pole placement in LMI regions
$begingroup$
In this paper, the authors elegantly present a LMI region as a subset $mathcal{D}$ of the complex plane
$$ mathcal{D} = {z in mathbb{C} | L + zcdot M + bar{z}cdot M^T < 0 }$$ where $L = L^T$ and $M$ are some real matrices. Then, they proceed to say that a real matrix $A$ is $mathcal{D}$ stable (that is, it has all eigenvalues in $mathcal{D}$) iff there $exists$ a symmetric positive definite matrix $X$, such that
$$ L otimes X + M otimes (Xcdot A) + M^T otimes (A^Tcdot X) < 0$$ where $otimes$ denotes the Kronecker product. How can I prove this?
My ideea
Indeed, for $L = 0$ and $M = 1$ the LMI region is the left complex plane and indeed the above condition becomes the well known Lyapunov stability requirement for the dynamical system $dot{x} = Acdot x$ which is equivalent with the eigenvalues of $A$ being in the left complex plane! Am I suppose to see this as some sort of transformation of the imaginary axis in a convex region?
convex-optimization dynamical-systems lmis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this paper, the authors elegantly present a LMI region as a subset $mathcal{D}$ of the complex plane
$$ mathcal{D} = {z in mathbb{C} | L + zcdot M + bar{z}cdot M^T < 0 }$$ where $L = L^T$ and $M$ are some real matrices. Then, they proceed to say that a real matrix $A$ is $mathcal{D}$ stable (that is, it has all eigenvalues in $mathcal{D}$) iff there $exists$ a symmetric positive definite matrix $X$, such that
$$ L otimes X + M otimes (Xcdot A) + M^T otimes (A^Tcdot X) < 0$$ where $otimes$ denotes the Kronecker product. How can I prove this?
My ideea
Indeed, for $L = 0$ and $M = 1$ the LMI region is the left complex plane and indeed the above condition becomes the well known Lyapunov stability requirement for the dynamical system $dot{x} = Acdot x$ which is equivalent with the eigenvalues of $A$ being in the left complex plane! Am I suppose to see this as some sort of transformation of the imaginary axis in a convex region?
convex-optimization dynamical-systems lmis
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The proof can be found in the Appendix of the full version of the paper: researchgate.net/publication/…
$endgroup$
– shamisen
Jan 21 at 22:03
$begingroup$
@shamisen thank you!
$endgroup$
– C Marius
Jan 21 at 22:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this paper, the authors elegantly present a LMI region as a subset $mathcal{D}$ of the complex plane
$$ mathcal{D} = {z in mathbb{C} | L + zcdot M + bar{z}cdot M^T < 0 }$$ where $L = L^T$ and $M$ are some real matrices. Then, they proceed to say that a real matrix $A$ is $mathcal{D}$ stable (that is, it has all eigenvalues in $mathcal{D}$) iff there $exists$ a symmetric positive definite matrix $X$, such that
$$ L otimes X + M otimes (Xcdot A) + M^T otimes (A^Tcdot X) < 0$$ where $otimes$ denotes the Kronecker product. How can I prove this?
My ideea
Indeed, for $L = 0$ and $M = 1$ the LMI region is the left complex plane and indeed the above condition becomes the well known Lyapunov stability requirement for the dynamical system $dot{x} = Acdot x$ which is equivalent with the eigenvalues of $A$ being in the left complex plane! Am I suppose to see this as some sort of transformation of the imaginary axis in a convex region?
convex-optimization dynamical-systems lmis
$endgroup$
In this paper, the authors elegantly present a LMI region as a subset $mathcal{D}$ of the complex plane
$$ mathcal{D} = {z in mathbb{C} | L + zcdot M + bar{z}cdot M^T < 0 }$$ where $L = L^T$ and $M$ are some real matrices. Then, they proceed to say that a real matrix $A$ is $mathcal{D}$ stable (that is, it has all eigenvalues in $mathcal{D}$) iff there $exists$ a symmetric positive definite matrix $X$, such that
$$ L otimes X + M otimes (Xcdot A) + M^T otimes (A^Tcdot X) < 0$$ where $otimes$ denotes the Kronecker product. How can I prove this?
My ideea
Indeed, for $L = 0$ and $M = 1$ the LMI region is the left complex plane and indeed the above condition becomes the well known Lyapunov stability requirement for the dynamical system $dot{x} = Acdot x$ which is equivalent with the eigenvalues of $A$ being in the left complex plane! Am I suppose to see this as some sort of transformation of the imaginary axis in a convex region?
convex-optimization dynamical-systems lmis
convex-optimization dynamical-systems lmis
edited Jan 21 at 20:57
C Marius
asked Jan 21 at 12:46
C MariusC Marius
581210
581210
$begingroup$
The proof can be found in the Appendix of the full version of the paper: researchgate.net/publication/…
$endgroup$
– shamisen
Jan 21 at 22:03
$begingroup$
@shamisen thank you!
$endgroup$
– C Marius
Jan 21 at 22:32
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The proof can be found in the Appendix of the full version of the paper: researchgate.net/publication/…
$endgroup$
– shamisen
Jan 21 at 22:03
$begingroup$
@shamisen thank you!
$endgroup$
– C Marius
Jan 21 at 22:32
$begingroup$
The proof can be found in the Appendix of the full version of the paper: researchgate.net/publication/…
$endgroup$
– shamisen
Jan 21 at 22:03
$begingroup$
The proof can be found in the Appendix of the full version of the paper: researchgate.net/publication/…
$endgroup$
– shamisen
Jan 21 at 22:03
$begingroup$
@shamisen thank you!
$endgroup$
– C Marius
Jan 21 at 22:32
$begingroup$
@shamisen thank you!
$endgroup$
– C Marius
Jan 21 at 22:32
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081836%2fpole-placement-in-lmi-regions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081836%2fpole-placement-in-lmi-regions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The proof can be found in the Appendix of the full version of the paper: researchgate.net/publication/…
$endgroup$
– shamisen
Jan 21 at 22:03
$begingroup$
@shamisen thank you!
$endgroup$
– C Marius
Jan 21 at 22:32