pole placement in LMI regions












2












$begingroup$


In this paper, the authors elegantly present a LMI region as a subset $mathcal{D}$ of the complex plane



$$ mathcal{D} = {z in mathbb{C} | L + zcdot M + bar{z}cdot M^T < 0 }$$ where $L = L^T$ and $M$ are some real matrices. Then, they proceed to say that a real matrix $A$ is $mathcal{D}$ stable (that is, it has all eigenvalues in $mathcal{D}$) iff there $exists$ a symmetric positive definite matrix $X$, such that
$$ L otimes X + M otimes (Xcdot A) + M^T otimes (A^Tcdot X) < 0$$ where $otimes$ denotes the Kronecker product. How can I prove this?



My ideea



Indeed, for $L = 0$ and $M = 1$ the LMI region is the left complex plane and indeed the above condition becomes the well known Lyapunov stability requirement for the dynamical system $dot{x} = Acdot x$ which is equivalent with the eigenvalues of $A$ being in the left complex plane! Am I suppose to see this as some sort of transformation of the imaginary axis in a convex region?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The proof can be found in the Appendix of the full version of the paper: researchgate.net/publication/…
    $endgroup$
    – shamisen
    Jan 21 at 22:03










  • $begingroup$
    @shamisen thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – C Marius
    Jan 21 at 22:32
















2












$begingroup$


In this paper, the authors elegantly present a LMI region as a subset $mathcal{D}$ of the complex plane



$$ mathcal{D} = {z in mathbb{C} | L + zcdot M + bar{z}cdot M^T < 0 }$$ where $L = L^T$ and $M$ are some real matrices. Then, they proceed to say that a real matrix $A$ is $mathcal{D}$ stable (that is, it has all eigenvalues in $mathcal{D}$) iff there $exists$ a symmetric positive definite matrix $X$, such that
$$ L otimes X + M otimes (Xcdot A) + M^T otimes (A^Tcdot X) < 0$$ where $otimes$ denotes the Kronecker product. How can I prove this?



My ideea



Indeed, for $L = 0$ and $M = 1$ the LMI region is the left complex plane and indeed the above condition becomes the well known Lyapunov stability requirement for the dynamical system $dot{x} = Acdot x$ which is equivalent with the eigenvalues of $A$ being in the left complex plane! Am I suppose to see this as some sort of transformation of the imaginary axis in a convex region?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The proof can be found in the Appendix of the full version of the paper: researchgate.net/publication/…
    $endgroup$
    – shamisen
    Jan 21 at 22:03










  • $begingroup$
    @shamisen thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – C Marius
    Jan 21 at 22:32














2












2








2





$begingroup$


In this paper, the authors elegantly present a LMI region as a subset $mathcal{D}$ of the complex plane



$$ mathcal{D} = {z in mathbb{C} | L + zcdot M + bar{z}cdot M^T < 0 }$$ where $L = L^T$ and $M$ are some real matrices. Then, they proceed to say that a real matrix $A$ is $mathcal{D}$ stable (that is, it has all eigenvalues in $mathcal{D}$) iff there $exists$ a symmetric positive definite matrix $X$, such that
$$ L otimes X + M otimes (Xcdot A) + M^T otimes (A^Tcdot X) < 0$$ where $otimes$ denotes the Kronecker product. How can I prove this?



My ideea



Indeed, for $L = 0$ and $M = 1$ the LMI region is the left complex plane and indeed the above condition becomes the well known Lyapunov stability requirement for the dynamical system $dot{x} = Acdot x$ which is equivalent with the eigenvalues of $A$ being in the left complex plane! Am I suppose to see this as some sort of transformation of the imaginary axis in a convex region?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




In this paper, the authors elegantly present a LMI region as a subset $mathcal{D}$ of the complex plane



$$ mathcal{D} = {z in mathbb{C} | L + zcdot M + bar{z}cdot M^T < 0 }$$ where $L = L^T$ and $M$ are some real matrices. Then, they proceed to say that a real matrix $A$ is $mathcal{D}$ stable (that is, it has all eigenvalues in $mathcal{D}$) iff there $exists$ a symmetric positive definite matrix $X$, such that
$$ L otimes X + M otimes (Xcdot A) + M^T otimes (A^Tcdot X) < 0$$ where $otimes$ denotes the Kronecker product. How can I prove this?



My ideea



Indeed, for $L = 0$ and $M = 1$ the LMI region is the left complex plane and indeed the above condition becomes the well known Lyapunov stability requirement for the dynamical system $dot{x} = Acdot x$ which is equivalent with the eigenvalues of $A$ being in the left complex plane! Am I suppose to see this as some sort of transformation of the imaginary axis in a convex region?







convex-optimization dynamical-systems lmis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 21 at 20:57







C Marius

















asked Jan 21 at 12:46









C MariusC Marius

581210




581210












  • $begingroup$
    The proof can be found in the Appendix of the full version of the paper: researchgate.net/publication/…
    $endgroup$
    – shamisen
    Jan 21 at 22:03










  • $begingroup$
    @shamisen thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – C Marius
    Jan 21 at 22:32


















  • $begingroup$
    The proof can be found in the Appendix of the full version of the paper: researchgate.net/publication/…
    $endgroup$
    – shamisen
    Jan 21 at 22:03










  • $begingroup$
    @shamisen thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – C Marius
    Jan 21 at 22:32
















$begingroup$
The proof can be found in the Appendix of the full version of the paper: researchgate.net/publication/…
$endgroup$
– shamisen
Jan 21 at 22:03




$begingroup$
The proof can be found in the Appendix of the full version of the paper: researchgate.net/publication/…
$endgroup$
– shamisen
Jan 21 at 22:03












$begingroup$
@shamisen thank you!
$endgroup$
– C Marius
Jan 21 at 22:32




$begingroup$
@shamisen thank you!
$endgroup$
– C Marius
Jan 21 at 22:32










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081836%2fpole-placement-in-lmi-regions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081836%2fpole-placement-in-lmi-regions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?