What is the negation of a closed subset?

Multi tool use
$begingroup$
Closed subset:= If $(a_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ converges and the elements of the sequence are all in $A$ then the Limit sits in $A$.
If I could Show that there exists a convergent sequence where all the Elements of the sequence are in $A$ and the Limit is not in $A$ would it be equivalent to say that $A$ is not a closed subset?$(*)$
I.e $A$ not a closed subset $iff exists (a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$ convergent and $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nnotin A$
I have the Feeling that something is wrong because the Definition says:
$A$ closed subset $iff forall(a_n)_{ninmathbb{N}},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}} convergentRightarrow lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nin A$
Therefor the Negation would have to be
$A$ not closed subset $iff forall(a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$ convergent and $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nnotin A$
If I have $(*)$ can it help me to prove:
$A$ closed subset $iff A^C$ is open
general-topology definition
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Closed subset:= If $(a_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ converges and the elements of the sequence are all in $A$ then the Limit sits in $A$.
If I could Show that there exists a convergent sequence where all the Elements of the sequence are in $A$ and the Limit is not in $A$ would it be equivalent to say that $A$ is not a closed subset?$(*)$
I.e $A$ not a closed subset $iff exists (a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$ convergent and $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nnotin A$
I have the Feeling that something is wrong because the Definition says:
$A$ closed subset $iff forall(a_n)_{ninmathbb{N}},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}} convergentRightarrow lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nin A$
Therefor the Negation would have to be
$A$ not closed subset $iff forall(a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$ convergent and $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nnotin A$
If I have $(*)$ can it help me to prove:
$A$ closed subset $iff A^C$ is open
general-topology definition
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it should be exists, as you describe at the beginning of your post. The negation at the end of your post is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 19:21
1
$begingroup$
The negation of $forall$ is $exists$.
$endgroup$
– hamam_Abdallah
Jan 13 at 19:22
$begingroup$
but $neg (ARightarrow B )= A$ and $neg B$ with $A$ being:$forall(a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$convergent and $B$ being $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nin A$
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 13 at 19:25
$begingroup$
You said I have to Change the quantorsign but the Formula above says that A must remain as it is
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 13 at 19:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Closed subset:= If $(a_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ converges and the elements of the sequence are all in $A$ then the Limit sits in $A$.
If I could Show that there exists a convergent sequence where all the Elements of the sequence are in $A$ and the Limit is not in $A$ would it be equivalent to say that $A$ is not a closed subset?$(*)$
I.e $A$ not a closed subset $iff exists (a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$ convergent and $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nnotin A$
I have the Feeling that something is wrong because the Definition says:
$A$ closed subset $iff forall(a_n)_{ninmathbb{N}},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}} convergentRightarrow lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nin A$
Therefor the Negation would have to be
$A$ not closed subset $iff forall(a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$ convergent and $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nnotin A$
If I have $(*)$ can it help me to prove:
$A$ closed subset $iff A^C$ is open
general-topology definition
$endgroup$
Closed subset:= If $(a_n)_{ninmathbb{N}}$ converges and the elements of the sequence are all in $A$ then the Limit sits in $A$.
If I could Show that there exists a convergent sequence where all the Elements of the sequence are in $A$ and the Limit is not in $A$ would it be equivalent to say that $A$ is not a closed subset?$(*)$
I.e $A$ not a closed subset $iff exists (a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$ convergent and $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nnotin A$
I have the Feeling that something is wrong because the Definition says:
$A$ closed subset $iff forall(a_n)_{ninmathbb{N}},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}} convergentRightarrow lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nin A$
Therefor the Negation would have to be
$A$ not closed subset $iff forall(a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$ convergent and $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nnotin A$
If I have $(*)$ can it help me to prove:
$A$ closed subset $iff A^C$ is open
general-topology definition
general-topology definition
edited Jan 13 at 19:29
RM777
asked Jan 13 at 19:18
RM777RM777
38512
38512
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it should be exists, as you describe at the beginning of your post. The negation at the end of your post is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 19:21
1
$begingroup$
The negation of $forall$ is $exists$.
$endgroup$
– hamam_Abdallah
Jan 13 at 19:22
$begingroup$
but $neg (ARightarrow B )= A$ and $neg B$ with $A$ being:$forall(a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$convergent and $B$ being $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nin A$
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 13 at 19:25
$begingroup$
You said I have to Change the quantorsign but the Formula above says that A must remain as it is
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 13 at 19:27
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it should be exists, as you describe at the beginning of your post. The negation at the end of your post is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 19:21
1
$begingroup$
The negation of $forall$ is $exists$.
$endgroup$
– hamam_Abdallah
Jan 13 at 19:22
$begingroup$
but $neg (ARightarrow B )= A$ and $neg B$ with $A$ being:$forall(a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$convergent and $B$ being $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nin A$
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 13 at 19:25
$begingroup$
You said I have to Change the quantorsign but the Formula above says that A must remain as it is
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 13 at 19:27
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it should be exists, as you describe at the beginning of your post. The negation at the end of your post is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 19:21
$begingroup$
Yes, it should be exists, as you describe at the beginning of your post. The negation at the end of your post is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 19:21
1
1
$begingroup$
The negation of $forall$ is $exists$.
$endgroup$
– hamam_Abdallah
Jan 13 at 19:22
$begingroup$
The negation of $forall$ is $exists$.
$endgroup$
– hamam_Abdallah
Jan 13 at 19:22
$begingroup$
but $neg (ARightarrow B )= A$ and $neg B$ with $A$ being:$forall(a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$convergent and $B$ being $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nin A$
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 13 at 19:25
$begingroup$
but $neg (ARightarrow B )= A$ and $neg B$ with $A$ being:$forall(a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$convergent and $B$ being $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nin A$
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 13 at 19:25
$begingroup$
You said I have to Change the quantorsign but the Formula above says that A must remain as it is
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 13 at 19:27
$begingroup$
You said I have to Change the quantorsign but the Formula above says that A must remain as it is
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 13 at 19:27
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you define closed as sequentially closed (so every sequence in $A$ that converges in $X$ to $p$ has $ p in A$ too), then the logical negation of that
$A$ is not closed iff there exists some sequence $(a_n)$ converging to $p$ where all $a_n in A$ but $p notin A$. (so one such sequence is enough to disprove closedness).
I don't see how that helps you proving $A$ closed iff its complement is open if you don't also have a definition of open sets in terms of sequences.
A final word of caution: said equivalence of closed and sequentially closed does not holds in all spaces (but it does in e.g. metric spaces, a very common case).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072413%2fwhat-is-the-negation-of-a-closed-subset%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you define closed as sequentially closed (so every sequence in $A$ that converges in $X$ to $p$ has $ p in A$ too), then the logical negation of that
$A$ is not closed iff there exists some sequence $(a_n)$ converging to $p$ where all $a_n in A$ but $p notin A$. (so one such sequence is enough to disprove closedness).
I don't see how that helps you proving $A$ closed iff its complement is open if you don't also have a definition of open sets in terms of sequences.
A final word of caution: said equivalence of closed and sequentially closed does not holds in all spaces (but it does in e.g. metric spaces, a very common case).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you define closed as sequentially closed (so every sequence in $A$ that converges in $X$ to $p$ has $ p in A$ too), then the logical negation of that
$A$ is not closed iff there exists some sequence $(a_n)$ converging to $p$ where all $a_n in A$ but $p notin A$. (so one such sequence is enough to disprove closedness).
I don't see how that helps you proving $A$ closed iff its complement is open if you don't also have a definition of open sets in terms of sequences.
A final word of caution: said equivalence of closed and sequentially closed does not holds in all spaces (but it does in e.g. metric spaces, a very common case).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you define closed as sequentially closed (so every sequence in $A$ that converges in $X$ to $p$ has $ p in A$ too), then the logical negation of that
$A$ is not closed iff there exists some sequence $(a_n)$ converging to $p$ where all $a_n in A$ but $p notin A$. (so one such sequence is enough to disprove closedness).
I don't see how that helps you proving $A$ closed iff its complement is open if you don't also have a definition of open sets in terms of sequences.
A final word of caution: said equivalence of closed and sequentially closed does not holds in all spaces (but it does in e.g. metric spaces, a very common case).
$endgroup$
If you define closed as sequentially closed (so every sequence in $A$ that converges in $X$ to $p$ has $ p in A$ too), then the logical negation of that
$A$ is not closed iff there exists some sequence $(a_n)$ converging to $p$ where all $a_n in A$ but $p notin A$. (so one such sequence is enough to disprove closedness).
I don't see how that helps you proving $A$ closed iff its complement is open if you don't also have a definition of open sets in terms of sequences.
A final word of caution: said equivalence of closed and sequentially closed does not holds in all spaces (but it does in e.g. metric spaces, a very common case).
answered Jan 13 at 23:01
Henno BrandsmaHenno Brandsma
107k347114
107k347114
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3072413%2fwhat-is-the-negation-of-a-closed-subset%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
seWk7lvKIpAvM0cfvjTdm5wxa9I vltg,wl9FfFjfBEu DZ6E VFEhoIk8 fTDjR2Wnl,Xn
1
$begingroup$
Yes, it should be exists, as you describe at the beginning of your post. The negation at the end of your post is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– angryavian
Jan 13 at 19:21
1
$begingroup$
The negation of $forall$ is $exists$.
$endgroup$
– hamam_Abdallah
Jan 13 at 19:22
$begingroup$
but $neg (ARightarrow B )= A$ and $neg B$ with $A$ being:$forall(a_n)_ninmathbb{N},a_nin A forall_{ninmathbb{N}}$convergent and $B$ being $lim_{nrightarrowinfty}a_nin A$
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 13 at 19:25
$begingroup$
You said I have to Change the quantorsign but the Formula above says that A must remain as it is
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 13 at 19:27