Can Erdős-Turán $frac{5}{8}$ theorem be generalised that way?
$begingroup$
Suppose for an arbitrary group word $w$ ower the alphabet of $n$ symbols $mathfrak{U_w}$ is a variety of all groups $G$, that satisfy an identity $forall a_1, … , a_n in G$ $w(a_1, … , a_n) = e$. Is it true, that for any group word $w$ there exists a positive real number $epsilon (w) > 0$, such that any finite group $G$ is in $mathfrak{U_w}$ iff $$frac{lvert{(a_1, … , a_n) in G^n : w(a_1, … , a_n) = e}rvert}{{|G|}^n} > 1 - epsilon(w)?$$
How did this question arise? There is a widely known theorem proved by P. Erdős and P. Turán that states:
A finite group $G$ is abelian iff $$frac{|{(a, b) in G^2 : [a, b] = e}|}{{|G|}^2} > frac{5}{8}.$$
This theorem can be rephrased using aforementioned terminology as $epsilon([a, b]) = frac{3}{8}$.
There also is a generalisation of this theorem, stating that a finite group $G$ is nilpotent of class $n$ iff $$frac{|{(a_0, a_1, … , a_n) in G^{n + 1} : [ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n] = e}|}{{|G|}^{n + 1}} > 1 - frac{3}{2^{n + 2}},$$ thus making $epsilon([ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n]) = frac{3}{2^{n + 2}}$.
However, I have never seen similar statements about other one-word varieties being proved or disproved, despite such question seeming quite natural . . .
Actually, I doubt that the conjecture in the main part of question is true. However, I failed to find any counterexamples myself.
combinatorics group-theory finite-groups conjectures group-varieties
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose for an arbitrary group word $w$ ower the alphabet of $n$ symbols $mathfrak{U_w}$ is a variety of all groups $G$, that satisfy an identity $forall a_1, … , a_n in G$ $w(a_1, … , a_n) = e$. Is it true, that for any group word $w$ there exists a positive real number $epsilon (w) > 0$, such that any finite group $G$ is in $mathfrak{U_w}$ iff $$frac{lvert{(a_1, … , a_n) in G^n : w(a_1, … , a_n) = e}rvert}{{|G|}^n} > 1 - epsilon(w)?$$
How did this question arise? There is a widely known theorem proved by P. Erdős and P. Turán that states:
A finite group $G$ is abelian iff $$frac{|{(a, b) in G^2 : [a, b] = e}|}{{|G|}^2} > frac{5}{8}.$$
This theorem can be rephrased using aforementioned terminology as $epsilon([a, b]) = frac{3}{8}$.
There also is a generalisation of this theorem, stating that a finite group $G$ is nilpotent of class $n$ iff $$frac{|{(a_0, a_1, … , a_n) in G^{n + 1} : [ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n] = e}|}{{|G|}^{n + 1}} > 1 - frac{3}{2^{n + 2}},$$ thus making $epsilon([ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n]) = frac{3}{2^{n + 2}}$.
However, I have never seen similar statements about other one-word varieties being proved or disproved, despite such question seeming quite natural . . .
Actually, I doubt that the conjecture in the main part of question is true. However, I failed to find any counterexamples myself.
combinatorics group-theory finite-groups conjectures group-varieties
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I one wrote out an answer which is about generalising the Erdos-Turan result to infinite groups: math.stackexchange.com/a/2809964/10513 You might find it interesting/relevant.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Jan 18 at 11:54
3
$begingroup$
Not mentioned in a 2015 survey Farrokhi, D. G. (2015). ON THE PROBABILITY THAT A GROUP SATISFIES A LAW: A SURVEY (Research on finite groups and their representations, vertex operator algebras, and algebraic combinatorics), muroran-it.ac.jp/mathsci/danwakai/past/articles/201404-201503/…. Mentioned as open in a note by John D. Dixon, "Probabilistic Group Theory", people.math.carleton.ca/~jdixon/Prgrpth.pdf
$endgroup$
– Dap
Jan 18 at 18:00
$begingroup$
Is the $n=1$ case obviously true? Or is even that case difficult?
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose for an arbitrary group word $w$ ower the alphabet of $n$ symbols $mathfrak{U_w}$ is a variety of all groups $G$, that satisfy an identity $forall a_1, … , a_n in G$ $w(a_1, … , a_n) = e$. Is it true, that for any group word $w$ there exists a positive real number $epsilon (w) > 0$, such that any finite group $G$ is in $mathfrak{U_w}$ iff $$frac{lvert{(a_1, … , a_n) in G^n : w(a_1, … , a_n) = e}rvert}{{|G|}^n} > 1 - epsilon(w)?$$
How did this question arise? There is a widely known theorem proved by P. Erdős and P. Turán that states:
A finite group $G$ is abelian iff $$frac{|{(a, b) in G^2 : [a, b] = e}|}{{|G|}^2} > frac{5}{8}.$$
This theorem can be rephrased using aforementioned terminology as $epsilon([a, b]) = frac{3}{8}$.
There also is a generalisation of this theorem, stating that a finite group $G$ is nilpotent of class $n$ iff $$frac{|{(a_0, a_1, … , a_n) in G^{n + 1} : [ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n] = e}|}{{|G|}^{n + 1}} > 1 - frac{3}{2^{n + 2}},$$ thus making $epsilon([ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n]) = frac{3}{2^{n + 2}}$.
However, I have never seen similar statements about other one-word varieties being proved or disproved, despite such question seeming quite natural . . .
Actually, I doubt that the conjecture in the main part of question is true. However, I failed to find any counterexamples myself.
combinatorics group-theory finite-groups conjectures group-varieties
$endgroup$
Suppose for an arbitrary group word $w$ ower the alphabet of $n$ symbols $mathfrak{U_w}$ is a variety of all groups $G$, that satisfy an identity $forall a_1, … , a_n in G$ $w(a_1, … , a_n) = e$. Is it true, that for any group word $w$ there exists a positive real number $epsilon (w) > 0$, such that any finite group $G$ is in $mathfrak{U_w}$ iff $$frac{lvert{(a_1, … , a_n) in G^n : w(a_1, … , a_n) = e}rvert}{{|G|}^n} > 1 - epsilon(w)?$$
How did this question arise? There is a widely known theorem proved by P. Erdős and P. Turán that states:
A finite group $G$ is abelian iff $$frac{|{(a, b) in G^2 : [a, b] = e}|}{{|G|}^2} > frac{5}{8}.$$
This theorem can be rephrased using aforementioned terminology as $epsilon([a, b]) = frac{3}{8}$.
There also is a generalisation of this theorem, stating that a finite group $G$ is nilpotent of class $n$ iff $$frac{|{(a_0, a_1, … , a_n) in G^{n + 1} : [ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n] = e}|}{{|G|}^{n + 1}} > 1 - frac{3}{2^{n + 2}},$$ thus making $epsilon([ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n]) = frac{3}{2^{n + 2}}$.
However, I have never seen similar statements about other one-word varieties being proved or disproved, despite such question seeming quite natural . . .
Actually, I doubt that the conjecture in the main part of question is true. However, I failed to find any counterexamples myself.
combinatorics group-theory finite-groups conjectures group-varieties
combinatorics group-theory finite-groups conjectures group-varieties
edited Jan 22 at 17:12
user1729
16.9k64085
16.9k64085
asked Jan 11 at 20:51
Yanior WegYanior Weg
1,30311136
1,30311136
1
$begingroup$
I one wrote out an answer which is about generalising the Erdos-Turan result to infinite groups: math.stackexchange.com/a/2809964/10513 You might find it interesting/relevant.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Jan 18 at 11:54
3
$begingroup$
Not mentioned in a 2015 survey Farrokhi, D. G. (2015). ON THE PROBABILITY THAT A GROUP SATISFIES A LAW: A SURVEY (Research on finite groups and their representations, vertex operator algebras, and algebraic combinatorics), muroran-it.ac.jp/mathsci/danwakai/past/articles/201404-201503/…. Mentioned as open in a note by John D. Dixon, "Probabilistic Group Theory", people.math.carleton.ca/~jdixon/Prgrpth.pdf
$endgroup$
– Dap
Jan 18 at 18:00
$begingroup$
Is the $n=1$ case obviously true? Or is even that case difficult?
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I one wrote out an answer which is about generalising the Erdos-Turan result to infinite groups: math.stackexchange.com/a/2809964/10513 You might find it interesting/relevant.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Jan 18 at 11:54
3
$begingroup$
Not mentioned in a 2015 survey Farrokhi, D. G. (2015). ON THE PROBABILITY THAT A GROUP SATISFIES A LAW: A SURVEY (Research on finite groups and their representations, vertex operator algebras, and algebraic combinatorics), muroran-it.ac.jp/mathsci/danwakai/past/articles/201404-201503/…. Mentioned as open in a note by John D. Dixon, "Probabilistic Group Theory", people.math.carleton.ca/~jdixon/Prgrpth.pdf
$endgroup$
– Dap
Jan 18 at 18:00
$begingroup$
Is the $n=1$ case obviously true? Or is even that case difficult?
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I one wrote out an answer which is about generalising the Erdos-Turan result to infinite groups: math.stackexchange.com/a/2809964/10513 You might find it interesting/relevant.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Jan 18 at 11:54
$begingroup$
I one wrote out an answer which is about generalising the Erdos-Turan result to infinite groups: math.stackexchange.com/a/2809964/10513 You might find it interesting/relevant.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Jan 18 at 11:54
3
3
$begingroup$
Not mentioned in a 2015 survey Farrokhi, D. G. (2015). ON THE PROBABILITY THAT A GROUP SATISFIES A LAW: A SURVEY (Research on finite groups and their representations, vertex operator algebras, and algebraic combinatorics), muroran-it.ac.jp/mathsci/danwakai/past/articles/201404-201503/…. Mentioned as open in a note by John D. Dixon, "Probabilistic Group Theory", people.math.carleton.ca/~jdixon/Prgrpth.pdf
$endgroup$
– Dap
Jan 18 at 18:00
$begingroup$
Not mentioned in a 2015 survey Farrokhi, D. G. (2015). ON THE PROBABILITY THAT A GROUP SATISFIES A LAW: A SURVEY (Research on finite groups and their representations, vertex operator algebras, and algebraic combinatorics), muroran-it.ac.jp/mathsci/danwakai/past/articles/201404-201503/…. Mentioned as open in a note by John D. Dixon, "Probabilistic Group Theory", people.math.carleton.ca/~jdixon/Prgrpth.pdf
$endgroup$
– Dap
Jan 18 at 18:00
$begingroup$
Is the $n=1$ case obviously true? Or is even that case difficult?
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Is the $n=1$ case obviously true? Or is even that case difficult?
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
2 days ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070332%2fcan-erd%25c5%2591s-tur%25c3%25a1n-frac58-theorem-be-generalised-that-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070332%2fcan-erd%25c5%2591s-tur%25c3%25a1n-frac58-theorem-be-generalised-that-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I one wrote out an answer which is about generalising the Erdos-Turan result to infinite groups: math.stackexchange.com/a/2809964/10513 You might find it interesting/relevant.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Jan 18 at 11:54
3
$begingroup$
Not mentioned in a 2015 survey Farrokhi, D. G. (2015). ON THE PROBABILITY THAT A GROUP SATISFIES A LAW: A SURVEY (Research on finite groups and their representations, vertex operator algebras, and algebraic combinatorics), muroran-it.ac.jp/mathsci/danwakai/past/articles/201404-201503/…. Mentioned as open in a note by John D. Dixon, "Probabilistic Group Theory", people.math.carleton.ca/~jdixon/Prgrpth.pdf
$endgroup$
– Dap
Jan 18 at 18:00
$begingroup$
Is the $n=1$ case obviously true? Or is even that case difficult?
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
2 days ago