Transforming equation with $e$ in order to find $x$












-1












$begingroup$


this task comes from electrotechnics.



How can I modify this equation in order to find $x$?
I need to have the equation in such form:



$x = text{...something...}$



Here is the equation:
$$expleft(-frac{a}{frac{1}{2}bx}right) = frac{2c-d}{d}$$
(this is e to the power of $-frac{a}{frac{1}{2}bx}$, looks confusing).



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Take the natural log of both sides. Cross multiply and it's a linear equation in $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    Jan 20 at 0:29










  • $begingroup$
    What exactly is your difficulty with this problem? Is just that it "looks confusing"? This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level.
    $endgroup$
    – Rory Daulton
    Jan 20 at 0:43










  • $begingroup$
    Well what exactly have you tried?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Wang
    Jan 20 at 2:00
















-1












$begingroup$


this task comes from electrotechnics.



How can I modify this equation in order to find $x$?
I need to have the equation in such form:



$x = text{...something...}$



Here is the equation:
$$expleft(-frac{a}{frac{1}{2}bx}right) = frac{2c-d}{d}$$
(this is e to the power of $-frac{a}{frac{1}{2}bx}$, looks confusing).



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Take the natural log of both sides. Cross multiply and it's a linear equation in $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    Jan 20 at 0:29










  • $begingroup$
    What exactly is your difficulty with this problem? Is just that it "looks confusing"? This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level.
    $endgroup$
    – Rory Daulton
    Jan 20 at 0:43










  • $begingroup$
    Well what exactly have you tried?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Wang
    Jan 20 at 2:00














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$


this task comes from electrotechnics.



How can I modify this equation in order to find $x$?
I need to have the equation in such form:



$x = text{...something...}$



Here is the equation:
$$expleft(-frac{a}{frac{1}{2}bx}right) = frac{2c-d}{d}$$
(this is e to the power of $-frac{a}{frac{1}{2}bx}$, looks confusing).



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




this task comes from electrotechnics.



How can I modify this equation in order to find $x$?
I need to have the equation in such form:



$x = text{...something...}$



Here is the equation:
$$expleft(-frac{a}{frac{1}{2}bx}right) = frac{2c-d}{d}$$
(this is e to the power of $-frac{a}{frac{1}{2}bx}$, looks confusing).



Thank you.







algebra-precalculus






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 20 at 0:45









David C. Ullrich

60.9k43994




60.9k43994










asked Jan 20 at 0:27









wenoweno

29211




29211








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Take the natural log of both sides. Cross multiply and it's a linear equation in $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    Jan 20 at 0:29










  • $begingroup$
    What exactly is your difficulty with this problem? Is just that it "looks confusing"? This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level.
    $endgroup$
    – Rory Daulton
    Jan 20 at 0:43










  • $begingroup$
    Well what exactly have you tried?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Wang
    Jan 20 at 2:00














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Take the natural log of both sides. Cross multiply and it's a linear equation in $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – Ethan Bolker
    Jan 20 at 0:29










  • $begingroup$
    What exactly is your difficulty with this problem? Is just that it "looks confusing"? This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level.
    $endgroup$
    – Rory Daulton
    Jan 20 at 0:43










  • $begingroup$
    Well what exactly have you tried?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Wang
    Jan 20 at 2:00








3




3




$begingroup$
Take the natural log of both sides. Cross multiply and it's a linear equation in $x$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 20 at 0:29




$begingroup$
Take the natural log of both sides. Cross multiply and it's a linear equation in $x$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 20 at 0:29












$begingroup$
What exactly is your difficulty with this problem? Is just that it "looks confusing"? This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level.
$endgroup$
– Rory Daulton
Jan 20 at 0:43




$begingroup$
What exactly is your difficulty with this problem? Is just that it "looks confusing"? This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level.
$endgroup$
– Rory Daulton
Jan 20 at 0:43












$begingroup$
Well what exactly have you tried?
$endgroup$
– Michael Wang
Jan 20 at 2:00




$begingroup$
Well what exactly have you tried?
$endgroup$
– Michael Wang
Jan 20 at 2:00










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides gives:
$$frac{-2a}{bx} = ln(frac{2c-d}{d})$$

Then divide both sides by $ln(frac{2c-d}{d})$ and multiply both sides by $x$ to obtain:
$$x = frac{-2a}{bln(frac{2c-d}{d})}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    MathJax hint: if you put a backslash before common functions you get the right font and spacing, so ln x gives $ln x$ compared to ln x which gives $ln x$
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 20 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks Ross! Very helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – user636441
    Jan 20 at 20:01











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080015%2ftransforming-equation-with-e-in-order-to-find-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides gives:
$$frac{-2a}{bx} = ln(frac{2c-d}{d})$$

Then divide both sides by $ln(frac{2c-d}{d})$ and multiply both sides by $x$ to obtain:
$$x = frac{-2a}{bln(frac{2c-d}{d})}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    MathJax hint: if you put a backslash before common functions you get the right font and spacing, so ln x gives $ln x$ compared to ln x which gives $ln x$
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 20 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks Ross! Very helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – user636441
    Jan 20 at 20:01
















1












$begingroup$

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides gives:
$$frac{-2a}{bx} = ln(frac{2c-d}{d})$$

Then divide both sides by $ln(frac{2c-d}{d})$ and multiply both sides by $x$ to obtain:
$$x = frac{-2a}{bln(frac{2c-d}{d})}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    MathJax hint: if you put a backslash before common functions you get the right font and spacing, so ln x gives $ln x$ compared to ln x which gives $ln x$
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 20 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks Ross! Very helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – user636441
    Jan 20 at 20:01














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides gives:
$$frac{-2a}{bx} = ln(frac{2c-d}{d})$$

Then divide both sides by $ln(frac{2c-d}{d})$ and multiply both sides by $x$ to obtain:
$$x = frac{-2a}{bln(frac{2c-d}{d})}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Taking the natural logarithm of both sides gives:
$$frac{-2a}{bx} = ln(frac{2c-d}{d})$$

Then divide both sides by $ln(frac{2c-d}{d})$ and multiply both sides by $x$ to obtain:
$$x = frac{-2a}{bln(frac{2c-d}{d})}$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 20 at 20:00

























answered Jan 20 at 1:48









user636441user636441

908




908








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    MathJax hint: if you put a backslash before common functions you get the right font and spacing, so ln x gives $ln x$ compared to ln x which gives $ln x$
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 20 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks Ross! Very helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – user636441
    Jan 20 at 20:01














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    MathJax hint: if you put a backslash before common functions you get the right font and spacing, so ln x gives $ln x$ compared to ln x which gives $ln x$
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    Jan 20 at 2:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks Ross! Very helpful.
    $endgroup$
    – user636441
    Jan 20 at 20:01








1




1




$begingroup$
MathJax hint: if you put a backslash before common functions you get the right font and spacing, so ln x gives $ln x$ compared to ln x which gives $ln x$
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 20 at 2:25




$begingroup$
MathJax hint: if you put a backslash before common functions you get the right font and spacing, so ln x gives $ln x$ compared to ln x which gives $ln x$
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
Jan 20 at 2:25












$begingroup$
Thanks Ross! Very helpful.
$endgroup$
– user636441
Jan 20 at 20:01




$begingroup$
Thanks Ross! Very helpful.
$endgroup$
– user636441
Jan 20 at 20:01


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080015%2ftransforming-equation-with-e-in-order-to-find-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Antonio Litta Visconti Arese