Evaluating what looks like a Frullani integral
$begingroup$
Can the following integral be evaluated?
$$I=int_{0}^{infty} frac{e^{-ax^alpha}-e^{-bx^beta}}{x}dx$$
It looks to me as though it could be a Frullani integral, but I can't seem to find a good way to solve it (if there is one). I've even tried differentiating under the integral sign, but I couldn't seem to get anywhere with that either. If someone could be nice and either point me in the correct direction or just answer the question entirely, that would be very much appreciated. Thanks!
calculus
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can the following integral be evaluated?
$$I=int_{0}^{infty} frac{e^{-ax^alpha}-e^{-bx^beta}}{x}dx$$
It looks to me as though it could be a Frullani integral, but I can't seem to find a good way to solve it (if there is one). I've even tried differentiating under the integral sign, but I couldn't seem to get anywhere with that either. If someone could be nice and either point me in the correct direction or just answer the question entirely, that would be very much appreciated. Thanks!
calculus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is it meant to be $alpha x^alpha$ or is it intentionally two different constants?
$endgroup$
– Henry Lee
Jan 21 at 0:17
1
$begingroup$
Two different constants, sorry my code was a little bad so the integral looks tiny for some reason.
$endgroup$
– DerpyMcDerp
Jan 21 at 0:31
$begingroup$
I don’t believe is it of this form as we cannot define a function f(x) that fits both parts of the equation
$endgroup$
– Henry Lee
Jan 21 at 0:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Can the following integral be evaluated?
$$I=int_{0}^{infty} frac{e^{-ax^alpha}-e^{-bx^beta}}{x}dx$$
It looks to me as though it could be a Frullani integral, but I can't seem to find a good way to solve it (if there is one). I've even tried differentiating under the integral sign, but I couldn't seem to get anywhere with that either. If someone could be nice and either point me in the correct direction or just answer the question entirely, that would be very much appreciated. Thanks!
calculus
$endgroup$
Can the following integral be evaluated?
$$I=int_{0}^{infty} frac{e^{-ax^alpha}-e^{-bx^beta}}{x}dx$$
It looks to me as though it could be a Frullani integral, but I can't seem to find a good way to solve it (if there is one). I've even tried differentiating under the integral sign, but I couldn't seem to get anywhere with that either. If someone could be nice and either point me in the correct direction or just answer the question entirely, that would be very much appreciated. Thanks!
calculus
calculus
edited Jan 21 at 0:33
Henry Lee
2,042219
2,042219
asked Jan 21 at 0:07
DerpyMcDerpDerpyMcDerp
905
905
$begingroup$
Is it meant to be $alpha x^alpha$ or is it intentionally two different constants?
$endgroup$
– Henry Lee
Jan 21 at 0:17
1
$begingroup$
Two different constants, sorry my code was a little bad so the integral looks tiny for some reason.
$endgroup$
– DerpyMcDerp
Jan 21 at 0:31
$begingroup$
I don’t believe is it of this form as we cannot define a function f(x) that fits both parts of the equation
$endgroup$
– Henry Lee
Jan 21 at 0:48
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is it meant to be $alpha x^alpha$ or is it intentionally two different constants?
$endgroup$
– Henry Lee
Jan 21 at 0:17
1
$begingroup$
Two different constants, sorry my code was a little bad so the integral looks tiny for some reason.
$endgroup$
– DerpyMcDerp
Jan 21 at 0:31
$begingroup$
I don’t believe is it of this form as we cannot define a function f(x) that fits both parts of the equation
$endgroup$
– Henry Lee
Jan 21 at 0:48
$begingroup$
Is it meant to be $alpha x^alpha$ or is it intentionally two different constants?
$endgroup$
– Henry Lee
Jan 21 at 0:17
$begingroup$
Is it meant to be $alpha x^alpha$ or is it intentionally two different constants?
$endgroup$
– Henry Lee
Jan 21 at 0:17
1
1
$begingroup$
Two different constants, sorry my code was a little bad so the integral looks tiny for some reason.
$endgroup$
– DerpyMcDerp
Jan 21 at 0:31
$begingroup$
Two different constants, sorry my code was a little bad so the integral looks tiny for some reason.
$endgroup$
– DerpyMcDerp
Jan 21 at 0:31
$begingroup$
I don’t believe is it of this form as we cannot define a function f(x) that fits both parts of the equation
$endgroup$
– Henry Lee
Jan 21 at 0:48
$begingroup$
I don’t believe is it of this form as we cannot define a function f(x) that fits both parts of the equation
$endgroup$
– Henry Lee
Jan 21 at 0:48
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let
$$I = int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx.$$
I will assume $a,b, alpha, beta > 0$.
Integrating by parts we have
$$I = a alpha int_0^infty ln x , x^{alpha - 1} e^{-a x^alpha} , dx - b beta int_0^infty ln x, x^{beta - 1} e^{-b x^beta} , dx = I_1 - I_2.$$
In $I_1$ setting $u = ax^alpha$, gives $dx = (u/a)^{frac{1}{alpha} - 1} du/(aalpha)$. The limits of integral are unchanged since $alpha > 0$ (see below if $alpha, beta < 0$). Thus
begin{align}
I_1 &= frac{1}{alpha} int_0^infty ln left (frac{u}{a} right ) e^{-u} , du\
&= frac{1}{alpha} int_0^infty ln u e^{-u} , du - frac{ln a}{alpha} int_0^infty e^{-u} , du\
&= frac{1}{alpha} (-gamma - ln a).
end{align}
Here the integral representation for the Euler–Mascheroni constant of
$$gamma = - int_0^infty ln x e^{-x} , dx,$$
has been used.
Similarly
$I_2 = frac{1}{beta} (-gamma - ln b).$
Thus
$$int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx = frac{1}{alpha} (-gamma - ln a) - frac{1}{beta} (-gamma - ln b).$$
Note the result can be extended to all $alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$ provided the product $alpha beta$ is positive (needed if we are to have convergence in the integral). In this case the limits of integration become reversed in the substitution made in $I_1$. The final result is therefore
$$int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx = frac{1}{|alpha|} (-gamma - ln a) - frac{1}{|beta|} (-gamma - ln b), qquad a,b > 0, alpha beta > 0.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081303%2fevaluating-what-looks-like-a-frullani-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let
$$I = int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx.$$
I will assume $a,b, alpha, beta > 0$.
Integrating by parts we have
$$I = a alpha int_0^infty ln x , x^{alpha - 1} e^{-a x^alpha} , dx - b beta int_0^infty ln x, x^{beta - 1} e^{-b x^beta} , dx = I_1 - I_2.$$
In $I_1$ setting $u = ax^alpha$, gives $dx = (u/a)^{frac{1}{alpha} - 1} du/(aalpha)$. The limits of integral are unchanged since $alpha > 0$ (see below if $alpha, beta < 0$). Thus
begin{align}
I_1 &= frac{1}{alpha} int_0^infty ln left (frac{u}{a} right ) e^{-u} , du\
&= frac{1}{alpha} int_0^infty ln u e^{-u} , du - frac{ln a}{alpha} int_0^infty e^{-u} , du\
&= frac{1}{alpha} (-gamma - ln a).
end{align}
Here the integral representation for the Euler–Mascheroni constant of
$$gamma = - int_0^infty ln x e^{-x} , dx,$$
has been used.
Similarly
$I_2 = frac{1}{beta} (-gamma - ln b).$
Thus
$$int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx = frac{1}{alpha} (-gamma - ln a) - frac{1}{beta} (-gamma - ln b).$$
Note the result can be extended to all $alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$ provided the product $alpha beta$ is positive (needed if we are to have convergence in the integral). In this case the limits of integration become reversed in the substitution made in $I_1$. The final result is therefore
$$int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx = frac{1}{|alpha|} (-gamma - ln a) - frac{1}{|beta|} (-gamma - ln b), qquad a,b > 0, alpha beta > 0.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let
$$I = int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx.$$
I will assume $a,b, alpha, beta > 0$.
Integrating by parts we have
$$I = a alpha int_0^infty ln x , x^{alpha - 1} e^{-a x^alpha} , dx - b beta int_0^infty ln x, x^{beta - 1} e^{-b x^beta} , dx = I_1 - I_2.$$
In $I_1$ setting $u = ax^alpha$, gives $dx = (u/a)^{frac{1}{alpha} - 1} du/(aalpha)$. The limits of integral are unchanged since $alpha > 0$ (see below if $alpha, beta < 0$). Thus
begin{align}
I_1 &= frac{1}{alpha} int_0^infty ln left (frac{u}{a} right ) e^{-u} , du\
&= frac{1}{alpha} int_0^infty ln u e^{-u} , du - frac{ln a}{alpha} int_0^infty e^{-u} , du\
&= frac{1}{alpha} (-gamma - ln a).
end{align}
Here the integral representation for the Euler–Mascheroni constant of
$$gamma = - int_0^infty ln x e^{-x} , dx,$$
has been used.
Similarly
$I_2 = frac{1}{beta} (-gamma - ln b).$
Thus
$$int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx = frac{1}{alpha} (-gamma - ln a) - frac{1}{beta} (-gamma - ln b).$$
Note the result can be extended to all $alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$ provided the product $alpha beta$ is positive (needed if we are to have convergence in the integral). In this case the limits of integration become reversed in the substitution made in $I_1$. The final result is therefore
$$int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx = frac{1}{|alpha|} (-gamma - ln a) - frac{1}{|beta|} (-gamma - ln b), qquad a,b > 0, alpha beta > 0.$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let
$$I = int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx.$$
I will assume $a,b, alpha, beta > 0$.
Integrating by parts we have
$$I = a alpha int_0^infty ln x , x^{alpha - 1} e^{-a x^alpha} , dx - b beta int_0^infty ln x, x^{beta - 1} e^{-b x^beta} , dx = I_1 - I_2.$$
In $I_1$ setting $u = ax^alpha$, gives $dx = (u/a)^{frac{1}{alpha} - 1} du/(aalpha)$. The limits of integral are unchanged since $alpha > 0$ (see below if $alpha, beta < 0$). Thus
begin{align}
I_1 &= frac{1}{alpha} int_0^infty ln left (frac{u}{a} right ) e^{-u} , du\
&= frac{1}{alpha} int_0^infty ln u e^{-u} , du - frac{ln a}{alpha} int_0^infty e^{-u} , du\
&= frac{1}{alpha} (-gamma - ln a).
end{align}
Here the integral representation for the Euler–Mascheroni constant of
$$gamma = - int_0^infty ln x e^{-x} , dx,$$
has been used.
Similarly
$I_2 = frac{1}{beta} (-gamma - ln b).$
Thus
$$int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx = frac{1}{alpha} (-gamma - ln a) - frac{1}{beta} (-gamma - ln b).$$
Note the result can be extended to all $alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$ provided the product $alpha beta$ is positive (needed if we are to have convergence in the integral). In this case the limits of integration become reversed in the substitution made in $I_1$. The final result is therefore
$$int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx = frac{1}{|alpha|} (-gamma - ln a) - frac{1}{|beta|} (-gamma - ln b), qquad a,b > 0, alpha beta > 0.$$
$endgroup$
Let
$$I = int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx.$$
I will assume $a,b, alpha, beta > 0$.
Integrating by parts we have
$$I = a alpha int_0^infty ln x , x^{alpha - 1} e^{-a x^alpha} , dx - b beta int_0^infty ln x, x^{beta - 1} e^{-b x^beta} , dx = I_1 - I_2.$$
In $I_1$ setting $u = ax^alpha$, gives $dx = (u/a)^{frac{1}{alpha} - 1} du/(aalpha)$. The limits of integral are unchanged since $alpha > 0$ (see below if $alpha, beta < 0$). Thus
begin{align}
I_1 &= frac{1}{alpha} int_0^infty ln left (frac{u}{a} right ) e^{-u} , du\
&= frac{1}{alpha} int_0^infty ln u e^{-u} , du - frac{ln a}{alpha} int_0^infty e^{-u} , du\
&= frac{1}{alpha} (-gamma - ln a).
end{align}
Here the integral representation for the Euler–Mascheroni constant of
$$gamma = - int_0^infty ln x e^{-x} , dx,$$
has been used.
Similarly
$I_2 = frac{1}{beta} (-gamma - ln b).$
Thus
$$int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx = frac{1}{alpha} (-gamma - ln a) - frac{1}{beta} (-gamma - ln b).$$
Note the result can be extended to all $alpha, beta in mathbb{R}$ provided the product $alpha beta$ is positive (needed if we are to have convergence in the integral). In this case the limits of integration become reversed in the substitution made in $I_1$. The final result is therefore
$$int_0^infty frac{e^{-ax^alpha} - e^{-b x^beta}}{x} , dx = frac{1}{|alpha|} (-gamma - ln a) - frac{1}{|beta|} (-gamma - ln b), qquad a,b > 0, alpha beta > 0.$$
edited Jan 21 at 5:19
answered Jan 21 at 1:59
omegadotomegadot
6,0222828
6,0222828
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081303%2fevaluating-what-looks-like-a-frullani-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Is it meant to be $alpha x^alpha$ or is it intentionally two different constants?
$endgroup$
– Henry Lee
Jan 21 at 0:17
1
$begingroup$
Two different constants, sorry my code was a little bad so the integral looks tiny for some reason.
$endgroup$
– DerpyMcDerp
Jan 21 at 0:31
$begingroup$
I don’t believe is it of this form as we cannot define a function f(x) that fits both parts of the equation
$endgroup$
– Henry Lee
Jan 21 at 0:48