why is $ {(0,x,z)|x,zin R}$ is a two dimensional subspace space of $R^{3}$ over $R$ but ${(0,0,z)|zin R} $...
$begingroup$
why is $ A={(0,x,z)|x,zin R}$ is a two dimensional subspace space of $R^{3}$ over $R$
but $B={(0,0,z)|zin R} $ $cup$ ${(0,x,0)|xin R}$ is not?
i Think both are two dimensional as A has Basis={(0,1,0),(0,0,1)} and
B is direct sum of two subspace of $ R^{3}$ with same basis .
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
why is $ A={(0,x,z)|x,zin R}$ is a two dimensional subspace space of $R^{3}$ over $R$
but $B={(0,0,z)|zin R} $ $cup$ ${(0,x,0)|xin R}$ is not?
i Think both are two dimensional as A has Basis={(0,1,0),(0,0,1)} and
B is direct sum of two subspace of $ R^{3}$ with same basis .
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
"B is direct sum of two subspace of $ R^{3}$ with same basis" No, $B$ is a union of subspaces.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 21 at 12:35
1
$begingroup$
I suspect your confusion lies in the fact that every $v in B$ has a unique decomposition $v = (0,0,a) +(0,b,0)$. The issue is not in the existence or uniqueness of this decomposition, it is that the space $B$ isn't closed under addition.
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Jan 21 at 12:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
why is $ A={(0,x,z)|x,zin R}$ is a two dimensional subspace space of $R^{3}$ over $R$
but $B={(0,0,z)|zin R} $ $cup$ ${(0,x,0)|xin R}$ is not?
i Think both are two dimensional as A has Basis={(0,1,0),(0,0,1)} and
B is direct sum of two subspace of $ R^{3}$ with same basis .
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
$endgroup$
why is $ A={(0,x,z)|x,zin R}$ is a two dimensional subspace space of $R^{3}$ over $R$
but $B={(0,0,z)|zin R} $ $cup$ ${(0,x,0)|xin R}$ is not?
i Think both are two dimensional as A has Basis={(0,1,0),(0,0,1)} and
B is direct sum of two subspace of $ R^{3}$ with same basis .
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations
asked Jan 21 at 12:32
sejysejy
1539
1539
2
$begingroup$
"B is direct sum of two subspace of $ R^{3}$ with same basis" No, $B$ is a union of subspaces.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 21 at 12:35
1
$begingroup$
I suspect your confusion lies in the fact that every $v in B$ has a unique decomposition $v = (0,0,a) +(0,b,0)$. The issue is not in the existence or uniqueness of this decomposition, it is that the space $B$ isn't closed under addition.
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Jan 21 at 12:38
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
"B is direct sum of two subspace of $ R^{3}$ with same basis" No, $B$ is a union of subspaces.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 21 at 12:35
1
$begingroup$
I suspect your confusion lies in the fact that every $v in B$ has a unique decomposition $v = (0,0,a) +(0,b,0)$. The issue is not in the existence or uniqueness of this decomposition, it is that the space $B$ isn't closed under addition.
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Jan 21 at 12:38
2
2
$begingroup$
"B is direct sum of two subspace of $ R^{3}$ with same basis" No, $B$ is a union of subspaces.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 21 at 12:35
$begingroup$
"B is direct sum of two subspace of $ R^{3}$ with same basis" No, $B$ is a union of subspaces.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 21 at 12:35
1
1
$begingroup$
I suspect your confusion lies in the fact that every $v in B$ has a unique decomposition $v = (0,0,a) +(0,b,0)$. The issue is not in the existence or uniqueness of this decomposition, it is that the space $B$ isn't closed under addition.
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Jan 21 at 12:38
$begingroup$
I suspect your confusion lies in the fact that every $v in B$ has a unique decomposition $v = (0,0,a) +(0,b,0)$. The issue is not in the existence or uniqueness of this decomposition, it is that the space $B$ isn't closed under addition.
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Jan 21 at 12:38
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$B$ is defined as the union of two subsets of $mathbb R^{3}$, not as a sum of subspaces. $(0,0,1)+(0,1,0)=(0,1,1)$ is not in $B$ so it is not a subspace of $mathbb R^{3}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$B$ is a union of two subspaces and is missing all of the vectors that are “in between” the subspaces. More formally, the union isn’t closed under vector addition: $(0,0,z)+(0,x,0)notin B$ unless at least one of those two vectors is zero. On the other hand, $A$ contains all of those sums and then some: if you add any two vectors of the form $(0,x,z)$ to each other, you get another vector of the same form, so $A$ is closed under vector addition. It’s easy to verify that it also contains the zero vector and is closed under scalar multiplication, so it is a subspace of $mathbb R^3$.
To illustrate this geometrically, $B$ is the union of the $y$-and $z$-axes. This just gets you a pair of lines, which you probably know is not a vector space. On the other hand, $A$ describes the entire $y$-$z$ plane, which contains those two lines, but also all of the points “in between” them on that plane. This plane is isomorphic to $mathbb R^2$, which you know to be a vector space.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
U cleared my confusion insightful !!
$endgroup$
– sejy
Jan 23 at 0:38
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081823%2fwhy-is-0-x-zx-z-in-r-is-a-two-dimensional-subspace-space-of-r3-ov%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$B$ is defined as the union of two subsets of $mathbb R^{3}$, not as a sum of subspaces. $(0,0,1)+(0,1,0)=(0,1,1)$ is not in $B$ so it is not a subspace of $mathbb R^{3}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$B$ is defined as the union of two subsets of $mathbb R^{3}$, not as a sum of subspaces. $(0,0,1)+(0,1,0)=(0,1,1)$ is not in $B$ so it is not a subspace of $mathbb R^{3}$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$B$ is defined as the union of two subsets of $mathbb R^{3}$, not as a sum of subspaces. $(0,0,1)+(0,1,0)=(0,1,1)$ is not in $B$ so it is not a subspace of $mathbb R^{3}$.
$endgroup$
$B$ is defined as the union of two subsets of $mathbb R^{3}$, not as a sum of subspaces. $(0,0,1)+(0,1,0)=(0,1,1)$ is not in $B$ so it is not a subspace of $mathbb R^{3}$.
answered Jan 21 at 12:33
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
62.3k42262
62.3k42262
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$B$ is a union of two subspaces and is missing all of the vectors that are “in between” the subspaces. More formally, the union isn’t closed under vector addition: $(0,0,z)+(0,x,0)notin B$ unless at least one of those two vectors is zero. On the other hand, $A$ contains all of those sums and then some: if you add any two vectors of the form $(0,x,z)$ to each other, you get another vector of the same form, so $A$ is closed under vector addition. It’s easy to verify that it also contains the zero vector and is closed under scalar multiplication, so it is a subspace of $mathbb R^3$.
To illustrate this geometrically, $B$ is the union of the $y$-and $z$-axes. This just gets you a pair of lines, which you probably know is not a vector space. On the other hand, $A$ describes the entire $y$-$z$ plane, which contains those two lines, but also all of the points “in between” them on that plane. This plane is isomorphic to $mathbb R^2$, which you know to be a vector space.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
U cleared my confusion insightful !!
$endgroup$
– sejy
Jan 23 at 0:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$B$ is a union of two subspaces and is missing all of the vectors that are “in between” the subspaces. More formally, the union isn’t closed under vector addition: $(0,0,z)+(0,x,0)notin B$ unless at least one of those two vectors is zero. On the other hand, $A$ contains all of those sums and then some: if you add any two vectors of the form $(0,x,z)$ to each other, you get another vector of the same form, so $A$ is closed under vector addition. It’s easy to verify that it also contains the zero vector and is closed under scalar multiplication, so it is a subspace of $mathbb R^3$.
To illustrate this geometrically, $B$ is the union of the $y$-and $z$-axes. This just gets you a pair of lines, which you probably know is not a vector space. On the other hand, $A$ describes the entire $y$-$z$ plane, which contains those two lines, but also all of the points “in between” them on that plane. This plane is isomorphic to $mathbb R^2$, which you know to be a vector space.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
U cleared my confusion insightful !!
$endgroup$
– sejy
Jan 23 at 0:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$B$ is a union of two subspaces and is missing all of the vectors that are “in between” the subspaces. More formally, the union isn’t closed under vector addition: $(0,0,z)+(0,x,0)notin B$ unless at least one of those two vectors is zero. On the other hand, $A$ contains all of those sums and then some: if you add any two vectors of the form $(0,x,z)$ to each other, you get another vector of the same form, so $A$ is closed under vector addition. It’s easy to verify that it also contains the zero vector and is closed under scalar multiplication, so it is a subspace of $mathbb R^3$.
To illustrate this geometrically, $B$ is the union of the $y$-and $z$-axes. This just gets you a pair of lines, which you probably know is not a vector space. On the other hand, $A$ describes the entire $y$-$z$ plane, which contains those two lines, but also all of the points “in between” them on that plane. This plane is isomorphic to $mathbb R^2$, which you know to be a vector space.
$endgroup$
$B$ is a union of two subspaces and is missing all of the vectors that are “in between” the subspaces. More formally, the union isn’t closed under vector addition: $(0,0,z)+(0,x,0)notin B$ unless at least one of those two vectors is zero. On the other hand, $A$ contains all of those sums and then some: if you add any two vectors of the form $(0,x,z)$ to each other, you get another vector of the same form, so $A$ is closed under vector addition. It’s easy to verify that it also contains the zero vector and is closed under scalar multiplication, so it is a subspace of $mathbb R^3$.
To illustrate this geometrically, $B$ is the union of the $y$-and $z$-axes. This just gets you a pair of lines, which you probably know is not a vector space. On the other hand, $A$ describes the entire $y$-$z$ plane, which contains those two lines, but also all of the points “in between” them on that plane. This plane is isomorphic to $mathbb R^2$, which you know to be a vector space.
edited Jan 23 at 0:52
answered Jan 21 at 21:35
amdamd
30.6k21050
30.6k21050
$begingroup$
U cleared my confusion insightful !!
$endgroup$
– sejy
Jan 23 at 0:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
U cleared my confusion insightful !!
$endgroup$
– sejy
Jan 23 at 0:38
$begingroup$
U cleared my confusion insightful !!
$endgroup$
– sejy
Jan 23 at 0:38
$begingroup$
U cleared my confusion insightful !!
$endgroup$
– sejy
Jan 23 at 0:38
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081823%2fwhy-is-0-x-zx-z-in-r-is-a-two-dimensional-subspace-space-of-r3-ov%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
"B is direct sum of two subspace of $ R^{3}$ with same basis" No, $B$ is a union of subspaces.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 21 at 12:35
1
$begingroup$
I suspect your confusion lies in the fact that every $v in B$ has a unique decomposition $v = (0,0,a) +(0,b,0)$. The issue is not in the existence or uniqueness of this decomposition, it is that the space $B$ isn't closed under addition.
$endgroup$
– Calvin Khor
Jan 21 at 12:38