prove the L’Hospitals rule without Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem
$begingroup$
I am trying to prove the L’Hospitals rule in the following using the mean value theorem of the differential calculus instead of Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem(the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus).
Consider two functions $f(x)$ and $g(x)$, continuous on a closed interval $[a, b]$ of the X-axis, and differentiable on the interior of that interval. We assume that $g'(x)$ is positive and $f(a) = g(a) = 0$. The ordinary mean value theorem of differential calculus applied separately to $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ furnishes the expression:
$$frac{f(x) - f(a)}{gleft( x right) - gleft( a right)}=frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}.$$
where $c_1$ and $c_2$ are suitable intermediate values in the open interval $(a, x)$.
After taking limit on both sides and substituting $f(a) = g(a) = 0 $, one got
$$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x) - f(a)}{gleft( x right) - gleft( a right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{gleft( x right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}$$
However, L’Hospital’s Rule needs $$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{gleft( x right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g^{'}left( x right)}$$
so I wonder whether $lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g^{'}left( x right)}$ hold in this case ?
Some progress I have made in solving the problem :
- For every x, there always exist $c_1$ and $c_2$ in (a, x), so one
can denote $c_1=m(x)$ and $c_2=n(x)$, then $$lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f(x)}{gleft( x right)}=lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}=lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(m(x))}{g^{'}left( n(x) right)}$$(As @Bernard pointed out in the comment - if there are several $c_1$s
or $c_2$s in $(a, x)$, then I would choose any one of them, then $c_1$ and $c_2$ are functions of $x$ .), so the problem
becomes : whether $lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(m(x))}{g^{'}left( n(x) right)}=lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(x)}{g^{'}left( x right)}$ hold in this case ? - As $x$ approaches $a$, $c_1$ and $c_2$ also approach $a$ because it
always lies between $a$ and $x$.
real-analysis calculus
$endgroup$
|
show 9 more comments
$begingroup$
I am trying to prove the L’Hospitals rule in the following using the mean value theorem of the differential calculus instead of Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem(the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus).
Consider two functions $f(x)$ and $g(x)$, continuous on a closed interval $[a, b]$ of the X-axis, and differentiable on the interior of that interval. We assume that $g'(x)$ is positive and $f(a) = g(a) = 0$. The ordinary mean value theorem of differential calculus applied separately to $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ furnishes the expression:
$$frac{f(x) - f(a)}{gleft( x right) - gleft( a right)}=frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}.$$
where $c_1$ and $c_2$ are suitable intermediate values in the open interval $(a, x)$.
After taking limit on both sides and substituting $f(a) = g(a) = 0 $, one got
$$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x) - f(a)}{gleft( x right) - gleft( a right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{gleft( x right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}$$
However, L’Hospital’s Rule needs $$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{gleft( x right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g^{'}left( x right)}$$
so I wonder whether $lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g^{'}left( x right)}$ hold in this case ?
Some progress I have made in solving the problem :
- For every x, there always exist $c_1$ and $c_2$ in (a, x), so one
can denote $c_1=m(x)$ and $c_2=n(x)$, then $$lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f(x)}{gleft( x right)}=lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}=lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(m(x))}{g^{'}left( n(x) right)}$$(As @Bernard pointed out in the comment - if there are several $c_1$s
or $c_2$s in $(a, x)$, then I would choose any one of them, then $c_1$ and $c_2$ are functions of $x$ .), so the problem
becomes : whether $lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(m(x))}{g^{'}left( n(x) right)}=lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(x)}{g^{'}left( x right)}$ hold in this case ? - As $x$ approaches $a$, $c_1$ and $c_2$ also approach $a$ because it
always lies between $a$ and $x$.
real-analysis calculus
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Writing $lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}$ is meaningless because $c_1$ and $c_2$ are not functions of $x$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 15:20
$begingroup$
@Bernard I think not. For every x, there always exist $c_1$ and $c_2$ in (a, x), so one can denote $c_1=m(x)$ and $c_2=n(x)$. BTW, as $x$ approaches $a$, $c_1$ and $c_2$ also approaches $a$ because it always lies between $a$ and $x$.
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:35
$begingroup$
And if there are several $c_1$s or $c_2$s?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 15:45
$begingroup$
@Bernard Oh, I haven't considered that. If there are several $c_1$s or $c_2$s, then I may choose any one of them
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:53
$begingroup$
With the axiom of choice? It raises some fundamental questions…
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 16:30
|
show 9 more comments
$begingroup$
I am trying to prove the L’Hospitals rule in the following using the mean value theorem of the differential calculus instead of Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem(the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus).
Consider two functions $f(x)$ and $g(x)$, continuous on a closed interval $[a, b]$ of the X-axis, and differentiable on the interior of that interval. We assume that $g'(x)$ is positive and $f(a) = g(a) = 0$. The ordinary mean value theorem of differential calculus applied separately to $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ furnishes the expression:
$$frac{f(x) - f(a)}{gleft( x right) - gleft( a right)}=frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}.$$
where $c_1$ and $c_2$ are suitable intermediate values in the open interval $(a, x)$.
After taking limit on both sides and substituting $f(a) = g(a) = 0 $, one got
$$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x) - f(a)}{gleft( x right) - gleft( a right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{gleft( x right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}$$
However, L’Hospital’s Rule needs $$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{gleft( x right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g^{'}left( x right)}$$
so I wonder whether $lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g^{'}left( x right)}$ hold in this case ?
Some progress I have made in solving the problem :
- For every x, there always exist $c_1$ and $c_2$ in (a, x), so one
can denote $c_1=m(x)$ and $c_2=n(x)$, then $$lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f(x)}{gleft( x right)}=lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}=lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(m(x))}{g^{'}left( n(x) right)}$$(As @Bernard pointed out in the comment - if there are several $c_1$s
or $c_2$s in $(a, x)$, then I would choose any one of them, then $c_1$ and $c_2$ are functions of $x$ .), so the problem
becomes : whether $lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(m(x))}{g^{'}left( n(x) right)}=lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(x)}{g^{'}left( x right)}$ hold in this case ? - As $x$ approaches $a$, $c_1$ and $c_2$ also approach $a$ because it
always lies between $a$ and $x$.
real-analysis calculus
$endgroup$
I am trying to prove the L’Hospitals rule in the following using the mean value theorem of the differential calculus instead of Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem(the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus).
Consider two functions $f(x)$ and $g(x)$, continuous on a closed interval $[a, b]$ of the X-axis, and differentiable on the interior of that interval. We assume that $g'(x)$ is positive and $f(a) = g(a) = 0$. The ordinary mean value theorem of differential calculus applied separately to $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ furnishes the expression:
$$frac{f(x) - f(a)}{gleft( x right) - gleft( a right)}=frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}.$$
where $c_1$ and $c_2$ are suitable intermediate values in the open interval $(a, x)$.
After taking limit on both sides and substituting $f(a) = g(a) = 0 $, one got
$$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x) - f(a)}{gleft( x right) - gleft( a right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{gleft( x right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}$$
However, L’Hospital’s Rule needs $$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{gleft( x right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g^{'}left( x right)}$$
so I wonder whether $lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g^{'}left( x right)}$ hold in this case ?
Some progress I have made in solving the problem :
- For every x, there always exist $c_1$ and $c_2$ in (a, x), so one
can denote $c_1=m(x)$ and $c_2=n(x)$, then $$lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f(x)}{gleft( x right)}=lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}=lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(m(x))}{g^{'}left( n(x) right)}$$(As @Bernard pointed out in the comment - if there are several $c_1$s
or $c_2$s in $(a, x)$, then I would choose any one of them, then $c_1$ and $c_2$ are functions of $x$ .), so the problem
becomes : whether $lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(m(x))}{g^{'}left( n(x) right)}=lim _{xrightarrow
a+}frac{f'(x)}{g^{'}left( x right)}$ hold in this case ? - As $x$ approaches $a$, $c_1$ and $c_2$ also approach $a$ because it
always lies between $a$ and $x$.
real-analysis calculus
real-analysis calculus
edited Jan 21 at 3:54
iMath
asked Jan 20 at 15:13
iMathiMath
1,011821
1,011821
$begingroup$
Writing $lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}$ is meaningless because $c_1$ and $c_2$ are not functions of $x$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 15:20
$begingroup$
@Bernard I think not. For every x, there always exist $c_1$ and $c_2$ in (a, x), so one can denote $c_1=m(x)$ and $c_2=n(x)$. BTW, as $x$ approaches $a$, $c_1$ and $c_2$ also approaches $a$ because it always lies between $a$ and $x$.
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:35
$begingroup$
And if there are several $c_1$s or $c_2$s?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 15:45
$begingroup$
@Bernard Oh, I haven't considered that. If there are several $c_1$s or $c_2$s, then I may choose any one of them
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:53
$begingroup$
With the axiom of choice? It raises some fundamental questions…
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 16:30
|
show 9 more comments
$begingroup$
Writing $lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}$ is meaningless because $c_1$ and $c_2$ are not functions of $x$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 15:20
$begingroup$
@Bernard I think not. For every x, there always exist $c_1$ and $c_2$ in (a, x), so one can denote $c_1=m(x)$ and $c_2=n(x)$. BTW, as $x$ approaches $a$, $c_1$ and $c_2$ also approaches $a$ because it always lies between $a$ and $x$.
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:35
$begingroup$
And if there are several $c_1$s or $c_2$s?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 15:45
$begingroup$
@Bernard Oh, I haven't considered that. If there are several $c_1$s or $c_2$s, then I may choose any one of them
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:53
$begingroup$
With the axiom of choice? It raises some fundamental questions…
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 16:30
$begingroup$
Writing $lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}$ is meaningless because $c_1$ and $c_2$ are not functions of $x$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 15:20
$begingroup$
Writing $lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}$ is meaningless because $c_1$ and $c_2$ are not functions of $x$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 15:20
$begingroup$
@Bernard I think not. For every x, there always exist $c_1$ and $c_2$ in (a, x), so one can denote $c_1=m(x)$ and $c_2=n(x)$. BTW, as $x$ approaches $a$, $c_1$ and $c_2$ also approaches $a$ because it always lies between $a$ and $x$.
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:35
$begingroup$
@Bernard I think not. For every x, there always exist $c_1$ and $c_2$ in (a, x), so one can denote $c_1=m(x)$ and $c_2=n(x)$. BTW, as $x$ approaches $a$, $c_1$ and $c_2$ also approaches $a$ because it always lies between $a$ and $x$.
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:35
$begingroup$
And if there are several $c_1$s or $c_2$s?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 15:45
$begingroup$
And if there are several $c_1$s or $c_2$s?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 15:45
$begingroup$
@Bernard Oh, I haven't considered that. If there are several $c_1$s or $c_2$s, then I may choose any one of them
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:53
$begingroup$
@Bernard Oh, I haven't considered that. If there are several $c_1$s or $c_2$s, then I may choose any one of them
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:53
$begingroup$
With the axiom of choice? It raises some fundamental questions…
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 16:30
$begingroup$
With the axiom of choice? It raises some fundamental questions…
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 16:30
|
show 9 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since we have the same restrictions of domain for $f, g$ we can say that without loss of generality that $c_1 = c_2$.
Fully the proof would be as follows:
If $x in (a,b)$, then by the Mean Value Theorem applied to our given restrictions of $f,g$ to $[a, x]$, there exists some $xi_x in (a,x)$ with $$frac{f'(xi_x )}{g'(xi_x )}=frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$$
Since $xi_x rightarrow a$ as $xrightarrow a_+$ we have $$lim_{xrightarrow a_+} frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=lim_{xrightarrow a_+} frac{f'(xi_x)}{g'(xi_x)}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have to use Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem; that is
$$frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}$$
for some $c$ such that $a<c<x$. Thus when $xto a^+$, one has $to a^+$. So
$$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}=lim_{crightarrow a+}frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)}.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:37
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080701%2fprove-the-l-hospitals-rule-without-cauchys-mean-value-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Since we have the same restrictions of domain for $f, g$ we can say that without loss of generality that $c_1 = c_2$.
Fully the proof would be as follows:
If $x in (a,b)$, then by the Mean Value Theorem applied to our given restrictions of $f,g$ to $[a, x]$, there exists some $xi_x in (a,x)$ with $$frac{f'(xi_x )}{g'(xi_x )}=frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$$
Since $xi_x rightarrow a$ as $xrightarrow a_+$ we have $$lim_{xrightarrow a_+} frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=lim_{xrightarrow a_+} frac{f'(xi_x)}{g'(xi_x)}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since we have the same restrictions of domain for $f, g$ we can say that without loss of generality that $c_1 = c_2$.
Fully the proof would be as follows:
If $x in (a,b)$, then by the Mean Value Theorem applied to our given restrictions of $f,g$ to $[a, x]$, there exists some $xi_x in (a,x)$ with $$frac{f'(xi_x )}{g'(xi_x )}=frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$$
Since $xi_x rightarrow a$ as $xrightarrow a_+$ we have $$lim_{xrightarrow a_+} frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=lim_{xrightarrow a_+} frac{f'(xi_x)}{g'(xi_x)}$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since we have the same restrictions of domain for $f, g$ we can say that without loss of generality that $c_1 = c_2$.
Fully the proof would be as follows:
If $x in (a,b)$, then by the Mean Value Theorem applied to our given restrictions of $f,g$ to $[a, x]$, there exists some $xi_x in (a,x)$ with $$frac{f'(xi_x )}{g'(xi_x )}=frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$$
Since $xi_x rightarrow a$ as $xrightarrow a_+$ we have $$lim_{xrightarrow a_+} frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=lim_{xrightarrow a_+} frac{f'(xi_x)}{g'(xi_x)}$$
$endgroup$
Since we have the same restrictions of domain for $f, g$ we can say that without loss of generality that $c_1 = c_2$.
Fully the proof would be as follows:
If $x in (a,b)$, then by the Mean Value Theorem applied to our given restrictions of $f,g$ to $[a, x]$, there exists some $xi_x in (a,x)$ with $$frac{f'(xi_x )}{g'(xi_x )}=frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{f(x)}{g(x)}$$
Since $xi_x rightarrow a$ as $xrightarrow a_+$ we have $$lim_{xrightarrow a_+} frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=lim_{xrightarrow a_+} frac{f'(xi_x)}{g'(xi_x)}$$
answered Jan 20 at 15:26
Joel BiffinJoel Biffin
966
966
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:50
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:50
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have to use Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem; that is
$$frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}$$
for some $c$ such that $a<c<x$. Thus when $xto a^+$, one has $to a^+$. So
$$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}=lim_{crightarrow a+}frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)}.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have to use Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem; that is
$$frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}$$
for some $c$ such that $a<c<x$. Thus when $xto a^+$, one has $to a^+$. So
$$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}=lim_{crightarrow a+}frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)}.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You have to use Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem; that is
$$frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}$$
for some $c$ such that $a<c<x$. Thus when $xto a^+$, one has $to a^+$. So
$$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}=lim_{crightarrow a+}frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)}.$$
$endgroup$
You have to use Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem; that is
$$frac{f(x)-f(a)}{g(x)-g(a)}=frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}$$
for some $c$ such that $a<c<x$. Thus when $xto a^+$, one has $to a^+$. So
$$lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f(x)}{g(x)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}=lim_{crightarrow a+}frac{f'(c)}{g'(c)}=lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(x)}{g'(x)}.$$
edited Jan 20 at 15:33
answered Jan 20 at 15:26
xpaulxpaul
22.8k24455
22.8k24455
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:37
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:37
$begingroup$
Sorry, but Cauchy's Mean Value Theorem is the same as the generalized mean value theorem of differential calculus, I don't want to use it to prove here
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:37
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080701%2fprove-the-l-hospitals-rule-without-cauchys-mean-value-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Writing $lim _{xrightarrow a+}frac{f'(c_1)}{g^{'}left( c_2 right)}$ is meaningless because $c_1$ and $c_2$ are not functions of $x$.
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 15:20
$begingroup$
@Bernard I think not. For every x, there always exist $c_1$ and $c_2$ in (a, x), so one can denote $c_1=m(x)$ and $c_2=n(x)$. BTW, as $x$ approaches $a$, $c_1$ and $c_2$ also approaches $a$ because it always lies between $a$ and $x$.
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:35
$begingroup$
And if there are several $c_1$s or $c_2$s?
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 15:45
$begingroup$
@Bernard Oh, I haven't considered that. If there are several $c_1$s or $c_2$s, then I may choose any one of them
$endgroup$
– iMath
Jan 20 at 15:53
$begingroup$
With the axiom of choice? It raises some fundamental questions…
$endgroup$
– Bernard
Jan 20 at 16:30