A characterization of the subgroup of $text{GL}(bigwedge^k V)$ which preserves pure tensors?
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be a $d$-dimensional real vector space, and let $1<k<d$. Set
$$H={Bintext{GL}(bigwedge^k V) , | , B ,text{ preserves pure tensors }}$$
(i.e. $B in H$ if it maps decomposable elements to decomposable elements).
$H$ is a closed subgroup of the Lie group $text{GL}(bigwedge^k V) $, hence it is an embedded Lie subgroup of it.
Can we characterize it explicitly? What is $dim H$? How does its Lie algebra look like?
Here is a lower bound: The exterior power map $psi:text{GL}( V) to text{GL}(bigwedge^k V)$ defined by $psi(A)=bigwedge^k A$ is a smooth immersion*. Since $text{Image}(psi)subseteq H$, $dim H ge dim text{GL}( V) =d^2$.
I think that this might be related to the following question: Let $omega^I$ be a basis for $bigwedge^kV$, whose elements are all decomposable. Is $omega^I$ "induced" by a standard basis, i.e. $omega^{i_1,ldots,i_k}=v^{i_1} wedge ldots wedge v^{i_k}$ for some basis $v_i$?
*One way to see that the exterior power map $psi$ is an immersion, is that it is a locally-injective homomorphism of Lie groups, and in particular, it has a constant rank. The local injectivity (which comes from the fact that $bigwedge^k A=bigwedge^k B Rightarrow A= pm B$) then implies that $psi$ is an immersion, due to the constant rank theorem.
representation-theory lie-groups symmetry exterior-algebra tensor-decomposition
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be a $d$-dimensional real vector space, and let $1<k<d$. Set
$$H={Bintext{GL}(bigwedge^k V) , | , B ,text{ preserves pure tensors }}$$
(i.e. $B in H$ if it maps decomposable elements to decomposable elements).
$H$ is a closed subgroup of the Lie group $text{GL}(bigwedge^k V) $, hence it is an embedded Lie subgroup of it.
Can we characterize it explicitly? What is $dim H$? How does its Lie algebra look like?
Here is a lower bound: The exterior power map $psi:text{GL}( V) to text{GL}(bigwedge^k V)$ defined by $psi(A)=bigwedge^k A$ is a smooth immersion*. Since $text{Image}(psi)subseteq H$, $dim H ge dim text{GL}( V) =d^2$.
I think that this might be related to the following question: Let $omega^I$ be a basis for $bigwedge^kV$, whose elements are all decomposable. Is $omega^I$ "induced" by a standard basis, i.e. $omega^{i_1,ldots,i_k}=v^{i_1} wedge ldots wedge v^{i_k}$ for some basis $v_i$?
*One way to see that the exterior power map $psi$ is an immersion, is that it is a locally-injective homomorphism of Lie groups, and in particular, it has a constant rank. The local injectivity (which comes from the fact that $bigwedge^k A=bigwedge^k B Rightarrow A= pm B$) then implies that $psi$ is an immersion, due to the constant rank theorem.
representation-theory lie-groups symmetry exterior-algebra tensor-decomposition
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Do you have examples of $B in H$ not of the form $bigwedge^k A$ for any $A$ ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
I'm not sure I understand; there are elements of $operatorname{GL}(bigwedge^kV)$ that preserve decomposable elements, but that are not induced by automorphisms of $V$. In the simplest case, when $d=4$ and $k=2$, the set of decomposable elements is the zero locus of $$x_{12}x_{34}-x_{13}x_{24}+x_{14}x_{23},$$ with respect to the standard basis $e_iwedge e_j$ of $bigwedge^2V$. The element of $operatorname{GL}(bigwedge^kV)$ that switches $x_{12}$ and $x_{34}$ and fixes the other $x_{ij}$, for example, clearly stabilizes the Grassmannian, but is not induced by an automorphism of $V$.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 22 at 15:27
1
$begingroup$
@Servaes : I don't understand everything in the given link; but it does state that there are exceptions ("except when the dual map is an automorphism - when $n=2p$"; here $n$ is $d$ and your $d$ is $4=2times 2$ so that might be it)
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 22 at 16:04
$begingroup$
Agreed, problem solved!
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 22 at 16:31
$begingroup$
@Servaes Well, at least the problem is solved when $V$ is a complex vector space. I am interested in the real case though. Maybe we can reduce the real case to the complex case, but I am not sure. (You can see here.).
$endgroup$
– Asaf Shachar
Jan 23 at 12:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $V$ be a $d$-dimensional real vector space, and let $1<k<d$. Set
$$H={Bintext{GL}(bigwedge^k V) , | , B ,text{ preserves pure tensors }}$$
(i.e. $B in H$ if it maps decomposable elements to decomposable elements).
$H$ is a closed subgroup of the Lie group $text{GL}(bigwedge^k V) $, hence it is an embedded Lie subgroup of it.
Can we characterize it explicitly? What is $dim H$? How does its Lie algebra look like?
Here is a lower bound: The exterior power map $psi:text{GL}( V) to text{GL}(bigwedge^k V)$ defined by $psi(A)=bigwedge^k A$ is a smooth immersion*. Since $text{Image}(psi)subseteq H$, $dim H ge dim text{GL}( V) =d^2$.
I think that this might be related to the following question: Let $omega^I$ be a basis for $bigwedge^kV$, whose elements are all decomposable. Is $omega^I$ "induced" by a standard basis, i.e. $omega^{i_1,ldots,i_k}=v^{i_1} wedge ldots wedge v^{i_k}$ for some basis $v_i$?
*One way to see that the exterior power map $psi$ is an immersion, is that it is a locally-injective homomorphism of Lie groups, and in particular, it has a constant rank. The local injectivity (which comes from the fact that $bigwedge^k A=bigwedge^k B Rightarrow A= pm B$) then implies that $psi$ is an immersion, due to the constant rank theorem.
representation-theory lie-groups symmetry exterior-algebra tensor-decomposition
$endgroup$
Let $V$ be a $d$-dimensional real vector space, and let $1<k<d$. Set
$$H={Bintext{GL}(bigwedge^k V) , | , B ,text{ preserves pure tensors }}$$
(i.e. $B in H$ if it maps decomposable elements to decomposable elements).
$H$ is a closed subgroup of the Lie group $text{GL}(bigwedge^k V) $, hence it is an embedded Lie subgroup of it.
Can we characterize it explicitly? What is $dim H$? How does its Lie algebra look like?
Here is a lower bound: The exterior power map $psi:text{GL}( V) to text{GL}(bigwedge^k V)$ defined by $psi(A)=bigwedge^k A$ is a smooth immersion*. Since $text{Image}(psi)subseteq H$, $dim H ge dim text{GL}( V) =d^2$.
I think that this might be related to the following question: Let $omega^I$ be a basis for $bigwedge^kV$, whose elements are all decomposable. Is $omega^I$ "induced" by a standard basis, i.e. $omega^{i_1,ldots,i_k}=v^{i_1} wedge ldots wedge v^{i_k}$ for some basis $v_i$?
*One way to see that the exterior power map $psi$ is an immersion, is that it is a locally-injective homomorphism of Lie groups, and in particular, it has a constant rank. The local injectivity (which comes from the fact that $bigwedge^k A=bigwedge^k B Rightarrow A= pm B$) then implies that $psi$ is an immersion, due to the constant rank theorem.
representation-theory lie-groups symmetry exterior-algebra tensor-decomposition
representation-theory lie-groups symmetry exterior-algebra tensor-decomposition
edited Jan 24 at 13:58
Asaf Shachar
asked Jan 20 at 15:12
Asaf ShacharAsaf Shachar
5,64631141
5,64631141
$begingroup$
Do you have examples of $B in H$ not of the form $bigwedge^k A$ for any $A$ ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
I'm not sure I understand; there are elements of $operatorname{GL}(bigwedge^kV)$ that preserve decomposable elements, but that are not induced by automorphisms of $V$. In the simplest case, when $d=4$ and $k=2$, the set of decomposable elements is the zero locus of $$x_{12}x_{34}-x_{13}x_{24}+x_{14}x_{23},$$ with respect to the standard basis $e_iwedge e_j$ of $bigwedge^2V$. The element of $operatorname{GL}(bigwedge^kV)$ that switches $x_{12}$ and $x_{34}$ and fixes the other $x_{ij}$, for example, clearly stabilizes the Grassmannian, but is not induced by an automorphism of $V$.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 22 at 15:27
1
$begingroup$
@Servaes : I don't understand everything in the given link; but it does state that there are exceptions ("except when the dual map is an automorphism - when $n=2p$"; here $n$ is $d$ and your $d$ is $4=2times 2$ so that might be it)
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 22 at 16:04
$begingroup$
Agreed, problem solved!
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 22 at 16:31
$begingroup$
@Servaes Well, at least the problem is solved when $V$ is a complex vector space. I am interested in the real case though. Maybe we can reduce the real case to the complex case, but I am not sure. (You can see here.).
$endgroup$
– Asaf Shachar
Jan 23 at 12:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Do you have examples of $B in H$ not of the form $bigwedge^k A$ for any $A$ ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
I'm not sure I understand; there are elements of $operatorname{GL}(bigwedge^kV)$ that preserve decomposable elements, but that are not induced by automorphisms of $V$. In the simplest case, when $d=4$ and $k=2$, the set of decomposable elements is the zero locus of $$x_{12}x_{34}-x_{13}x_{24}+x_{14}x_{23},$$ with respect to the standard basis $e_iwedge e_j$ of $bigwedge^2V$. The element of $operatorname{GL}(bigwedge^kV)$ that switches $x_{12}$ and $x_{34}$ and fixes the other $x_{ij}$, for example, clearly stabilizes the Grassmannian, but is not induced by an automorphism of $V$.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 22 at 15:27
1
$begingroup$
@Servaes : I don't understand everything in the given link; but it does state that there are exceptions ("except when the dual map is an automorphism - when $n=2p$"; here $n$ is $d$ and your $d$ is $4=2times 2$ so that might be it)
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 22 at 16:04
$begingroup$
Agreed, problem solved!
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 22 at 16:31
$begingroup$
@Servaes Well, at least the problem is solved when $V$ is a complex vector space. I am interested in the real case though. Maybe we can reduce the real case to the complex case, but I am not sure. (You can see here.).
$endgroup$
– Asaf Shachar
Jan 23 at 12:45
$begingroup$
Do you have examples of $B in H$ not of the form $bigwedge^k A$ for any $A$ ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
Do you have examples of $B in H$ not of the form $bigwedge^k A$ for any $A$ ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
I'm not sure I understand; there are elements of $operatorname{GL}(bigwedge^kV)$ that preserve decomposable elements, but that are not induced by automorphisms of $V$. In the simplest case, when $d=4$ and $k=2$, the set of decomposable elements is the zero locus of $$x_{12}x_{34}-x_{13}x_{24}+x_{14}x_{23},$$ with respect to the standard basis $e_iwedge e_j$ of $bigwedge^2V$. The element of $operatorname{GL}(bigwedge^kV)$ that switches $x_{12}$ and $x_{34}$ and fixes the other $x_{ij}$, for example, clearly stabilizes the Grassmannian, but is not induced by an automorphism of $V$.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 22 at 15:27
$begingroup$
I'm not sure I understand; there are elements of $operatorname{GL}(bigwedge^kV)$ that preserve decomposable elements, but that are not induced by automorphisms of $V$. In the simplest case, when $d=4$ and $k=2$, the set of decomposable elements is the zero locus of $$x_{12}x_{34}-x_{13}x_{24}+x_{14}x_{23},$$ with respect to the standard basis $e_iwedge e_j$ of $bigwedge^2V$. The element of $operatorname{GL}(bigwedge^kV)$ that switches $x_{12}$ and $x_{34}$ and fixes the other $x_{ij}$, for example, clearly stabilizes the Grassmannian, but is not induced by an automorphism of $V$.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 22 at 15:27
1
1
$begingroup$
@Servaes : I don't understand everything in the given link; but it does state that there are exceptions ("except when the dual map is an automorphism - when $n=2p$"; here $n$ is $d$ and your $d$ is $4=2times 2$ so that might be it)
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 22 at 16:04
$begingroup$
@Servaes : I don't understand everything in the given link; but it does state that there are exceptions ("except when the dual map is an automorphism - when $n=2p$"; here $n$ is $d$ and your $d$ is $4=2times 2$ so that might be it)
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 22 at 16:04
$begingroup$
Agreed, problem solved!
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 22 at 16:31
$begingroup$
Agreed, problem solved!
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 22 at 16:31
$begingroup$
@Servaes Well, at least the problem is solved when $V$ is a complex vector space. I am interested in the real case though. Maybe we can reduce the real case to the complex case, but I am not sure. (You can see here.).
$endgroup$
– Asaf Shachar
Jan 23 at 12:45
$begingroup$
@Servaes Well, at least the problem is solved when $V$ is a complex vector space. I am interested in the real case though. Maybe we can reduce the real case to the complex case, but I am not sure. (You can see here.).
$endgroup$
– Asaf Shachar
Jan 23 at 12:45
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is a solution for the case where $V$ is a complex vector space. (I guess that the real case can be reduced to the complex one, see some subtle points below). It turns out that $H$ is pretty restricted: When $d neq 2k$, $H=text{Image}(psi)$, i.e. every map which preserves pure tensors is an exterior power of some $A in text{GL}$.
When $d=2k$, we have additional automorphisms, of the form $star circ bigwedge^k A$, where $star:bigwedge^k V to bigwedge^k V$ is the Hodge dual operator w.r.t some fixed metric on $V$.
For a reference, see here.
Here are some natural questions which arise from this representation claim:
1. Is this representation redundant in some way?
i.e. if $star$ equals to some exterior power, then it is not a "true" addition to the subgroup $H$. However, the Hodge is never an exterior power: Indeed, suppose that $star=bigwedge^k A$ for some $A in text{GL}(V)$. Let $v_1,dots,v_d$ be an orthonormal basis for $V$.
$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_k)=text{span}(v_{k+1},dots,v_d)$. Switching $v_k$ and $v_{k+1}$, we also deduce that $text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1},Av_{k+1})=text{span}(v_k,v_{k+2},dots,v_d)$, so $$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1})= text{span}(v_{k+2},dots,v_d).$$
In particular, we have proved that for any orthonormal basis $v_1,dots,v_{k-1},v_{k},v_{k+1},dots,v_d$, $$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+2},dots,v_d). tag{1} $$ Now, switching between $v_{k+1}$ and $v_{k+2}$, this also implies
$$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+1},v_{k+3},v_{k+4},dots,v_d) tag{2}.$$
Combining $(1)$ and $(2)$ together, we deduce that
$$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+3},dots,v_d) $$, which implies that $A$ maps the $k-1$ dimensional space $text{span}(v_1,dots,v_{k-1})$ to the $k-2$ dimensional space $text{span}(v_{k+3},dots,v_d) $, i.e. $A$ is not invertible. This implies $bigwedge^k A$ is also singular, so it cannot be equal to a Hodge dual. Contradiction.
2. What about automorphism of the form $ bigwedge^k A circ
star $? or $ star bigwedge^k A circ
star $?
Well, using the equality $star circ bigwedge^k A=det A bigwedge^k A^{-T} circ star=bigwedge^k (sqrt[k]{det A}cdot A^{-T} )circ star$ we can "move" $star$ from one side of $bigwedge^k A$ to the other one. (Here we used the assumption that $V$ is a complex vector space, since otherwise $sqrt[k]{det A}$ does not exist if $k$ is even, and $det A<0$). Maybe in that case we need to allow multiplication of exterior powers by negative scalars).
3. How do we account for all the different Hodge duals of all the different metrics, by using the Hodge operator induced by a single metric?
Since the map $g to star_g$ is smooth and injective up to a conformal rescaling of the metric (that is $star_g=star_h$ if and only if $g=ch$ ), one expects to obtains a continuous family of different Hodge duals of dimension $dim(text{Psym_d})-1$, so the dimension of $H$ should increase accordingly. However, this is not really what happens, since we can or express every Hodge dual in terms of one specific representative, by compensate for the difference via some exterior power of a mediating map.
(Actually, I think that we can induce a Hodge dual using any non-degenerate bilinear form, symmetric or not). Here are the details:
Suppose $g,h$ are two metrics on $V$. Then we can write $g(v,w)=h(v,Tw)$ for some $T in text{GL}(V)$. It is obvious that $T$ is $h$-positive, and $h$-symmetric, hence there exist a uniqe $sqrt T$ which is also $h$-positive and symmetric. Thus, we have $g(v,w)=h(sqrt Tv,sqrt Tw)$, i.e. $sqrt T:(V,g) to (V,h)$ is an orientation-preserving isometry, hence it commutes with the Hodge dual, i.e.
$bigwedge^k sqrt T circ star_g= star_h circ bigwedge^k sqrt T$. So, now we can write
$$ star_g circ bigwedge^k A=bigwedge^k sqrt T^{-1} circ star_h circ bigwedge^k sqrt T A,$$
and since we only know how to move $star_h$ from one side of an exterior power to the other side (see point $2$), this representation can be reduced to $star_h circ bigwedge^B$ for some $B in text{GL}(V)$.
Similarly, we can represent creatures of the form of $star_h circ star_g$...by expressing $star_g$ via $star_h$ or vice-versa.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080700%2fa-characterization-of-the-subgroup-of-textgl-bigwedgek-v-which-preserves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is a solution for the case where $V$ is a complex vector space. (I guess that the real case can be reduced to the complex one, see some subtle points below). It turns out that $H$ is pretty restricted: When $d neq 2k$, $H=text{Image}(psi)$, i.e. every map which preserves pure tensors is an exterior power of some $A in text{GL}$.
When $d=2k$, we have additional automorphisms, of the form $star circ bigwedge^k A$, where $star:bigwedge^k V to bigwedge^k V$ is the Hodge dual operator w.r.t some fixed metric on $V$.
For a reference, see here.
Here are some natural questions which arise from this representation claim:
1. Is this representation redundant in some way?
i.e. if $star$ equals to some exterior power, then it is not a "true" addition to the subgroup $H$. However, the Hodge is never an exterior power: Indeed, suppose that $star=bigwedge^k A$ for some $A in text{GL}(V)$. Let $v_1,dots,v_d$ be an orthonormal basis for $V$.
$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_k)=text{span}(v_{k+1},dots,v_d)$. Switching $v_k$ and $v_{k+1}$, we also deduce that $text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1},Av_{k+1})=text{span}(v_k,v_{k+2},dots,v_d)$, so $$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1})= text{span}(v_{k+2},dots,v_d).$$
In particular, we have proved that for any orthonormal basis $v_1,dots,v_{k-1},v_{k},v_{k+1},dots,v_d$, $$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+2},dots,v_d). tag{1} $$ Now, switching between $v_{k+1}$ and $v_{k+2}$, this also implies
$$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+1},v_{k+3},v_{k+4},dots,v_d) tag{2}.$$
Combining $(1)$ and $(2)$ together, we deduce that
$$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+3},dots,v_d) $$, which implies that $A$ maps the $k-1$ dimensional space $text{span}(v_1,dots,v_{k-1})$ to the $k-2$ dimensional space $text{span}(v_{k+3},dots,v_d) $, i.e. $A$ is not invertible. This implies $bigwedge^k A$ is also singular, so it cannot be equal to a Hodge dual. Contradiction.
2. What about automorphism of the form $ bigwedge^k A circ
star $? or $ star bigwedge^k A circ
star $?
Well, using the equality $star circ bigwedge^k A=det A bigwedge^k A^{-T} circ star=bigwedge^k (sqrt[k]{det A}cdot A^{-T} )circ star$ we can "move" $star$ from one side of $bigwedge^k A$ to the other one. (Here we used the assumption that $V$ is a complex vector space, since otherwise $sqrt[k]{det A}$ does not exist if $k$ is even, and $det A<0$). Maybe in that case we need to allow multiplication of exterior powers by negative scalars).
3. How do we account for all the different Hodge duals of all the different metrics, by using the Hodge operator induced by a single metric?
Since the map $g to star_g$ is smooth and injective up to a conformal rescaling of the metric (that is $star_g=star_h$ if and only if $g=ch$ ), one expects to obtains a continuous family of different Hodge duals of dimension $dim(text{Psym_d})-1$, so the dimension of $H$ should increase accordingly. However, this is not really what happens, since we can or express every Hodge dual in terms of one specific representative, by compensate for the difference via some exterior power of a mediating map.
(Actually, I think that we can induce a Hodge dual using any non-degenerate bilinear form, symmetric or not). Here are the details:
Suppose $g,h$ are two metrics on $V$. Then we can write $g(v,w)=h(v,Tw)$ for some $T in text{GL}(V)$. It is obvious that $T$ is $h$-positive, and $h$-symmetric, hence there exist a uniqe $sqrt T$ which is also $h$-positive and symmetric. Thus, we have $g(v,w)=h(sqrt Tv,sqrt Tw)$, i.e. $sqrt T:(V,g) to (V,h)$ is an orientation-preserving isometry, hence it commutes with the Hodge dual, i.e.
$bigwedge^k sqrt T circ star_g= star_h circ bigwedge^k sqrt T$. So, now we can write
$$ star_g circ bigwedge^k A=bigwedge^k sqrt T^{-1} circ star_h circ bigwedge^k sqrt T A,$$
and since we only know how to move $star_h$ from one side of an exterior power to the other side (see point $2$), this representation can be reduced to $star_h circ bigwedge^B$ for some $B in text{GL}(V)$.
Similarly, we can represent creatures of the form of $star_h circ star_g$...by expressing $star_g$ via $star_h$ or vice-versa.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a solution for the case where $V$ is a complex vector space. (I guess that the real case can be reduced to the complex one, see some subtle points below). It turns out that $H$ is pretty restricted: When $d neq 2k$, $H=text{Image}(psi)$, i.e. every map which preserves pure tensors is an exterior power of some $A in text{GL}$.
When $d=2k$, we have additional automorphisms, of the form $star circ bigwedge^k A$, where $star:bigwedge^k V to bigwedge^k V$ is the Hodge dual operator w.r.t some fixed metric on $V$.
For a reference, see here.
Here are some natural questions which arise from this representation claim:
1. Is this representation redundant in some way?
i.e. if $star$ equals to some exterior power, then it is not a "true" addition to the subgroup $H$. However, the Hodge is never an exterior power: Indeed, suppose that $star=bigwedge^k A$ for some $A in text{GL}(V)$. Let $v_1,dots,v_d$ be an orthonormal basis for $V$.
$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_k)=text{span}(v_{k+1},dots,v_d)$. Switching $v_k$ and $v_{k+1}$, we also deduce that $text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1},Av_{k+1})=text{span}(v_k,v_{k+2},dots,v_d)$, so $$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1})= text{span}(v_{k+2},dots,v_d).$$
In particular, we have proved that for any orthonormal basis $v_1,dots,v_{k-1},v_{k},v_{k+1},dots,v_d$, $$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+2},dots,v_d). tag{1} $$ Now, switching between $v_{k+1}$ and $v_{k+2}$, this also implies
$$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+1},v_{k+3},v_{k+4},dots,v_d) tag{2}.$$
Combining $(1)$ and $(2)$ together, we deduce that
$$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+3},dots,v_d) $$, which implies that $A$ maps the $k-1$ dimensional space $text{span}(v_1,dots,v_{k-1})$ to the $k-2$ dimensional space $text{span}(v_{k+3},dots,v_d) $, i.e. $A$ is not invertible. This implies $bigwedge^k A$ is also singular, so it cannot be equal to a Hodge dual. Contradiction.
2. What about automorphism of the form $ bigwedge^k A circ
star $? or $ star bigwedge^k A circ
star $?
Well, using the equality $star circ bigwedge^k A=det A bigwedge^k A^{-T} circ star=bigwedge^k (sqrt[k]{det A}cdot A^{-T} )circ star$ we can "move" $star$ from one side of $bigwedge^k A$ to the other one. (Here we used the assumption that $V$ is a complex vector space, since otherwise $sqrt[k]{det A}$ does not exist if $k$ is even, and $det A<0$). Maybe in that case we need to allow multiplication of exterior powers by negative scalars).
3. How do we account for all the different Hodge duals of all the different metrics, by using the Hodge operator induced by a single metric?
Since the map $g to star_g$ is smooth and injective up to a conformal rescaling of the metric (that is $star_g=star_h$ if and only if $g=ch$ ), one expects to obtains a continuous family of different Hodge duals of dimension $dim(text{Psym_d})-1$, so the dimension of $H$ should increase accordingly. However, this is not really what happens, since we can or express every Hodge dual in terms of one specific representative, by compensate for the difference via some exterior power of a mediating map.
(Actually, I think that we can induce a Hodge dual using any non-degenerate bilinear form, symmetric or not). Here are the details:
Suppose $g,h$ are two metrics on $V$. Then we can write $g(v,w)=h(v,Tw)$ for some $T in text{GL}(V)$. It is obvious that $T$ is $h$-positive, and $h$-symmetric, hence there exist a uniqe $sqrt T$ which is also $h$-positive and symmetric. Thus, we have $g(v,w)=h(sqrt Tv,sqrt Tw)$, i.e. $sqrt T:(V,g) to (V,h)$ is an orientation-preserving isometry, hence it commutes with the Hodge dual, i.e.
$bigwedge^k sqrt T circ star_g= star_h circ bigwedge^k sqrt T$. So, now we can write
$$ star_g circ bigwedge^k A=bigwedge^k sqrt T^{-1} circ star_h circ bigwedge^k sqrt T A,$$
and since we only know how to move $star_h$ from one side of an exterior power to the other side (see point $2$), this representation can be reduced to $star_h circ bigwedge^B$ for some $B in text{GL}(V)$.
Similarly, we can represent creatures of the form of $star_h circ star_g$...by expressing $star_g$ via $star_h$ or vice-versa.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is a solution for the case where $V$ is a complex vector space. (I guess that the real case can be reduced to the complex one, see some subtle points below). It turns out that $H$ is pretty restricted: When $d neq 2k$, $H=text{Image}(psi)$, i.e. every map which preserves pure tensors is an exterior power of some $A in text{GL}$.
When $d=2k$, we have additional automorphisms, of the form $star circ bigwedge^k A$, where $star:bigwedge^k V to bigwedge^k V$ is the Hodge dual operator w.r.t some fixed metric on $V$.
For a reference, see here.
Here are some natural questions which arise from this representation claim:
1. Is this representation redundant in some way?
i.e. if $star$ equals to some exterior power, then it is not a "true" addition to the subgroup $H$. However, the Hodge is never an exterior power: Indeed, suppose that $star=bigwedge^k A$ for some $A in text{GL}(V)$. Let $v_1,dots,v_d$ be an orthonormal basis for $V$.
$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_k)=text{span}(v_{k+1},dots,v_d)$. Switching $v_k$ and $v_{k+1}$, we also deduce that $text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1},Av_{k+1})=text{span}(v_k,v_{k+2},dots,v_d)$, so $$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1})= text{span}(v_{k+2},dots,v_d).$$
In particular, we have proved that for any orthonormal basis $v_1,dots,v_{k-1},v_{k},v_{k+1},dots,v_d$, $$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+2},dots,v_d). tag{1} $$ Now, switching between $v_{k+1}$ and $v_{k+2}$, this also implies
$$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+1},v_{k+3},v_{k+4},dots,v_d) tag{2}.$$
Combining $(1)$ and $(2)$ together, we deduce that
$$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+3},dots,v_d) $$, which implies that $A$ maps the $k-1$ dimensional space $text{span}(v_1,dots,v_{k-1})$ to the $k-2$ dimensional space $text{span}(v_{k+3},dots,v_d) $, i.e. $A$ is not invertible. This implies $bigwedge^k A$ is also singular, so it cannot be equal to a Hodge dual. Contradiction.
2. What about automorphism of the form $ bigwedge^k A circ
star $? or $ star bigwedge^k A circ
star $?
Well, using the equality $star circ bigwedge^k A=det A bigwedge^k A^{-T} circ star=bigwedge^k (sqrt[k]{det A}cdot A^{-T} )circ star$ we can "move" $star$ from one side of $bigwedge^k A$ to the other one. (Here we used the assumption that $V$ is a complex vector space, since otherwise $sqrt[k]{det A}$ does not exist if $k$ is even, and $det A<0$). Maybe in that case we need to allow multiplication of exterior powers by negative scalars).
3. How do we account for all the different Hodge duals of all the different metrics, by using the Hodge operator induced by a single metric?
Since the map $g to star_g$ is smooth and injective up to a conformal rescaling of the metric (that is $star_g=star_h$ if and only if $g=ch$ ), one expects to obtains a continuous family of different Hodge duals of dimension $dim(text{Psym_d})-1$, so the dimension of $H$ should increase accordingly. However, this is not really what happens, since we can or express every Hodge dual in terms of one specific representative, by compensate for the difference via some exterior power of a mediating map.
(Actually, I think that we can induce a Hodge dual using any non-degenerate bilinear form, symmetric or not). Here are the details:
Suppose $g,h$ are two metrics on $V$. Then we can write $g(v,w)=h(v,Tw)$ for some $T in text{GL}(V)$. It is obvious that $T$ is $h$-positive, and $h$-symmetric, hence there exist a uniqe $sqrt T$ which is also $h$-positive and symmetric. Thus, we have $g(v,w)=h(sqrt Tv,sqrt Tw)$, i.e. $sqrt T:(V,g) to (V,h)$ is an orientation-preserving isometry, hence it commutes with the Hodge dual, i.e.
$bigwedge^k sqrt T circ star_g= star_h circ bigwedge^k sqrt T$. So, now we can write
$$ star_g circ bigwedge^k A=bigwedge^k sqrt T^{-1} circ star_h circ bigwedge^k sqrt T A,$$
and since we only know how to move $star_h$ from one side of an exterior power to the other side (see point $2$), this representation can be reduced to $star_h circ bigwedge^B$ for some $B in text{GL}(V)$.
Similarly, we can represent creatures of the form of $star_h circ star_g$...by expressing $star_g$ via $star_h$ or vice-versa.
$endgroup$
Here is a solution for the case where $V$ is a complex vector space. (I guess that the real case can be reduced to the complex one, see some subtle points below). It turns out that $H$ is pretty restricted: When $d neq 2k$, $H=text{Image}(psi)$, i.e. every map which preserves pure tensors is an exterior power of some $A in text{GL}$.
When $d=2k$, we have additional automorphisms, of the form $star circ bigwedge^k A$, where $star:bigwedge^k V to bigwedge^k V$ is the Hodge dual operator w.r.t some fixed metric on $V$.
For a reference, see here.
Here are some natural questions which arise from this representation claim:
1. Is this representation redundant in some way?
i.e. if $star$ equals to some exterior power, then it is not a "true" addition to the subgroup $H$. However, the Hodge is never an exterior power: Indeed, suppose that $star=bigwedge^k A$ for some $A in text{GL}(V)$. Let $v_1,dots,v_d$ be an orthonormal basis for $V$.
$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_k)=text{span}(v_{k+1},dots,v_d)$. Switching $v_k$ and $v_{k+1}$, we also deduce that $text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1},Av_{k+1})=text{span}(v_k,v_{k+2},dots,v_d)$, so $$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1})= text{span}(v_{k+2},dots,v_d).$$
In particular, we have proved that for any orthonormal basis $v_1,dots,v_{k-1},v_{k},v_{k+1},dots,v_d$, $$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+2},dots,v_d). tag{1} $$ Now, switching between $v_{k+1}$ and $v_{k+2}$, this also implies
$$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+1},v_{k+3},v_{k+4},dots,v_d) tag{2}.$$
Combining $(1)$ and $(2)$ together, we deduce that
$$text{span}(Av_1,dots,Av_{k-1}) subseteq text{span}(v_{k+3},dots,v_d) $$, which implies that $A$ maps the $k-1$ dimensional space $text{span}(v_1,dots,v_{k-1})$ to the $k-2$ dimensional space $text{span}(v_{k+3},dots,v_d) $, i.e. $A$ is not invertible. This implies $bigwedge^k A$ is also singular, so it cannot be equal to a Hodge dual. Contradiction.
2. What about automorphism of the form $ bigwedge^k A circ
star $? or $ star bigwedge^k A circ
star $?
Well, using the equality $star circ bigwedge^k A=det A bigwedge^k A^{-T} circ star=bigwedge^k (sqrt[k]{det A}cdot A^{-T} )circ star$ we can "move" $star$ from one side of $bigwedge^k A$ to the other one. (Here we used the assumption that $V$ is a complex vector space, since otherwise $sqrt[k]{det A}$ does not exist if $k$ is even, and $det A<0$). Maybe in that case we need to allow multiplication of exterior powers by negative scalars).
3. How do we account for all the different Hodge duals of all the different metrics, by using the Hodge operator induced by a single metric?
Since the map $g to star_g$ is smooth and injective up to a conformal rescaling of the metric (that is $star_g=star_h$ if and only if $g=ch$ ), one expects to obtains a continuous family of different Hodge duals of dimension $dim(text{Psym_d})-1$, so the dimension of $H$ should increase accordingly. However, this is not really what happens, since we can or express every Hodge dual in terms of one specific representative, by compensate for the difference via some exterior power of a mediating map.
(Actually, I think that we can induce a Hodge dual using any non-degenerate bilinear form, symmetric or not). Here are the details:
Suppose $g,h$ are two metrics on $V$. Then we can write $g(v,w)=h(v,Tw)$ for some $T in text{GL}(V)$. It is obvious that $T$ is $h$-positive, and $h$-symmetric, hence there exist a uniqe $sqrt T$ which is also $h$-positive and symmetric. Thus, we have $g(v,w)=h(sqrt Tv,sqrt Tw)$, i.e. $sqrt T:(V,g) to (V,h)$ is an orientation-preserving isometry, hence it commutes with the Hodge dual, i.e.
$bigwedge^k sqrt T circ star_g= star_h circ bigwedge^k sqrt T$. So, now we can write
$$ star_g circ bigwedge^k A=bigwedge^k sqrt T^{-1} circ star_h circ bigwedge^k sqrt T A,$$
and since we only know how to move $star_h$ from one side of an exterior power to the other side (see point $2$), this representation can be reduced to $star_h circ bigwedge^B$ for some $B in text{GL}(V)$.
Similarly, we can represent creatures of the form of $star_h circ star_g$...by expressing $star_g$ via $star_h$ or vice-versa.
edited Jan 24 at 14:17
answered Jan 24 at 13:58
Asaf ShacharAsaf Shachar
5,64631141
5,64631141
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080700%2fa-characterization-of-the-subgroup-of-textgl-bigwedgek-v-which-preserves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Do you have examples of $B in H$ not of the form $bigwedge^k A$ for any $A$ ?
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 20 at 15:52
$begingroup$
I'm not sure I understand; there are elements of $operatorname{GL}(bigwedge^kV)$ that preserve decomposable elements, but that are not induced by automorphisms of $V$. In the simplest case, when $d=4$ and $k=2$, the set of decomposable elements is the zero locus of $$x_{12}x_{34}-x_{13}x_{24}+x_{14}x_{23},$$ with respect to the standard basis $e_iwedge e_j$ of $bigwedge^2V$. The element of $operatorname{GL}(bigwedge^kV)$ that switches $x_{12}$ and $x_{34}$ and fixes the other $x_{ij}$, for example, clearly stabilizes the Grassmannian, but is not induced by an automorphism of $V$.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 22 at 15:27
1
$begingroup$
@Servaes : I don't understand everything in the given link; but it does state that there are exceptions ("except when the dual map is an automorphism - when $n=2p$"; here $n$ is $d$ and your $d$ is $4=2times 2$ so that might be it)
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 22 at 16:04
$begingroup$
Agreed, problem solved!
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 22 at 16:31
$begingroup$
@Servaes Well, at least the problem is solved when $V$ is a complex vector space. I am interested in the real case though. Maybe we can reduce the real case to the complex case, but I am not sure. (You can see here.).
$endgroup$
– Asaf Shachar
Jan 23 at 12:45