Can Erdős-Turán $frac{5}{8}$ theorem be generalised that way?












29












$begingroup$



Suppose for an arbitrary group word $w$ ower the alphabet of $n$ symbols $mathfrak{U_w}$ is a variety of all groups $G$, that satisfy an identity $forall a_1, … , a_n in G$ $w(a_1, … , a_n) = e$. Is it true, that for any group word $w$ there exists a positive real number $epsilon (w) > 0$, such that any finite group $G$ is in $mathfrak{U_w}$ iff $$frac{lvert{(a_1, … , a_n) in G^n : w(a_1, … , a_n) = e}rvert}{{|G|}^n} > 1 - epsilon(w)?$$




How did this question arise? There is a widely known theorem proved by P. Erdős and P. Turán that states:




A finite group $G$ is abelian iff $$frac{|{(a, b) in G^2 : [a, b] = e}|}{{|G|}^2} > frac{5}{8}.$$




This theorem can be rephrased using aforementioned terminology as $epsilon([a, b]) = frac{3}{8}$.



There also is a generalisation of this theorem, stating that a finite group $G$ is nilpotent of class $n$ iff $$frac{|{(a_0, a_1, … , a_n) in G^{n + 1} : [ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n] = e}|}{{|G|}^{n + 1}} > 1 - frac{3}{2^{n + 2}},$$ thus making $epsilon([ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n]) = frac{3}{2^{n + 2}}$.



However, I have never seen similar statements about other one-word varieties being proved or disproved, despite such question seeming quite natural . . .



Actually, I doubt that the conjecture in the main part of question is true. However, I failed to find any counterexamples myself.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I one wrote out an answer which is about generalising the Erdos-Turan result to infinite groups: math.stackexchange.com/a/2809964/10513 You might find it interesting/relevant.
    $endgroup$
    – user1729
    Jan 18 at 11:54








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Not mentioned in a 2015 survey Farrokhi, D. G. (2015). ON THE PROBABILITY THAT A GROUP SATISFIES A LAW: A SURVEY (Research on finite groups and their representations, vertex operator algebras, and algebraic combinatorics), muroran-it.ac.jp/mathsci/danwakai/past/articles/201404-201503/…. Mentioned as open in a note by John D. Dixon, "Probabilistic Group Theory", people.math.carleton.ca/~jdixon/Prgrpth.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Dap
    Jan 18 at 18:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the $n=1$ case obviously true? Or is even that case difficult?
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    2 days ago
















29












$begingroup$



Suppose for an arbitrary group word $w$ ower the alphabet of $n$ symbols $mathfrak{U_w}$ is a variety of all groups $G$, that satisfy an identity $forall a_1, … , a_n in G$ $w(a_1, … , a_n) = e$. Is it true, that for any group word $w$ there exists a positive real number $epsilon (w) > 0$, such that any finite group $G$ is in $mathfrak{U_w}$ iff $$frac{lvert{(a_1, … , a_n) in G^n : w(a_1, … , a_n) = e}rvert}{{|G|}^n} > 1 - epsilon(w)?$$




How did this question arise? There is a widely known theorem proved by P. Erdős and P. Turán that states:




A finite group $G$ is abelian iff $$frac{|{(a, b) in G^2 : [a, b] = e}|}{{|G|}^2} > frac{5}{8}.$$




This theorem can be rephrased using aforementioned terminology as $epsilon([a, b]) = frac{3}{8}$.



There also is a generalisation of this theorem, stating that a finite group $G$ is nilpotent of class $n$ iff $$frac{|{(a_0, a_1, … , a_n) in G^{n + 1} : [ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n] = e}|}{{|G|}^{n + 1}} > 1 - frac{3}{2^{n + 2}},$$ thus making $epsilon([ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n]) = frac{3}{2^{n + 2}}$.



However, I have never seen similar statements about other one-word varieties being proved or disproved, despite such question seeming quite natural . . .



Actually, I doubt that the conjecture in the main part of question is true. However, I failed to find any counterexamples myself.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I one wrote out an answer which is about generalising the Erdos-Turan result to infinite groups: math.stackexchange.com/a/2809964/10513 You might find it interesting/relevant.
    $endgroup$
    – user1729
    Jan 18 at 11:54








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Not mentioned in a 2015 survey Farrokhi, D. G. (2015). ON THE PROBABILITY THAT A GROUP SATISFIES A LAW: A SURVEY (Research on finite groups and their representations, vertex operator algebras, and algebraic combinatorics), muroran-it.ac.jp/mathsci/danwakai/past/articles/201404-201503/…. Mentioned as open in a note by John D. Dixon, "Probabilistic Group Theory", people.math.carleton.ca/~jdixon/Prgrpth.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Dap
    Jan 18 at 18:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the $n=1$ case obviously true? Or is even that case difficult?
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    2 days ago














29












29








29


10



$begingroup$



Suppose for an arbitrary group word $w$ ower the alphabet of $n$ symbols $mathfrak{U_w}$ is a variety of all groups $G$, that satisfy an identity $forall a_1, … , a_n in G$ $w(a_1, … , a_n) = e$. Is it true, that for any group word $w$ there exists a positive real number $epsilon (w) > 0$, such that any finite group $G$ is in $mathfrak{U_w}$ iff $$frac{lvert{(a_1, … , a_n) in G^n : w(a_1, … , a_n) = e}rvert}{{|G|}^n} > 1 - epsilon(w)?$$




How did this question arise? There is a widely known theorem proved by P. Erdős and P. Turán that states:




A finite group $G$ is abelian iff $$frac{|{(a, b) in G^2 : [a, b] = e}|}{{|G|}^2} > frac{5}{8}.$$




This theorem can be rephrased using aforementioned terminology as $epsilon([a, b]) = frac{3}{8}$.



There also is a generalisation of this theorem, stating that a finite group $G$ is nilpotent of class $n$ iff $$frac{|{(a_0, a_1, … , a_n) in G^{n + 1} : [ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n] = e}|}{{|G|}^{n + 1}} > 1 - frac{3}{2^{n + 2}},$$ thus making $epsilon([ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n]) = frac{3}{2^{n + 2}}$.



However, I have never seen similar statements about other one-word varieties being proved or disproved, despite such question seeming quite natural . . .



Actually, I doubt that the conjecture in the main part of question is true. However, I failed to find any counterexamples myself.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Suppose for an arbitrary group word $w$ ower the alphabet of $n$ symbols $mathfrak{U_w}$ is a variety of all groups $G$, that satisfy an identity $forall a_1, … , a_n in G$ $w(a_1, … , a_n) = e$. Is it true, that for any group word $w$ there exists a positive real number $epsilon (w) > 0$, such that any finite group $G$ is in $mathfrak{U_w}$ iff $$frac{lvert{(a_1, … , a_n) in G^n : w(a_1, … , a_n) = e}rvert}{{|G|}^n} > 1 - epsilon(w)?$$




How did this question arise? There is a widely known theorem proved by P. Erdős and P. Turán that states:




A finite group $G$ is abelian iff $$frac{|{(a, b) in G^2 : [a, b] = e}|}{{|G|}^2} > frac{5}{8}.$$




This theorem can be rephrased using aforementioned terminology as $epsilon([a, b]) = frac{3}{8}$.



There also is a generalisation of this theorem, stating that a finite group $G$ is nilpotent of class $n$ iff $$frac{|{(a_0, a_1, … , a_n) in G^{n + 1} : [ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n] = e}|}{{|G|}^{n + 1}} > 1 - frac{3}{2^{n + 2}},$$ thus making $epsilon([ … [[a_0, a_1], a_2]… a_n]) = frac{3}{2^{n + 2}}$.



However, I have never seen similar statements about other one-word varieties being proved or disproved, despite such question seeming quite natural . . .



Actually, I doubt that the conjecture in the main part of question is true. However, I failed to find any counterexamples myself.







combinatorics group-theory finite-groups conjectures group-varieties






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 22 at 17:12









user1729

16.9k64085




16.9k64085










asked Jan 11 at 20:51









Yanior WegYanior Weg

1,30311136




1,30311136








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I one wrote out an answer which is about generalising the Erdos-Turan result to infinite groups: math.stackexchange.com/a/2809964/10513 You might find it interesting/relevant.
    $endgroup$
    – user1729
    Jan 18 at 11:54








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Not mentioned in a 2015 survey Farrokhi, D. G. (2015). ON THE PROBABILITY THAT A GROUP SATISFIES A LAW: A SURVEY (Research on finite groups and their representations, vertex operator algebras, and algebraic combinatorics), muroran-it.ac.jp/mathsci/danwakai/past/articles/201404-201503/…. Mentioned as open in a note by John D. Dixon, "Probabilistic Group Theory", people.math.carleton.ca/~jdixon/Prgrpth.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Dap
    Jan 18 at 18:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the $n=1$ case obviously true? Or is even that case difficult?
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    2 days ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I one wrote out an answer which is about generalising the Erdos-Turan result to infinite groups: math.stackexchange.com/a/2809964/10513 You might find it interesting/relevant.
    $endgroup$
    – user1729
    Jan 18 at 11:54








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Not mentioned in a 2015 survey Farrokhi, D. G. (2015). ON THE PROBABILITY THAT A GROUP SATISFIES A LAW: A SURVEY (Research on finite groups and their representations, vertex operator algebras, and algebraic combinatorics), muroran-it.ac.jp/mathsci/danwakai/past/articles/201404-201503/…. Mentioned as open in a note by John D. Dixon, "Probabilistic Group Theory", people.math.carleton.ca/~jdixon/Prgrpth.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Dap
    Jan 18 at 18:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the $n=1$ case obviously true? Or is even that case difficult?
    $endgroup$
    – Mees de Vries
    2 days ago








1




1




$begingroup$
I one wrote out an answer which is about generalising the Erdos-Turan result to infinite groups: math.stackexchange.com/a/2809964/10513 You might find it interesting/relevant.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Jan 18 at 11:54






$begingroup$
I one wrote out an answer which is about generalising the Erdos-Turan result to infinite groups: math.stackexchange.com/a/2809964/10513 You might find it interesting/relevant.
$endgroup$
– user1729
Jan 18 at 11:54






3




3




$begingroup$
Not mentioned in a 2015 survey Farrokhi, D. G. (2015). ON THE PROBABILITY THAT A GROUP SATISFIES A LAW: A SURVEY (Research on finite groups and their representations, vertex operator algebras, and algebraic combinatorics), muroran-it.ac.jp/mathsci/danwakai/past/articles/201404-201503/…. Mentioned as open in a note by John D. Dixon, "Probabilistic Group Theory", people.math.carleton.ca/~jdixon/Prgrpth.pdf
$endgroup$
– Dap
Jan 18 at 18:00




$begingroup$
Not mentioned in a 2015 survey Farrokhi, D. G. (2015). ON THE PROBABILITY THAT A GROUP SATISFIES A LAW: A SURVEY (Research on finite groups and their representations, vertex operator algebras, and algebraic combinatorics), muroran-it.ac.jp/mathsci/danwakai/past/articles/201404-201503/…. Mentioned as open in a note by John D. Dixon, "Probabilistic Group Theory", people.math.carleton.ca/~jdixon/Prgrpth.pdf
$endgroup$
– Dap
Jan 18 at 18:00












$begingroup$
Is the $n=1$ case obviously true? Or is even that case difficult?
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Is the $n=1$ case obviously true? Or is even that case difficult?
$endgroup$
– Mees de Vries
2 days ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070332%2fcan-erd%25c5%2591s-tur%25c3%25a1n-frac58-theorem-be-generalised-that-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3070332%2fcan-erd%25c5%2591s-tur%25c3%25a1n-frac58-theorem-be-generalised-that-way%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Antonio Litta Visconti Arese