Regarding equivalent conditions of Frechet differentiability












0












$begingroup$


Gateaux and Frechet differentiability in a Banach space are defined as below.
enter image description here
Can you tell below how (ii) implies (i). The rest is easy.enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The equivalence of (i) and (ii) is just your given definition of Fréchet differentiability, isn't it?
    $endgroup$
    – gerw
    Jan 21 at 13:49










  • $begingroup$
    In the above, what is $S_X$?
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Jan 21 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    I would guess that $S_X$ is the unit sphere of $X$, i.e., $S_X = {x in X mid |x|=1}$.
    $endgroup$
    – gerw
    Jan 22 at 6:42
















0












$begingroup$


Gateaux and Frechet differentiability in a Banach space are defined as below.
enter image description here
Can you tell below how (ii) implies (i). The rest is easy.enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The equivalence of (i) and (ii) is just your given definition of Fréchet differentiability, isn't it?
    $endgroup$
    – gerw
    Jan 21 at 13:49










  • $begingroup$
    In the above, what is $S_X$?
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Jan 21 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    I would guess that $S_X$ is the unit sphere of $X$, i.e., $S_X = {x in X mid |x|=1}$.
    $endgroup$
    – gerw
    Jan 22 at 6:42














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Gateaux and Frechet differentiability in a Banach space are defined as below.
enter image description here
Can you tell below how (ii) implies (i). The rest is easy.enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Gateaux and Frechet differentiability in a Banach space are defined as below.
enter image description here
Can you tell below how (ii) implies (i). The rest is easy.enter image description here







functional-analysis banach-spaces






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 21 at 12:45









user31459user31459

284




284












  • $begingroup$
    The equivalence of (i) and (ii) is just your given definition of Fréchet differentiability, isn't it?
    $endgroup$
    – gerw
    Jan 21 at 13:49










  • $begingroup$
    In the above, what is $S_X$?
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Jan 21 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    I would guess that $S_X$ is the unit sphere of $X$, i.e., $S_X = {x in X mid |x|=1}$.
    $endgroup$
    – gerw
    Jan 22 at 6:42


















  • $begingroup$
    The equivalence of (i) and (ii) is just your given definition of Fréchet differentiability, isn't it?
    $endgroup$
    – gerw
    Jan 21 at 13:49










  • $begingroup$
    In the above, what is $S_X$?
    $endgroup$
    – kimchi lover
    Jan 21 at 19:41










  • $begingroup$
    I would guess that $S_X$ is the unit sphere of $X$, i.e., $S_X = {x in X mid |x|=1}$.
    $endgroup$
    – gerw
    Jan 22 at 6:42
















$begingroup$
The equivalence of (i) and (ii) is just your given definition of Fréchet differentiability, isn't it?
$endgroup$
– gerw
Jan 21 at 13:49




$begingroup$
The equivalence of (i) and (ii) is just your given definition of Fréchet differentiability, isn't it?
$endgroup$
– gerw
Jan 21 at 13:49












$begingroup$
In the above, what is $S_X$?
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Jan 21 at 19:41




$begingroup$
In the above, what is $S_X$?
$endgroup$
– kimchi lover
Jan 21 at 19:41












$begingroup$
I would guess that $S_X$ is the unit sphere of $X$, i.e., $S_X = {x in X mid |x|=1}$.
$endgroup$
– gerw
Jan 22 at 6:42




$begingroup$
I would guess that $S_X$ is the unit sphere of $X$, i.e., $S_X = {x in X mid |x|=1}$.
$endgroup$
– gerw
Jan 22 at 6:42










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Let me denote $f(x):=|x|$ and
the limit
$$
f'(x;h) = lim_{tto0} frac1t{f(x+th)-f(x)} quad xin S_X,hin X.
$$

Due to (ii), this limit exists for all such $x,t$.



First, let me show that $hmapsto f'(x;h)$ is a linear map. Let $hin X$, $sin mathbb Rsetminus{0}$ be given. Then
$$
f'(x; sh) = lim_{tto0} frac1t{f(x+sth)-f(x)} = s lim_{tto0} frac1{st}{f(x+sth)-f(x)} = s f'(x;h).
$$

Let now $h_1,h_2$ be given. Then by convexity (or triangle inequality)
$$
|x + frac12t(h_1+h_2)| le frac12 |x+th_1| + frac12 |x+th_2|.
$$

Subtracting $|x|$ on both sides, dividing by $t>0$, passing to the limit $tsearrow0$ yields
$$
f'(x,frac12(h_1+h_2))le frac12 f'(x,h_1+h_2)+frac12 f'(x,h_1+h_2),
$$

which implies $f'(x;h_1+h_2) le f'(x;h_1)+f'(x;h_2)$. Replacing $h_i$ by $-h_i$ implies the reverse inequality, hence $f'(x;h_1+h_2) = f'(x;h_1)+f'(x;h_2)$.
This proves Gateaux differentiability of the norm.



The uniformity of the limit then gives the required $o$-property to obtain Frechet differentiability.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081834%2fregarding-equivalent-conditions-of-frechet-differentiability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Let me denote $f(x):=|x|$ and
    the limit
    $$
    f'(x;h) = lim_{tto0} frac1t{f(x+th)-f(x)} quad xin S_X,hin X.
    $$

    Due to (ii), this limit exists for all such $x,t$.



    First, let me show that $hmapsto f'(x;h)$ is a linear map. Let $hin X$, $sin mathbb Rsetminus{0}$ be given. Then
    $$
    f'(x; sh) = lim_{tto0} frac1t{f(x+sth)-f(x)} = s lim_{tto0} frac1{st}{f(x+sth)-f(x)} = s f'(x;h).
    $$

    Let now $h_1,h_2$ be given. Then by convexity (or triangle inequality)
    $$
    |x + frac12t(h_1+h_2)| le frac12 |x+th_1| + frac12 |x+th_2|.
    $$

    Subtracting $|x|$ on both sides, dividing by $t>0$, passing to the limit $tsearrow0$ yields
    $$
    f'(x,frac12(h_1+h_2))le frac12 f'(x,h_1+h_2)+frac12 f'(x,h_1+h_2),
    $$

    which implies $f'(x;h_1+h_2) le f'(x;h_1)+f'(x;h_2)$. Replacing $h_i$ by $-h_i$ implies the reverse inequality, hence $f'(x;h_1+h_2) = f'(x;h_1)+f'(x;h_2)$.
    This proves Gateaux differentiability of the norm.



    The uniformity of the limit then gives the required $o$-property to obtain Frechet differentiability.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Let me denote $f(x):=|x|$ and
      the limit
      $$
      f'(x;h) = lim_{tto0} frac1t{f(x+th)-f(x)} quad xin S_X,hin X.
      $$

      Due to (ii), this limit exists for all such $x,t$.



      First, let me show that $hmapsto f'(x;h)$ is a linear map. Let $hin X$, $sin mathbb Rsetminus{0}$ be given. Then
      $$
      f'(x; sh) = lim_{tto0} frac1t{f(x+sth)-f(x)} = s lim_{tto0} frac1{st}{f(x+sth)-f(x)} = s f'(x;h).
      $$

      Let now $h_1,h_2$ be given. Then by convexity (or triangle inequality)
      $$
      |x + frac12t(h_1+h_2)| le frac12 |x+th_1| + frac12 |x+th_2|.
      $$

      Subtracting $|x|$ on both sides, dividing by $t>0$, passing to the limit $tsearrow0$ yields
      $$
      f'(x,frac12(h_1+h_2))le frac12 f'(x,h_1+h_2)+frac12 f'(x,h_1+h_2),
      $$

      which implies $f'(x;h_1+h_2) le f'(x;h_1)+f'(x;h_2)$. Replacing $h_i$ by $-h_i$ implies the reverse inequality, hence $f'(x;h_1+h_2) = f'(x;h_1)+f'(x;h_2)$.
      This proves Gateaux differentiability of the norm.



      The uniformity of the limit then gives the required $o$-property to obtain Frechet differentiability.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Let me denote $f(x):=|x|$ and
        the limit
        $$
        f'(x;h) = lim_{tto0} frac1t{f(x+th)-f(x)} quad xin S_X,hin X.
        $$

        Due to (ii), this limit exists for all such $x,t$.



        First, let me show that $hmapsto f'(x;h)$ is a linear map. Let $hin X$, $sin mathbb Rsetminus{0}$ be given. Then
        $$
        f'(x; sh) = lim_{tto0} frac1t{f(x+sth)-f(x)} = s lim_{tto0} frac1{st}{f(x+sth)-f(x)} = s f'(x;h).
        $$

        Let now $h_1,h_2$ be given. Then by convexity (or triangle inequality)
        $$
        |x + frac12t(h_1+h_2)| le frac12 |x+th_1| + frac12 |x+th_2|.
        $$

        Subtracting $|x|$ on both sides, dividing by $t>0$, passing to the limit $tsearrow0$ yields
        $$
        f'(x,frac12(h_1+h_2))le frac12 f'(x,h_1+h_2)+frac12 f'(x,h_1+h_2),
        $$

        which implies $f'(x;h_1+h_2) le f'(x;h_1)+f'(x;h_2)$. Replacing $h_i$ by $-h_i$ implies the reverse inequality, hence $f'(x;h_1+h_2) = f'(x;h_1)+f'(x;h_2)$.
        This proves Gateaux differentiability of the norm.



        The uniformity of the limit then gives the required $o$-property to obtain Frechet differentiability.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Let me denote $f(x):=|x|$ and
        the limit
        $$
        f'(x;h) = lim_{tto0} frac1t{f(x+th)-f(x)} quad xin S_X,hin X.
        $$

        Due to (ii), this limit exists for all such $x,t$.



        First, let me show that $hmapsto f'(x;h)$ is a linear map. Let $hin X$, $sin mathbb Rsetminus{0}$ be given. Then
        $$
        f'(x; sh) = lim_{tto0} frac1t{f(x+sth)-f(x)} = s lim_{tto0} frac1{st}{f(x+sth)-f(x)} = s f'(x;h).
        $$

        Let now $h_1,h_2$ be given. Then by convexity (or triangle inequality)
        $$
        |x + frac12t(h_1+h_2)| le frac12 |x+th_1| + frac12 |x+th_2|.
        $$

        Subtracting $|x|$ on both sides, dividing by $t>0$, passing to the limit $tsearrow0$ yields
        $$
        f'(x,frac12(h_1+h_2))le frac12 f'(x,h_1+h_2)+frac12 f'(x,h_1+h_2),
        $$

        which implies $f'(x;h_1+h_2) le f'(x;h_1)+f'(x;h_2)$. Replacing $h_i$ by $-h_i$ implies the reverse inequality, hence $f'(x;h_1+h_2) = f'(x;h_1)+f'(x;h_2)$.
        This proves Gateaux differentiability of the norm.



        The uniformity of the limit then gives the required $o$-property to obtain Frechet differentiability.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 23 at 7:38









        dawdaw

        24.6k1645




        24.6k1645






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081834%2fregarding-equivalent-conditions-of-frechet-differentiability%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese