In which degrees there exist non-decomposable elements in the exterior algebra?












2












$begingroup$


I am trying to get a better understanding of the concept "decomposable" element in an exterior algebra. Let $V$ be a $d$-dimensional real vector space, and let $1<k<d$.
For which tuples $(k,d)$, $bigwedge^k V $ contains non-decomposable elements?



Here is a partial answer:




  1. First, the answer for $(k,d),(d-k,d)$ is the same, by duality. So, it suffices to assume $k le d/2$.


  2. For even $kle d/2$, there are always non-decomposable elements:



Set $sigma = e_1 wedge dots wedge e_k + e_{k+1} wedge dots wedge e_{2k} $, where $e_1,dots,e_d$ form a basis for $V$.



Then $sigma wedge sigma=(1+(-1)^{k^2})e_1 wedge dots wedge e_{2k}=(1+(-1)^k)e_1 wedge dots wedge e_{2k}$, which for even $k$ becomes $sigma wedge sigma=2e_1 wedge dots wedge e_{2k} neq 0$, so $sigma$ must be non-decomposable.




  1. For $(1,d)$, (and hence also for $(d-1,d)$) every element is decomposable.


I am not sure what happens for odd $k le d/2$.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    I am trying to get a better understanding of the concept "decomposable" element in an exterior algebra. Let $V$ be a $d$-dimensional real vector space, and let $1<k<d$.
    For which tuples $(k,d)$, $bigwedge^k V $ contains non-decomposable elements?



    Here is a partial answer:




    1. First, the answer for $(k,d),(d-k,d)$ is the same, by duality. So, it suffices to assume $k le d/2$.


    2. For even $kle d/2$, there are always non-decomposable elements:



    Set $sigma = e_1 wedge dots wedge e_k + e_{k+1} wedge dots wedge e_{2k} $, where $e_1,dots,e_d$ form a basis for $V$.



    Then $sigma wedge sigma=(1+(-1)^{k^2})e_1 wedge dots wedge e_{2k}=(1+(-1)^k)e_1 wedge dots wedge e_{2k}$, which for even $k$ becomes $sigma wedge sigma=2e_1 wedge dots wedge e_{2k} neq 0$, so $sigma$ must be non-decomposable.




    1. For $(1,d)$, (and hence also for $(d-1,d)$) every element is decomposable.


    I am not sure what happens for odd $k le d/2$.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I am trying to get a better understanding of the concept "decomposable" element in an exterior algebra. Let $V$ be a $d$-dimensional real vector space, and let $1<k<d$.
      For which tuples $(k,d)$, $bigwedge^k V $ contains non-decomposable elements?



      Here is a partial answer:




      1. First, the answer for $(k,d),(d-k,d)$ is the same, by duality. So, it suffices to assume $k le d/2$.


      2. For even $kle d/2$, there are always non-decomposable elements:



      Set $sigma = e_1 wedge dots wedge e_k + e_{k+1} wedge dots wedge e_{2k} $, where $e_1,dots,e_d$ form a basis for $V$.



      Then $sigma wedge sigma=(1+(-1)^{k^2})e_1 wedge dots wedge e_{2k}=(1+(-1)^k)e_1 wedge dots wedge e_{2k}$, which for even $k$ becomes $sigma wedge sigma=2e_1 wedge dots wedge e_{2k} neq 0$, so $sigma$ must be non-decomposable.




      1. For $(1,d)$, (and hence also for $(d-1,d)$) every element is decomposable.


      I am not sure what happens for odd $k le d/2$.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am trying to get a better understanding of the concept "decomposable" element in an exterior algebra. Let $V$ be a $d$-dimensional real vector space, and let $1<k<d$.
      For which tuples $(k,d)$, $bigwedge^k V $ contains non-decomposable elements?



      Here is a partial answer:




      1. First, the answer for $(k,d),(d-k,d)$ is the same, by duality. So, it suffices to assume $k le d/2$.


      2. For even $kle d/2$, there are always non-decomposable elements:



      Set $sigma = e_1 wedge dots wedge e_k + e_{k+1} wedge dots wedge e_{2k} $, where $e_1,dots,e_d$ form a basis for $V$.



      Then $sigma wedge sigma=(1+(-1)^{k^2})e_1 wedge dots wedge e_{2k}=(1+(-1)^k)e_1 wedge dots wedge e_{2k}$, which for even $k$ becomes $sigma wedge sigma=2e_1 wedge dots wedge e_{2k} neq 0$, so $sigma$ must be non-decomposable.




      1. For $(1,d)$, (and hence also for $(d-1,d)$) every element is decomposable.


      I am not sure what happens for odd $k le d/2$.







      differential-geometry symmetry exterior-algebra tensor-decomposition






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 21 at 13:23









      Asaf ShacharAsaf Shachar

      5,64631141




      5,64631141






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The set of decomposable elements forms a smooth projective subvariety of $Bbb{P}(bigwedge^kV)$ of dimension $k(d-k)$, called the Grassmannian. In particular there are non-decomposable elements if and only if
          $$k(d-k)<dimBbb{P}(bigwedge^kV)=binom{d}{k}-1,$$
          i.e. if and only if $1<k<d-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! This is a nice argument. By the way, do you know a nice reference for reading about the Plucker relations? The wikipedia article contains only a "coordinate formulation", but I guess there should be a more invariant (coordinate-free) approach...
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Shachar
            Jan 22 at 13:23












          • $begingroup$
            I believe EGA I (second edition) has a section on Grassmannians, which is no doubt coordinate-free. I don't have a copy at hand though.
            $endgroup$
            – Servaes
            Jan 22 at 14:53











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081876%2fin-which-degrees-there-exist-non-decomposable-elements-in-the-exterior-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          The set of decomposable elements forms a smooth projective subvariety of $Bbb{P}(bigwedge^kV)$ of dimension $k(d-k)$, called the Grassmannian. In particular there are non-decomposable elements if and only if
          $$k(d-k)<dimBbb{P}(bigwedge^kV)=binom{d}{k}-1,$$
          i.e. if and only if $1<k<d-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! This is a nice argument. By the way, do you know a nice reference for reading about the Plucker relations? The wikipedia article contains only a "coordinate formulation", but I guess there should be a more invariant (coordinate-free) approach...
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Shachar
            Jan 22 at 13:23












          • $begingroup$
            I believe EGA I (second edition) has a section on Grassmannians, which is no doubt coordinate-free. I don't have a copy at hand though.
            $endgroup$
            – Servaes
            Jan 22 at 14:53
















          2












          $begingroup$

          The set of decomposable elements forms a smooth projective subvariety of $Bbb{P}(bigwedge^kV)$ of dimension $k(d-k)$, called the Grassmannian. In particular there are non-decomposable elements if and only if
          $$k(d-k)<dimBbb{P}(bigwedge^kV)=binom{d}{k}-1,$$
          i.e. if and only if $1<k<d-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! This is a nice argument. By the way, do you know a nice reference for reading about the Plucker relations? The wikipedia article contains only a "coordinate formulation", but I guess there should be a more invariant (coordinate-free) approach...
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Shachar
            Jan 22 at 13:23












          • $begingroup$
            I believe EGA I (second edition) has a section on Grassmannians, which is no doubt coordinate-free. I don't have a copy at hand though.
            $endgroup$
            – Servaes
            Jan 22 at 14:53














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          The set of decomposable elements forms a smooth projective subvariety of $Bbb{P}(bigwedge^kV)$ of dimension $k(d-k)$, called the Grassmannian. In particular there are non-decomposable elements if and only if
          $$k(d-k)<dimBbb{P}(bigwedge^kV)=binom{d}{k}-1,$$
          i.e. if and only if $1<k<d-1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The set of decomposable elements forms a smooth projective subvariety of $Bbb{P}(bigwedge^kV)$ of dimension $k(d-k)$, called the Grassmannian. In particular there are non-decomposable elements if and only if
          $$k(d-k)<dimBbb{P}(bigwedge^kV)=binom{d}{k}-1,$$
          i.e. if and only if $1<k<d-1$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 22 at 13:21









          ServaesServaes

          25.8k33996




          25.8k33996












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! This is a nice argument. By the way, do you know a nice reference for reading about the Plucker relations? The wikipedia article contains only a "coordinate formulation", but I guess there should be a more invariant (coordinate-free) approach...
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Shachar
            Jan 22 at 13:23












          • $begingroup$
            I believe EGA I (second edition) has a section on Grassmannians, which is no doubt coordinate-free. I don't have a copy at hand though.
            $endgroup$
            – Servaes
            Jan 22 at 14:53


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! This is a nice argument. By the way, do you know a nice reference for reading about the Plucker relations? The wikipedia article contains only a "coordinate formulation", but I guess there should be a more invariant (coordinate-free) approach...
            $endgroup$
            – Asaf Shachar
            Jan 22 at 13:23












          • $begingroup$
            I believe EGA I (second edition) has a section on Grassmannians, which is no doubt coordinate-free. I don't have a copy at hand though.
            $endgroup$
            – Servaes
            Jan 22 at 14:53
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks! This is a nice argument. By the way, do you know a nice reference for reading about the Plucker relations? The wikipedia article contains only a "coordinate formulation", but I guess there should be a more invariant (coordinate-free) approach...
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Shachar
          Jan 22 at 13:23






          $begingroup$
          Thanks! This is a nice argument. By the way, do you know a nice reference for reading about the Plucker relations? The wikipedia article contains only a "coordinate formulation", but I guess there should be a more invariant (coordinate-free) approach...
          $endgroup$
          – Asaf Shachar
          Jan 22 at 13:23














          $begingroup$
          I believe EGA I (second edition) has a section on Grassmannians, which is no doubt coordinate-free. I don't have a copy at hand though.
          $endgroup$
          – Servaes
          Jan 22 at 14:53




          $begingroup$
          I believe EGA I (second edition) has a section on Grassmannians, which is no doubt coordinate-free. I don't have a copy at hand though.
          $endgroup$
          – Servaes
          Jan 22 at 14:53


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081876%2fin-which-degrees-there-exist-non-decomposable-elements-in-the-exterior-algebra%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese