What does it mean for a complex differential form on a complex manifold to be real?












0












$begingroup$


I am trying to read Kobayashi's "Differential geometry of complex vector bundles". There are many places where a complex differential form is referred to as being real. e.g



Chapter I, Proposition 7.24 p. 28 " A closed real $(p,p)$ form $omega$ on a compact Kähler manifold M is cohomologous to zero if and only if $ omega = id' d'' phi $ for some real $(p-1,p-1)$-form $phi. $ "



Similarly, p. 41 Chapter II, Proposition 2.23 " Given any closed real $(1,1)$-form $phi$ representing $c_{1}(E),$ there is an Hermitian structure $h$ in $E$ such that $phi = c_{1}(E)$ provided $M$ is compact Kähler."



What does it mean? Does it mean that the coefficients are real valued function? Or does it mean that it is the same under complex conjugation?
i.e. $bar{phi} = phi ? $



To be more explicit,



Let $alpha, beta : mathbb{C}^{2} rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be real valued smooth functions and let $$ phi = [alpha(z_{1}, z_{2}) + i beta(z_{1}, z_{2})] dz_{1}wedge dbar{z_{2}} - [alpha(z_{1}, z_{2}) - i beta(z_{1}, z_{2})] dz_{2}wedge dbar{z_{1}} . $$



This is a $(1,1)$-form on $mathbb{C}^{2}$ with the property that $bar{phi} = phi, $ since $ overline{dz_{1}wedge dbar{z_{2}}} = - dz_{2}wedge dbar{z_{1}},$ but this is a real valued form only if $beta equiv 0$ on $mathbb{C}^{2}.$ Or does $phi$ being real mean something else?



Thanks in advance for any help.






differential-geometry differential-forms complex-geometry







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am trying to read Kobayashi's "Differential geometry of complex vector bundles". There are many places where a complex differential form is referred to as being real. e.g



    Chapter I, Proposition 7.24 p. 28 " A closed real $(p,p)$ form $omega$ on a compact Kähler manifold M is cohomologous to zero if and only if $ omega = id' d'' phi $ for some real $(p-1,p-1)$-form $phi. $ "



    Similarly, p. 41 Chapter II, Proposition 2.23 " Given any closed real $(1,1)$-form $phi$ representing $c_{1}(E),$ there is an Hermitian structure $h$ in $E$ such that $phi = c_{1}(E)$ provided $M$ is compact Kähler."



    What does it mean? Does it mean that the coefficients are real valued function? Or does it mean that it is the same under complex conjugation?
    i.e. $bar{phi} = phi ? $



    To be more explicit,



    Let $alpha, beta : mathbb{C}^{2} rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be real valued smooth functions and let $$ phi = [alpha(z_{1}, z_{2}) + i beta(z_{1}, z_{2})] dz_{1}wedge dbar{z_{2}} - [alpha(z_{1}, z_{2}) - i beta(z_{1}, z_{2})] dz_{2}wedge dbar{z_{1}} . $$



    This is a $(1,1)$-form on $mathbb{C}^{2}$ with the property that $bar{phi} = phi, $ since $ overline{dz_{1}wedge dbar{z_{2}}} = - dz_{2}wedge dbar{z_{1}},$ but this is a real valued form only if $beta equiv 0$ on $mathbb{C}^{2}.$ Or does $phi$ being real mean something else?



    Thanks in advance for any help.






    differential-geometry differential-forms complex-geometry







    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I am trying to read Kobayashi's "Differential geometry of complex vector bundles". There are many places where a complex differential form is referred to as being real. e.g



      Chapter I, Proposition 7.24 p. 28 " A closed real $(p,p)$ form $omega$ on a compact Kähler manifold M is cohomologous to zero if and only if $ omega = id' d'' phi $ for some real $(p-1,p-1)$-form $phi. $ "



      Similarly, p. 41 Chapter II, Proposition 2.23 " Given any closed real $(1,1)$-form $phi$ representing $c_{1}(E),$ there is an Hermitian structure $h$ in $E$ such that $phi = c_{1}(E)$ provided $M$ is compact Kähler."



      What does it mean? Does it mean that the coefficients are real valued function? Or does it mean that it is the same under complex conjugation?
      i.e. $bar{phi} = phi ? $



      To be more explicit,



      Let $alpha, beta : mathbb{C}^{2} rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be real valued smooth functions and let $$ phi = [alpha(z_{1}, z_{2}) + i beta(z_{1}, z_{2})] dz_{1}wedge dbar{z_{2}} - [alpha(z_{1}, z_{2}) - i beta(z_{1}, z_{2})] dz_{2}wedge dbar{z_{1}} . $$



      This is a $(1,1)$-form on $mathbb{C}^{2}$ with the property that $bar{phi} = phi, $ since $ overline{dz_{1}wedge dbar{z_{2}}} = - dz_{2}wedge dbar{z_{1}},$ but this is a real valued form only if $beta equiv 0$ on $mathbb{C}^{2}.$ Or does $phi$ being real mean something else?



      Thanks in advance for any help.






      differential-geometry differential-forms complex-geometry







      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am trying to read Kobayashi's "Differential geometry of complex vector bundles". There are many places where a complex differential form is referred to as being real. e.g



      Chapter I, Proposition 7.24 p. 28 " A closed real $(p,p)$ form $omega$ on a compact Kähler manifold M is cohomologous to zero if and only if $ omega = id' d'' phi $ for some real $(p-1,p-1)$-form $phi. $ "



      Similarly, p. 41 Chapter II, Proposition 2.23 " Given any closed real $(1,1)$-form $phi$ representing $c_{1}(E),$ there is an Hermitian structure $h$ in $E$ such that $phi = c_{1}(E)$ provided $M$ is compact Kähler."



      What does it mean? Does it mean that the coefficients are real valued function? Or does it mean that it is the same under complex conjugation?
      i.e. $bar{phi} = phi ? $



      To be more explicit,



      Let $alpha, beta : mathbb{C}^{2} rightarrow mathbb{R}$ be real valued smooth functions and let $$ phi = [alpha(z_{1}, z_{2}) + i beta(z_{1}, z_{2})] dz_{1}wedge dbar{z_{2}} - [alpha(z_{1}, z_{2}) - i beta(z_{1}, z_{2})] dz_{2}wedge dbar{z_{1}} . $$



      This is a $(1,1)$-form on $mathbb{C}^{2}$ with the property that $bar{phi} = phi, $ since $ overline{dz_{1}wedge dbar{z_{2}}} = - dz_{2}wedge dbar{z_{1}},$ but this is a real valued form only if $beta equiv 0$ on $mathbb{C}^{2}.$ Or does $phi$ being real mean something else?



      Thanks in advance for any help.






      differential-geometry differential-forms complex-geometry




      differential-geometry differential-forms complex-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 21 '18 at 15:13







      Swarnendu Sil

















      asked Dec 21 '18 at 14:59









      Swarnendu SilSwarnendu Sil

      799




      799






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          That means if you write $dz_j=dx_j+sqrt{-1}dy_j$ and expand everything you are left with only real coefficients. For example, a $(1,1)$-form $xi dzwedge d overline{z}$ is real if writing $xi=alpha+sqrt{-1}beta$ and $dz=dx+sqrt{-1}dy$,$$xi dzwedge doverline{z}=(alpha+sqrt{-1}beta)(-2sqrt{-1}dxwedge dy)$$ has real coefficient, i.e., $(alpha+sqrt{-1}beta)(-2sqrt{-1})$ is a real function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I am not absolutely sure, but I think what is you said is always equivalent to requiring $bar{phi} = phi .$ At any rate, your answer clarifies the point that being real and being real-valued are distinct notions. My example above is real, since in real co-ordinates, it would be $2 alpha ( dx_{1}wedge dx_{2} + dy_{1}wedge dy_{2}) + 2 beta ( dx_{1}wedge dy_{2} + dx_{2}wedge dy_{1}).$ But it is not real-valued unless $beta = 0.$ Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Swarnendu Sil
            Jan 11 at 19:21












          • $begingroup$
            You’re welcome, yes they are equivalent
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Huang
            Jan 11 at 20:15











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048573%2fwhat-does-it-mean-for-a-complex-differential-form-on-a-complex-manifold-to-be-re%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          That means if you write $dz_j=dx_j+sqrt{-1}dy_j$ and expand everything you are left with only real coefficients. For example, a $(1,1)$-form $xi dzwedge d overline{z}$ is real if writing $xi=alpha+sqrt{-1}beta$ and $dz=dx+sqrt{-1}dy$,$$xi dzwedge doverline{z}=(alpha+sqrt{-1}beta)(-2sqrt{-1}dxwedge dy)$$ has real coefficient, i.e., $(alpha+sqrt{-1}beta)(-2sqrt{-1})$ is a real function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I am not absolutely sure, but I think what is you said is always equivalent to requiring $bar{phi} = phi .$ At any rate, your answer clarifies the point that being real and being real-valued are distinct notions. My example above is real, since in real co-ordinates, it would be $2 alpha ( dx_{1}wedge dx_{2} + dy_{1}wedge dy_{2}) + 2 beta ( dx_{1}wedge dy_{2} + dx_{2}wedge dy_{1}).$ But it is not real-valued unless $beta = 0.$ Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Swarnendu Sil
            Jan 11 at 19:21












          • $begingroup$
            You’re welcome, yes they are equivalent
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Huang
            Jan 11 at 20:15
















          1












          $begingroup$

          That means if you write $dz_j=dx_j+sqrt{-1}dy_j$ and expand everything you are left with only real coefficients. For example, a $(1,1)$-form $xi dzwedge d overline{z}$ is real if writing $xi=alpha+sqrt{-1}beta$ and $dz=dx+sqrt{-1}dy$,$$xi dzwedge doverline{z}=(alpha+sqrt{-1}beta)(-2sqrt{-1}dxwedge dy)$$ has real coefficient, i.e., $(alpha+sqrt{-1}beta)(-2sqrt{-1})$ is a real function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$









          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I am not absolutely sure, but I think what is you said is always equivalent to requiring $bar{phi} = phi .$ At any rate, your answer clarifies the point that being real and being real-valued are distinct notions. My example above is real, since in real co-ordinates, it would be $2 alpha ( dx_{1}wedge dx_{2} + dy_{1}wedge dy_{2}) + 2 beta ( dx_{1}wedge dy_{2} + dx_{2}wedge dy_{1}).$ But it is not real-valued unless $beta = 0.$ Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Swarnendu Sil
            Jan 11 at 19:21












          • $begingroup$
            You’re welcome, yes they are equivalent
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Huang
            Jan 11 at 20:15














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          That means if you write $dz_j=dx_j+sqrt{-1}dy_j$ and expand everything you are left with only real coefficients. For example, a $(1,1)$-form $xi dzwedge d overline{z}$ is real if writing $xi=alpha+sqrt{-1}beta$ and $dz=dx+sqrt{-1}dy$,$$xi dzwedge doverline{z}=(alpha+sqrt{-1}beta)(-2sqrt{-1}dxwedge dy)$$ has real coefficient, i.e., $(alpha+sqrt{-1}beta)(-2sqrt{-1})$ is a real function.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          That means if you write $dz_j=dx_j+sqrt{-1}dy_j$ and expand everything you are left with only real coefficients. For example, a $(1,1)$-form $xi dzwedge d overline{z}$ is real if writing $xi=alpha+sqrt{-1}beta$ and $dz=dx+sqrt{-1}dy$,$$xi dzwedge doverline{z}=(alpha+sqrt{-1}beta)(-2sqrt{-1}dxwedge dy)$$ has real coefficient, i.e., $(alpha+sqrt{-1}beta)(-2sqrt{-1})$ is a real function.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 11 at 18:33









          Chris HuangChris Huang

          13019




          13019








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I am not absolutely sure, but I think what is you said is always equivalent to requiring $bar{phi} = phi .$ At any rate, your answer clarifies the point that being real and being real-valued are distinct notions. My example above is real, since in real co-ordinates, it would be $2 alpha ( dx_{1}wedge dx_{2} + dy_{1}wedge dy_{2}) + 2 beta ( dx_{1}wedge dy_{2} + dx_{2}wedge dy_{1}).$ But it is not real-valued unless $beta = 0.$ Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Swarnendu Sil
            Jan 11 at 19:21












          • $begingroup$
            You’re welcome, yes they are equivalent
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Huang
            Jan 11 at 20:15














          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I am not absolutely sure, but I think what is you said is always equivalent to requiring $bar{phi} = phi .$ At any rate, your answer clarifies the point that being real and being real-valued are distinct notions. My example above is real, since in real co-ordinates, it would be $2 alpha ( dx_{1}wedge dx_{2} + dy_{1}wedge dy_{2}) + 2 beta ( dx_{1}wedge dy_{2} + dx_{2}wedge dy_{1}).$ But it is not real-valued unless $beta = 0.$ Thanks.
            $endgroup$
            – Swarnendu Sil
            Jan 11 at 19:21












          • $begingroup$
            You’re welcome, yes they are equivalent
            $endgroup$
            – Chris Huang
            Jan 11 at 20:15








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I am not absolutely sure, but I think what is you said is always equivalent to requiring $bar{phi} = phi .$ At any rate, your answer clarifies the point that being real and being real-valued are distinct notions. My example above is real, since in real co-ordinates, it would be $2 alpha ( dx_{1}wedge dx_{2} + dy_{1}wedge dy_{2}) + 2 beta ( dx_{1}wedge dy_{2} + dx_{2}wedge dy_{1}).$ But it is not real-valued unless $beta = 0.$ Thanks.
          $endgroup$
          – Swarnendu Sil
          Jan 11 at 19:21






          $begingroup$
          I am not absolutely sure, but I think what is you said is always equivalent to requiring $bar{phi} = phi .$ At any rate, your answer clarifies the point that being real and being real-valued are distinct notions. My example above is real, since in real co-ordinates, it would be $2 alpha ( dx_{1}wedge dx_{2} + dy_{1}wedge dy_{2}) + 2 beta ( dx_{1}wedge dy_{2} + dx_{2}wedge dy_{1}).$ But it is not real-valued unless $beta = 0.$ Thanks.
          $endgroup$
          – Swarnendu Sil
          Jan 11 at 19:21














          $begingroup$
          You’re welcome, yes they are equivalent
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Huang
          Jan 11 at 20:15




          $begingroup$
          You’re welcome, yes they are equivalent
          $endgroup$
          – Chris Huang
          Jan 11 at 20:15


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3048573%2fwhat-does-it-mean-for-a-complex-differential-form-on-a-complex-manifold-to-be-re%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          Image
          Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
          Read more

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

          Image
          5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
          Read more

          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

          Image
          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
          Read more