A question concerning higher residues (quadratic and so on)












1












$begingroup$


When $x equiv a pmod{n}$ one says that $a$ is the residue of $x$ modulo $n$.



So one can define:




$a$ is a 1-residue modulo $n$ if there is an $x$ with $x equiv a
pmod{n}$
.




Clearly, every $a<n$ is a 1-residue modulo $n$.



When $x^2 equiv a pmod{n}$ one says that $a$ is the quadratic residue of $x$ modulo $n$.



So one can define:




$a$ is a 2-residue modulo $n$ if there is an $x$ with $x^2 equiv a
pmod{n}$
.




In general:




$a$ is a k-residue modulo $n$ if there is an $x$ with $x^k equiv a
pmod{n}$
.




And finally




$a$ is a higher residue modulo $n$ when it is a k-residue modulo
$n$ for some $k>1$.




In other words:




$a$ is a higher residue modulo $n$ when there is a $k>1$ and
an $x$ with $x^k equiv a pmod{n}$.




I have learned that




$a$ is a higher residue modulo $n$ iff it is a 1-residue modulo $n$.




– i.e. every $a < n$ is a higher residue.



An argument, why this is so, was given by Darij Grinberg in a comment to another question. It involves Euler's totient function $varphi$:




You can take $k=varphi(n)+1$ as $x^{varphi(n)} equiv 1 pmod{n}$
for each $x$ coprime to $n$.




Could anyone please clarify this argument - for me it's too concise.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That argument only works for those classes prime to $n$. If, say, you let $n=4, a=2$ there is no $k>1$ for which $x^kequiv 2pmod 4$ has a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 11 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu: Which "classes prime to $n$" do you mean? I only know "numbers coprime to $n$".
    $endgroup$
    – Hans Stricker
    Jan 11 at 21:09












  • $begingroup$
    Same thing. I mean the numbers coprime to $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 11 at 21:14
















1












$begingroup$


When $x equiv a pmod{n}$ one says that $a$ is the residue of $x$ modulo $n$.



So one can define:




$a$ is a 1-residue modulo $n$ if there is an $x$ with $x equiv a
pmod{n}$
.




Clearly, every $a<n$ is a 1-residue modulo $n$.



When $x^2 equiv a pmod{n}$ one says that $a$ is the quadratic residue of $x$ modulo $n$.



So one can define:




$a$ is a 2-residue modulo $n$ if there is an $x$ with $x^2 equiv a
pmod{n}$
.




In general:




$a$ is a k-residue modulo $n$ if there is an $x$ with $x^k equiv a
pmod{n}$
.




And finally




$a$ is a higher residue modulo $n$ when it is a k-residue modulo
$n$ for some $k>1$.




In other words:




$a$ is a higher residue modulo $n$ when there is a $k>1$ and
an $x$ with $x^k equiv a pmod{n}$.




I have learned that




$a$ is a higher residue modulo $n$ iff it is a 1-residue modulo $n$.




– i.e. every $a < n$ is a higher residue.



An argument, why this is so, was given by Darij Grinberg in a comment to another question. It involves Euler's totient function $varphi$:




You can take $k=varphi(n)+1$ as $x^{varphi(n)} equiv 1 pmod{n}$
for each $x$ coprime to $n$.




Could anyone please clarify this argument - for me it's too concise.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That argument only works for those classes prime to $n$. If, say, you let $n=4, a=2$ there is no $k>1$ for which $x^kequiv 2pmod 4$ has a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 11 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu: Which "classes prime to $n$" do you mean? I only know "numbers coprime to $n$".
    $endgroup$
    – Hans Stricker
    Jan 11 at 21:09












  • $begingroup$
    Same thing. I mean the numbers coprime to $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 11 at 21:14














1












1








1





$begingroup$


When $x equiv a pmod{n}$ one says that $a$ is the residue of $x$ modulo $n$.



So one can define:




$a$ is a 1-residue modulo $n$ if there is an $x$ with $x equiv a
pmod{n}$
.




Clearly, every $a<n$ is a 1-residue modulo $n$.



When $x^2 equiv a pmod{n}$ one says that $a$ is the quadratic residue of $x$ modulo $n$.



So one can define:




$a$ is a 2-residue modulo $n$ if there is an $x$ with $x^2 equiv a
pmod{n}$
.




In general:




$a$ is a k-residue modulo $n$ if there is an $x$ with $x^k equiv a
pmod{n}$
.




And finally




$a$ is a higher residue modulo $n$ when it is a k-residue modulo
$n$ for some $k>1$.




In other words:




$a$ is a higher residue modulo $n$ when there is a $k>1$ and
an $x$ with $x^k equiv a pmod{n}$.




I have learned that




$a$ is a higher residue modulo $n$ iff it is a 1-residue modulo $n$.




– i.e. every $a < n$ is a higher residue.



An argument, why this is so, was given by Darij Grinberg in a comment to another question. It involves Euler's totient function $varphi$:




You can take $k=varphi(n)+1$ as $x^{varphi(n)} equiv 1 pmod{n}$
for each $x$ coprime to $n$.




Could anyone please clarify this argument - for me it's too concise.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




When $x equiv a pmod{n}$ one says that $a$ is the residue of $x$ modulo $n$.



So one can define:




$a$ is a 1-residue modulo $n$ if there is an $x$ with $x equiv a
pmod{n}$
.




Clearly, every $a<n$ is a 1-residue modulo $n$.



When $x^2 equiv a pmod{n}$ one says that $a$ is the quadratic residue of $x$ modulo $n$.



So one can define:




$a$ is a 2-residue modulo $n$ if there is an $x$ with $x^2 equiv a
pmod{n}$
.




In general:




$a$ is a k-residue modulo $n$ if there is an $x$ with $x^k equiv a
pmod{n}$
.




And finally




$a$ is a higher residue modulo $n$ when it is a k-residue modulo
$n$ for some $k>1$.




In other words:




$a$ is a higher residue modulo $n$ when there is a $k>1$ and
an $x$ with $x^k equiv a pmod{n}$.




I have learned that




$a$ is a higher residue modulo $n$ iff it is a 1-residue modulo $n$.




– i.e. every $a < n$ is a higher residue.



An argument, why this is so, was given by Darij Grinberg in a comment to another question. It involves Euler's totient function $varphi$:




You can take $k=varphi(n)+1$ as $x^{varphi(n)} equiv 1 pmod{n}$
for each $x$ coprime to $n$.




Could anyone please clarify this argument - for me it's too concise.







elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic totient-function quadratic-residues






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 11 at 20:57









Hans StrickerHans Stricker

6,03043886




6,03043886












  • $begingroup$
    That argument only works for those classes prime to $n$. If, say, you let $n=4, a=2$ there is no $k>1$ for which $x^kequiv 2pmod 4$ has a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 11 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu: Which "classes prime to $n$" do you mean? I only know "numbers coprime to $n$".
    $endgroup$
    – Hans Stricker
    Jan 11 at 21:09












  • $begingroup$
    Same thing. I mean the numbers coprime to $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 11 at 21:14


















  • $begingroup$
    That argument only works for those classes prime to $n$. If, say, you let $n=4, a=2$ there is no $k>1$ for which $x^kequiv 2pmod 4$ has a solution.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 11 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    @lulu: Which "classes prime to $n$" do you mean? I only know "numbers coprime to $n$".
    $endgroup$
    – Hans Stricker
    Jan 11 at 21:09












  • $begingroup$
    Same thing. I mean the numbers coprime to $n$.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 11 at 21:14
















$begingroup$
That argument only works for those classes prime to $n$. If, say, you let $n=4, a=2$ there is no $k>1$ for which $x^kequiv 2pmod 4$ has a solution.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 11 at 21:04




$begingroup$
That argument only works for those classes prime to $n$. If, say, you let $n=4, a=2$ there is no $k>1$ for which $x^kequiv 2pmod 4$ has a solution.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 11 at 21:04












$begingroup$
@lulu: Which "classes prime to $n$" do you mean? I only know "numbers coprime to $n$".
$endgroup$
– Hans Stricker
Jan 11 at 21:09






$begingroup$
@lulu: Which "classes prime to $n$" do you mean? I only know "numbers coprime to $n$".
$endgroup$
– Hans Stricker
Jan 11 at 21:09














$begingroup$
Same thing. I mean the numbers coprime to $n$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 11 at 21:14




$begingroup$
Same thing. I mean the numbers coprime to $n$.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 11 at 21:14










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

If $gcd(a,n)=1$ then $a$ is invertible $pmod n$, by Bezout's Lemma. Indeed the set of residues coprime with $n$ form a group under multiplication $pmod n$. By definition the order of that group is $varphi(n)$. It follows from basic group theory that $gcd(a,n)=1implies a^{varphi(n)}equiv 1pmod n$ whence that $a^{varphi(n)+1}equiv apmod n$



Note, however, that this argument only applies to residue classes prime to $n$. The claim you assert isn't true generally. For example, let $n=4,a=2$. We claim that, for $k>1$, the congruence $x^kequiv 2pmod 4$ has no solution. Indeed, we just go case by case. if $xequiv 0 $ then $x^kequiv 0$, if $xequiv 1$ then $x^kequiv 1$, if $xequiv 2$ then $x^kequiv 0$ (since $k>1$), and if $xequiv 3$ then $x^kequiv (-1)^knot equiv 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070338%2fa-question-concerning-higher-residues-quadratic-and-so-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    If $gcd(a,n)=1$ then $a$ is invertible $pmod n$, by Bezout's Lemma. Indeed the set of residues coprime with $n$ form a group under multiplication $pmod n$. By definition the order of that group is $varphi(n)$. It follows from basic group theory that $gcd(a,n)=1implies a^{varphi(n)}equiv 1pmod n$ whence that $a^{varphi(n)+1}equiv apmod n$



    Note, however, that this argument only applies to residue classes prime to $n$. The claim you assert isn't true generally. For example, let $n=4,a=2$. We claim that, for $k>1$, the congruence $x^kequiv 2pmod 4$ has no solution. Indeed, we just go case by case. if $xequiv 0 $ then $x^kequiv 0$, if $xequiv 1$ then $x^kequiv 1$, if $xequiv 2$ then $x^kequiv 0$ (since $k>1$), and if $xequiv 3$ then $x^kequiv (-1)^knot equiv 0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      If $gcd(a,n)=1$ then $a$ is invertible $pmod n$, by Bezout's Lemma. Indeed the set of residues coprime with $n$ form a group under multiplication $pmod n$. By definition the order of that group is $varphi(n)$. It follows from basic group theory that $gcd(a,n)=1implies a^{varphi(n)}equiv 1pmod n$ whence that $a^{varphi(n)+1}equiv apmod n$



      Note, however, that this argument only applies to residue classes prime to $n$. The claim you assert isn't true generally. For example, let $n=4,a=2$. We claim that, for $k>1$, the congruence $x^kequiv 2pmod 4$ has no solution. Indeed, we just go case by case. if $xequiv 0 $ then $x^kequiv 0$, if $xequiv 1$ then $x^kequiv 1$, if $xequiv 2$ then $x^kequiv 0$ (since $k>1$), and if $xequiv 3$ then $x^kequiv (-1)^knot equiv 0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        If $gcd(a,n)=1$ then $a$ is invertible $pmod n$, by Bezout's Lemma. Indeed the set of residues coprime with $n$ form a group under multiplication $pmod n$. By definition the order of that group is $varphi(n)$. It follows from basic group theory that $gcd(a,n)=1implies a^{varphi(n)}equiv 1pmod n$ whence that $a^{varphi(n)+1}equiv apmod n$



        Note, however, that this argument only applies to residue classes prime to $n$. The claim you assert isn't true generally. For example, let $n=4,a=2$. We claim that, for $k>1$, the congruence $x^kequiv 2pmod 4$ has no solution. Indeed, we just go case by case. if $xequiv 0 $ then $x^kequiv 0$, if $xequiv 1$ then $x^kequiv 1$, if $xequiv 2$ then $x^kequiv 0$ (since $k>1$), and if $xequiv 3$ then $x^kequiv (-1)^knot equiv 0$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        If $gcd(a,n)=1$ then $a$ is invertible $pmod n$, by Bezout's Lemma. Indeed the set of residues coprime with $n$ form a group under multiplication $pmod n$. By definition the order of that group is $varphi(n)$. It follows from basic group theory that $gcd(a,n)=1implies a^{varphi(n)}equiv 1pmod n$ whence that $a^{varphi(n)+1}equiv apmod n$



        Note, however, that this argument only applies to residue classes prime to $n$. The claim you assert isn't true generally. For example, let $n=4,a=2$. We claim that, for $k>1$, the congruence $x^kequiv 2pmod 4$ has no solution. Indeed, we just go case by case. if $xequiv 0 $ then $x^kequiv 0$, if $xequiv 1$ then $x^kequiv 1$, if $xequiv 2$ then $x^kequiv 0$ (since $k>1$), and if $xequiv 3$ then $x^kequiv (-1)^knot equiv 0$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 11 at 21:15









        lulululu

        40.1k24778




        40.1k24778






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070338%2fa-question-concerning-higher-residues-quadratic-and-so-on%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?