Help with Maclaurin series of $cos(ln(x+1))$?
$begingroup$
Hi I've almost completed a maths question I am stuck on I just can't seem to get to the final result. The question is:
Find the Maclaurin series of $g(x) = cos(ln(x+1))$ up to order 3.
I have used the formulas which I won't type out as I'm not great with Mathjax yet sorry. But I have obtained:
$$ ln(x+1) = x - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{3} - frac{x^4}{4} $$
$$ cos x = 1 - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^4}{24} - frac{x^6}{720} $$
I'm sure what I have done above is correct however I can't seem to get to the final solution shown in the answers and would like some help please. Thanks
real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series taylor-expansion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hi I've almost completed a maths question I am stuck on I just can't seem to get to the final result. The question is:
Find the Maclaurin series of $g(x) = cos(ln(x+1))$ up to order 3.
I have used the formulas which I won't type out as I'm not great with Mathjax yet sorry. But I have obtained:
$$ ln(x+1) = x - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{3} - frac{x^4}{4} $$
$$ cos x = 1 - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^4}{24} - frac{x^6}{720} $$
I'm sure what I have done above is correct however I can't seem to get to the final solution shown in the answers and would like some help please. Thanks
real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series taylor-expansion
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Replace $x$ in your second line with the series of $ln(1+x)$
$endgroup$
– Dylan
Jan 20 at 15:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hi I've almost completed a maths question I am stuck on I just can't seem to get to the final result. The question is:
Find the Maclaurin series of $g(x) = cos(ln(x+1))$ up to order 3.
I have used the formulas which I won't type out as I'm not great with Mathjax yet sorry. But I have obtained:
$$ ln(x+1) = x - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{3} - frac{x^4}{4} $$
$$ cos x = 1 - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^4}{24} - frac{x^6}{720} $$
I'm sure what I have done above is correct however I can't seem to get to the final solution shown in the answers and would like some help please. Thanks
real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series taylor-expansion
$endgroup$
Hi I've almost completed a maths question I am stuck on I just can't seem to get to the final result. The question is:
Find the Maclaurin series of $g(x) = cos(ln(x+1))$ up to order 3.
I have used the formulas which I won't type out as I'm not great with Mathjax yet sorry. But I have obtained:
$$ ln(x+1) = x - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{3} - frac{x^4}{4} $$
$$ cos x = 1 - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^4}{24} - frac{x^6}{720} $$
I'm sure what I have done above is correct however I can't seem to get to the final solution shown in the answers and would like some help please. Thanks
real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series taylor-expansion
real-analysis calculus sequences-and-series taylor-expansion
edited Jan 20 at 15:06
Dylan
12.9k31027
12.9k31027
asked Jan 20 at 14:47
CinnaCinna
122
122
$begingroup$
Replace $x$ in your second line with the series of $ln(1+x)$
$endgroup$
– Dylan
Jan 20 at 15:07
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Replace $x$ in your second line with the series of $ln(1+x)$
$endgroup$
– Dylan
Jan 20 at 15:07
$begingroup$
Replace $x$ in your second line with the series of $ln(1+x)$
$endgroup$
– Dylan
Jan 20 at 15:07
$begingroup$
Replace $x$ in your second line with the series of $ln(1+x)$
$endgroup$
– Dylan
Jan 20 at 15:07
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$f(x)=o(x^k)$ if:
$underset{xrightarrow 0}{lim} frac{f(x)}{x^k}=0$
Since smaller powers of $x$ matter more when tending to $0$, it essentially means that something is negligible relative to $x^k$ when tending to $0$. Moreover by simple calculus one can see that if $f=o(x^m)$ and $g=o(x^ell)$, then:
$f(x)+g(x)=o(x^{min {m,ell } })$
And for $k<ell$ we have that:
$acdot x^ell = o(x^k)$
Therefore by uniqueness of the Taylor series, you want to write your function of the form:
$cos big( ln(1+x) big)= p_3(x)+o(x^3)$
Where $p_3$ is a polynomial of $x$ with degree at most $3$. If we denote by $T_m^f(x)$ the Taylor polynomial up to order $m$ at $0$. Then by your calculations:
$T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x)=x-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^3}{3}-frac{x^4}{4}quad$ and $quad T_6^{cos(x)}(x)=1-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^4}{24}-frac{x^6}{720}$
Then the function $T_6^{cos(x)}circ T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) $ is a polynomial, and if you erase the powers negligible to $x^3$ in the final polynomial, then you obtain the Taylor polynomial at $0$ of order $3$. In particular:
$cos(ln(1+x))= 1 - Big( T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) Big)/2 + Big( T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) Big)^4/24+o(x^4)=$
$=1- frac{1}{2} Big( x- frac{1}{2} x^2+ +frac{x^3}{3} +o(x^3) Big)^2 +o(x^4)=$
$=1-frac{1}{2} Big( x^2- x^3 +o(x^3) Big)+ o(x^4)= 1-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^3}{2}+o(x^3)$
Where I neglected things that I saw which were going to be of powers strictly greater than $3$.
I think it is helpful to go by this algorithm when unsure.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hi thanks so much for your help but I still don't understand what your doing ? It just makes no sense to me i can't see how you got to the final answer ? Could you type out what your doing in a more simple way maybe then I might understand. Sorry if this is a dumb question I just can't see what you are doing. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the notation of small $o$?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:22
$begingroup$
No im not is that what is causing my confusion ?
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:23
$begingroup$
It might be. It is implict in my explanation. I'll try to rewrite a friendlier version.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:26
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. I hope this clears up some things.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 17:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Since you also don't need very high orders, the straightforward calculation of derivatives is tractable, though not preferable computationally. If $f(x) = cos log(1+x)$, then $$f'(x) = -frac{sin log (1+x)}{1+x}, quad f'(0) = 0.$$ Then $$f''(x) = -frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^2} + frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^2}, quad f''(0) = -1.$$ Finally, $$f'''(x) = frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} + frac{2cos log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} + frac{cos log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} - frac{2 sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^3}, quad f'''(0) = 3.$$ Then $$f(x) = f(0) + frac{f'(0)}{1!}x + frac{f''(0)}{2!}x^2 + frac{f'''(0)}{3!}x^3 + O(x^4) = 1 - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{2} + O(x^4).$$
It is worth noting that $$f^{(n)}(x) = frac{A_n cos log (1+x) + B_n sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^n},$$ for suitable constants $A_n$, $B_n$. A proof by induction is straightforward and yields insight into the recursion relations defining ${(A_n, B_n)}_{n ge 1}$: $$begin{align*} f^{(n+1)}(x) &= -A_n frac{sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} - nA_n frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} - n B_n frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} + B_n frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} \
&= frac{(B_n - nA_n) cos log(1+x) + (-A_n - nB_n)sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}}.
end{align*}.$$ Therefore, $$begin{align*} A_{n+1} & = -nA_n + B_n, \ B_{n+1} &= -A_n - nB_n, \ A_0 &= 1, \ B_0 &= 0. end{align*}$$ In matrix form, this recurrence is equivalent to $$begin{bmatrix}A_{n+1} \ B_{n+1}end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} -n & 1 \ -1 & -n end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} A_n \ B_n end{bmatrix},$$ consequently $$begin{bmatrix}A_n \ B_nend{bmatrix} = M_n begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix},$$ where $$M_n = prod_{k=0}^{n-1} begin{bmatrix} -k & 1 \ -1 & -k end{bmatrix}$$ and $f^{(n)}(0) = A_n$. This lets us continue our calculation of higher orders with relative ease if we keep track of the matrix product $M_n$, which is always of the form $$M_n = begin{bmatrix} a & b \ -b & a end{bmatrix};$$ for example, $$M_3 = begin{bmatrix} 3 & 1 \ -1 & 3end{bmatrix}, quad M_4 = begin{bmatrix} -3 & 1 \ -1 & -3end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} 3 & 1 \ -1 & 3end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} -10 & 0 \ 0 & -10 end{bmatrix},$$ so that $A_4 = -10$ and the next coefficient is $-10/4! = -5/12$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Interestingly, the coefficients of the series expansion of $f$ are almost alternating in sign, but in the first $50000$ terms, there are three instances where the sign of consecutive terms is the same: specifically, the coefficients of $x^{18}$, $x^{397}$, and $x^{9166}$ are positive when the term immediately preceding it is also positive. Based on this very limited pattern, I suspect the next coefficient satisfying this property will be around $x^{211000}$. I wonder if this has been researched.
$endgroup$
– heropup
Jan 20 at 23:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since$$cos x=1-frac{x^2}2+cdots,$$you havebegin{align}cosbigl(log(x+1)bigr)&=1-frac12left(x-frac{x^2}2+frac{x^3}3-cdotsright)^2+cdots\&=1-frac{x^2}2+frac{x^3}2+cdotsend{align}Note that this argument works because the series for $log(x+1)$ has no constant term. A consequence of this is that no matter how more terms you use from both series, you will get no new term whose degree is smaller than $4$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think that you should add some comments about why no higher grade terms are needed of $cos x$ and $log(x+1)$.
$endgroup$
– md2perpe
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 20 at 15:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A heuristic way using complex numbers that's related to one of the other answers: define
$$begin{align}
f(x)&=cosln(1+x) \
g(x)&=sin ln(1+x)text{.}
end{align}$$
Then
$$begin{align}f(0)+mathrm{i}g(0)&=1\
(f+mathrm{i}g)'&=frac{mathrm{i}(f+mathrm{i}g)}{1+x}
end{align}$$
so the left- and right-hand sides of
$$f(x)+mathrm{i}g(x)=(1+x)^{mathrm{i}}$$
coincide as formal power series in $x$. Thus
$$begin{split}cos ln(1+x)&= 1 +Re mathrm{i} x+Re tfrac{mathrm{i}(mathrm{i}-1)}{2} x^2+Re tfrac{mathrm{i}(mathrm{i}-1)(mathrm{i}-2)}{6} x^3+o(x^3)\
&=1-tfrac{x^2}{2}+tfrac{x^3}{2}+o(x^3)end{split}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080664%2fhelp-with-maclaurin-series-of-cos-lnx1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$f(x)=o(x^k)$ if:
$underset{xrightarrow 0}{lim} frac{f(x)}{x^k}=0$
Since smaller powers of $x$ matter more when tending to $0$, it essentially means that something is negligible relative to $x^k$ when tending to $0$. Moreover by simple calculus one can see that if $f=o(x^m)$ and $g=o(x^ell)$, then:
$f(x)+g(x)=o(x^{min {m,ell } })$
And for $k<ell$ we have that:
$acdot x^ell = o(x^k)$
Therefore by uniqueness of the Taylor series, you want to write your function of the form:
$cos big( ln(1+x) big)= p_3(x)+o(x^3)$
Where $p_3$ is a polynomial of $x$ with degree at most $3$. If we denote by $T_m^f(x)$ the Taylor polynomial up to order $m$ at $0$. Then by your calculations:
$T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x)=x-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^3}{3}-frac{x^4}{4}quad$ and $quad T_6^{cos(x)}(x)=1-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^4}{24}-frac{x^6}{720}$
Then the function $T_6^{cos(x)}circ T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) $ is a polynomial, and if you erase the powers negligible to $x^3$ in the final polynomial, then you obtain the Taylor polynomial at $0$ of order $3$. In particular:
$cos(ln(1+x))= 1 - Big( T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) Big)/2 + Big( T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) Big)^4/24+o(x^4)=$
$=1- frac{1}{2} Big( x- frac{1}{2} x^2+ +frac{x^3}{3} +o(x^3) Big)^2 +o(x^4)=$
$=1-frac{1}{2} Big( x^2- x^3 +o(x^3) Big)+ o(x^4)= 1-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^3}{2}+o(x^3)$
Where I neglected things that I saw which were going to be of powers strictly greater than $3$.
I think it is helpful to go by this algorithm when unsure.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hi thanks so much for your help but I still don't understand what your doing ? It just makes no sense to me i can't see how you got to the final answer ? Could you type out what your doing in a more simple way maybe then I might understand. Sorry if this is a dumb question I just can't see what you are doing. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the notation of small $o$?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:22
$begingroup$
No im not is that what is causing my confusion ?
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:23
$begingroup$
It might be. It is implict in my explanation. I'll try to rewrite a friendlier version.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:26
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. I hope this clears up some things.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 17:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
$f(x)=o(x^k)$ if:
$underset{xrightarrow 0}{lim} frac{f(x)}{x^k}=0$
Since smaller powers of $x$ matter more when tending to $0$, it essentially means that something is negligible relative to $x^k$ when tending to $0$. Moreover by simple calculus one can see that if $f=o(x^m)$ and $g=o(x^ell)$, then:
$f(x)+g(x)=o(x^{min {m,ell } })$
And for $k<ell$ we have that:
$acdot x^ell = o(x^k)$
Therefore by uniqueness of the Taylor series, you want to write your function of the form:
$cos big( ln(1+x) big)= p_3(x)+o(x^3)$
Where $p_3$ is a polynomial of $x$ with degree at most $3$. If we denote by $T_m^f(x)$ the Taylor polynomial up to order $m$ at $0$. Then by your calculations:
$T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x)=x-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^3}{3}-frac{x^4}{4}quad$ and $quad T_6^{cos(x)}(x)=1-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^4}{24}-frac{x^6}{720}$
Then the function $T_6^{cos(x)}circ T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) $ is a polynomial, and if you erase the powers negligible to $x^3$ in the final polynomial, then you obtain the Taylor polynomial at $0$ of order $3$. In particular:
$cos(ln(1+x))= 1 - Big( T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) Big)/2 + Big( T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) Big)^4/24+o(x^4)=$
$=1- frac{1}{2} Big( x- frac{1}{2} x^2+ +frac{x^3}{3} +o(x^3) Big)^2 +o(x^4)=$
$=1-frac{1}{2} Big( x^2- x^3 +o(x^3) Big)+ o(x^4)= 1-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^3}{2}+o(x^3)$
Where I neglected things that I saw which were going to be of powers strictly greater than $3$.
I think it is helpful to go by this algorithm when unsure.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hi thanks so much for your help but I still don't understand what your doing ? It just makes no sense to me i can't see how you got to the final answer ? Could you type out what your doing in a more simple way maybe then I might understand. Sorry if this is a dumb question I just can't see what you are doing. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the notation of small $o$?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:22
$begingroup$
No im not is that what is causing my confusion ?
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:23
$begingroup$
It might be. It is implict in my explanation. I'll try to rewrite a friendlier version.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:26
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. I hope this clears up some things.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 17:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
$f(x)=o(x^k)$ if:
$underset{xrightarrow 0}{lim} frac{f(x)}{x^k}=0$
Since smaller powers of $x$ matter more when tending to $0$, it essentially means that something is negligible relative to $x^k$ when tending to $0$. Moreover by simple calculus one can see that if $f=o(x^m)$ and $g=o(x^ell)$, then:
$f(x)+g(x)=o(x^{min {m,ell } })$
And for $k<ell$ we have that:
$acdot x^ell = o(x^k)$
Therefore by uniqueness of the Taylor series, you want to write your function of the form:
$cos big( ln(1+x) big)= p_3(x)+o(x^3)$
Where $p_3$ is a polynomial of $x$ with degree at most $3$. If we denote by $T_m^f(x)$ the Taylor polynomial up to order $m$ at $0$. Then by your calculations:
$T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x)=x-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^3}{3}-frac{x^4}{4}quad$ and $quad T_6^{cos(x)}(x)=1-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^4}{24}-frac{x^6}{720}$
Then the function $T_6^{cos(x)}circ T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) $ is a polynomial, and if you erase the powers negligible to $x^3$ in the final polynomial, then you obtain the Taylor polynomial at $0$ of order $3$. In particular:
$cos(ln(1+x))= 1 - Big( T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) Big)/2 + Big( T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) Big)^4/24+o(x^4)=$
$=1- frac{1}{2} Big( x- frac{1}{2} x^2+ +frac{x^3}{3} +o(x^3) Big)^2 +o(x^4)=$
$=1-frac{1}{2} Big( x^2- x^3 +o(x^3) Big)+ o(x^4)= 1-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^3}{2}+o(x^3)$
Where I neglected things that I saw which were going to be of powers strictly greater than $3$.
I think it is helpful to go by this algorithm when unsure.
$endgroup$
$f(x)=o(x^k)$ if:
$underset{xrightarrow 0}{lim} frac{f(x)}{x^k}=0$
Since smaller powers of $x$ matter more when tending to $0$, it essentially means that something is negligible relative to $x^k$ when tending to $0$. Moreover by simple calculus one can see that if $f=o(x^m)$ and $g=o(x^ell)$, then:
$f(x)+g(x)=o(x^{min {m,ell } })$
And for $k<ell$ we have that:
$acdot x^ell = o(x^k)$
Therefore by uniqueness of the Taylor series, you want to write your function of the form:
$cos big( ln(1+x) big)= p_3(x)+o(x^3)$
Where $p_3$ is a polynomial of $x$ with degree at most $3$. If we denote by $T_m^f(x)$ the Taylor polynomial up to order $m$ at $0$. Then by your calculations:
$T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x)=x-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^3}{3}-frac{x^4}{4}quad$ and $quad T_6^{cos(x)}(x)=1-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^4}{24}-frac{x^6}{720}$
Then the function $T_6^{cos(x)}circ T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) $ is a polynomial, and if you erase the powers negligible to $x^3$ in the final polynomial, then you obtain the Taylor polynomial at $0$ of order $3$. In particular:
$cos(ln(1+x))= 1 - Big( T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) Big)/2 + Big( T_4^{ln(x+1)}(x) Big)^4/24+o(x^4)=$
$=1- frac{1}{2} Big( x- frac{1}{2} x^2+ +frac{x^3}{3} +o(x^3) Big)^2 +o(x^4)=$
$=1-frac{1}{2} Big( x^2- x^3 +o(x^3) Big)+ o(x^4)= 1-frac{x^2}{2}+frac{x^3}{2}+o(x^3)$
Where I neglected things that I saw which were going to be of powers strictly greater than $3$.
I think it is helpful to go by this algorithm when unsure.
edited Jan 20 at 17:19
answered Jan 20 at 15:02
Keen-ameteurKeen-ameteur
1,440316
1,440316
$begingroup$
Hi thanks so much for your help but I still don't understand what your doing ? It just makes no sense to me i can't see how you got to the final answer ? Could you type out what your doing in a more simple way maybe then I might understand. Sorry if this is a dumb question I just can't see what you are doing. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the notation of small $o$?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:22
$begingroup$
No im not is that what is causing my confusion ?
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:23
$begingroup$
It might be. It is implict in my explanation. I'll try to rewrite a friendlier version.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:26
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. I hope this clears up some things.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 17:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Hi thanks so much for your help but I still don't understand what your doing ? It just makes no sense to me i can't see how you got to the final answer ? Could you type out what your doing in a more simple way maybe then I might understand. Sorry if this is a dumb question I just can't see what you are doing. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the notation of small $o$?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:22
$begingroup$
No im not is that what is causing my confusion ?
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:23
$begingroup$
It might be. It is implict in my explanation. I'll try to rewrite a friendlier version.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:26
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. I hope this clears up some things.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 17:20
$begingroup$
Hi thanks so much for your help but I still don't understand what your doing ? It just makes no sense to me i can't see how you got to the final answer ? Could you type out what your doing in a more simple way maybe then I might understand. Sorry if this is a dumb question I just can't see what you are doing. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Hi thanks so much for your help but I still don't understand what your doing ? It just makes no sense to me i can't see how you got to the final answer ? Could you type out what your doing in a more simple way maybe then I might understand. Sorry if this is a dumb question I just can't see what you are doing. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the notation of small $o$?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:22
$begingroup$
Are you familiar with the notation of small $o$?
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:22
$begingroup$
No im not is that what is causing my confusion ?
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:23
$begingroup$
No im not is that what is causing my confusion ?
$endgroup$
– Cinna
Jan 20 at 15:23
$begingroup$
It might be. It is implict in my explanation. I'll try to rewrite a friendlier version.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:26
$begingroup$
It might be. It is implict in my explanation. I'll try to rewrite a friendlier version.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 15:26
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. I hope this clears up some things.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 17:20
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. I hope this clears up some things.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 20 at 17:20
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Since you also don't need very high orders, the straightforward calculation of derivatives is tractable, though not preferable computationally. If $f(x) = cos log(1+x)$, then $$f'(x) = -frac{sin log (1+x)}{1+x}, quad f'(0) = 0.$$ Then $$f''(x) = -frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^2} + frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^2}, quad f''(0) = -1.$$ Finally, $$f'''(x) = frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} + frac{2cos log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} + frac{cos log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} - frac{2 sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^3}, quad f'''(0) = 3.$$ Then $$f(x) = f(0) + frac{f'(0)}{1!}x + frac{f''(0)}{2!}x^2 + frac{f'''(0)}{3!}x^3 + O(x^4) = 1 - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{2} + O(x^4).$$
It is worth noting that $$f^{(n)}(x) = frac{A_n cos log (1+x) + B_n sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^n},$$ for suitable constants $A_n$, $B_n$. A proof by induction is straightforward and yields insight into the recursion relations defining ${(A_n, B_n)}_{n ge 1}$: $$begin{align*} f^{(n+1)}(x) &= -A_n frac{sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} - nA_n frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} - n B_n frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} + B_n frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} \
&= frac{(B_n - nA_n) cos log(1+x) + (-A_n - nB_n)sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}}.
end{align*}.$$ Therefore, $$begin{align*} A_{n+1} & = -nA_n + B_n, \ B_{n+1} &= -A_n - nB_n, \ A_0 &= 1, \ B_0 &= 0. end{align*}$$ In matrix form, this recurrence is equivalent to $$begin{bmatrix}A_{n+1} \ B_{n+1}end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} -n & 1 \ -1 & -n end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} A_n \ B_n end{bmatrix},$$ consequently $$begin{bmatrix}A_n \ B_nend{bmatrix} = M_n begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix},$$ where $$M_n = prod_{k=0}^{n-1} begin{bmatrix} -k & 1 \ -1 & -k end{bmatrix}$$ and $f^{(n)}(0) = A_n$. This lets us continue our calculation of higher orders with relative ease if we keep track of the matrix product $M_n$, which is always of the form $$M_n = begin{bmatrix} a & b \ -b & a end{bmatrix};$$ for example, $$M_3 = begin{bmatrix} 3 & 1 \ -1 & 3end{bmatrix}, quad M_4 = begin{bmatrix} -3 & 1 \ -1 & -3end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} 3 & 1 \ -1 & 3end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} -10 & 0 \ 0 & -10 end{bmatrix},$$ so that $A_4 = -10$ and the next coefficient is $-10/4! = -5/12$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Interestingly, the coefficients of the series expansion of $f$ are almost alternating in sign, but in the first $50000$ terms, there are three instances where the sign of consecutive terms is the same: specifically, the coefficients of $x^{18}$, $x^{397}$, and $x^{9166}$ are positive when the term immediately preceding it is also positive. Based on this very limited pattern, I suspect the next coefficient satisfying this property will be around $x^{211000}$. I wonder if this has been researched.
$endgroup$
– heropup
Jan 20 at 23:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since you also don't need very high orders, the straightforward calculation of derivatives is tractable, though not preferable computationally. If $f(x) = cos log(1+x)$, then $$f'(x) = -frac{sin log (1+x)}{1+x}, quad f'(0) = 0.$$ Then $$f''(x) = -frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^2} + frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^2}, quad f''(0) = -1.$$ Finally, $$f'''(x) = frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} + frac{2cos log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} + frac{cos log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} - frac{2 sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^3}, quad f'''(0) = 3.$$ Then $$f(x) = f(0) + frac{f'(0)}{1!}x + frac{f''(0)}{2!}x^2 + frac{f'''(0)}{3!}x^3 + O(x^4) = 1 - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{2} + O(x^4).$$
It is worth noting that $$f^{(n)}(x) = frac{A_n cos log (1+x) + B_n sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^n},$$ for suitable constants $A_n$, $B_n$. A proof by induction is straightforward and yields insight into the recursion relations defining ${(A_n, B_n)}_{n ge 1}$: $$begin{align*} f^{(n+1)}(x) &= -A_n frac{sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} - nA_n frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} - n B_n frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} + B_n frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} \
&= frac{(B_n - nA_n) cos log(1+x) + (-A_n - nB_n)sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}}.
end{align*}.$$ Therefore, $$begin{align*} A_{n+1} & = -nA_n + B_n, \ B_{n+1} &= -A_n - nB_n, \ A_0 &= 1, \ B_0 &= 0. end{align*}$$ In matrix form, this recurrence is equivalent to $$begin{bmatrix}A_{n+1} \ B_{n+1}end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} -n & 1 \ -1 & -n end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} A_n \ B_n end{bmatrix},$$ consequently $$begin{bmatrix}A_n \ B_nend{bmatrix} = M_n begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix},$$ where $$M_n = prod_{k=0}^{n-1} begin{bmatrix} -k & 1 \ -1 & -k end{bmatrix}$$ and $f^{(n)}(0) = A_n$. This lets us continue our calculation of higher orders with relative ease if we keep track of the matrix product $M_n$, which is always of the form $$M_n = begin{bmatrix} a & b \ -b & a end{bmatrix};$$ for example, $$M_3 = begin{bmatrix} 3 & 1 \ -1 & 3end{bmatrix}, quad M_4 = begin{bmatrix} -3 & 1 \ -1 & -3end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} 3 & 1 \ -1 & 3end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} -10 & 0 \ 0 & -10 end{bmatrix},$$ so that $A_4 = -10$ and the next coefficient is $-10/4! = -5/12$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Interestingly, the coefficients of the series expansion of $f$ are almost alternating in sign, but in the first $50000$ terms, there are three instances where the sign of consecutive terms is the same: specifically, the coefficients of $x^{18}$, $x^{397}$, and $x^{9166}$ are positive when the term immediately preceding it is also positive. Based on this very limited pattern, I suspect the next coefficient satisfying this property will be around $x^{211000}$. I wonder if this has been researched.
$endgroup$
– heropup
Jan 20 at 23:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since you also don't need very high orders, the straightforward calculation of derivatives is tractable, though not preferable computationally. If $f(x) = cos log(1+x)$, then $$f'(x) = -frac{sin log (1+x)}{1+x}, quad f'(0) = 0.$$ Then $$f''(x) = -frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^2} + frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^2}, quad f''(0) = -1.$$ Finally, $$f'''(x) = frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} + frac{2cos log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} + frac{cos log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} - frac{2 sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^3}, quad f'''(0) = 3.$$ Then $$f(x) = f(0) + frac{f'(0)}{1!}x + frac{f''(0)}{2!}x^2 + frac{f'''(0)}{3!}x^3 + O(x^4) = 1 - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{2} + O(x^4).$$
It is worth noting that $$f^{(n)}(x) = frac{A_n cos log (1+x) + B_n sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^n},$$ for suitable constants $A_n$, $B_n$. A proof by induction is straightforward and yields insight into the recursion relations defining ${(A_n, B_n)}_{n ge 1}$: $$begin{align*} f^{(n+1)}(x) &= -A_n frac{sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} - nA_n frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} - n B_n frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} + B_n frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} \
&= frac{(B_n - nA_n) cos log(1+x) + (-A_n - nB_n)sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}}.
end{align*}.$$ Therefore, $$begin{align*} A_{n+1} & = -nA_n + B_n, \ B_{n+1} &= -A_n - nB_n, \ A_0 &= 1, \ B_0 &= 0. end{align*}$$ In matrix form, this recurrence is equivalent to $$begin{bmatrix}A_{n+1} \ B_{n+1}end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} -n & 1 \ -1 & -n end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} A_n \ B_n end{bmatrix},$$ consequently $$begin{bmatrix}A_n \ B_nend{bmatrix} = M_n begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix},$$ where $$M_n = prod_{k=0}^{n-1} begin{bmatrix} -k & 1 \ -1 & -k end{bmatrix}$$ and $f^{(n)}(0) = A_n$. This lets us continue our calculation of higher orders with relative ease if we keep track of the matrix product $M_n$, which is always of the form $$M_n = begin{bmatrix} a & b \ -b & a end{bmatrix};$$ for example, $$M_3 = begin{bmatrix} 3 & 1 \ -1 & 3end{bmatrix}, quad M_4 = begin{bmatrix} -3 & 1 \ -1 & -3end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} 3 & 1 \ -1 & 3end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} -10 & 0 \ 0 & -10 end{bmatrix},$$ so that $A_4 = -10$ and the next coefficient is $-10/4! = -5/12$.
$endgroup$
Since you also don't need very high orders, the straightforward calculation of derivatives is tractable, though not preferable computationally. If $f(x) = cos log(1+x)$, then $$f'(x) = -frac{sin log (1+x)}{1+x}, quad f'(0) = 0.$$ Then $$f''(x) = -frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^2} + frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^2}, quad f''(0) = -1.$$ Finally, $$f'''(x) = frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} + frac{2cos log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} + frac{cos log(1+x)}{(1+x)^3} - frac{2 sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^3}, quad f'''(0) = 3.$$ Then $$f(x) = f(0) + frac{f'(0)}{1!}x + frac{f''(0)}{2!}x^2 + frac{f'''(0)}{3!}x^3 + O(x^4) = 1 - frac{x^2}{2} + frac{x^3}{2} + O(x^4).$$
It is worth noting that $$f^{(n)}(x) = frac{A_n cos log (1+x) + B_n sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^n},$$ for suitable constants $A_n$, $B_n$. A proof by induction is straightforward and yields insight into the recursion relations defining ${(A_n, B_n)}_{n ge 1}$: $$begin{align*} f^{(n+1)}(x) &= -A_n frac{sin log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} - nA_n frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} - n B_n frac{sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} + B_n frac{cos log (1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}} \
&= frac{(B_n - nA_n) cos log(1+x) + (-A_n - nB_n)sin log(1+x)}{(1+x)^{n+1}}.
end{align*}.$$ Therefore, $$begin{align*} A_{n+1} & = -nA_n + B_n, \ B_{n+1} &= -A_n - nB_n, \ A_0 &= 1, \ B_0 &= 0. end{align*}$$ In matrix form, this recurrence is equivalent to $$begin{bmatrix}A_{n+1} \ B_{n+1}end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} -n & 1 \ -1 & -n end{bmatrix} begin{bmatrix} A_n \ B_n end{bmatrix},$$ consequently $$begin{bmatrix}A_n \ B_nend{bmatrix} = M_n begin{bmatrix} 1 \ 0 end{bmatrix},$$ where $$M_n = prod_{k=0}^{n-1} begin{bmatrix} -k & 1 \ -1 & -k end{bmatrix}$$ and $f^{(n)}(0) = A_n$. This lets us continue our calculation of higher orders with relative ease if we keep track of the matrix product $M_n$, which is always of the form $$M_n = begin{bmatrix} a & b \ -b & a end{bmatrix};$$ for example, $$M_3 = begin{bmatrix} 3 & 1 \ -1 & 3end{bmatrix}, quad M_4 = begin{bmatrix} -3 & 1 \ -1 & -3end{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix} 3 & 1 \ -1 & 3end{bmatrix} = begin{bmatrix} -10 & 0 \ 0 & -10 end{bmatrix},$$ so that $A_4 = -10$ and the next coefficient is $-10/4! = -5/12$.
answered Jan 20 at 20:07
heropupheropup
63.8k762102
63.8k762102
$begingroup$
Interestingly, the coefficients of the series expansion of $f$ are almost alternating in sign, but in the first $50000$ terms, there are three instances where the sign of consecutive terms is the same: specifically, the coefficients of $x^{18}$, $x^{397}$, and $x^{9166}$ are positive when the term immediately preceding it is also positive. Based on this very limited pattern, I suspect the next coefficient satisfying this property will be around $x^{211000}$. I wonder if this has been researched.
$endgroup$
– heropup
Jan 20 at 23:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Interestingly, the coefficients of the series expansion of $f$ are almost alternating in sign, but in the first $50000$ terms, there are three instances where the sign of consecutive terms is the same: specifically, the coefficients of $x^{18}$, $x^{397}$, and $x^{9166}$ are positive when the term immediately preceding it is also positive. Based on this very limited pattern, I suspect the next coefficient satisfying this property will be around $x^{211000}$. I wonder if this has been researched.
$endgroup$
– heropup
Jan 20 at 23:11
$begingroup$
Interestingly, the coefficients of the series expansion of $f$ are almost alternating in sign, but in the first $50000$ terms, there are three instances where the sign of consecutive terms is the same: specifically, the coefficients of $x^{18}$, $x^{397}$, and $x^{9166}$ are positive when the term immediately preceding it is also positive. Based on this very limited pattern, I suspect the next coefficient satisfying this property will be around $x^{211000}$. I wonder if this has been researched.
$endgroup$
– heropup
Jan 20 at 23:11
$begingroup$
Interestingly, the coefficients of the series expansion of $f$ are almost alternating in sign, but in the first $50000$ terms, there are three instances where the sign of consecutive terms is the same: specifically, the coefficients of $x^{18}$, $x^{397}$, and $x^{9166}$ are positive when the term immediately preceding it is also positive. Based on this very limited pattern, I suspect the next coefficient satisfying this property will be around $x^{211000}$. I wonder if this has been researched.
$endgroup$
– heropup
Jan 20 at 23:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since$$cos x=1-frac{x^2}2+cdots,$$you havebegin{align}cosbigl(log(x+1)bigr)&=1-frac12left(x-frac{x^2}2+frac{x^3}3-cdotsright)^2+cdots\&=1-frac{x^2}2+frac{x^3}2+cdotsend{align}Note that this argument works because the series for $log(x+1)$ has no constant term. A consequence of this is that no matter how more terms you use from both series, you will get no new term whose degree is smaller than $4$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think that you should add some comments about why no higher grade terms are needed of $cos x$ and $log(x+1)$.
$endgroup$
– md2perpe
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 20 at 15:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since$$cos x=1-frac{x^2}2+cdots,$$you havebegin{align}cosbigl(log(x+1)bigr)&=1-frac12left(x-frac{x^2}2+frac{x^3}3-cdotsright)^2+cdots\&=1-frac{x^2}2+frac{x^3}2+cdotsend{align}Note that this argument works because the series for $log(x+1)$ has no constant term. A consequence of this is that no matter how more terms you use from both series, you will get no new term whose degree is smaller than $4$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think that you should add some comments about why no higher grade terms are needed of $cos x$ and $log(x+1)$.
$endgroup$
– md2perpe
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 20 at 15:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since$$cos x=1-frac{x^2}2+cdots,$$you havebegin{align}cosbigl(log(x+1)bigr)&=1-frac12left(x-frac{x^2}2+frac{x^3}3-cdotsright)^2+cdots\&=1-frac{x^2}2+frac{x^3}2+cdotsend{align}Note that this argument works because the series for $log(x+1)$ has no constant term. A consequence of this is that no matter how more terms you use from both series, you will get no new term whose degree is smaller than $4$.
$endgroup$
Since$$cos x=1-frac{x^2}2+cdots,$$you havebegin{align}cosbigl(log(x+1)bigr)&=1-frac12left(x-frac{x^2}2+frac{x^3}3-cdotsright)^2+cdots\&=1-frac{x^2}2+frac{x^3}2+cdotsend{align}Note that this argument works because the series for $log(x+1)$ has no constant term. A consequence of this is that no matter how more terms you use from both series, you will get no new term whose degree is smaller than $4$.
edited Jan 20 at 15:22
answered Jan 20 at 14:57
José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos
162k22130233
162k22130233
$begingroup$
I think that you should add some comments about why no higher grade terms are needed of $cos x$ and $log(x+1)$.
$endgroup$
– md2perpe
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 20 at 15:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think that you should add some comments about why no higher grade terms are needed of $cos x$ and $log(x+1)$.
$endgroup$
– md2perpe
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 20 at 15:22
$begingroup$
I think that you should add some comments about why no higher grade terms are needed of $cos x$ and $log(x+1)$.
$endgroup$
– md2perpe
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
I think that you should add some comments about why no higher grade terms are needed of $cos x$ and $log(x+1)$.
$endgroup$
– md2perpe
Jan 20 at 15:19
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 20 at 15:22
$begingroup$
I've edited my answer. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 20 at 15:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A heuristic way using complex numbers that's related to one of the other answers: define
$$begin{align}
f(x)&=cosln(1+x) \
g(x)&=sin ln(1+x)text{.}
end{align}$$
Then
$$begin{align}f(0)+mathrm{i}g(0)&=1\
(f+mathrm{i}g)'&=frac{mathrm{i}(f+mathrm{i}g)}{1+x}
end{align}$$
so the left- and right-hand sides of
$$f(x)+mathrm{i}g(x)=(1+x)^{mathrm{i}}$$
coincide as formal power series in $x$. Thus
$$begin{split}cos ln(1+x)&= 1 +Re mathrm{i} x+Re tfrac{mathrm{i}(mathrm{i}-1)}{2} x^2+Re tfrac{mathrm{i}(mathrm{i}-1)(mathrm{i}-2)}{6} x^3+o(x^3)\
&=1-tfrac{x^2}{2}+tfrac{x^3}{2}+o(x^3)end{split}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A heuristic way using complex numbers that's related to one of the other answers: define
$$begin{align}
f(x)&=cosln(1+x) \
g(x)&=sin ln(1+x)text{.}
end{align}$$
Then
$$begin{align}f(0)+mathrm{i}g(0)&=1\
(f+mathrm{i}g)'&=frac{mathrm{i}(f+mathrm{i}g)}{1+x}
end{align}$$
so the left- and right-hand sides of
$$f(x)+mathrm{i}g(x)=(1+x)^{mathrm{i}}$$
coincide as formal power series in $x$. Thus
$$begin{split}cos ln(1+x)&= 1 +Re mathrm{i} x+Re tfrac{mathrm{i}(mathrm{i}-1)}{2} x^2+Re tfrac{mathrm{i}(mathrm{i}-1)(mathrm{i}-2)}{6} x^3+o(x^3)\
&=1-tfrac{x^2}{2}+tfrac{x^3}{2}+o(x^3)end{split}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A heuristic way using complex numbers that's related to one of the other answers: define
$$begin{align}
f(x)&=cosln(1+x) \
g(x)&=sin ln(1+x)text{.}
end{align}$$
Then
$$begin{align}f(0)+mathrm{i}g(0)&=1\
(f+mathrm{i}g)'&=frac{mathrm{i}(f+mathrm{i}g)}{1+x}
end{align}$$
so the left- and right-hand sides of
$$f(x)+mathrm{i}g(x)=(1+x)^{mathrm{i}}$$
coincide as formal power series in $x$. Thus
$$begin{split}cos ln(1+x)&= 1 +Re mathrm{i} x+Re tfrac{mathrm{i}(mathrm{i}-1)}{2} x^2+Re tfrac{mathrm{i}(mathrm{i}-1)(mathrm{i}-2)}{6} x^3+o(x^3)\
&=1-tfrac{x^2}{2}+tfrac{x^3}{2}+o(x^3)end{split}$$
$endgroup$
A heuristic way using complex numbers that's related to one of the other answers: define
$$begin{align}
f(x)&=cosln(1+x) \
g(x)&=sin ln(1+x)text{.}
end{align}$$
Then
$$begin{align}f(0)+mathrm{i}g(0)&=1\
(f+mathrm{i}g)'&=frac{mathrm{i}(f+mathrm{i}g)}{1+x}
end{align}$$
so the left- and right-hand sides of
$$f(x)+mathrm{i}g(x)=(1+x)^{mathrm{i}}$$
coincide as formal power series in $x$. Thus
$$begin{split}cos ln(1+x)&= 1 +Re mathrm{i} x+Re tfrac{mathrm{i}(mathrm{i}-1)}{2} x^2+Re tfrac{mathrm{i}(mathrm{i}-1)(mathrm{i}-2)}{6} x^3+o(x^3)\
&=1-tfrac{x^2}{2}+tfrac{x^3}{2}+o(x^3)end{split}$$
answered Jan 20 at 20:33
K B DaveK B Dave
3,377217
3,377217
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080664%2fhelp-with-maclaurin-series-of-cos-lnx1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Replace $x$ in your second line with the series of $ln(1+x)$
$endgroup$
– Dylan
Jan 20 at 15:07