : "Did I get it right?"
$endgroup$
– Graham Kemp
Feb 17 '16 at 2:23




$begingroup$
@Yeah. The question appears to be : "Did I get it right?"
$endgroup$
– Graham Kemp
Feb 17 '16 at 2:23












$begingroup$
@GrahamKemp YES! :P
$endgroup$
– Krin Yongvongphaiboon
Feb 17 '16 at 2:24




$begingroup$
@GrahamKemp YES! :P
$endgroup$
– Krin Yongvongphaiboon
Feb 17 '16 at 2:24










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

What you have done is wrong. Why you have negated all the proposition and the then find the dual?



Like dual of (p ∧ ¬q) is (p ∨ ¬q) not (¬p ∨ q).



Here is the definition of dual of a compound proposition-
"The dual of a compound proposition that contains only the logical operators ∨, ∧, and ¬ is the compound proposition obtained by replacing each ∨ by ∧, each ∧ by ∨, each T
by F, and each F by T. The dual of s is denoted by s∗."

(Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen)



Example:

S =(p ∧ q)∨ (¬p ∨ q)∨ F

S* =(p ∨ q)∧ (¬p ∧ q)∧T (dual of S is denoted by S*)



So the correct answer to your question is:



a) p∧¬q∧¬r



b) (p∧q∧r)∨s



c) (p∨F)∧(q∨T)



answers:



a) p∨¬q∨¬r



b) (p∨q∨r)∧s



c) (p∧T)∨(q∧F)






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    -1












    $begingroup$

    Yes.   All three check: okay.



    You've negated all the propositions and dualled all the operators.



    That is what you needed to do.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for confirming :)
      $endgroup$
      – Krin Yongvongphaiboon
      Feb 17 '16 at 2:25











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1659134%2fdual-of-each-of-these-compound-propositions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    What you have done is wrong. Why you have negated all the proposition and the then find the dual?



    Like dual of (p ∧ ¬q) is (p ∨ ¬q) not (¬p ∨ q).



    Here is the definition of dual of a compound proposition-
    "The dual of a compound proposition that contains only the logical operators ∨, ∧, and ¬ is the compound proposition obtained by replacing each ∨ by ∧, each ∧ by ∨, each T
    by F, and each F by T. The dual of s is denoted by s∗."

    (Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen)



    Example:

    S =(p ∧ q)∨ (¬p ∨ q)∨ F

    S* =(p ∨ q)∧ (¬p ∧ q)∧T (dual of S is denoted by S*)



    So the correct answer to your question is:



    a) p∧¬q∧¬r



    b) (p∧q∧r)∨s



    c) (p∨F)∧(q∨T)



    answers:



    a) p∨¬q∨¬r



    b) (p∨q∨r)∧s



    c) (p∧T)∨(q∧F)






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      What you have done is wrong. Why you have negated all the proposition and the then find the dual?



      Like dual of (p ∧ ¬q) is (p ∨ ¬q) not (¬p ∨ q).



      Here is the definition of dual of a compound proposition-
      "The dual of a compound proposition that contains only the logical operators ∨, ∧, and ¬ is the compound proposition obtained by replacing each ∨ by ∧, each ∧ by ∨, each T
      by F, and each F by T. The dual of s is denoted by s∗."

      (Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen)



      Example:

      S =(p ∧ q)∨ (¬p ∨ q)∨ F

      S* =(p ∨ q)∧ (¬p ∧ q)∧T (dual of S is denoted by S*)



      So the correct answer to your question is:



      a) p∧¬q∧¬r



      b) (p∧q∧r)∨s



      c) (p∨F)∧(q∨T)



      answers:



      a) p∨¬q∨¬r



      b) (p∨q∨r)∧s



      c) (p∧T)∨(q∧F)






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        What you have done is wrong. Why you have negated all the proposition and the then find the dual?



        Like dual of (p ∧ ¬q) is (p ∨ ¬q) not (¬p ∨ q).



        Here is the definition of dual of a compound proposition-
        "The dual of a compound proposition that contains only the logical operators ∨, ∧, and ¬ is the compound proposition obtained by replacing each ∨ by ∧, each ∧ by ∨, each T
        by F, and each F by T. The dual of s is denoted by s∗."

        (Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen)



        Example:

        S =(p ∧ q)∨ (¬p ∨ q)∨ F

        S* =(p ∨ q)∧ (¬p ∧ q)∧T (dual of S is denoted by S*)



        So the correct answer to your question is:



        a) p∧¬q∧¬r



        b) (p∧q∧r)∨s



        c) (p∨F)∧(q∨T)



        answers:



        a) p∨¬q∨¬r



        b) (p∨q∨r)∧s



        c) (p∧T)∨(q∧F)






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        What you have done is wrong. Why you have negated all the proposition and the then find the dual?



        Like dual of (p ∧ ¬q) is (p ∨ ¬q) not (¬p ∨ q).



        Here is the definition of dual of a compound proposition-
        "The dual of a compound proposition that contains only the logical operators ∨, ∧, and ¬ is the compound proposition obtained by replacing each ∨ by ∧, each ∧ by ∨, each T
        by F, and each F by T. The dual of s is denoted by s∗."

        (Reference: Discrete Mathematics (7th Edition) Kenneth H. Rosen)



        Example:

        S =(p ∧ q)∨ (¬p ∨ q)∨ F

        S* =(p ∨ q)∧ (¬p ∧ q)∧T (dual of S is denoted by S*)



        So the correct answer to your question is:



        a) p∧¬q∧¬r



        b) (p∧q∧r)∨s



        c) (p∨F)∧(q∨T)



        answers:



        a) p∨¬q∨¬r



        b) (p∨q∨r)∧s



        c) (p∧T)∨(q∧F)







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 18 at 16:57

























        answered Jan 18 at 16:39









        Sumit RanjanSumit Ranjan

        315




        315























            -1












            $begingroup$

            Yes.   All three check: okay.



            You've negated all the propositions and dualled all the operators.



            That is what you needed to do.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for confirming :)
              $endgroup$
              – Krin Yongvongphaiboon
              Feb 17 '16 at 2:25
















            -1












            $begingroup$

            Yes.   All three check: okay.



            You've negated all the propositions and dualled all the operators.



            That is what you needed to do.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for confirming :)
              $endgroup$
              – Krin Yongvongphaiboon
              Feb 17 '16 at 2:25














            -1












            -1








            -1





            $begingroup$

            Yes.   All three check: okay.



            You've negated all the propositions and dualled all the operators.



            That is what you needed to do.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Yes.   All three check: okay.



            You've negated all the propositions and dualled all the operators.



            That is what you needed to do.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            answered Feb 17 '16 at 2:21


























            community wiki





            Graham Kemp













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for confirming :)
              $endgroup$
              – Krin Yongvongphaiboon
              Feb 17 '16 at 2:25


















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for confirming :)
              $endgroup$
              – Krin Yongvongphaiboon
              Feb 17 '16 at 2:25
















            $begingroup$
            Thank you for confirming :)
            $endgroup$
            – Krin Yongvongphaiboon
            Feb 17 '16 at 2:25




            $begingroup$
            Thank you for confirming :)
            $endgroup$
            – Krin Yongvongphaiboon
            Feb 17 '16 at 2:25


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1659134%2fdual-of-each-of-these-compound-propositions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?